We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress Polls
Expert and Citizen Preferences on AI Governance
Sourced quotes and a participation layer keep expert and citizen preferences in plain view.
-
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
54 opinions
For (46)Aza RaskinCo-founder, Center for Humane Technologyvotes For and says:The race to attention becomes the race to intimacy. There is massive market incentive to have your company's AI occupy the chief intimate relational spot in someone's life, especially kids. [...] Any moment that you spend talking with your friends or... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (8)Morgan WilsmannPublic Knowledge policy advocatevotes Against and says:Although age restrictions on chatbots designed for erotic or intimate interactions likely meet the “obscene for children” standard from Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, we oppose wide-ranging age restrictions, as they could hinder both children and a... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (27)Neil deGrasse TysonAstrophysicist, author, science communicatorvotes For and says:That branch of AI is lethal. We've got to do something about that. Nobody should build it. And everyone needs to agree to that by treaty. Treaties are not perfect, but they are the best we have as humans. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (16)Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes Against and says:The idea of stopping or even substantially slowing the technology is fundamentally untenable. If one company does not build it, others will do so nearly as fast. [...] Even if all Western companies stopped their work on AI, authoritarian countries wo... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
66 opinions
For (35)Marc AndreessenGeneral Partner at a16z (VC), co-founder of Netscapevotes For and says:Everybody wants to talk about job loss, but really what you want to look at is task loss. The job persists longer than the individual tasks. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Pascual RestrepoYale economist; Associate Professor studying automation, AI, and labor markets; frequent collaborator with Nobel laureate Daron Acemogluabstains and says:People have the wrong intuition when they say that if AI can do my job for ten dollars an hour, then my wage falls to ten dollars and my life is terrible. A world where AI can do research or teaching at that cost is a world where AI is extremely capa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (28)Mitchell H. KatzPresident and CEO of NYC Health + Hospitals, America's largest public hospital systemvotes Against and says:We could replace a great deal of radiologists with AI at this moment, if we are ready to do the regulatory challenge. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (26)Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:There are some digital products (say CSAM and AI letting terrorists make bioweapons) that I oppose regardless of whether they are open-source or not, but I'm overall supportive of open source, and you can easily verify that my MIT research group defa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (5)Jonas B. SandbrinkBiosecurity researcher, University of Oxfordabstains and says:LLMs, such as GPT-4 and its successors, might provide dual-use information and thus remove some barriers encountered by historical biological weapons efforts. [...] BDTs may enable the creation of pandemic pathogens substantially worse than anything ... more Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (14)Tal FeldmanLawfare contributorvotes Against and says:Since computational infrastructure is largely open-access, decentralized, and global, regulatory chokepoints are limited. Export controls may delay access to high-performance computing, but they are unlikely to prevent the use of open-source models f... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (33)Marc BenioffCEO and co-founder of Salesforcevotes For and says:They love Section 230, which basically says they're not responsible. If this large language model coaches this child into suicide, they're not responsible because of Section 230. That's probably something that needs to get reshaped, shifted, changed. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Matt SchruersTech policy advocate; CCIA presidentvotes Against and says:This [...] legislation could [...] subjecting [...] to lawsuits [...]. The bill is overly broad [...] subject to litigation. [...] could subject online services to costly [...] lawsuits. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
56 opinions
For (34)Stuart J. RussellAI Expert and Professorvotes For and says:For governments to allow private entities to essentially play Russian roulette with every human being on earth is, in my view, a total dereliction of duty. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (22)Jensen HuangNvidia cofounder and CEOvotes Against and says:When 90% of the messaging is all around the end of the world and the pessimism...we're scaring people from making the investments in AI. It's not helpful. It's not helpful to people. It's not helpful to the industry. It's not helpful to society. It's... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
19 opinions
For (16)Tom SteyerBillionaire investor, climate activist, and 2026 California gubernatorial candidate; founder of Farallon Capital and NextGen Americavotes For and says:This is a technology which basically enables a computer to replace the thought of millions of people and then delivers their salaries to the person who owns the computer. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:Capitalism has also depended on somewhat of a power balance between labor and capital, but if it's hard in many of our current jobs to outwork a GPU, then that changes. [...] If there was an easy consensus answer, we'd have done it by now, so I don't... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (2)Anton KorinekEconomist at University of Virginia and Brookings Institution; researcher on AI economics and public financevotes Against and says:As labor income taxation becomes less viable, the primary lesson is that consumption taxation must carry more fiscal weight. This shift aligns naturally with pro-innovation policies, as consumption taxes avoid penalizing the capital investments essen... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
36 opinions
For (27)Caitlin KalinowskiFormer head of robotics at OpenAI; previously led Meta's Orion AR glasses and Oculus VR hardwarevotes For and says:surveillance of Americans without judicial oversight and lethal autonomy without human authorization are lines that deserved more deliberation than they got. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Mikey DickersonFounding administrator of the U.S. Digital Service; crisis engineer at Layer Alephvotes Against and says:A "human in the loop" whose sole function is to approve a machine's actions is not a safeguard but a design failure. [...] In high-stakes environments, the illusion of human oversight is worse than no oversight at all. It creates confidence without c... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (19)Narendra ModiPrime Minister of Indiavotes For and says:Deepfake and fabricated content are bringing instability in open societies. In the physical world we see nutrition labels on food to inform our decisions. Likewise, authenticity labels should accompany digital content so that people know what is AI g... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Institute for Free SpeechFirst Amendment advocacy nonprofitvotes Against and says:While there are many problems with this proposal, a few stand above the others and are fatal to this effort. First, the Commission lacks statutory authority to require disclosure or disclaimers on political advertisements that utilize “artificial int... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (29)Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (8)Alex AyalaMilwaukee Police Association presidentvotes Against and says:It causes a lot of cases to get solved. It’s another tool we’re now not going to have. That facial recognition can potentially solve homicides, [...] Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (39)Chris PainterPolicy Director at METR (Model Evaluation & Threat Research); works on frontier AI safety evaluations and third-party risk assessmentvotes For and says:I like the emphasis on transparent risk reporting and publicly verifiable safety roadmaps [but am] concerned that moving away from binary thresholds might enable a "frog-boiling" effect, where danger slowly ramps up without a single moment that sets ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Neil ChilsonAI policy head, Abundance Institutevotes Against and says:Those compliance costs are merely the beginning. The bill, if passed, would feed California regulators truckloads of company information that they will use to design a compliance industrial complex. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (14)Elham TabassiDirector of the AI and Emerging Technology Initiative at the Brookings Institution; former Chief AI Advisor at NIST and CTO of the U.S. AI Safety Institutevotes For and says:Most risk management or governance looks at pre-deployment. But the majority of incidents we have to worry about cannot be reliably predicted before deployment. [...] We need standardised definitions of incidents and accidents. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:If you have to report to 50 different state regulators at 50 different times with 50 different definitions, it's extremely onerous. And it's going to slow down innovation, and it's going to hinder our progress in the AI race. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (40)Dick DurbinU.S. Senator; Senate Democratic Whipvotes For and says:I rise today to ask the Senate to pass the DEFIANCE Act — bipartisan legislation that gives victims of nonconsensual, sexually-explicit deepfakes the tools they need to fight back against those who exploit them. Imagine losing control over your own l... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Brian McMillanCCIA VP for Federal Affairsvotes Against and says:Without provisions that allow for fair use and free expression online, this legislation would dramatically change the internet. Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
20 opinions
For (15)Brian SchatzU.S. Senator (D–Hawaii)votes For and says:Embracing the amazing possibilities of AI can't come at the cost of leaving Americans vulnerable to its profound risks, which is exactly what President Trump and Republicans are trying to do. Preventing states from enacting common-sense regulation th... more Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Daniel CastroDirector, Center for Data Innovationvotes Against and says:The United States cannot remain competitive if developers, businesses, and users face fifty different legal regimes governing a general-purpose technology. [...] Congress should take this recommendation seriously and establish a light-touch national ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
35 opinions
For (30)Demis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindvotes For and says:It's very important that we have international summits like this to discuss how to make sure the opportunities benefit the whole world and how we can mitigate the risks. [...] It is becoming an incredibly important convening point for international d... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Yuval Noah HarariIsraeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalemvotes Against and says:With nuclear weapons, [...] they can't [...] in secret, but with developing new types of AI, it's much easier [...] So it's not enough to have an agreement. Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.