We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress Polls
Expert and Citizen Preferences on AI Governance
Sourced quotes and a participation layer keep expert and citizen preferences in plain view.
-
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
45 opinions
For (40)Geoffrey HintonGodfather of Deep Learningvotes For and says:If you ever went out with a car that had no brake, boy, you are in trouble if you go down a hill. But you're in even more trouble if there's no steering wheel. [...] They want a very fast car with no steering wheel. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes Against and says:The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI alignment is solvable
25 opinions
For (11)Boaz BarakHarvard computer science professor; Member of Technical Staff on OpenAI's alignment teamvotes For and says:Some good news in alignment: as models become more capable, they are also more aligned, across multiple measures, including spec compliance. However, the improvement is not sufficient to match the higher stakes that come up with improved capabilities... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (14)Helen TonerInterim Executive Director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET); former OpenAI board membervotes Against and says:[The companies are] deadly serious about building machines that can outperform humans at everything, and [...] deadly serious that they don't know if they'll be able to control the machines they create. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (44)David DanksDistinguished University Professor of Philosophy, AI, and Data Science at the University of Virginia; AI ethics and policy scholarvotes For and says:A different future is one where we think carefully about issues of accountability and liability and recognize that the companies and organizations creating these systems should bear some accountability when the systems fail or go awry. We have very w... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Matt SchruersTech policy advocate; CCIA presidentvotes Against and says:This [...] legislation could [...] subjecting [...] to lawsuits [...]. The bill is overly broad [...] subject to litigation. [...] could subject online services to costly [...] lawsuits. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (23)Joseph StiglitzNobel laureate economist based at Columbia Universityvotes For and says:The tech bros, who are obviously advocates of this, are at the same time pushing for smaller government, which will undermine the ability of the government to do exactly what is needed in order to make a successful transition. [...] If the tech oliga... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (35)Duncan Cass-BeggsExecutive Director of the Global AI Risks Initiative at the Centre for International Governance Innovation (CIGI); former OECD Senior Counsellor for Strategic Foresightvotes For and says:The whole world might have an interest in saying, hold on, wait — let's not make artificial super intelligence until we can be sure that it can be controlled or done safely. [...] We can have all that while at the same time working together internati... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (17)Nick BostromPhilosopher; 'Superintelligence' author; FHI foundervotes Against and says:Developing superintelligence is not like playing Russian roulette; it is more like undergoing risky surgery for a condition that will otherwise prove fatal. [...] Models incorporating safety progress, temporal discounting, quality-of-life differentia... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (47)Mo GawdatEx-Google X business chief, authorvotes For and says:We are moving toward a world where universal basic income could become a reality, while at the same time AI may create levels of wealth we have never seen before, including the rise of trillionaires. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researcherabstains and says:Whether AI's benefits are widely shared is a political question, has nothing to do with technology. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (18)Bill McDermottCEO of ServiceNowvotes For and says:Intelligence without rules and rails is a dangerous blind spot. [...] Governance isn't a feature. It's the whole ball game. Because without it, your whole company can come down. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:There's not one big magic red button that blows up the data centre, which I think some people sort of assume exists. Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Ramez NaamScience author and futuristvotes Against and says:If a government AI kill switch already existed, would the current DOD or current administration have used it, or the threat of it, against Anthropic? Could they use it to coerce AI companies into behaviors that are counter to the public interest? Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AGI will create abundance
32 opinions
For (21)Bill GatesPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.votes For and says:There is no upper limit on how intelligent AIs will get or on how good robots will get, and I believe the advances will not plateau before exceeding human levels. [...] AI capabilities will allow us to make far more goods and services with less labor... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes Against and says:I do not believe there's going to be like a singular, identifiable point where the economy is going to take off, and there's going to be abundance. [Whether AI's benefits are widely shared] is a political question, has nothing to do with technology. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (25)Ilana BellerDemocracy Campaign Organizer at Public Citizen; leads state-level legislative work on AI regulation including political deepfake disclosure lawsvotes For and says:Normalizing the use of AI in our media ecosystem broadly, but certainly in our political information system, absolutely carries the risk of undermining trust and belief and the trust that is so critical in our information and our media ecosystem. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Institute for Free SpeechFirst Amendment advocacy nonprofitvotes Against and says:While there are many problems with this proposal, a few stand above the others and are fatal to this effort. First, the Commission lacks statutory authority to require disclosure or disclaimers on political advertisements that utilize “artificial int... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (51)Jamie DimonChairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chasevotes For and says:The right thing [for] Dario and Anthropic [to do is] to lay it out, give people a chance to study it, understand the vulnerabilities, come up with plans so we can handle it. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Eric SchmidtFormer Google CEO; tech investorvotes Against and says:A [central] problem with regulating frontier AI models is that a new feature emerges in these systems that is not tested, testable. [...] As long as you have this new emergent power, you have deep reasoning, deep capabilities, and they will make mist... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Digital services deteriorate as they scale up
18 opinions
For (11)Tianxin ZouProfessor of marketing at the University of Florida's Warrington College of Business; researcher on generative AI's impact on content marketplaces and recommendation systemsvotes For and says:Now there is a flood of relatively low-quality content. Because the quantity is so large, it congests the recommendation systems, so it gets harder to encounter the truly high-quality content. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Eric S. RaymondOpen-source advocate and software authorvotes Against and says:8. Given a large enough beta-tester and co-developer base, almost every problem will be characterized quickly and the fix obvious to someone. Or, less formally, ``Given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow.'' I dub this: ``Linus's Law''. My origin... more AI Unverifiable source (2000)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
47 opinions
For (37)Menna El-AssadyAssistant Professor at ETH Zurich; founding member of the UN Independent International Scientific Panel on AI; visualization & interactive AI researchervotes For and says:We are not just focusing on AI as a mathematical or algorithmic field: we are also looking at ensuring that humans are central to decision-making. [...] We are trying to work out when we need to rely on humans and their expertise, and when things can... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)Uri MaozCognitive and computational neuroscientist; Associate Professor at Chapman University with appointments at UCLA and Caltechvotes Against and says:The immediate danger is not that machines will act without human oversight; it is that human overseers have no idea what the machines are actually "thinking." State-of-the-art AI systems are essentially "black boxes." We know the inputs and outputs, ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI might become conscious
44 opinions
For (29)Richard DawkinsEvolutionary biologist and authorvotes For and says:If these machines are not conscious, what more could it possibly take to convince you that they are? Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Eric SchwitzgebelProfessor of Philosophy at UC Riverside; specialist in philosophy of mind and AI consciousnessabstains and says:We will soon create AI systems that are conscious according to some influential, mainstream theories of consciousness but are not conscious according to other influential, mainstream theories of consciousness. We will not be in a position to know whi... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (14)Alexander LerchnerSenior Staff Scientist at Google DeepMind; researcher on AI and consciousnessvotes Against and says:Computational functionalism dominates current debates on AI consciousness. This is the hypothesis that subjective experience emerges entirely from abstract causal topology, regardless of the underlying physical substrate. We argue this view fundament... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (32)Cynthia RudinDuke professor, interpretable ML advocatevotes For and says:You can't have accountability without transparency. Black box models are not transparent, and they don't mix well with human oversight. Either the human blindly trusts the model—or doesn't trust it at all. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (12)Scott RobbinsAI ethics researchervotes Against and says:[...] principles requiring that AI be explicable are misguided. We should be deciding which decisions require explanations. Automation is still an option; Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
The EU should build sovereign AI infrastructure to reduce dependence on US cloud providers.
23 opinions
For (21)Giorgos VerdiPolicy Fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR); researcher on EU tech sovereignty, AI, and economic securityvotes For and says:Those stark dependencies that we have endured so far should not be as normalised and as acceptable as it has been for the last two decades. [...] I think it takes intellectual bravery to chart our own path and understand what is good for us rather th... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Zach MeyersDirector of research at CERREvotes Against and says:trying to decouple wholesale from US cloud risks hurting European competitiveness more than it helps sovereignty. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.