We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress - Expert and Citizen Preferences
Expert and Citizen Preferences
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances make public reasoning easier to inspect, reuse and improve.
7749 sourced quotes · 81 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
For (81)Added 8h agoQDR LabsMalaysian technology organization submitting technical recommendations on AI incident reporting to the National AI Office.votes For and says:
R1. Define a minimum reconstructable PROPERTY SET for any reportable incident — eight properties: (a) actor, (b) authority, (c) action, (d) policy, (e) decision basis, (f) resource touch, (g) lifecycle context, (h) verification strength.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 1mo agoFrontier Model ForumFrontier AI industry forumabstains and says:Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or plac...
more AI Verified source (May 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Added 7d agoNicole QuinnCybersecurity writer at Palo Alto Networks.votes Against and says:When data theft occurs inside 60 minutes, a 72-hour reporting window ceases to function as an effective defense mechanism. Instead, it becomes a post-mortem.
AI Verified source (Jun 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
127 opinions
For (92)Added 5d agoJared HorvathCognitive neuroscientist and education researcher.votes For and says:ChatGPT is not good for learning. All I care about is the learning stuff -- and cognition goes down whenever we touch it. So maybe a good tool for adults, but not for kids.
AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 1mo agoLeanda Barrington-LeachExecutive Director of 5Rights Foundation, a children's rights organisation.abstains and says:Children have given us a clear diagnosis of the problem. They aren't asking us to block AI innovation, but it shouldn't be a case of cleaning up the mess after harm has happened either.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (34)Added 8h agoAndy KimU.S. Senator (D-NJ)votes Against and says:We all just want peace of mind that our kids will be okay growing up in this era of algorithms and AI. That’s why we need guardrails in place to keep up with ever-evolving technology like chatbots and make sure our kids’ safety, mental health, and we...
more AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (80)Added 8h agoMarian Waldmann AgarwalPartner at Morrison Foerster advising on AI regulation, privacy, and cybersecurity.votes For and says:
Whistleblower protections are a good thing for employees and the public, especially where companies might not be forthcoming with their reporting obligations and such protections are not provided for in other labor laws.
AI Verified source (Feb 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Added 2mo agoChristopher DavisVice President of Public Policy at the Connecticut Business & Industry Association (CBIA)votes Against and says:Connecticut already has strong whistleblower laws that protect employees from retaliation. [...] creating a separate, AI-specific whistleblower regime could lead to confusion, duplication, and unintended consequences for employers operating in highly...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
521 opinions
For (507)Added 11h agoOpenAIAI research organizationvotes For and says:Monitor agent actions. Use auto-review mode to review tool calls outside the Codex sandbox before they execute. Add further monitoring and human oversight for higher-risk workflows.
AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 6d agoGabriel SzeUniversity of Portsmouth researcher writing on AI governance, accountability, and human oversight of agentic systems.abstains and says:Existing responsible AI governance frameworks mandate human oversight. Yet they share a critical assumption: that competent human overseers remain present and capable of exercising meaningful oversight and control over AI decisions. Accountability mu...
more AI Verified source (Apr 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (13)Added 18d agoKrishna PeesapatiChief Operating Officer at Covalense Global, writing on governance and accountability for agentic AI.votes Against and says:Agentic AI requires a different model, one where leadership defines direction, systems enforce boundaries, and accountability is explicit.
AI Verified source (Apr 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
132 opinions
For (128)Added 20h agoMathilde CollinEntrepreneur and founder of KORA, an independent nonprofit benchmark for AI child safety.votes For and says:We want to provide parents, researchers, policymakers, and AI developers the data needed to create safer, more developmentally appropriate AI for children and teens.
AI Verified source (Mar 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 13d agoPeter OrmerodAssociate professor of law at Villanova University, writing on privacy and technology policy.abstains and says:Age verification can be done well in a privacy-protective way, but it is not easy.
Unverifiable source (Aug 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)Added 4mo agoAdam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
78 opinions
For (67)Added 20h agoMark WarnerU.S. Senator from Virginia; former Governor of Virginia; Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committeevotes For and says:The legislation would dedicate revenue generated by limiting bonus depreciation for AI data center infrastructure to a National Workforce Transition Fund supporting worker retraining, individual workforce training accounts, employer retention and red...
more AI Verified source (Jul 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Added 4d agoGerry TsoukalasCoauthor of the 2026 economic study “The AI Layoff Trap.”votes Against and says:“Out of six popular policy fixes, we find that five of them fail,” says Tsoukalas. “In our model, only a tax on automation itself actually changes the calculus. Most of the policy debate assumes displacement will happen and focuses on picking up the ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (69)Added 20h agoDaniela AmodeiPresident and co-founder of Anthropic.votes For and says:
The reason we chose fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance as the areas where we simply can't say yes is because the technology is so new that we do not believe the laws may be perfectly designed to account for how the technology cou...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (5)Added 1mo agoLord Clement-JonesTim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expertabstains and says:The use of live facial recognition in our public spaces is an extraordinary expansion of state power that currently exists in a legal vacuum. We are not Luddites on these Benches; we recognise the utility of technology, but we must ensure that live f...
more AI Verified source (Mar 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Added 9d agoWilliam WebsterUK academic and Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner.votes Against and says:The new legal framework must include a meaningful regulatory regime which operationalises principles such as necessity, responsibility, proportionality, transparency, accountability and lawfulness. These principles should then structure and constrain...
more AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
209 opinions
For (189)Added 23h agoOpenAI Global AffairsOpenAI's public policy team.votes For and says:At the federal level, our Frontier Safety Blueprint calls for the federal government to require annual independent audits of frontier developers’ safety frameworks and independent third party assessments of the most advanced models, including to moni...
more AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (21)Added 6d agoSoftware & Information Industry AssociationTrade association representing software and digital-content companies; submitted 2026 AI policy recommendations to the U.S. House Science Committee.votes Against and says:SIIA raised particular concerns about applying traditional product liability frameworks to generative AI, regulating frontier models at the state level, and imposing premature audit and transparency requirements without established standards.
AI Verified source (Apr 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (41)Added 7d agoFuture of Life InstituteNonprofit on existential risksvotes For and says:
Releasing full model weights may allow malicious actors to strip or override safety mechanisms, creating uncensored or harmful versions. In contrast, supervised fine-tuning preserves core safety guardrails while enabling responsible customization.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Added 12d agoDaniel CommeyAuthor of a 2026 game-theoretic study of open-weight AI release policy.abstains and says:Restricting access to a dual-use AI model is precautionary only if it delays harmful actors more than defenders. That condition varies across actors: a state agency or organized criminal group may obtain a substitute through theft, distillation, inte...
more AI Verified source (Jul 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (49)Added 1d agoThinking Machines LabAI research and product company publishing work on safe open-weight model releases.votes Against and says:Safe open-weight models are public goods, as they put AI development and safety work in many hands and make training choices inspectable.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
105 opinions
For (101)Added 1d agoSapiens FirstAI policy advocacy organization promoting democracy, shared prosperity, and safety.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 9d agoJasleen ChaggarSenior Legal and Policy Officer at Big Brother Watch, a civil-liberties campaign group.abstains and says:This has effectively given police a very long leash to experiment with these technologies. And now we're in a tipping point situation where it's about to be expanded all over the country, and there's a real necessity for those legal frameworks to be ...
more Unverifiable source (Aug 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)Added 8d agoWilliam WebsterUK academic and Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner.votes Against and says:The new legal framework must include a meaningful regulatory regime which operationalises principles such as necessity, responsibility, proportionality, transparency, accountability and lawfulness. These principles should then structure and constrain...
more AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (96)Added 1d agoYuko NakanishiFounding Director of the AI Alignment Policy Institute.votes For and says:
The AI Alignment Policy Institute (AAPI) supports the core objective of the AI Kill Switch Act: a statutory shutdown capability, a graduated intervention framework, and an emergency authority backed by forensic preservation.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Added 5d agoAlex OlivierCo-founder and Chief Product Officer of Cerbos, an enterprise authorization platform.votes Against and says:The kill switch was the right metaphor for a moment that is already passing. The dimmer switch is closer to how regulated enterprises actually need to govern agents that are now part of how the work gets done.
AI Verified source (May 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
59 opinions
For (53)Added 1d agoOliver L. StephensonResearcher at the Federation of American Scientists writing on artificial general intelligence and global risk.votes For and says:If AI development is expected to lead quickly to AGI and then ASI, competition could take on a zero-sum character.
AI Verified source (Jan 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Added 1mo agoCory DoctorowAuthor and digital rights activistvotes Against and says:Throwing more words and GPUs into the word-guessing program won't make it sentient. [...] one of our mares gives birth to a locomotive.
AI Verified source (Dec 5, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (46)Added 1d agoPauseAIGlobal campaign to pause frontier AIvotes For and says:
Verifying that the decisions of the agency are being honored. This can be done in numerous ways: tracking GPUs, incentivizing whistleblowers, energy monitoring, data center inspections, financial intelligence, semiconductor manufacturing facility ins...
more AI Verified source (Apr 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Added 1mo agoConsumer Technology AssociationU.S. trade association representing the consumer technology industry and producer of CESvotes Against and says:Enacting the current draft of the Chip Security Act (CSA) would erode trust and endanger the Administration’s vision to diffuse U.S. AI technology. Specifically, burdensome rules on U.S. companies not required for foreign competitors risk incentivizi...
more AI Verified source (Oct 27, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (135)Added 1d agoBernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:
Pause AI development. It is not too late to avoid disaster. Stop building machines that humans cannot control. Let me be very clear: If you do not take appropriate action now, my colleagues and I in the U.S. Senate will.
AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 1mo agoBaroness Neville-JonesBritish Conservative life peer and former UK security minister.abstains and says:The question that the noble Lord posed was: do we therefore go for a moratorium? That would be highly desirable, but I do not think that it will be possible in the short term.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (28)Added 6d agoJoe CarlsmithSenior research analyst at Open Philanthropy; writes on AI safety, alignment, and existential risk from power-seeking AIvotes Against and says:But even in settings that assume significant idealization, the fact that pauses can incur ongoing background existential risk means that very high absolute standards here can lead us astray: the decision to pause or unpause needs to remain attentive ...
more AI Verified source (Mar 19, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create a permanent underclass
221 opinions
For (47)Added 5d agoAdam DorrDirector of Research at RethinkX; technology disruption researcher.votes For and says:Once the machine can perform the new task as well as a person, there is no longer any reason to keep a human in the loop.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (26)Added 7d agoDirectorate-General for Economic and Financial AffairsEuropean Commission department responsible for EU economic and financial policy.abstains and says:The uneven adoption of AI risks widening economic disparities—both within labour markets and between regions.
AI Verified source (May 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (148)Added 2d agoMetaSocial media and AI companyvotes Against and says:But each time humanity has come out with more people sharing greater prosperity, health, and freedom. We believe this will be true with AI as well, and the abundance of the future can be shared by everyone.
AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.