We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress Polls
Expert and Citizen Preferences on AI Governance
Sourced quotes and a participation layer keep expert and citizen preferences in plain view.
-
For (34)Greg CasarU.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucusvotes For and says:This is a flashing red siren for anyone who cares about keeping America safe and free. The Trump administration wants to use A.I. to spy on Americans without a warrant and to give A.I. power to make life and death decisions without humans involved. T... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (8)Alex AyalaMilwaukee Police Association presidentvotes Against and says:It causes a lot of cases to get solved. It’s another tool we’re now not going to have. That facial recognition can potentially solve homicides, [...] Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (39)Nicolai TangenCEO of Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, managing Norway's Government Pension Fund Global (~$2 trillion)votes For and says:I'm surprised by people who basically use it only to take out costs. Instead, why don't you use it to become more productive and gain market share? You are going to make adoption faster and easier for yourself - and you are going to make it easier fo... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researcherabstains and says:Whether AI's benefits are widely shared is a political question, has nothing to do with technology. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
63 opinions
For (39)Gary MarcusProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencevotes For and says:It should be obvious that applying hallucinatory and unreliable generative AI to weapon systems without humans in the loop could be catastrophic. [...] Paraphrasing a button that I used to wear as a teenager, one hallucination could ruin your whole p... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (24)Lt. Gen. Jack ShanahanFormer JAIC director, USAF generalvotes Against and says:To the second part of your question, I am strongly in favor of discussions internationally about things like norms. I think with this point, it would be counterproductive to have outright bans on things that people don't even fully understand what th... more Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
72 opinions
For (39)Christopher J. WallerGovernor, U.S. Federal Reserve Boardvotes For and says:I'm not a doom and gloomer [about AI's economic impact]. I don't think you're ever going to take the humans out of the picture and AI is going to do everything and we're going to be left working the drive-through window at McDonald's. At the end of t... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Pascual RestrepoYale economist; Associate Professor studying automation, AI, and labor markets; frequent collaborator with Nobel laureate Daron Acemogluabstains and says:People have the wrong intuition when they say that if AI can do my job for ten dollars an hour, then my wage falls to ten dollars and my life is terrible. A world where AI can do research or teaching at that cost is a world where AI is extremely capa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (30)Michael BarrFederal Reserve Governor; former U.S. Treasury Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions; law professor at the University of Michiganvotes Against and says:We should be clear-eyed about how painful these changes could be for affected workers and how challenging it would be for the government and the private sector to successfully manage the fallout. [...] AI-centric start-ups with radically new business... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (31)Uri MaozCognitive and computational neuroscientist; Associate Professor at Chapman University with appointments at UCLA and Caltechvotes For and says:The immediate danger is not that machines will act without human oversight; it is that human overseers have no idea what the machines are actually "thinking." State-of-the-art AI systems are essentially "black boxes." We know the inputs and outputs, ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (12)Scott RobbinsAI ethics researchervotes Against and says:[...] principles requiring that AI be explicable are misguided. We should be deciding which decisions require explanations. Automation is still an option; Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
12 opinions
For (12)Kate ChaneyIndependent Australian MP for Curtin; advocate for AI safety governance and technology regulationvotes For and says:For no more than $100 million a year – a rounding error against a $735 billion budget – Australia could position itself as a world leader in one of the defining industries of this century. [...] A commitment of $100 million a year could position Aust... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
69 opinions
For (52)Volker TürkUN human rights chiefvotes For and says:When it comes to AI tools, we need to demand that companies do a human rights impact assessment when they design, roll out and market them. [...] Artificial intelligence is a technological tool and it needs to be developed on the basis of risk assess... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (17)Kevin FrazierLawfare contributorvotes Against and says:Finally, it’s not clear how well some of the act’s provisions reflect the current state of the AI ecosystem. The act demands that labs hire an independent third party to complete an annual audit of their protocols to ensure compliance with the act. T... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
43 opinions
For (38)Mary RobinsonFormer Irish president; Elders chairvotes For and says:I remain deeply concerned at the lack of progress on the global governance of artificial intelligence. Decision-making on AI's rapid development sits disproportionately within private companies without significant checks and balances. AI risks and sa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes Against and says:The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (20)Sean McGregorExecutive Director of the AI Incident Database; Fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center; General Chair of IAAI 2026votes For and says:The volume that we're dealing with is one where eventually we do need to switch from this kind of voluntary reporting, to more mandatory form of reporting. [...] The insight you can derive from mandatory reporting is greater than that of this volunta... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:If you have to report to 50 different state regulators at 50 different times with 50 different definitions, it's extremely onerous. And it's going to slow down innovation, and it's going to hinder our progress in the AI race. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
63 opinions
For (54)Narendra ModiPrime Minister of Indiavotes For and says:We have to be more cautious regarding children's safety. Just as a school syllabus is carefully curated, the AI space too must be child-safe and family-guided. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Adam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (41)Rumman ChowdhuryAI ethicist and Humane Intelligence CEOvotes For and says:If you profit from deploying AI that affects people's fundamental rights, you must evaluate it, manage its risks, and be accountable when it discriminates. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Matt SchruersTech policy advocate; CCIA presidentvotes Against and says:This [...] legislation could [...] subjecting [...] to lawsuits [...]. The bill is overly broad [...] subject to litigation. [...] could subject online services to costly [...] lawsuits. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (10)Cameron F. KerryAnn R. and Andrew H. Tisch Distinguished Visiting Fellow at Brookings Institution; former Acting Secretary and General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Commercevotes For and says:As jurisdictions introduce AI incident reporting requirements with differing definitions and thresholds, developing shared taxonomies and standards can help harmonize reporting, enable coordinated responses, and ensure incident data informs policy an... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (23)Robert WeissmanPresident, Public Citizenvotes For and says:This deepfake is a disgrace and the NRSC should put it down immediately. Political deepfakes are a profound threat to our democracy, because there is no realistic way for voters to understand they are seeing fake representations rather than real vide... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Institute for Free SpeechFirst Amendment advocacy nonprofitvotes Against and says:While there are many problems with this proposal, a few stand above the others and are fatal to this effort. First, the Commission lacks statutory authority to require disclosure or disclaimers on political advertisements that utilize “artificial int... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
28 opinions
For (25)Simon JohnsonNobel laureate economist; MIT Sloan professor; former IMF chief economist; co-author of Power and Progressvotes For and says:The tax code in the US and many other countries places a heavier burden on firms that hire labor than on those that invest in algorithms to automate work. [...] Policymakers should aim to create a more symmetric tax structure, equalizing marginal tax... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:Capitalism has also depended on somewhat of a power balance between labor and capital, but if it's hard in many of our current jobs to outwork a GPU, then that changes. [...] If there was an easy consensus answer, we'd have done it by now, so I don't... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Tyler CowenProfessor of Economics, George Mason University & author of Average is Overvotes Against and says:I think quality homes in good locations will be extremely valuable. Those could be taxed more. You could call that a wealth tax, but arguably it is closer to a "housing services tax". [...] You could put higher consumption taxes on items the wealthy ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI alignment is solvable
21 opinions
For (9)David DalrympleAI safety researcher; Programme Director, Safeguarded AI at ARIA (UK)votes For and says:In 2024 I would have said it's about 40-50% likely that LLMs scaled up to ASI would end up killing us all; now I would say that it's only about 5-8% likely even with no additional progress on alignment, and more like 1-2% likely simpliciter. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (12)Eliezer YudkowskyAI researcher and writervotes Against and says:I have heard zero people advocating "make AI do our ASI alignment homework" show they understand the elementary computer science of why that's hard: you can't verify inside a loss function whether a proposed ASI alignment scheme is any good. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.