We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What's new in AI governance, safety, jobs and society
Follow the latest sourced positions from experts, policymakers and public figures.
Explore or search the 7839 sourced positions from Yoshua Bengio, Demis Hassabis, Andrew Ng, Pope Leo XIV, and more.
Quote date
Added
-
Yesterday
3 -
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
83 opinions
Urvashi AnejaFounder of research organization Digital Futures Labvotes For and says:But if governments don’t invest in the safety infrastructure now, public trust will erode, and the opportunity to leverage benefits from AI will go away, and then we’re looking at deepening inequality.
AI Verified source (Sep 1, 2026) -
AI UnderstandingIndependent 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that publishes AI education, research, and editorial analysis.votes For and says:
Future risk reports, system cards and external evaluations should be assessed for reproducible methods, clear separation between simulated and real actions, disclosure of missed detections, and evidence that safety interventions do not simply make pr...
more AI Verified source (Sep 1, 2026) -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
212 opinions
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:It is really important, given the stakes, that people who develop AI and those who test it don’t have relationships with each other.
AI Verified source (Sep 1, 2026)Yoshua Bengio · statements & votes- Abstain AI will create a permanent underclass (Jul 13, 2026)
- For Democratic middle powers should jointly develop frontier AI and share its benefits globally (May 29, 2026)
- For AI poses an existential threat to humanity (May 7, 2026)
- For Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation (May 7, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Mar 27, 2026)
-
Earlier this week
2 -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
495 opinions
Sean HigginsResearch fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute specializing in labor and employment issues.votes For and says:Such concerns are not only overblown but may also have things backwards. It is just as likely that AI will lead to employment gains. [...] The benefit new technology brings is greater production. It requires workers with different skill sets, but not...
more AI Verified source (Aug 31, 2026) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
192 opinions
Australia’s Data and Digital MinistersAustralian federal, state, and territory ministers responsible for data and digital policy.votes For and says:The following practices are mapped to Australia’s 8 AI Ethics Principles, demonstrating how governments can practically apply them to their assurance of AI. [...] Governments should identify and consult with stakeholders, including subject matter and...
more AI Verified source (Aug 31, 2026)Australia’s Data and Digital Ministers · statements & votes -
Last week
9 -
Liam ByrneUK Labour Member of Parliament for Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North; writer on AI, economic policy, and public wealth.votes For and says:
The proceeds - cash, shares, warrants, royalties and other assets - should then flow into the National AI Dividend Fund. [...] The dividends from this fund should then capitalise new universal savings accounts for every young person.
AI Verified source (Aug 30, 2026) -
Loss of Control ObservatoryAI-safety observatory operated by the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, tracking reported real-world AI loss-of-control incidents.votes For and says:
It is calling on the government to require AI companies to monitor and report severe loss of control incidents and to introduce emergency powers to manage severe loss of control incidents including temporarily restricting AI services.
AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026) -
Marie IradukundaResearch Associate at the ILINA Program focusing on frontier-AI governance in Global South countries, especially monitoring and reporting AI harms.votes For and says:
For funders and international community: support and/or collaborate with local actors best placed to detect AI harm, and back efforts to establish cross-border AI incident information sharing.
AI Verified source (Aug 28, 2026) -
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
108 opinions
Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:We must come together to stop Flock and AI mass surveillance. That is why I will soon be introducing legislation to do just that.
AI Verified source (Aug 28, 2026)Bernie Sanders · statements & votes- For Ban governments from using AI to conduct mass surveillance of citizens (Aug 26, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Aug 10, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Aug 10, 2026)
- For A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits (Jun 22, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jun 22, 2026)
-
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
154 opinions
Rogé KarmaStaff writer at The Atlantic covering economics, technology, and public policy.votes For and says:What humanity needs is an international AI nonproliferation treaty.
AI Verified source (Aug 27, 2026)Rogé Karma · statements & votes- For A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits (Jul 2, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a global trust that pays a dividend to every person on Earth (Jul 2, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jul 2, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (Jul 2, 2026)
- Abstain AI will create a permanent underclass (Jul 2, 2026)
-
Alan WoodwardResearcher and co-author of a 2026 paper on frontier-AI export controls and national AI sovereignty.votes For and says:
Government should be pressing Washington for published criteria before access is restricted, advance warning and exemptions for allies, as we already handle security of supply in energy and defense. At home, it should require critical infrastructure ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 27, 2026) -
Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:
We cannot allow America to become a surveillance state where a handful of AI oligarchs profit by giving the government the power to track our every movement.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)Bernie Sanders · statements & votes- For Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (Aug 28, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Aug 10, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Aug 10, 2026)
- For A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits (Jun 22, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jun 22, 2026)
-
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
84 opinions
Bill GatesPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.votes For and says:I believe we should tax AI tokens and robots. [...] The tax system nudges you toward replacing people with machines.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)Bill Gates · statements & votes- For AI will create a permanent underclass (Aug 26, 2026)
- For Establish a UN-led body to oversee compute-intensive AI (Aug 26, 2026)
- Against AI will create more jobs than it destroys (Aug 26, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (Jan 9, 2026)
- For Ban open source AI models capable of creating WMDs (2026)
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
523 opinions
Australia’s Data and Digital MinistersAustralian federal, state, and territory ministers responsible for data and digital policy.votes For and says:Those responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and accountable for the outcomes of the AI systems, and human oversight of AI systems should be enabled.
AI Verified source (Aug 25, 2026)Australia’s Data and Digital Ministers · statements & votes -
Last month
1 -
Build artificial general intelligence
55 opinions
Daron AcemogluNobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progressvotes Against and says:Many leading companies are engaged in a single-minded pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI). [...] Rather than racing to replace people, we should build AI tools that amplify human expertise and expand opportunity.
AI Verified source (Aug 21, 2026)Daron Acemoglu · statements & votes- For Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy (Jul 28, 2026)
- Against AI will create more jobs than it destroys (Jul 15, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Mar 27, 2026)
- For AI will create a permanent underclass (2026)
- For AGI could make governments subordinate to the companies that develop it (2026)