We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
YouCongress - Expert and Citizen Preferences
Expert and Citizen Preferences
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances make public reasoning easier to inspect, reuse and improve.
6296 sourced quotes ¡ 80 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
62 opinions
For (62)Added 1h agoThe White HouseExecutive office of U.S. presidentvotes For and says:GOLD EAGLE, established in President Trumpâs June 2, 2026 Executive Order âPromoting Advanced Artificial Intelligence Innovation and Securityâ (EO 14409), represents a new operational model for cyber defense. This new model will leverage frontier AI ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (32)Added 2h agoMark BeallPresident of Government Affairs at the AI Policy Network.votes For and says:
When AI researchers warn of extinction and tech leaders build doomsday bunkers, prudence demands we listen. Superintelligence without proper safeguards could be the ultimate expression of human hubrisâpower without moral restraint.
AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Added 15d agoAndrew CharltonAustralian Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economyvotes Against and says:Because the point of AI safety is not to slow the future down. It is to make sure the future remains human, aligned with our values, and advancing our interests.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (117)Added 3h agoFuture of Life InstituteNonprofit on existential risksvotes For and says:
The initiative calls for a prohibition on the development of superintelligence until the technology is reliably safe and controllable, and has public buy-in.
AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 16d agoBaroness Neville-JonesBritish Conservative life peer and former UK security minister.abstains and says:The question that the noble Lord posed was: do we therefore go for a moratorium? That would be highly desirable, but I do not think that it will be possible in the short term.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (27)Added 1d agoTakayuki MoritaPresident, CEO and Representative Director of NEC; technology executive.votes Against and says:What is needed is not to slow innovation but to harness it â to channel AIâs momentum toward outcomes that reinforce trust, safety and societal well-being.
AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nations should negotiate a binding international treaty on AI safety, similar to nuclear non-proliferation
115 opinions
For (102)Added 3h agoControlAICampaign to prohibit superintelligence developmentvotes For and says:We believe that in order to [avert extinction risks posed by superintelligent AI], we must secure an international prohibition on its development.
AI Verified source (Apr 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (13)Added 7d agoGovernment of AustraliaGovernment of Australia speaking through its delegate at the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes Against and says:A one-size-fits-all approach to AI governance will not be effective. We all face different risks, priorities, levels of digital development, and regulatory environments. Effective governance requires shared principles that can be implemented flexibly...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
56 opinions
For (49)Added 4h agoNate KratzerData Scientist at Meta.votes For and says:There are a lot of potentially good outcomes from AI. I think the most likely outcomes are good. But the risk of bad and even catastrophic outcomes is high enough to be worth taking seriously. We should actively build safety mechanisms in case we nee...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Added 1mo agoCory DoctorowAuthor and digital rights activistvotes Against and says:Throwing more words and GPUs into the word-guessing program won't make it sentient. [...] one of our mares gives birth to a locomotive.
AI Verified source (Dec 5, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (41)Added 4h agoDoreen Bogdan-MartinITU Secretary-Generalvotes For and says:
For AI to benefit all people, technology and international cooperation must move forward together.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)Added 15d agoDemis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindvotes Against and says:The time has come for a more systematic approach to AI regulation â funded by the industry, staffed by world-class technical experts, and answerable to the U.S. government.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI value alignment must be subject to public deliberation, not decided by developers alone
168 opinions
For (168)Added 7h agoAngel BrodinOpenAI employee and signatory to the July 2026 Pacing the Frontier statement.votes For and says:AI will reshape humanity, but its direction is not set in stone; it is ours to shape with the care and conviction that humanityâs future deserves.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
376 opinions
For (203)Added 11h agoOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)Intergovernmental organisation that develops evidence-based public policy standards and analysis.votes For and says:AI adoption has not yet resulted in widespread job loss but instead is associated with productivity gains and employment growth in high-exposure occupations.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (96)Added 11h agoSkills EnglandExecutive agency providing evidence and advice on Englandâs skills and labour-market needs.abstains and says:Artificial Intelligence (AI) is having a profound impact on the UK economy and labour market, but the speed of adoption and exactly how it will affect employment is still uncertain. AI is likely to automate or augment aspects of many occupations, cha...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (77)Added 21h agoRethinkXTechnology disruption think tank.votes Against and says:AI and humanoid robots break that logic because they are general-purpose. Yes, the disruption will create new jobs. The problem is that AI and robots will be able to do those new jobs too.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
175 opinions
For (157)Added 17h agoFathomIndependent nonprofit developing AI-governance and independent-verification frameworks.votes For and says:The bill gets the fundamentals correct. It sets one public standard â the adequate mitigation of catastrophic risk â and holds both the AI companies and their independent verifiers accountable to it.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (18)Added 6d agoNetChoiceOnline business trade associationvotes Against and says:This bill contains a critically flawed mandatory third-party audit requirement that creates an impossible compliance obligation on an unrealistic timeline.
AI Verified source (May 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
139 opinions
For (104)Added 17h agoZoe LofgrenU.S. Representative from California's 18th district; Ranking Member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committeevotes For and says:AI technology should not be making potentially lethal decisions without human involvement.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 16d agoCatherine ArdaghIrish Minister of State at the Department of Justice, Home Affairs and Migration.abstains and says:The Government strongly believes that there is a need to maintain meaningful human control of all weapons systems, including any systems that may be developed. Our position is that, for such systems to comply with international humanitarian law, cont...
more AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (35)Added 11d agoMichael J. BrodkaU.S. Army major and author writing on lethal autonomous weapon systems and military targeting.votes Against and says:Closing it requires redesigning Army doctrine, organizations, and training to integrate LAWS into targeting under lawful human-on-the-loop control.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
120 opinions
For (86)Added 1d agoJoe CarlsmithSenior research analyst at Open Philanthropy; writes on AI safety, alignment, and existential risk from power-seeking AIvotes For and says:Safety progress takes time. If you donât have enough time, at each stage of AI development, to ensure the AIs that you build in the next stage wonât destroy humanity, then youâll fail, and humanity will be destroyed.
AI Verified source (Mar 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Added 9mo agoTyler CowenProfessor of Economics, George Mason University & author of Average is Overabstains and says:So when people predict a high degree of existential risk from AGI, I donât actually think âarguing backâ on their chosen terms is the correct response. Radical agnosticism is the correct response, where all specific scenarios are pretty unlikely. Non...
more AI Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (33)Added 15d agoArthur MenschMistral AI co-founder and CEOvotes Against and says:Those extreme risks are still science fiction. So these speeches are largely diversions, very deliberately crafted.
AI Verified source (Feb 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AGI will create abundance
28 opinions
For (21)Added 11d agoLeandro MayaFinance professional, entrepreneur, and author of The Age of Abundance: AI and the Future of Work, Wealth, and Purpose.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 13d agoBernard MarrAuthor, futurist, and strategic business adviser writing about artificial intelligence and emerging technologies.abstains and says:AI could make goods and services cheaper than ever, raising hopes for a new age of abundance where scarcity plays a smaller role in human life.
AI Verified source (May 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Added 1d agoMichael B. HornCo-founder of the Clayton Christensen Institute; author and education researcher.votes Against and says:Using practical theories tested in the real world across different circumstancesâas opposed to opinions or analyses based on data that does not yet existâsuggests there may be important twists ahead that should lead us to question whether a âworld of...
more AI Verified source (Mar 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (44)Added 1d agoLiz KendallUK Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology; Labour MP for Leicester Westvotes For and says:
I believe Sovereign AI is going to be one of the most important things this government does to build a better future for our country.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (7)Added 15d agoMitchell RutledgePolicy Manager at CCIA Europe, a technology-industry trade association.votes Against and says:The EUâs ambition to triple data centre capacity is the right one. But the way to achieve that goal is by attracting investment, not shutting it out.
AI Verified source (Jun 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (20)Added 1d agoJoel N. ChristophAI governance commentator and World Economic Forum contributor.votes For and says:
A compute permit system would face its own challenges: defining which training runs qualify as high-stakes, preventing developers from fragmenting workloads to stay below thresholds, and ensuring that monitoring infrastructure does not become a tool ...
more AI Verified source (Feb 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Added 5mo agoMayer BrownInternational law firmabstains and says:According to the proposed rule, a covered US person will be required to provide quarterly reports to BIS if the US person âengages in, or plans, within six months, to engage in âapplicable activities.ââ âApplicable activitiesâ include: âConducting a...
more Disputed source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Added 15d agoKI BundesverbandGerman artificial-intelligence industry association representing AI companies and contributing to AI policy and regulatory consultations.votes Against and says:A regulatory trigger calibrated to compute volume does not measure what it purports to measure, and it was designed around a snapshot of model architecture that the industry has already moved beyond.
AI Verified source (Mar 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (77)Added 1d agoPhilip ReinerChief Executive Officer and co-founder of the Institute for Security and Technology.votes For and says:
Establishing a common definition of an âAI incidentâ could allow companies to report system failures anonymously through neutral platforms such as international research consortia. The goal would be not to share technology, but to understand failure ...
more AI Verified source (May 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Added 22d agoChris MeseroleExecutive Director of the Frontier Model Forum; AI policy expert and congressional witness on frontier AI security.votes Against and says:Rather than creating entirely new channels, policymakers should focus on ensuring that existing channels can effectively incorporate information related to frontier models and agents. Building on trusted relationships will be faster and more effectiv...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.