We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress - Expert and Citizen Preferences
Expert and Citizen Preferences
Source-grounded claims, quotes, votes and delegations make public reasoning easier to inspect, reuse and improve.
4453 sourced quotes · 77 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
42 opinions
For (32)Added 10min agoLinda LipsenCEO of the American Association for Justice (AAJ)votes For and says:As more and more children and teenagers are targeted by dangerous and predatory AI chatbots, it's imperative that Congress take action to protect children and teens online. The GUARD Act would help to protect minors from AI chatbots that target them ...
more AI Verified source (Apr 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 3mo agoJosh ShapiroGovernor of Pennsylvaniaabstains and says:Some kids are just too young to understand the difference between AI and a real person. [...] Remember, this is not a person... this is just something you download in the app store. It's not just our kids — these chatbots and the companies behind the...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 6d agoAdam SchiffU.S. Senator from California; former House Intelligence Committee chairvotes Against and says:AI chatbots that promote companionship pose significant risks to young and developing minds.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (39)Added 15min agoVictoria GuRhode Island state senator; chair of the Senate Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologiesvotes For and says:
Businesses in Rhode Island are already using AI and electronic monitoring tools to surveil and discipline workers in a way no human supervisor could. If you’re making these consequential decisions over workers’ lives, there needs to be disclosure, me...
more AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Added 5mo agoOrly LobelLaw professorvotes Against and says:In 2023, the United States saw countless proposals to ban AI technologies, [...] hiring, [...] law soon must embrace AI; [...] prohibit human intervention [...]
Disputed sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (41)Added 15min agoSara JacobsU.S. Representative from California's 51st congressional districtvotes For and says:
Federal laws shouldn’t become optional just because technology is new. AI is already helping make life-altering decisions for millions of Americans, but too often, it’s operating in a gray area. My Sectoral AI Governance Act gives federal agencies cl...
more AI Verified source (Jun 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (8)Added 4mo agoFei-Fei LiStanford AI professor; HAI co-directorvotes Against and says:SB-1047 holds liable [...] the original developer of that model. It is impossible [...] to predict every possible use. SB-1047 will force developers to pull back [...].
AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (21)Added 15min agoRob BontaCalifornia attorney generalvotes For and says:
Allowing federal agencies to buy or compile, analyze, and use large profiles of information about Americans without limits, oversight, or accountability undermines the public’s faith in our system of governance and is dangerous for democracy.
AI Verified source (Mar 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Added 1mo agoShabana MahmoodUK Home Secretary; Labour MP for Birmingham Ladywood; former Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretaryvotes Against and says:When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times. ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
16 opinions
For (13)Added 15min agoDave SundayAttorney General of Pennsylvaniavotes For and says:The potential dangers tied to overreliance on artificial intelligence are very real, as we have seen online chatbots play roles in numerous tragedies across the nation. We must do everything we can to keep children and vulnerable residents away from ...
more AI Verified source (Mar 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)Added 2mo agoAdam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (119)Added 21min agoEmily KoppInvestigative journalist covering public health and biodefensevotes For and says:
If the DEFUSE proposal had been patented, Covid would violate that patent. That is how closely the genome of the virus matches what is proposed in that grant.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (71)Added 2h agoLawfareNational security and legal analysis publication covering U.S. intelligence, law, and public policyabstains and says:The origins of COVID-19 remain uncertain. A lab-associated incident is plausible; so is natural spillover.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (211)Added 2h agoElizabeth GinexiResearcher and writer on science policy, ethics, and NIH-related issuesvotes Against and says:The majority of virologists and epidemiologists who have examined the question conclude that the available evidence favors a natural spillover origin. No credible evidence links NIH-funded research to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2.
AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
46 opinions
For (38)Added 54min agoDaniel DidechIllinois State Representative (Democrat); lead House sponsor of SB 315, the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Actvotes For and says:This legislation enacts critical protections against the most catastrophic risks that advanced AI systems pose to public safety. Artificial intelligence is among the most significant technological developments of modern time. It has the potential to ...
more AI Verified source (May 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 6mo agoKevin FrazierLawfare contributorvotes Against and says:Finally, it’s not clear how well some of the act’s provisions reflect the current state of the AI ecosystem. The act demands that labs hire an independent third party to complete an annual audit of their protocols to ensure compliance with the act. T...
more AI Verified source (Jun 3, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (74)Added 1h agoGabrielle M. EtzelWashington Examiner healthcare policy reporter.votes For and says:
Bayesian methods have grown in popularity in the past few decades with the advent of improved statistical software and computing power. But Levin’s paper is the first to apply the technique to the COVID origins debate.
AI Verified source (Feb 4, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (11)Added 17h agogecStatModeling commenter on uncertainty and COVID-19 originsabstains and says:The arguments around covid origins seem largely to fall into an inference trap Andrew has termed premature collapse of the wavefunction. Rather than maintaining multiple hypotheses with different levels of credibility, there seems to be a desire to c...
more AI Verified source (Aug 1, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (66)Added 4h agoDaniel EngberScience journalist and senior editor at The Atlanticvotes Against and says:The origins of the coronavirus pandemic remain contested; the evidence is incomplete.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (154)Added 2h agoFactCheck.orgFact-checking publication from the Annenberg Public Policy Center focused on misinformation and public claimsvotes For and says:
Evidence of zoonosis has surfaced. That's in addition to the epidemiology data, which show the earliest COVID-19 cases cluster around the market, even those without a known connection to the market.
AI Verified source (May 23, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (31)Added 4h agoJane QiuAward-winning independent science writer in Beijingabstains and says:Both sides are gathering evidence to support their case, yet neither can fully rule out the possibility put forward by the other.
AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (97)Added 2h agoDRASTICIndependent group investigating COVID-19 originsvotes Against and says:It challenges the prevailing narrative that the Huanan market served as the origin of the virus, drawing attention to negative SARS-CoV-2 tests in animals, the absence of precursor sequences, the dominance of lineage B, and evidence of viral circulat...
more AI Verified source (Apr 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
67 opinions
For (44)Added 3h agoSuhas SubramanyamU.S. Representative from Virginiavotes For and says:As AI and autonomous systems redefine warfare, we must ensure that our values and control are not sidelined. This bill ensures that a human operator can always oversee, override, or shut down an autonomous weapon. By pairing strict safety reviews wit...
more AI Verified source (Jun 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (24)Added 1mo agoVinod KhoslaVenture capitalist; Khosla Ventures foundervotes Against and says:Personal view: I admire @AnthropicAI sticking by their principles but disagree with the principle itself. Putin won't fight fair so we should have autonomous AI weapons for sure.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (24)Added 4h agoJosh GottheimerU.S. Representative from New Jerseyvotes For and says:
Americans deserve to know if what they’re seeing, reading, or hearing was made by a machine. This is a commonsense, bipartisan fix — we’re simply requiring that AI content come with a built-in label, so platforms, journalists, and everyday people can...
more AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Added 1mo agoDavid InserraFellow for Free Expression and Technology at the Cato Institutevotes Against and says:A media environment with more false and deceptive information is not a good thing for our society, but it is not the government's job to fix it. [...] Let's trust the American people, not the government, to decide for themselves how AI should be used...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
43 opinions
For (39)Added 5h agoNathaniel MoranU.S. Representative from Texasvotes For and says:AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and I want to see it flourish, but not without accountability and not without human oversight. The rule of law should apply to this new frontier. This legislation ensures that when something goes wrong with a hi...
more AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Added 1mo agoVinod KhoslaVenture capitalist; Khosla Ventures foundervotes Against and says:Personal view: I admire @AnthropicAI sticking by their principles but disagree with the principle itself. Putin won't fight fair so we should have autonomous AI weapons for sure.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (100)Added 1d agoAisling AhernePhD registered nutritionist and Senior Nutrition Science Manager at Kerry Health and Nutrition Institutevotes For and says:
Observational studies cannot determine cause and effect relationships and, hence, the impact of a single dietary or lifestyle factor.
AI Verified source (Feb 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 1d agoRegan L. BaileyFlorida State University nutrition researcher and coauthor of a 2026 Journal of Nutrition study on egg consumption and nutrient intake in U.S. adolescentsabstains and says:US adolescents consuming eggs, as primarily dishes or ingredients, had better compliance in meeting nutrient markers compared with nonegg consumers, highlighting associations between eggconsumption and nutrient intake.
Disputed source (Mar 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Added 1d agoStudyFinds AnalysisStudyFinds editorial analysis bylinevotes Against and says:Researchers are careful to note that country-level comparisons like this identify associations, not causes, and many factors beyond eggs differ between nations.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Genetic variation (e.g. hyper-responders) makes population-level egg advice misleading for individuals
137 opinions
For (132)Added 1d agoNora Eccles Harrison Cardiovascular Research and Training InstituteUniversity of Utah cardiovascular research institute publishing heart health and precision nutrition educationvotes For and says:This is where personalized nutrition will help refine broad guidelines to help people eat a diet that works with how their bodies metabolize, or process, foods. For example, if your genes put you at increased risk of heart disease, dietary changes ca...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Added 1d agoGhada A. SolimanAuthor of a review on dietary cholesterol and cardiovascular disease evidencevotes Against and says:Indeed, studies in humans have demonstrated that individuals could be hypo-responders or hyper-responders to dietary cholesterol.
AI Verified source (Jun 16, 2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (32)Added 3d agoNational Heart Foundation of AustraliaAustralian heart-health charityvotes For and says:
Eat less than seven eggs per week. People with type 2 diabetes or those with high cholesterol should eat no more than seven eggs per week. Research shows that eating eggs can raise LDL-cholesterol. In people with type 2 diabetes, eating more than sev...
more AI Verified source (Apr 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (8)Added 1d agoBilal HLiv Hospital health guide contributor.abstains and says:Genetics play a big role in how eggs affect your cholesterol. Some people are more sensitive to dietary cholesterol. This can lead to higher cholesterol levels when they eat eggs.
AI Verified source (Jan 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (94)Added 1d agoBen Jones MD PhDPhysician-scientist and health writer.votes Against and says:The answer isn’t as simple as “good” or “bad.” It depends on which part of the egg you eat, how you cook it, what you eat it with, and who you are.
AI Verified source (Jun 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.