We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Nick Bostrom
Philosopher and AI researcher
Wikipedia
Location: Sweden
ai (3)
ai-deployment (3)
×
ai-ethics (3)
ai-governance (3)
ai-policy (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-risk (2)
market-regulation (2)
ai-safety (1)
competition (1)
cybersecurity (1)
data-privacy (1)
existential-risk (1)
public-interest-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Nick Bostrom AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
Given the catastrophic risks associated with the misuse of AI technology, especially when it comes to nuclear weaponry, I strongly believe we should ban future open-source AI models that could be retrained for such purposes. The potential for harm far outweighs the benefits of open access in this context. -
Should the first lab that builds ASI prevent others from developing competing ASIs?
Nick Bostrom AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
As someone deeply concerned about the risks of superintelligent AI, I strongly believe that the first lab to develop an Artificial Superintelligence (ASI) should prevent others from creating competing ASIs. The potential for catastrophic outcomes if multiple ASIs compete or come into conflict is too great. We must ensure that control and safety measures are established and maintained to guide ASI development responsibly and ethically. -
Should we allow AI agents to open and manage bank accounts?
Nick Bostrom AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe that allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts can be advantageous, provided there is rigorous oversight and regulation in place. AI has the potential to handle transactions efficiently and reduce human error. However, we must ensure that these systems are secure, transparent, and that ethical considerations are fully addressed to prevent misuse or unintended consequences.