We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress Polls
Expert and Citizen Preferences on AI Governance
Sourced quotes and a participation layer keep expert and citizen preferences in plain view.
-
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
66 opinions
For (57)Valerie FousheeU.S. Representative for North Carolina's 4th congressional district; sponsor of the Protecting Consumers from Deceptive AI Actvotes For and says:People under the age of 18 should not be able to interact with AI chatbots. These chatbots continue to put the lives and mental health of children at risk, and it is critical for Congress to act immediately. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Adam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
32 opinions
For (25)Ron DeSantisGovernor of Floridavotes For and says:Clearly we have a right to do this. [...] An executive order can't block states. You can preempt states under Article 1 powers through congressional legislation on certain issues, but you can't do it through executive order. AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Michael KratsiosU.S. OSTP Directorvotes Against and says:Creating a patchwork of AI laws where 50 different states all have different goals is ultimately going to hurt little tech and startups more than anyone else. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The EU should build sovereign AI infrastructure to reduce dependence on US cloud providers
26 opinions
For (23)Mario DraghiEconomist, former ECB Presidentvotes For and says:AI requires industrial mobilisation on a scale not seen in generations: huge investments in energy, semiconductors, computing infrastructure and capital. [...] The US is on track to spend about five times more than Europe on building data centres by ... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)William EchiksonBrussels-based non-resident Senior Fellow at the Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA); journalist and tech policy analystvotes Against and says:Proponents of a "EuroStack" argue that Europe must build its own alternative at every level — from chips to cloud to software. But this path represents a €5-trillion mirage. Attempting to decouple from the global tech ecosystem through massive subsid... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (34)John MoolenaarU.S. Representative (R-MI)votes For and says:The bipartisan MATCH Act will close loopholes, create a level playing field for U.S. and allied toolmakers, and ensure the next decade of growth in chip manufacturing – and the jobs that come with it – happens in the United States and allied countrie... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Jensen HuangNvidia cofounder and CEOvotes Against and says:Conceding an entire market the size of China probably does not make a lot of strategic sense, so I think that has already largely backfired. Maybe it made sense at the time, but I think the policy really needs to be dynamic and needs to stay with the... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Democratic middle powers should jointly develop frontier AI and share its benefits globally
19 opinions
For (14)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes For and says:There is a huge demand from the industry and governments for a credible frontier AI company that is neither Chinese nor American. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Sriram KrishnanSenior White House Policy Advisor for Artificial Intelligence; former a16z general partner; former product leader at Microsoft, Meta, Twitter, and Snapvotes Against and says:We want to make sure that the world uses the American AI stack. [...] We also want the world to use our AI model. We want all our allies, including India, to leverage our AI infrastructure. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
31 opinions
For (27)Deric ChengDirector of Research at Windfall Trust; lead of AGI Social Contract initiative; AI economics and policy researchervotes For and says:Tax revenues globally could be at risk from transformative artificial intelligence (TAI) due to a shift from labor to capital, the concentration of economic profits, and weak international tax coordination. [...] A progressive global corporate profit... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:Capitalism has also depended on somewhat of a power balance between labor and capital, but if it's hard in many of our current jobs to outwork a GPU, then that changes. [...] If there was an easy consensus answer, we'd have done it by now, so I don't... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)Information Technology and Innovation FoundationUS innovation policy think tankvotes Against and says:Higher taxes on capital income reduce the return on investment, weakening firms' incentives to invest in AI infrastructure, advanced equipment, and productivity-enhancing technologies, which in a global environment where countries such as China are a... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (49)Steve BrotmanFounder and Managing Partner of Alpha Partners; venture capital investor with 25 years of experience; former adviser to Pritzker Group Venture Capitalvotes For and says:A sovereign wealth fund would not replace capitalism. It would extend capitalism's upside to people the current structure leaves out. [...] It would invest in society alongside the people already benefiting from these rapidly appreciating assets so t... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researcherabstains and says:Whether AI's benefits are widely shared is a political question, has nothing to do with technology. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
64 opinions
For (42)Paul Tudor JonesAmerican hedge fund manager and philanthropist; founder and CIO of Tudor Investment Corporation; co-founder of the Robin Hood Foundationvotes For and says:[AI] is the greatest challenge that has ever faced humanity. [...] We need to do it tomorrow. We're late already. We should have already done it. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (22)Milton MuellerProfessor at Georgia Tech School of Public Policy; internet governance scholar and co-founder of the Internet Governance Projectvotes Against and says:Computer scientists often aren't good judges of the social and political implications of technology. They are so focused on the AI's mechanisms and are overwhelmed by its success, but they are not very good at placing it into a social and historical ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI alignment is solvable
30 opinions
For (12)Adam JermynAI alignment researcher at Anthropic; physicist with PhD in Astronomy from the University of Cambridgevotes For and says:Overall, our impression is, as we hypothesized in our discussion of Claude's constitution, that teaching the principles underlying aligned behavior can be more effective than training on demonstrations of aligned behavior alone. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (18)Yujin PotterPhD student at UC Berkeley researching AI safety and multi-agent systemsvotes Against and says:Beyond the peer preservation, what we would like to emphasize is not only this specific scenario but also such misaligned behavior can emerge in many different scenarios. [...] Peer preservation is just like the tip of the iceberg. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
33 opinions
For (22)Patrick CollisonCo-founder and CEO of Stripe; Irish entrepreneur and tech investorvotes For and says:This is very arbitrary, obviously, but I feel like there's at least a reasonable chance that 2026 Q1 will be looked back upon as the first quarter of the singularity. [...] There's been a phase transition in 2025. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Roman V. YampolskiyAI safety researcher, Louisville professorabstains and says:Until some company or scientist says ‘Here’s the proof! We can definitely have a safety mechanism that can scale to any level of intelligence,’ I don’t think we should be developing those general superintelligences. We can get most of the benefits w... more AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)Carl Benedikt FreyAssociate Professor of AI & Work at the Oxford Internet Institute; Director of the Future of Work Program at the Oxford Martin School; author of The Technology Trap and How Progress Endsvotes Against and says:For the last-invention story to hold, people would have to become unnecessary even as partners or supervisors to AIs. [...] We would need a world where practical know-how is fully transferable through digital channels and where responsibility can be ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (53)Adam GleaveCEO and founder of FAR.AI; AI safety researcher; UC Berkeley PhD in AI alignment and reward-hackingvotes For and says:The central obstacle to AI safety coordination is not the absence of solutions but rather the absence of a standard: without a shared, legible definition of what makes an AI system safe, companies and governments have no basis for holding each other ... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Eric SchmidtFormer Google CEO; tech investorvotes Against and says:A [central] problem with regulating frontier AI models is that a new feature emerges in these systems that is not tested, testable. [...] As long as you have this new emergent power, you have deep reasoning, deep capabilities, and they will make mist... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Regulated industries should prohibit AI from making autonomous decisions where fiduciary duty applies
58 opinions
For (45)Pope Leo XIVHead of the Catholic Churchvotes For and says:In a context in which the high level of computerization of financial tools imposes increasingly elaborate and artificial forms of mediation in interpersonal relationships, you — heirs to a great tradition of human attentiveness — are called to ensure... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (6)Will BibleAudit & Assurance Partner and Digital Transformation Officer, Deloitteabstains and says:With agentic AI, experienced auditors would be supported by autonomous agents, allowing them to dedicate more attention to complex and judgment-oriented procedures. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Milan VeskovicCEO, Superagent AIvotes Against and says:We're redefining what it means to be an insurance agent — with fully autonomous AI agents that will eliminate human error, offer superior client interactions 24/7, and fundamentally alter industry expectations. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (30)Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:We can't allow a handful of billionaires, eager to increase their wealth and power, to rush forward with a technology that will fundamentally transform humanity without democratic input or accountability. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AGI will create abundance
33 opinions
For (21)Bill GatesPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.votes For and says:There is no upper limit on how intelligent AIs will get or on how good robots will get, and I believe the advances will not plateau before exceeding human levels. [...] AI capabilities will allow us to make far more goods and services with less labor... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (12)Anton KorinekEconomist at University of Virginia and Brookings Institution; researcher on AI economics and public financevotes Against and says:You could imagine a world in which AI systems and robots and so on can produce everything so cheaply that humans who have to compete with them won't even be able to afford a subsistence income. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
74 opinions
For (57)Chris FallDirector of the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) at NIST; former Energy Department official in the first Trump administrationvotes For and says:Independent, rigorous measurement science is essential to understanding frontier AI and its national security implications. [...] These expanded industry collaborations help us scale our work in the public interest at a critical moment. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (17)Kevin FrazierLawfare contributorvotes Against and says:Finally, it’s not clear how well some of the act’s provisions reflect the current state of the AI ecosystem. The act demands that labs hire an independent third party to complete an annual audit of their protocols to ensure compliance with the act. T... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.