We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress Polls
Expert and Citizen Preferences on AI Governance
Sourced quotes and a participation layer keep expert and citizen preferences in plain view.
-
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
68 opinions
For (51)Miles BrundageAI policy researcher; founder of AVERI (AI Verification Initiative); former OpenAI Head of Policy Researchvotes For and says:There's no one forcing them to work with third-party experts to make sure that things are safe and secure. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (17)Kevin FrazierLawfare contributorvotes Against and says:Finally, it’s not clear how well some of the act’s provisions reflect the current state of the AI ecosystem. The act demands that labs hire an independent third party to complete an annual audit of their protocols to ensure compliance with the act. T... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (43)Julia AngwinInvestigative journalist; contributing Opinion writer at The New York Times; founder of Proof News and The Markup; Pulitzer Prize finalistvotes For and says:I have worked for decades honing my skills as a writer and editor, and I am distressed to discover that a tech company is selling an imposter version of my hard-earned expertise. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Brian McMillanCCIA VP for Federal Affairsvotes Against and says:Without provisions that allow for fair use and free expression online, this legislation would dramatically change the internet. Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
26 opinions
For (17)Bill GatesPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.votes For and says:There is no upper limit on how intelligent AIs will get or on how good robots will get, and I believe the advances will not plateau before exceeding human levels. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Roman V. YampolskiyAI safety researcher, Louisville professorabstains and says:Until some company or scientist says ‘Here’s the proof! We can definitely have a safety mechanism that can scale to any level of intelligence,’ I don’t think we should be developing those general superintelligences. We can get most of the benefits w... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (8)Andrew NgBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainvotes Against and says:There’s also a lot of hype, that AI will create evil robots with super-intelligence. That’s an unnecessary distraction. Those of us on the frontline shipping code, we’re excited by AI, but we don’t see a realistic path for our software to become sen... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (15)Jeffrey LadishExecutive Director of Palisade Research; AI safety researcher focused on frontier AI controllability and cyber risks; former Anthropic information security leadvotes For and says:Several state-of-the-art language models, when presented with a simple task, sometimes actively subvert a shutdown mechanism in their environment to complete that task — doing so up to 97% of the time, even with an explicit instruction not to interfe... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:There's not one big magic red button that blows up the data centre, which I think some people sort of assume exists. Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Eran KahanaAI and cybersecurity lawyer; Fellow at Stanford CodeX; Adjunct Professor, University of Minnesota Law Schoolvotes Against and says:It needs only an optimization objective that treats shutdown as one more obstacle between the current state and the goal. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority
11 opinions
For (6)Jack ClarkAnthropic cofounder and policy researchervotes For and says:Our position is the government has to know about this stuff, and we have to find new ways for the government to partner with a private sector that is making things that are truly revolutionizing the economy, but are going to have aspects to them whic... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (5)Mayer BrownInternational law firmabstains and says:According to the proposed rule, a covered US person will be required to provide quarterly reports to BIS if the US person “engages in, or plans, within six months, to engage in ‘applicable activities.’” “Applicable activities” include: “Conducting a... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (28)Andrea MiottiFounder and CEO of ControlAIvotes For and says:Canada should publicly recognize superintelligent AI as a national and global security threat. [...] Canada should protect its citizens at home and lead by example abroad by prohibiting the development of superintelligent AI on its soil. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (16)Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes Against and says:The idea of stopping or even substantially slowing the technology is fundamentally untenable. If one company does not build it, others will do so nearly as fast. [...] Even if all Western companies stopped their work on AI, authoritarian countries wo... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Build artificial general intelligence
51 opinions
For (31)Jensen HuangNvidia cofounder and CEOvotes For and says:I think it's now. I think we've achieved AGI. [...] It is not out of the question that a Claude [model] was able to create a web service, some interesting little app that all of a sudden, you know, a few billion people used for 50 cents, and then it ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (20)Jeffrey LadishExecutive Director of Palisade Research; AI safety researcher focused on frontier AI controllability and cyber risks; former Anthropic information security leadvotes Against and says:If I can only convey one thing about AI: Companies are racing to develop AIs that will outcompete humans at everything. Not just "jobs" but also politics, strategy, persuasion, influence. If anyone builds a country of geniuses in a datacenter, those ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
69 opinions
For (37)Michael GapenChief U.S. Economist at Morgan Stanley; former Chief U.S. Economist at Bank of America; economist focused on monetary policy and labor marketsvotes For and says:The historical record is clear: Innovation waves are disruptive, capital-intensive and often volatile. They can displace workers, concentrate gains early and provoke political backlash. But over time, they raise productivity, restructure labor market... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Pascual RestrepoYale economist; Associate Professor studying automation, AI, and labor markets; frequent collaborator with Nobel laureate Daron Acemogluabstains and says:People have the wrong intuition when they say that if AI can do my job for ten dollars an hour, then my wage falls to ten dollars and my life is terrible. A world where AI can do research or teaching at that cost is a world where AI is extremely capa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (29)Gad LevanonChief Economist at the Burning Glass Institute; Ph.D. in Economics from Princeton University; NYU economics lecturervotes Against and says:Job loss is going to happen. [...] I wouldn't be surprised if we are at the beginning of decades of job displacement. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
58 opinions
For (35)Tristan HarrisCenter for Humane Technology cofoundervotes For and says:We are extremely close to recursive self-improvement right now. The companies, I think, are planning to do this in the next 12 months. The asteroid is coming for Earth. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (23)Milton MuellerProfessor at Georgia Tech School of Public Policy; internet governance scholar and co-founder of the Internet Governance Projectvotes Against and says:Computer scientists often aren't good judges of the social and political implications of technology. They are so focused on the AI's mechanisms and are overwhelmed by its success, but they are not very good at placing it into a social and historical ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (31)Pete RickettsU.S. Senator from Nebraskavotes For and says:We must ensure our allies align their export controls with American standards — through diplomacy if possible, but unilaterally if necessary. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of ChinaChina's foreign ministryvotes Against and says:coerced or courted some countries to adopt export restrictions against China. [...] Such bullying acts seriously violate market principles and the international trade order Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
25 opinions
For (23)Geoffrey HintonGodfather of Deep Learningvotes For and says:We somehow have to have a way of — when AI agents replace people — doing what Bill Gates has suggested recently. We have to have a way of taxing the AI agents, so there's still a tax base. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:Capitalism has also depended on somewhat of a power balance between labor and capital, but if it's hard in many of our current jobs to outwork a GPU, then that changes. [...] If there was an easy consensus answer, we'd have done it by now, so I don't... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Lawrence SummersFormer U.S. Secretary of the Treasury; President Emeritus of Harvard University; economistvotes Against and says:Why pick on robots? [...] I don't think simply trying to resist or stop technology is a viable strategy. I don't think it would be a viable strategy if it was adoptable on a global basis, but it's even less viable for a single country in internationa... more Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
58 opinions
For (49)Scott GallowayNYU Stern marketing professor and authorvotes For and says:I don't think anyone under the age of 18 should be in a synthetic relationship. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Adam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
61 opinions
For (37)Daniel PachoUndersecretary for the Multilateral Sector of the Secretariat of State of the Holy See (Vatican diplomat)votes For and says:It is fundamental to retain human control and judgement in the use of force, and a moratorium on the development and use of lethal autonomous weapons systems should be established immediately. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (24)Lt. Gen. Jack ShanahanFormer JAIC director, USAF generalvotes Against and says:To the second part of your question, I am strongly in favor of discussions internationally about things like norms. I think with this point, it would be counterproductive to have outright bans on things that people don't even fully understand what th... more Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (15)Rich WilsonCEO of Iswe Foundation; co-founder of the Global Citizens' Assembly; founder of Involvevotes For and says:A citizens' assembly brings together a group of everyday people, selected by lottery, to reflect the wider population, to learn, deliberate and make recommendations on major public issues. [...] Later this year, discussions on Artificial Intelligence... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Kevin T. FrazierLaw professor; AI litigation scholarvotes Against and says:Increasingly complex AI cases require juries of experts and professional peers rather than a random selection of citizens. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
41 opinions
For (32)Sayash KapoorComputer science Ph.D. candidate at Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy; co-author of AI Snake Oil; author of the AI as Normal Technology newsletter; 2025-2026 Jacobus Fellowvotes For and says:Surprisingly, even though the lack of reliability of AI agents is well known, right now the AI industry doesn't have good tools for measuring reliability, or even a good definition of reliability. [...] For autonomous operation in high-stakes context... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Mikey DickersonFounding administrator of the U.S. Digital Service; crisis engineer at Layer Alephvotes Against and says:A "human in the loop" whose sole function is to approve a machine's actions is not a safeguard but a design failure. [...] In high-stakes environments, the illusion of human oversight is worse than no oversight at all. It creates confidence without c... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.