We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What's new in AI governance, safety, jobs and society
Follow the latest sourced positions from experts, policymakers and public figures.
Explore or search the 8207 sourced positions from Yoshua Bengio, Demis Hassabis, Andrew Ng, Pope Leo XIV, and more.
Quote date
Added
-
Yesterday
2 -
Hakeem JeffriesU.S. Representative from New York and House Democratic Leader.votes For and says:
We should take decisive action now so that we can slow down, as the CEOs have recently acknowledged, slow down the pace of development in order to protect the American people and ensure that AI is proceeding safely.
AI Verified source (Sep 13, 2026)Hakeem Jeffries · statements & votes- For Ban governments from using AI to conduct mass surveillance of citizens (Feb 27, 2026)
- For Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (Feb 27, 2026)
-
Lori TrahanU.S. representative from Massachusettsvotes For and says:
Bringing in independent evaluators is a real step. But a voluntary commitment can be dropped the second it gets inconvenient. The FRONTIER Act makes safety and transparency the law, and puts independent auditors in place to hold frontier labs to it. ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 13, 2026)Lori Trahan · statements & votes- For Establish an international AI incident reporting system (Jul 23, 2026)
- For Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority (Jul 23, 2026)
- For Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models (Jun 25, 2026)
- For States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government (Jun 12, 2026)
- For Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods. (Jun 1, 2026)
-
Last week
13 -
Jim VandeHeiCo-founder and CEO of Axios; journalist and former Politico co-founder.votes For and says:
The only way to ultimately control AI on a worldwide scale in coming years will be for the two superpowers to create some kind of framework modeled after how we've safely governed nuclear weapons for decades.
AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026) -
The first company or companies to develop AGI could gain control over a majority of economic activity
31 opinions
Naval RavikantCEO of AngelListvotes For and says:AI isn’t going away. Barring unprecedented global government coordination, it isn’t even slowing down. The only real decision is whether to centralize power, or disperse it. Do you fear the technology? Or a small number of people controlling the te...
more AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026)Naval Ravikant · statements & votes- Abstain Nations should establish binding international rules for AI safety and governance (Sep 12, 2026)
-
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
215 opinions
Martin NovakFounder of the Synthocracy Institute; author and independent researcher on AI, governance, institutional power, and decision systems.votes For and says:The governance direction is therefore already visible: developer evidence → independent review → public-law standing.
AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026) -
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
131 opinions
Sherry TurkleMIT professor and founding director of the MIT Initiative on Technology and Self; author on technology and human relationships.abstains and says:Sweeping bans of anything are hard to enact and enforce, but the risks of generative AI are too great to dismiss bold measures as unfeasible. [...] In the absence of a wholesale ban on all interactions between juveniles and relational AI, a default s...
more AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026) -
Damien CharlotinFrench lawyer, data scientist, and HEC Paris senior research fellow focused on artificial intelligence and law.votes For and says:
And if we want these SSAs to obey law, we will have to grant them the benefits of the law as well as its burdens: property, standing, procedure. That would not make them human, but would help make them more governable.
AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026) -
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:
This suggests pacing the advances: not training or deploying AIs without a strong safety case that convinces independent experts.
AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026)Yoshua Bengio · statements & votes- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Sep 11, 2026)
- For AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models (Sep 9, 2026)
- For Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems (Sep 1, 2026)
- Abstain AI will create a permanent underclass (Jul 13, 2026)
- For Democratic middle powers should jointly develop frontier AI and share its benefits globally (May 29, 2026)
-
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
158 opinions
Alex TurnerAI safety researcher and former Google DeepMind research scientist.votes For and says:Many researchers believe they are building something that could kill everyone on the planet. It was literally my day job to think about how to stop that.
AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026)Alex Turner · statements & votes- For Ban autonomous lethal weapons (Jul 15, 2026)
- For Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (Jul 15, 2026)
-
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
134 opinions
Gavin NewsomGovernor of Californiavotes For and says:BREAKING: I just signed the strongest kid safety laws for AI chatbots and social media in America. California is banning addictive social media features for kids, cracking down on dangerous AI chatbots, and strengthening privacy protections for ALL k...
more AI Verified source (Sep 11, 2026)Gavin Newsom · statements & votes- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jun 26, 2026)
- Against AI will create a permanent underclass (May 21, 2026)
- For Introduce a universal basic wealth system that grants individuals a capital endowment at birth (May 20, 2026)
- For AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone (May 7, 2026)
- For States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government (Mar 30, 2026)
-
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
117 opinions
Americans for Responsible InnovationAI policy advocacy nonprofitvotes For and says:ARI has already worked with state lawmakers on a variety of fronts, including to advocate for greater community stewardship of data centers and to defeat federal preemption efforts.
AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2026)Americans for Responsible Innovation · statements & votes- For Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority (Aug 10, 2026)
- For [🇺🇸 Congress, Jan 2026] Giving Congress power to block AI chip exports to adversaries (Jul 14, 2026)
- For Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models (May 11, 2026)
- For Democracies should coordinate export controls on AI chips to China (2026)
-
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
501 opinions
The EconomistNews and analysis with a global perspective.votes For and says:The labour data are in from America and a trend is becoming clearer: on balance AI is starting to create more jobs than it hoovers up.
AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2026)The Economist · statements & votes- Against Implement a universal basic income (2016)
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
532 opinions
Alastair DennistonNHS consultant and Chair of the National Commission into the Regulation of AI in Healthcare.votes For and says:One message came through clearly: people are open to AI improving their care, but only if it is safe, overseen by humans, and if they know when it is being used. These recommendations are designed to make that trust possible, so that the UK can lead ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2026) -
Jacob CoxonAI safety researcher at Anthropic who publicly warned about risks from frontier AI development.votes For and says:
The problem with the pause is you've got China. So, what you really ultimately want is some sort of international agreement—international pacing, you might call it—which will require international coordination and understanding where all the compute ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 9, 2026)Jacob Coxon · statements & votes- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Sep 9, 2026)
- For AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence (Sep 9, 2026)
- For Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed (Sep 9, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Sep 9, 2026)
- For AI poses an existential threat to humanity (Sep 9, 2026)
-
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
70 opinions
Jacob CoxonAI safety researcher at Anthropic who publicly warned about risks from frontier AI development.votes For and says:Neither company is acting responsibly. They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives.
AI Verified source (Sep 9, 2026)Jacob Coxon · statements & votes- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Sep 9, 2026)
- For Create a global institute for AI, similar to CERN (Sep 9, 2026)
- For Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed (Sep 9, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Sep 9, 2026)
- For AI poses an existential threat to humanity (Sep 9, 2026)