We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What's new in AI governance, safety, jobs and society
Follow the latest sourced positions from experts, policymakers and public figures.
Want to see how articles and videos change minds? Check out Reconsider.
Explore, search or download the 8878 sourced positions from Yoshua Bengio, Demis Hassabis, Andrew Ng, Pope Leo XIV, and others.
-
Today
1 -
Pope Leo XIVHead of the Catholic Churchvotes Against and says:
Machines are tools, not persons. Today, some propose granting these systems rights, or even legal personhood. Such an approach risks obscuring human responsibility and leaving those who suffer harm to confront a faceless entity.
AI Verified source (Oct 31, 2026)Pope Leo XIV · statements & votes- For AI poses an existential threat to humanity (Sep 26, 2026)
- For The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity (May 25, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (May 25, 2026)
- For Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems (May 15, 2026)
- For Ban fully automated hiring decisions without human review (May 15, 2026)
-
Yesterday
2 -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
111 opinions
Robert E. LitanEconomist and attorney; nonresident senior fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution.votes For and says:Alternatively, a second idea suggested by Greg Ip of the Wall Street Journal, Nobel Prize winners Paul Krugman and Daron Acemoglu (with co-authors Andrea Manera and Pascual Restrepo) is to rectify the current imbalance of taxation on labor and capita...
more AI Verified source (Oct 30, 2026) -
Slow down AI development
188 opinions
Gillian HadfieldLegal scholar and AI governance researcher; Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University; Canada CIFAR AI Chair (Vector Institute)votes For and says:I support a pause in development while we figure out how to make these systems safe, and especially a pause in the development of agents.
AI Verified source (Oct 30, 2026)Gillian Hadfield · statements & votes- Abstain AI agents should be granted legal personhood as non-human corporations (Jul 20, 2026)
- For Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems (2026)
-
Earlier this week
7 -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
557 opinions
Maureen Doyle-SpareIndependent researcher in AI governance and founder of Doyle-Spare Research, specializing in agentic AI governance.votes For and says:On each in-scope decision, a runtime measurement, the Semantic Deviation Index quantifies how far the agent's resolved meaning sits from the authorized one. A Deterministic Gate turns that measurement into an enforced decision before execution author...
more AI Verified source (Oct 29, 2026) -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
518 opinions
RandstadGlobal talent and workforce-services company that publishes labor-market research.votes For and says: -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
227 opinions
Bruce BarcottEditorial Lead at Transparency Coalition.AI; environmental journalist and author.votes For and says:Independent third-party AI auditors will act like financial accounting firms: investigating and verifying safety protocols and legal compliance. They’re a critical part of the safeguards needed around powerful frontier AI models.
AI Verified source (Oct 28, 2026) -
Lawrence WongPrime Minister of Singapore.votes For and says:
And as a first step, I suggest that interested parties and countries can come together to launch a pilot around AI incident reporting. We can start by agreeing on a common set of incident categories and information to be shared. We can explore how pa...
more AI Verified source (Oct 28, 2026)Lawrence Wong · statements & votes- Abstain AI will create more jobs than it destroys (May 1, 2026)
- Against AI will create a permanent underclass (May 1, 2026)
-
AI alignment is solvable
92 opinions
Satya NadellaMicrosoft CEOabstains and says:I used to always think that, you know, alignment will just fall out. I no longer believe that. So I think this alignment thing may be a harder, different problem.
AI Verified source (Oct 27, 2026)Satya Nadella · statements & votes- For Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains (Oct 12, 2026)
- For AI labs should give independent evaluators employee-like access (Sep 15, 2026)
- For Slow down AI development (Sep 14, 2026)
- For The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity (Jun 14, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (Jun 14, 2026)
-
Lord TarassenkoDavid James Tarassenko, Baron Tarassenko; British engineer, academic, and crossbench member of the UK House of Lords.votes For and says:
I wish to speak in support of Amendment 41, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, to which I have added my name. We heard during Committee not only about the out-of-control behaviour from agents running AI models from OpenAI, Google and Me...
more AI Verified source (Oct 26, 2026)Lord Tarassenko · statements & votes- Against AIs understand (Jun 5, 2026)
- Against Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Jan 29, 2026)
- Against Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Jan 29, 2026)
- Against Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed (Jan 29, 2026)
-
AIs understand
66 opinions
Torsten SlokChief Economist at Apollo Global Managementvotes Against and says:AI may be a great calculator, but in business, intelligence is mostly judgment. AI does not understand accountability, trust, culture, unwritten rules, ethical trade-offs or fairness, all of which shape reputational risk and ultimately drive revenue ...
more AI Verified source (Oct 26, 2026)Torsten Slok · statements & votes- Against AI will create a permanent underclass (Jun 1, 2026)
- For AI will create more jobs than it destroys (Apr 28, 2026)
-
Last week
5 -
The Washington Post Editorial BoardEditorial board of The Washington Post, publishing the newspaper’s institutional opinions.votes Against and says:
Open-weight models have been a boon for defenders. When Hugging Face investigated how OpenAI-powered agents penetrated its systems, proprietary models refused some of the forensic work, but the Chinese open-weight model GLM-5.2 helped reconstruct the...
more AI Verified source (Oct 25, 2026) -
Kanishka NarayanUK Minister for AI and Online Safety; Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Science, Innovation and Technologyvotes For and says:
The AI Biosecurity Lab will be a major new global institution bringing together world-leading scientific expertise to keep the country safe.
AI Verified source (Oct 24, 2026)Kanishka Narayan · statements & votes- For Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models (Aug 4, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (Jun 19, 2026)
- Abstain AI will create more jobs than it destroys (Jun 19, 2026)
- Against Require frontier AI labs to conduct nearly all R&D publicly but keep the weights closed (Jun 10, 2026)
- For Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods. (Feb 19, 2026)
-
Yaim CooperMathematician studying the foundations of deep learning and AI’s societal impacts.votes For and says:
External evaluators should be embedded at AI companies, but they should not be restricted to AI safety researchers, and they should not be selected by the company being evaluated. Rather, they should represent communities across society, address a mu...
more AI Verified source (Oct 23, 2026) -
Shanna PortsSenior Legal Counsel, Campaign Finance at Campaign Legal Center.votes For and says:
Unsolicited, AI-generated robocalls to voters’ cell phones — when both robocalls and AI have a proven track record of spreading lies and can be particularly deceiving when combined — aren’t just a nuisance; they’re downright dangerous for our democra...
more AI Verified source (Oct 22, 2026) -
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
128 opinions
Jon McCray JonesPolicy Analyst at the ACLU of Wisconsin.votes For and says:We Must End AI-Powered Mass Surveillance, Not Switch Vendors. [...] ALPR’s don’t need a marketing rebrand – they need to be banned.
AI Verified source (Oct 22, 2026)