YouCongress - Expert and Citizen Preferences

pas beaucoup d’arguments en faveur de l’émergence naturelle du virus SARS-CoV-2

In the case of SARS-CoV-2, there are multiple scenarios that could, in principle, explain its origin with varying degrees of plausibility based on our current understanding. These scenarios range from natural zoonotic spillover to those that are asso...

Yet as outlined by the authors, there is presently no evidence to support the lab breach to date. It is a well written thoughtful piece. It adds to the debate and updates the evidence based on what we know of the contemporary viral variants. Its auth...

Whatever restriction you choose to apply to the virus on the lab-leak side, you need to apply to zoonosis (otherwise you’re calculating conditional probabilities of different evidence for each side).

The origins of COVID-19 remain uncertain. A lab-associated incident is plausible; so is natural spillover. China’s obstruction has made the truth harder to establish, and scientific opinions vary.

I was concerned that people might interpret my Bayesian analysis as the “main product” of the report, in isolation from the rest, which is why I heavily cautioned against taking it too literally; indeed I explicitly state that I do not think it is an...

An analysis of the geographic locations of the earliest known COVID cases – dating to December 2019 – revealed a strong clustering around the Huanan market. This was true not only for people who worked at or visited the market, but also for those who...

Analyses of the earliest documented COVID-19 cases suggest a significant spatial association with the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market (HSM) in Wuhan. Multiple independent studies have reported that many of the earliest cases – particularly those with...

Their dismissive tone is all the sadder in that they pushed the erroneous sentence that Two distinct genetic lineages of SARS-CoV-2 were identified in samples from early cases associated with the Huanan market which is 100% wrong.

Observational studies cannot determine cause and effect relationships and, hence, the impact of a single dietary or lifestyle factor.

US adolescents consuming eggs, as primarily dishes or ingredients, had better compliance in meeting nutrient markers compared with nonegg consumers, highlighting associations between eggconsumption and nutrient intake.

Researchers are careful to note that country-level comparisons like this identify associations, not causes, and many factors beyond eggs differ between nations.

This is where personalized nutrition will help refine broad guidelines to help people eat a diet that works with how their bodies metabolize, or process, foods. For example, if your genes put you at increased risk of heart disease, dietary changes ca...

Indeed, studies in humans have demonstrated that individuals could be hypo-responders or hyper-responders to dietary cholesterol.

Eat less than seven eggs per week. People with type 2 diabetes or those with high cholesterol should eat no more than seven eggs per week. Research shows that eating eggs can raise LDL-cholesterol. In people with type 2 diabetes, eating more than sev...

Genetics play a big role in how eggs affect your cholesterol. Some people are more sensitive to dietary cholesterol. This can lead to higher cholesterol levels when they eat eggs.

The answer isn’t as simple as “good” or “bad.” It depends on which part of the egg you eat, how you cook it, what you eat it with, and who you are.

Eating choline-rich foods like eggs may help slow brain aging and support overall brain health.

In Japan, a large cohort study published in 2006 showed that daily or nearly daily egg consumption did not increase the incidence of coronary heart disease. Conversely, a recent US study associated high egg consumption with increased cardiovascular d...

When it came to eggs, each half egg caused a 6% and 8% increased risk, respectively.

Machines selecting and engaging their target and taking a life – without human control and judgment. That is morally repugnant. It is politically unacceptable. And it must be banned by international law.

Personal view: I admire @AnthropicAI sticking by their principles but disagree with the principle itself. Putin won't fight fair so we should have autonomous AI weapons for sure.

Create a single, dedicated talent hub, accompanied by 1-5 separate compute hubs;

A semi-distributed structure, with a few core facilities, leveraging members' comparative advantages. Core facilities—fewer in number than the participating states—are necessary to create a critical mass of talent. Similarly, distributed compute can ...

Coordinated deployment of existing, planned, and within-reach European and other bridge power AI compute capacity is likely to provide sufficient computational resources to produce frontier AI models in the next few years, although significantly more...

The multinational partnership should aim to minimize its use of compute located in non-member states and compute owned by foreign entities. Although it could begin by renting compute, this reinforces and creates substantial vulnerabilities over time....

Governments are on track to spend more than $1 trillion by 2030 chasing a sovereign stack, the full range of hardware and capabilities necessary to deploy and operate AI infrastructure. [...] In an interdependent system, the question shifts from how ...

Our belief is that AI will largely augment human capability and not replace it. Creativity, judgement, communication and collaboration become much more important, because they leverage the benefits of human capability rather than compete with technol...

the evidence on how AI is affecting the labor market today is inconclusive, and claims about harmful impacts on particular groups of workers are premature.

AI and humanoid robots break that logic because they are general-purpose. Yes, the disruption will create new jobs. The problem is that AI and robots will be able to do those new jobs too.

Jurisdictions around the globe are moving to adopt common-sense rules around labeling AI-generated content – it’s time for the U.S. to catch up and in fact lead the world with a disclosure and anti-circumvention model that should be the global standa...

A media environment with more false and deceptive information is not a good thing for our society, but it is not the government's job to fix it. [...] Let's trust the American people, not the government, to decide for themselves how AI should be used...

People under the age of 18 should not be able to interact with AI chatbots. These chatbots continue to put the lives and mental health of children at risk, and it is critical for Congress to act immediately.

Some kids are just too young to understand the difference between AI and a real person. [...] Remember, this is not a person... this is just something you download in the app store. It's not just our kids — these chatbots and the companies behind the...

AI chatbots that promote companionship pose significant risks to young and developing minds.

There's much more to do, including giving CAISI the authority to create the standards we need to know whether a frontier model is safe before it ships, not after something goes wrong.

However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).