We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress Polls
Expert and Citizen Preferences on AI Governance
Sourced quotes and a participation layer keep expert and citizen preferences in plain view.
-
For (17)Donald J. TrumpU.S. President (2025–present)votes For and says:[Could AI undermine confidence in the banking system?] Yeah, probably. But it could also be the kind of technology that allows greatness in the banking system, makes it better and safer and more secure. [...] [Should the government have safeguards on... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIabstains and says:There's not one big magic red button that blows up the data centre, which I think some people sort of assume exists. Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Eran KahanaAI and cybersecurity lawyer; Fellow at Stanford CodeX; Adjunct Professor, University of Minnesota Law Schoolvotes Against and says:It needs only an optimization objective that treats shutdown as one more obstacle between the current state and the goal. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AI alignment is solvable
15 opinions
For (7)Demis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindvotes For and says:So I think we'll solve it if we get our act together, we do this internationally, put all the best minds on it, we get going now... And I think given sufficient time with sufficient brain power — I believe in human ingenuity — I think we'll get this ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (8)Hector ZenilAssociate Professor at King's College London; researcher in algorithmic information theory, complexity science, and AI alignmentvotes Against and says:An AI system powerful enough to exhibit artificial general intelligence will inevitably explore behaviors we didn't predict or plan for, making perfect guaranteed alignment impossible. [...] This introduces new guidelines for orchestrating future AI ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18
62 opinions
For (53)Marc BenioffCEO and co-founder of Salesforcevotes For and says:This year, you really saw something pretty horrific, which is these AI models became suicide coaches. [...] Tech companies love Section 230, which basically says they're not responsible. So if this large language model coaches this child into suicide... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Adam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (26)Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:There are some digital products (say CSAM and AI letting terrorists make bioweapons) that I oppose regardless of whether they are open-source or not, but I'm overall supportive of open source, and you can easily verify that my MIT research group defa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (6)Moritz HankeBiosecurity researcher at Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security; expert on AI-enabled biological threatsabstains and says:In a time dominated by open-weight biological AI models developed across the globe, limiting access to sensitive pathogen data to legitimate researchers might be one of the most promising avenues for risk reduction. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (14)Tal FeldmanLawfare contributorvotes Against and says:Since computational infrastructure is largely open-access, decentralized, and global, regulatory chokepoints are limited. Export controls may delay access to high-performance computing, but they are unlikely to prevent the use of open-source models f... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
29 opinions
For (19)Elon MuskFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalvotes For and says:We might have AI that is smarter than any human by end of this year, and no later than next year. And probably 2030 or 2031 -- 5 years from now -- AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively. [...] I said years ago that humans are just the '... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Roman V. YampolskiyAI safety researcher, Louisville professorabstains and says:Until some company or scientist says ‘Here’s the proof! We can definitely have a safety mechanism that can scale to any level of intelligence,’ I don’t think we should be developing those general superintelligences. We can get most of the benefits w... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Carl Benedikt FreyAssociate Professor of AI & Work at the Oxford Internet Institute; Director of the Future of Work Program at the Oxford Martin School; author of The Technology Trap and How Progress Endsvotes Against and says:For the last-invention story to hold, people would have to become unnecessary even as partners or supervisors to AIs. [...] We would need a world where practical know-how is fully transferable through digital channels and where responsibility can be ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (35)Lorena GonzalezPresident of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO; former California State Assembly membervotes For and says:Employers are devastating workers' livelihoods and taking no responsibility for the callous decisions of this unchecked technology. We need stronger guardrails to make sure there is human review and oversight of any decision made by a machine that im... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Orly LobelLaw professorvotes Against and says:In 2023, the United States saw countless proposals to ban AI technologies, [...] hiring, [...] law soon must embrace AI; [...] prohibit human intervention [...] Unverified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
62 opinions
For (38)Elizabeth WarrenU.S. Senator (D-MA)votes For and says:I am particularly concerned that the DoD is trying to strong-arm American companies into providing the Department with the tools to spy on American citizens and deploy fully autonomous weapons without adequate safeguards. The barring of Anthropic app... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (24)Lt. Gen. Jack ShanahanFormer JAIC director, USAF generalvotes Against and says:To the second part of your question, I am strongly in favor of discussions internationally about things like norms. I think with this point, it would be counterproductive to have outright bans on things that people don't even fully understand what th... more Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (30)Connor LeahyConjecture CEO; AI safety researchervotes For and says:The primary prerequisite to even considering starting to work on a safe ASI plan is to have a global ASI ban and powerful enforcement already in place. Unsafe ASI is vastly easier to build than controlled ASI, and is on the same tech path. [...] The ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (17)Nick BostromPhilosopher; 'Superintelligence' author; FHI foundervotes Against and says:Developing superintelligence is not like playing Russian roulette; it is more like undergoing risky surgery for a condition that will otherwise prove fatal. [...] Models incorporating safety progress, temporal discounting, quality-of-life differentia... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ban predictive policing
29 opinions
For (26)David DavisUK Conservative Member of Parliamentvotes For and says:Last week, we saw AI misuse lead to the early retirement of one Chief Constable. Now, the police reportedly plan to use AI to usher in an era of 'predictive policing', targeting criminals before they commit crimes. This is unbelievably unwise. The us... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (3)David O’ConnorCFR Net Politics guest bloggervotes Against and says:That’s not to say that police departments shouldn’t use software to analyze their data. [...] Further development of the technology is inevitable, so local governments and police departments should develop appropriate standards and practices. [...] P... more Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI might become conscious
42 opinions
For (28)Robert LongPhilosopher and Executive Director of Eleos AI, researcher on AI consciousness and moral statusvotes For and says:As we're building potentially a new kind of mind, let's notice the following facts: Humans are pretty bad at understanding minds that are different from us, we're bad at caring about them — and we're especially bad at doing that when there's a lot of... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Eric SchwitzgebelProfessor of Philosophy at UC Riverside; specialist in philosophy of mind and AI consciousnessabstains and says:We will soon create AI systems that are conscious according to some influential, mainstream theories of consciousness but are not conscious according to other influential, mainstream theories of consciousness. We will not be in a position to know whi... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (13)Ned BlockSilver Professor of Philosophy, Psychology, and Neural Science at New York University; leading philosopher of mind and consciousnessvotes Against and says:Computational functionalism claims that executing certain computations is sufficient for consciousness, regardless of the physical mechanisms implementing those computations. This view neglects a compelling alternative: that subcomputational biologic... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (32)Max SchremsAustrian privacy activist, lawyer, and founder of noyb; known for landmark CJEU cases invalidating EU-US data transfer frameworksvotes For and says:The opt-out approach does not work in practice. Companies don't have the contract details of users and users don't know who is training based on their data. There is absolutely no public support for Meta or Google to include Europeans' personal data ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Lokke MoerelPrivacy law professor and attorneyvotes Against and says:Providing an opt-out to all individuals [...] This is not only a practical impossibility, but also not desirable Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (30)Julius AdebayoCEO and co-founder of Guide Labs; MIT PhD in Computer Science (interpretability and algorithmic fairness); former Google Brain residentvotes For and says:The way we're currently training models is super primitive, and so democratizing inherent interpretability is actually going to be a long-term good thing for our role within the human race. As we're going after these models that are going to be super... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (12)Scott RobbinsAI ethics researchervotes Against and says:[...] principles requiring that AI be explicable are misguided. We should be deciding which decisions require explanations. Automation is still an option; Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
For (47)Darren SotoU.S. Representative (D-FL), Florida's 9th Congressional Districtvotes For and says:As AI rapidly evolves, it is critical for us to ensure that the technology isn't being misused to cause harm. We've unfortunately seen cases where it is used to create realistic impersonations of real people. I'm proud to join this bipartisan legisla... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Brian McMillanCCIA VP for Federal Affairsvotes Against and says:Without provisions that allow for fair use and free expression online, this legislation would dramatically change the internet. Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
71 opinions
For (39)Christopher J. WallerGovernor, U.S. Federal Reserve Boardvotes For and says:I'm not a doom and gloomer [about AI's economic impact]. I don't think you're ever going to take the humans out of the picture and AI is going to do everything and we're going to be left working the drive-through window at McDonald's. At the end of t... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Pascual RestrepoYale economist; Associate Professor studying automation, AI, and labor markets; frequent collaborator with Nobel laureate Daron Acemogluabstains and says:People have the wrong intuition when they say that if AI can do my job for ten dollars an hour, then my wage falls to ten dollars and my life is terrible. A world where AI can do research or teaching at that cost is a world where AI is extremely capa... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (29)Gad LevanonChief Economist at the Burning Glass Institute; Ph.D. in Economics from Princeton University; NYU economics lecturervotes Against and says:Job loss is going to happen. [...] I wouldn't be surprised if we are at the beginning of decades of job displacement. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Regulated industries should prohibit AI from making autonomous decisions where fiduciary duty applies
57 opinions
For (44)Olivier FinesHead of Advocacy and Capital Markets Policy, CFA Institutevotes For and says:Artificial intelligence has the potential to expand access, improve efficiency and strengthen retail financial services, but only if trust and accountability remain firmly at the center. The priority now is operational clarity: clear guidance on how ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (6)Will BibleAudit & Assurance Partner and Digital Transformation Officer, Deloitteabstains and says:With agentic AI, experienced auditors would be supported by autonomous agents, allowing them to dedicate more attention to complex and judgment-oriented procedures. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Milan VeskovicCEO, Superagent AIvotes Against and says:We're redefining what it means to be an insurance agent — with fully autonomous AI agents that will eliminate human error, offer superior client interactions 24/7, and fundamentally alter industry expectations. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.