We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What's new in AI governance, safety, jobs and society
Follow the latest sourced positions from experts, policymakers and public figures.
Want to see how articles and videos change minds? Check out Reconsider.
Explore, search or download the 8552 sourced positions from Yoshua Bengio, Demis Hassabis, Andrew Ng, Pope Leo XIV, and others.
-
Today
3 -
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:
Companies offering such models will need a liability framework, perhaps a new one for AI training.
AI Verified source (Oct 6, 2026)Sam Altman · statements & votes- For Slow down AI development (Sep 12, 2026)
- For AI labs should give independent evaluators employee-like access (Sep 12, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Jul 30, 2026)
- For Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed (Jul 30, 2026)
- Against AI will create a permanent underclass (Jul 26, 2026)
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
539 opinions
Tamaghn KasibhattaAI Product Manager at NxtGen Cloud Technologies, working on enterprise AI infrastructure and governance.votes For and says:An agent that can reconcile invoices, route support tickets or prepare a management report may save time with less risk. The same agent should not be allowed to approve a large payment, change a production system, make a hiring decision or send an ex...
more AI Verified source (Oct 6, 2026) -
Kate GilchristHead of Content Legal and Legal Operations at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC).votes Against and says:
An opt-out system as proposed by AI companies places burdens and costs on rights holders, as it would require ongoing surveillance to see whether copyright material is being used. We cannot scour the internet and ensure we are opting out on all of th...
more AI Verified source (Oct 6, 2026) -
Yesterday
4 -
Slow down AI development
153 opinions
votes For and says:I don’t know — I also don’t think it matters whether it’s 1% or 10% or 20% chance that something catastrophic will go wrong. None of these levels is remotely acceptable. We should not train models that we cannot make an extremely strong case that we ...
more AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026) -
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
74 opinions
Ben GoertzelSingularityNET founder; AGI researchervotes For and says:For a long time many of us thought of RSI as the way AGI turns into superintelligence. [...] I was advocating what I called a semi-hard takeoff: a period where the self-improvement was real but not that fast, followed by a point -- once the AGI fully...
more AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026)Ben Goertzel · statements & votes- For AI alignment is solvable (2023)
- For Build artificial general intelligence (Dec 4, 2018)
-
Alexander YenOxford DPhil candidate in International Relations and founding convenor of the Oxford China Research Group, researching Chinese foreign policy, strategic competition, and AI geopolitics.votes For and says:
Australia and the US’s Western allies face an incentive and opportunity structure that may promote, and enable, the less instead of the more destructive options. [...] A government that believes access to American frontier models will remain availabl...
more AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026) -
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
181 opinions
Gabe FirmentLouisiana state representative for District 22 and candidate for U.S. Congress.votes Against and says:We do need to have some safeguards in place to make sure there are no unintended consequences, but, no, I do not think AI is going to imperil human existence.
AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026) -
Last week
8 -
AI will create a permanent underclass
223 opinions
Arielle PardesAward-winning technology journalist covering artificial intelligence and its social impacts.votes For and says:There’s a common fear among people who work in Silicon Valley: snag one of the fast-growing, high-paying jobs in artificial intelligence, or get trapped in the “permanent underclass”, a phrase describing the fate of those who won’t have upward mobili...
more AI Verified source (Oct 4, 2026) -
Hannah CritchlowBritish neuroscientist, author, broadcaster, and science communicator based at the University of Cambridge.votes For and says:
We need to pause all of the research on this, we need to pause all of the application of AI and just sit down and have a proper think about where this is going, where we want it to go, and how we want it to happen and how we want it to be regulated. ...
more AI Verified source (Oct 4, 2026) -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
508 opinions
Jeffrey C. DixonProfessor of Sociology at the College of the Holy Cross who researches AI and work.abstains and says:Do artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT eliminate jobs, create new ones, or both? There’s a lot of speculation regarding this question, but little solid data in the U.S. to answer it.
AI Verified source (Oct 4, 2026) -
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
120 opinions
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezU.S. Representative for New York's 14th congressional district; lead sponsor of the DEFIANCE Actvotes For and says:Across the country, Big Tech companies like Flock Safety have built a mass surveillance system to harvest Americans’ private and personal data without their consent. AI-powered cameras are keeping track of our every move and weaponizing this data aga...
more AI Verified source (Oct 2, 2026)Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez · statements & votes- For Ban governments from using AI to conduct mass surveillance of citizens (Oct 2, 2026)
- For Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed (Jun 24, 2026)
- For AI poses an existential threat to humanity (Mar 25, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Mar 25, 2026)
-
Alexandria Ocasio-CortezU.S. Representative for New York's 14th congressional district; lead sponsor of the DEFIANCE Actvotes For and says:
Across the country, Big Tech companies like Flock Safety have built a mass surveillance system to harvest Americans’ private and personal data without their consent. AI-powered cameras are keeping track of our every move and weaponizing this data aga...
more AI Verified source (Oct 2, 2026)Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez · statements & votes- For Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (Oct 2, 2026)
- For Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed (Jun 24, 2026)
- For AI poses an existential threat to humanity (Mar 25, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Mar 25, 2026)
-
Vinod KhoslaVenture capitalist; Khosla Ventures foundervotes For and says:
The most interesting risk in AI is not the OpenAI and Anthropic models. It's open-source models. They're way more dangerous because they can't be monitored.
AI Verified source (Oct 1, 2026)Vinod Khosla · statements & votes- Against Slow down AI development (Sep 21, 2026)
- For Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy (Mar 24, 2026)
- For Build artificial general intelligence (Feb 20, 2026)
- Against Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains (2026)
- Against Ban autonomous lethal weapons (2026)
-
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
220 opinions
V. Ramgopal RaoIndian nanoelectronics researcher, IEEE Fellow, and Vice-Chancellor of BITS Pilani.votes For and says:Independent audits could help, but there needed to be clarity over who selects auditors, what standards they use, how much access they receive and whether findings are made public. [...] Some of these voluntary commitments would eventually need statu...
more AI Verified source (Oct 1, 2026) -
Marius HobbhahnCEO and co-founder of Apollo Research; AI safety researcher specializing in scheming and pre-deployment evaluations of frontier AI systemsvotes For and says:
Require independent embedded evaluations to close the internal deployment gap. Qualified independent third parties should test models throughout development and internal use, with employee-equivalent access.
AI Verified source (Sep 30, 2026)Marius Hobbhahn · statements & votes- For Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems (Sep 1, 2026)
- For We should adopt AI 2040 Plan A (Jul 11, 2026)
- For The U.S. and China should establish Mutually Assured Compute Destruction (Jul 11, 2026)