YouCongress Polls

Allowing machines to choose to kill humans would be devastating to our security and freedom. [...] the window to act is closing fast. Unverified source (2018)

SB 1047 will stifle open source AI and hinder AI innovation [...] and therefore will make AI less safe. Unverified source (2024)

I urge [...] to adopt a binding [...] treaty [...]. The goal of regulation [...] should not only be the prevention of harmful practices [...]. [...] the vulnerable [...]. Unverified source (2024)

My view is that the idea that AI will decide to literally kill humanity is a profound category error. Unverified source (2023)

I mean, I think a minimum is that users should be able to, to sort of opt out from having their data used by companies like ours or the social media companies. It should be easy to delete your data. I think those are, it should, but the thing that I ... more Unverified source (2023)

Our consciousness has to do with information being processed in certain ways and there's no reason whatsoever that machines can't when they do that. Unverified source (2023)

With nuclear weapons, [...] they can't [...] in secret, but with developing new types of AI, it's much easier [...] So it's not enough to have an agreement. Unverified source (2018)

SB-1047 holds liable [...] the original developer of that model. It is impossible [...] to predict every possible use. SB-1047 will force developers to pull back [...]. Unverified source (2024)

This means that in 2026-2027 we could end up in one of two starkly different worlds. In the US, multiple companies will definitely have the required millions of chips (at the cost of tens of billions of dollars). The question is whether China will al... more Unverified source (2025)

He also noted the standard should require AI developers to adopt policies for testing models and publicly disclose them [...] Unverified source (2026)

AI will not create enough jobs to take over the jobs that may be displaced. Unverified source

There’s also a lot of hype, that AI will create evil robots with super-intelligence. That’s an unnecessary distraction. Those of us on the frontline shipping code, we’re excited by AI, but we don’t see a realistic path for our software to become sen... more Unverified source (2015)

My view is that autonomous weapons are the most dangerous existential threat that AI poses to humanity. Unverified source (2021)

Ideally this would stay in the hands of neutral international organizations (think of a combination of IAEA and CERN for AI) that develop safe and beneficial AI [...] safe superhuman AI Verified source (2023)

We talk about the IAEA as a model where the world has said 'OK, very dangerous technology, let's all put some guard rails.' Unverified source (2023)