We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
What's new in AI governance, safety, jobs and society
Follow the latest sourced positions from experts, policymakers and public figures.
Explore or search the 7820 sourced positions from Yoshua Bengio, Demis Hassabis, Andrew Ng, Pope Leo XIV, and more.
Quote date
Added
-
Yesterday
2 -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
495 opinions
Sean HigginsResearch fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute specializing in labor and employment issues.votes For and says:Such concerns are not only overblown but may also have things backwards. It is just as likely that AI will lead to employment gains. [...] The benefit new technology brings is greater production. It requires workers with different skill sets, but not...
more AI Verified source (Aug 31, 2026) -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
192 opinions
Australia’s Data and Digital MinistersAustralian federal, state, and territory ministers responsible for data and digital policy.votes For and says:The following practices are mapped to Australia’s 8 AI Ethics Principles, demonstrating how governments can practically apply them to their assurance of AI. [...] Governments should identify and consult with stakeholders, including subject matter and...
more AI Verified source (Aug 31, 2026)Australia’s Data and Digital Ministers · statements & votes -
Last week
8 -
Liam ByrneUK Labour Member of Parliament for Birmingham Hodge Hill and Solihull North; writer on AI, economic policy, and public wealth.votes For and says:
The proceeds - cash, shares, warrants, royalties and other assets - should then flow into the National AI Dividend Fund. [...] The dividends from this fund should then capitalise new universal savings accounts for every young person.
AI Verified source (Aug 30, 2026)Liam Byrne · statements & votes -
Loss of Control ObservatoryAI-safety observatory operated by the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, tracking reported real-world AI loss-of-control incidents.votes For and says:
It is calling on the government to require AI companies to monitor and report severe loss of control incidents and to introduce emergency powers to manage severe loss of control incidents including temporarily restricting AI services.
AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026) -
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
107 opinions
Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:We must come together to stop Flock and AI mass surveillance. That is why I will soon be introducing legislation to do just that.
AI Verified source (Aug 28, 2026)Bernie Sanders · statements & votes- For Ban governments from using AI to conduct mass surveillance of citizens (Aug 26, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Aug 10, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Aug 10, 2026)
- For A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits (Jun 22, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jun 22, 2026)
-
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
154 opinions
Rogé KarmaStaff writer at The Atlantic covering economics, technology, and public policy.votes For and says:What humanity needs is an international AI nonproliferation treaty.
AI Verified source (Aug 27, 2026)Rogé Karma · statements & votes- For A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits (Jul 2, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a global trust that pays a dividend to every person on Earth (Jul 2, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jul 2, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (Jul 2, 2026)
- Abstain AI will create a permanent underclass (Jul 2, 2026)
-
Alan WoodwardResearcher and co-author of a 2026 paper on frontier-AI export controls and national AI sovereignty.votes For and says:
Government should be pressing Washington for published criteria before access is restricted, advance warning and exemptions for allies, as we already handle security of supply in energy and defense. At home, it should require critical infrastructure ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 27, 2026) -
Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:
We cannot allow America to become a surveillance state where a handful of AI oligarchs profit by giving the government the power to track our every movement.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)Bernie Sanders · statements & votes- For Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance (Aug 28, 2026)
- For Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached (Aug 10, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Aug 10, 2026)
- For A nation should fund a citizens' dividend from AI windfall profits (Jun 22, 2026)
- For Frontier AI labs should be required to contribute a share of their equity to a national fund that pays a dividend to every citizen (Jun 22, 2026)
-
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
83 opinions
Bill GatesPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.votes For and says:I believe we should tax AI tokens and robots. [...] The tax system nudges you toward replacing people with machines.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)Bill Gates · statements & votes- Against AI will create more jobs than it destroys (Aug 26, 2026)
- For The economic gains from frontier AI should be shared with every person on Earth (Jan 9, 2026)
- For Ban open source AI models capable of creating WMDs (2026)
- For AGI will create abundance (2026)
- Against Implement a universal basic income (2017)
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
523 opinions
Australia’s Data and Digital MinistersAustralian federal, state, and territory ministers responsible for data and digital policy.votes For and says:Those responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and accountable for the outcomes of the AI systems, and human oversight of AI systems should be enabled.
AI Verified source (Aug 25, 2026)Australia’s Data and Digital Ministers · statements & votes -
Last month
5 -
Build artificial general intelligence
55 opinions
Daron AcemogluNobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progressvotes Against and says:Many leading companies are engaged in a single-minded pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI). [...] Rather than racing to replace people, we should build AI tools that amplify human expertise and expand opportunity.
AI Verified source (Aug 21, 2026)Daron Acemoglu · statements & votes- For Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy (Jul 28, 2026)
- Against AI will create more jobs than it destroys (Jul 15, 2026)
- For Pausing AI at human-genius level to solve alignment is safer than either racing to superintelligence or halting entirely (Mar 27, 2026)
- For AI will create a permanent underclass (2026)
- For AGI could make governments subordinate to the companies that develop it (2026)
-
Toby WPrincipal Security Architect at the UK National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC).votes For and says:
If an incident is detected or reported, you should always be able to ‘pull the plug’ and halt autonomous AI agent activity immediately.
AI Verified source (Aug 20, 2026) -
Ryu Je-myungSecond Vice Minister of Science and ICT of South Korea.votes For and says:
About 1,400 citizens applied, and we randomly selected 200 of them to participate as members of the evaluation panel. [...] Ultimately, 185 citizens participated.
AI Verified source (Aug 19, 2026) -
AI alignment is solvable
63 opinions
votes For and says: -
Federal Communications CommissionU.S. communications regulatorvotes For and says:
The Federal Communications Commission initiated this proceeding to protect consumer from unwanted AI-generated calls while ensuring that our rules do not hinder the potential benefits that AI can offer, including making telecommunications more readil...
more AI Verified source (Aug 14, 2026)