We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress - Expert and Citizen Preferences
Expert and Citizen Preferences
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances make public reasoning easier to inspect, reuse and improve.
6145 sourced quotes · 80 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
118 opinions
For (85)Added 2h agoLeo GaoMember of Technical Staff at OpenAI; AI researcher.votes For and says:The world is locked in a deadly race towards an intelligence explosion, where AI’s ability to create better AIs reaches a critical point, just like a runaway nuclear chain reaction. Going slower would give us much-needed time to make it go well, but ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 9mo agoTyler CowenProfessor of Economics, George Mason University & author of Average is Overabstains and says:So when people predict a high degree of existential risk from AGI, I don’t actually think “arguing back” on their chosen terms is the correct response. Radical agnosticism is the correct response, where all specific scenarios are pretty unlikely. Non...
more AI Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (33)Added 12d agoArthur MenschMistral AI co-founder and CEOvotes Against and says:Those extreme risks are still science fiction. So these speeches are largely diversions, very deliberately crafted.
AI Verified source (Feb 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (71)Added 3h agoComputer & Communications Industry Association EuropeEuropean technology-industry trade association.votes For and says:
By allowing rightsholders to opt out, the mechanisms must remain technically viable.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 11d agoInformation Technology and Innovation FoundationUS innovation policy think tankvotes Against and says:Restricting access to training data, whether through mandatory compensation, expanded opt-out rights, or onerous compliance requirements, can have the effect of restricting AI development itself.
AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
126 opinions
For (116)Added 5h agoAlex ZhaoResearch Scientist at OpenAI and signatory to the July 2026 Pacing the Frontier statement.votes For and says:My opinion is that while coordination between American labs is feasible and could potentially be straightforward, the much larger and more significant threat is from a geopolitical arms race with China. Much as the Manhattan Project thought they migh...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 13d agoBaroness Neville-JonesBritish Conservative life peer and former UK security minister.abstains and says:The question that the noble Lord posed was: do we therefore go for a moratorium? That would be highly desirable, but I do not think that it will be possible in the short term.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 8d agoJob van den BergDutch artificial intelligence entrepreneur, speaker, and writer.votes Against and says:The conclusion is sobering: a global stop to the development of superintelligent AI seems impossible.
AI Verified source (Feb 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
353 opinions
For (187)Added 11h agoRobert WaltersInternational recruitment and talent-advisory company publishing workforce research.votes For and says:These findings suggest that while AI is transforming and creating roles, it’s not necessarily replacing jobs. Workforce optimisation is a key objective of the introduction of AI for only 33% of organisations surveyed.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (92)Added 1d agoNg Chee MengSecretary-General of Singapore’s National Trades Union Congress.abstains and says:AI is changing the way we work, and it is critical that our workers are not left behind. The Tripartite Jobs Council can bring together and scale tripartite capabilities under one roof as we take collective action to stand with workers of all collars...
more AI Verified source (Apr 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (74)Added 11h agoNational Australia BankAustralian financial institution that publishes research on small-business AI adoption and workforce impacts.votes Against and says:Rather than replacing workers, AI appears to be helping SMEs get more from their existing workforce, an important distinction in an environment where skills shortages and hiring constraints remain prominent for many businesses.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Replace cookie banners with automated privacy signals from your browser or device that websites and apps must obey
250 opinions
For (226)Added 13h agoStaffan LindgrenSwedish technology executive; Group CTO and Chief AI Officer at Aura/Comprend.votes For and says:For years we’ve been stuck with intrusive cookie banners, a clumsy solution that frustrates users and offers little real control. Now, the EU’s Digital Omnibus Regulation proposal, though disappointingly slow to implement, finally sets a clear direct...
more AI Verified source (Nov 12, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 14h agoSilvan JongeriusFounder of the Berlin privacy consultancy TechGDPR and former CTO.abstains and says:The standards for how this works haven't been written yet. And that implementation detail will determine whether this actually works for people, or just replaces one broken system with another that serves the same advertising interests.
AI Verified source (Feb 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (23)Added 13h agoDayan PfammatterSwiss freelance technology and society journalist at Digitec Galaxus.votes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (73)Added 15h agoWill YagerAI researcher at Anthropic.votes For and says:
Like splitting the atom, AI holds the potential for both immense benefit and immense risk. The world should take the time to do this right.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 13d agoBaroness Neville-JonesBritish Conservative life peer and former UK security minister.abstains and says:The question that the noble Lord posed was: do we therefore go for a moratorium? That would be highly desirable, but I do not think that it will be possible in the short term.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (26)Added 8d agoLord TarassenkoDavid James Tarassenko, Baron Tarassenko; British engineer, academic, and crossbench member of the UK House of Lords.votes Against and says:My own view, after talking with colleagues in the AI Security Institute and the Alan Turing Institute, is that a moratorium would be unenforceable.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
[🇺🇸 Congress, Mar 2025] Prohibiting deceptive AI-generated media of federal election candidates
61 opinions
For (51)Added 20h agoAbigail BellowsSenior Policy Director for Anti-Corruption & Accountability at Common Cause.votes For and says:Deceptive AI content online can manipulate voters, which is why we need this commonsense bill to ban AI ads that misrepresent candidates.
AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Added 2mo agoDavid InserraFellow for Free Expression and Technology at the Cato Institutevotes Against and says:A media environment with more false and deceptive information is not a good thing for our society, but it is not the government's job to fix it. [...] Let's trust the American people, not the government, to decide for themselves how AI should be used...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (104)Added 1d agoClaude Cummings Jr.President of the Communications Workers of America, a U.S. labor union.votes For and says:
CWA has a long and proud history of bargaining over new technologies, limiting their negative impacts on workers, customers, and the public while ensuring that workers win their fair share of the economic gains that new innovations bring.
AI Verified source (Mar 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
113 opinions
For (101)Added 1d agoAnne Le HénanffFrench Minister for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Affairs.votes For and says:AI safety and security raise challenges that no single country can address alone.
AI Verified source (Jul 17, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (13)Added 4d agoGovernment of AustraliaGovernment of Australia speaking through its delegate at the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes Against and says:A one-size-fits-all approach to AI governance will not be effective. We all face different risks, priorities, levels of digital development, and regulatory environments. Effective governance requires shared principles that can be implemented flexibly...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (43)Added 1d agoZoe LofgrenU.S. Representative from California's 18th district; Ranking Member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committeevotes For and says:
Any freedom loving American can appreciate Anthropic's attempts to prevent the DOD from using its AI model for mass surveillance of Americans.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (5)Added 9d agoLord Clement-JonesTim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expertabstains and says:The use of live facial recognition in our public spaces is an extraordinary expansion of state power that currently exists in a legal vacuum. We are not Luddites on these Benches; we recognise the utility of technology, but we must ensure that live f...
more AI Verified source (Mar 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Added 10d agoGovernment of BangladeshNational government of Bangladesh, speaking through its delegation at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in July 2026.votes Against and says:Prohibited practices shall include AI-enabled social scoring, indiscriminate biometric mass surveillance in public spaces without lawful authorization, and manipulative or deceptive AI systems that exploit vulnerabilities of individuals or groups.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
84 opinions
For (82)Added 1d agoOpenAIAI research organizationvotes For and says:No use of OpenAI technology for mass domestic surveillance.
AI Verified source (Feb 28, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Added 1mo agoShabana MahmoodUK Home Secretary; Labour MP for Birmingham Ladywood; former Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretaryvotes Against and says:When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times. ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
139 opinions
For (103)Added 1d agoElissa SlotkinU.S. Senator from Michigan; former CIA analyst and Pentagon official; member of the Senate Armed Services Committeevotes For and says:My bill ensures a human is involved when deadly autonomous weapons are fired, AI cannot be used to spy on the American people, and that a human is on the switch to launch nuclear weapons.
AI Verified source (Mar 17, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 13d agoCatherine ArdaghIrish Minister of State at the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration.abstains and says:The Government strongly believes that there is a need to maintain meaningful human control of all weapons systems, including any systems that may be developed. Our position is that, for such systems to comply with international humanitarian law, cont...
more AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (35)Added 8d agoMichael J. BrodkaU.S. Army major and author writing on lethal autonomous weapon systems and military targeting.votes Against and says:Closing it requires redesigning Army doctrine, organizations, and training to integrate LAWS into targeting under lawful human-on-the-loop control.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
39 opinions
For (34)Added 1d agoDaron AcemogluNobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progressvotes For and says:In the United States, for example, labor income is taxed significantly more than capital income. If a business pays a worker $100, it will have to hand over as much as $30 in tax and spending obligations. But paying $100 for automation equipment lead...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Added 8d agoMeghan OstertagPolicy analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation writing on AI, tax policy, and innovation.votes Against and says:Policymakers should not focus on slowing the development of AI through an AI compute tax; they should focus on helping workers transition to a labor force increasingly augmented by AI.
AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (148)Added 1d agoLord Black of BrentwoodConservative life peer and media executive in the UK House of Lords.votes For and says:
The truth is that legislation, even of the most modest sort, is long overdue to protect public safety, ensure transparency, tame untrammelled market power and protect content and intellectual property.
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (13)Added 1d agoBaroness Lloyd of EffraLiz Lloyd; UK Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for AI and Digital Government (DSIT)votes Against and says:Our view is that AI is a general-purpose technology with a wide range of applications, and also that regulators understand well the sectors they are regulating. They understand the risks that are present and understand, as many noble Lords have raise...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (45)Added 1d agoLord Clement-JonesTim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expertvotes For and says:
Finally, in the face of autonomous AI threats, the Government need an ultimate backstop. We support proposals from ControlAI to introduce strictly constrained last resort powers, allowing the Secretary of State to direct the shutdown of data centres ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)Added 1d agoEv KontsevoyCEO of Teleport and cybersecurity executive writing on identity-based governance for AI agents.votes Against and says:If you’re relying on a ‘kill switch’ to stop an AI agent, you’ve already made a fundamental mistake. A properly governed agent is simply never handed the task, so there is nothing to kill.
AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.