We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models
Cast your vote:
For (56)
-
Don BeyerU.S. Representative from Virginia's 8th district; co-sponsor of the GUARDRAILS Act on AIvotes For and says:[Trump's AI executive order] continues to allow companies to release powerful models to the public without undergoing meaningful evaluation or review. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Brendan SteinhauserCEO of The Alliance for Secure AI; longtime Republican political strategist and former Tea Party organizervotes For and says:We know that Big Tech will still try to cut corners on safety and security. [...] Lawmakers need to create a legal framework that makes federal government review of advanced AI models mandatory. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Steve BannonFormer White House Chief Strategist; conservative media figure and host of the War Room podcastvotes For and says:This letter takes us next level. The letter lays out [that] we must have mandatory testing and government approval. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Adam GleaveCEO and founder of FAR.AI; AI safety researcher; UC Berkeley PhD in AI alignment and reward-hackingvotes For and says:The central obstacle to AI safety coordination is not the absence of solutions but rather the absence of a standard: without a shared, legible definition of what makes an AI system safe, companies and governments have no basis for holding each other ... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gordon M. GoldsteinAdjunct senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author on technology and national securityvotes For and says:Industry leaders like Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Microsoft, and OpenAI—a strategic cohort that has been responsibly transparent and repeatedly explicit about the compounding AI crisis of control—must form a coalition of the willing to lead their ind... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jamie DimonChairman and CEO of JPMorgan Chasevotes For and says:The right thing [for] Dario and Anthropic [to do is] to lay it out, give people a chance to study it, understand the vulnerabilities, come up with plans so we can handle it. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Kevin HassettDirector of the U.S. National Economic Council; economist; former Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisersvotes For and says:We're studying, possibly an executive order to give a clear roadmap to everybody about how this is going to go and how future AIs that also potentially create vulnerabilities should go through a process so that they're released to the wild after they... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mariana Olaizola RosenblatPolicy Advisor on Technology and Law at the NYU Stern Center for Business and Human Rights; former Lecturer-in-Law at the University of Chicago Law Schoolvotes For and says:When the consequences of a single corporate decision can compromise the world's digital infrastructure, industry self-governance is not enough, and democratic governments must step in and regulate robustly. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gary MarcusProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencevotes For and says:The demo was definitely proof of concept that we need to get our regulatory and technical house in order, but not the immediate threat the media and public was lead to believe. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Helen TonerInterim Executive Director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET); former OpenAI board membervotes For and says:It's truly unprecedented the mismatch between how strategically important this technology is and how little involvement government has in developing it. [...] I think it is very important that the U.S. AI sector remains ahead of the Chinese AI sector... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Geoffrey HintonGodfather of Deep Learningvotes For and says:If you ever went out with a car that had no brake, boy, you are in trouble if you go down a hill. But you're in even more trouble if there's no steering wheel. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Marietje SchaakeStanford Cyber Policy Center; former MEP; UN AI Advisory Body member; author of The Tech Coupvotes For and says:[It is] concerning that models with far-reaching impact are controlled by a private company. [...] Now would be a good time to agree on disclosure rules and oversight mechanisms. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jade LeungChief Technology Officer of the UK AI Security Institute; Prime Minister's AI Adviser; previously led the Governance team at OpenAIvotes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Rumman ChowdhuryAI ethicist and Humane Intelligence CEOvotes For and says:The bill's requirement for independent, periodic third-party audits for high-risk AI systems is particularly important. The most meaningful improvements have come when evaluations are run by entities structurally independent of product and revenue te... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stuart J. RussellAI Expert and Professorvotes For and says:The creators of AI are saying, 'We are building a technology that will kill every single person on Earth with a 25% probability.' And governments are saying, 'Oh, go ahead, that's great.' AI Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yolanda GilResearch Professor at USC; co-chair of the Stanford HAI AI Index; Fellow of AAAI, ACM, IEEE; former AAAI president; National Science Board membervotes For and says:A lot of companies are not releasing how their models do in certain benchmarks, particularly the responsible-AI benchmarks. The absence of how your model is doing on a benchmark maybe says something. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Demis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindvotes For and says:It may be a good thing that [AI development is] not as fast. There's a whole bunch of other things that we need to think through with this technology [...] We don't have a lot of time to sort out before we get to [Artificial General Intelligence]. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Chris PainterPolicy Director at METR (Model Evaluation & Threat Research); works on frontier AI safety evaluations and third-party risk assessmentvotes For and says:I like the emphasis on transparent risk reporting and publicly verifiable safety roadmaps [but am] concerned that moving away from binary thresholds might enable a "frog-boiling" effect, where danger slowly ramps up without a single moment that sets ... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Tyler JohnstonFounder of the Midas Project, an AI safety watchdog nonprofit monitoring AI companies' compliance with safety commitmentsvotes For and says:This is especially embarrassing given how low the floor SB 53 sets is: basically just adopt a voluntary safety plan of your choice and communicate honestly about it, changing it as needed, but not violating or lying about it. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Narendra ModiPrime Minister of Indiavotes For and says:We need a glass box approach instead of a black box, where safety rules can be viewed and verified. Accountability will become clearer, and ethical behaviour in business will also be encouraged. [...] AI platforms must keep their safety rules clear a... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Miles BrundageAI policy researcher; founder of AVERI (AI Verification Initiative); former OpenAI Head of Policy Researchvotes For and says:Right now consumers, businesses, and governments simply have to trust what the AI labs say about these tests. No one is forcing them to conduct these evaluations or report them according to any particular set of standards. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:You never have to worry that some drug company is going to release some other drug that causes massive harm before people have figured out how to make it safe, because the FDA won't allow them to release anything until it's safe enough. [...] In the ... more AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michael WooldridgeOxford AI professor; multi-agent systems expertvotes For and says:It's the classic technology scenario. You've got a technology that's very, very promising, but not as rigorously tested as you would like it to be, and the commercial pressure behind it is unbearable. [...] The Hindenburg disaster destroyed global in... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:We're seeing AIs whose behavior, when they are tested, [...] is different from when they are being used. [This] significantly hampers our ability to correctly estimate risks. [...] The gap between the pace of technological advancement and our ability... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Anu BradfordColumbia Law School professor; author of The Brussels Effect and Digital Empiresvotes For and says:I am concerned about reforms being pushed further by corporate pressures, and about less resolute enforcement at a time when the AI race is heating up and geopolitical tensions are high. That combination increases the risk of irresponsible choices th... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Liv BoereeScience communicator and strategic adviser at the Center for AI Safety (CAIS)votes For and says:With its incredible power comes incredible risk, especially given the speed with which it is being developed and released. [...] We need to build a steering wheel, a brake, and all the other features of a car beyond just a gas pedal. AI Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:It is somewhat awkward to say this as the CEO of an AI company, but I think the next tier of risk is actually AI companies themselves. [...] AI companies control massive data centers, train the most advanced models, and possess unmatched expertise in... more AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Alex BoresNew York State Assemblymembervotes For and says:New York is poised to be the first government in the United States to do what Americans have been screaming for: require basic guardrails for AI safety. Developers have promised to keep us safe, and this bipartisan bill simply ensures that they keep ... more AI Verified source (2025) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Miles KodamaAI policy researchervotes For and says:Today, frontier AI developers have no legal obligation to disclose anything about their safety and security protocols to government, let alone to the public. When a company releases a new AI system more powerful than any system before, it is entirely... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Teri OlleDirector, Economic Security California Actionvotes For and says:Including safety and transparency protections recommended by Gov. Newsom’s AI commission in SB 53 is an opportunity for California to be on the right side of history and advance commonsense AI regulations while our national leaders dither, In additi... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Geoff RalstonFounder, Safe AI Fundvotes For and says:Artificial intelligence is one of the most powerful technologies ever developed, and it’s advancing at breakneck speed. Even industry leaders have warned of its potential risks. Ensuring AI is developed safely should not be controversial—it should be... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Economic Security Project ActionPolicy advocacy organizationvotes For and says:Building on the report’s “trust, but verify” approach, the amended bill requires the largest AI companies to publicly disclose their safety and security protocols and report the most critical safety incidents to the California Attorney General. The r... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Steven AdlerAI safety researcher; Lawfare writervotes For and says:Before a new model's release, Al companies commonly (though not always) run safety tests - and release the results in a "System Card." The idea is to see if the model has any extreme abilities (like strong cyberhacking), and then to take an appropri... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mark ReddishCenter for AI Policy researchervotes For and says:Requiring companies to publish risk management frameworks does not mean disclosing confidential or proprietary information that could compromise business interests or national security. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Miranda BogenDirector, AI Governance Lab (CDT)votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
OpenAIAI research organizationvotes For and says:The Safety Hub provides public access to safety evaluation results for our models. [...] evaluations of models under our Preparedness Framework prior to their deployment. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Chris LehaneOpenAI chief global affairs officervotes For and says:We also publicly share safety evaluations through our Preparedness Framework, which sets out how we measure, monitor, and mitigate large-scale risks. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Thomas WoodsideSecure AI Project co-foundervotes For and says:Those updates should include the results of evaluations for models that haven’t been publicly deployed yet, since those models could also pose serious risks. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Dean W. BallAI policy writervotes For and says:There is much to recommend these laws over the Nevada and Illinois bills I discussed above. Unlike those laws, SB 53 and RAISE are technically sophisticated, reflecting a clear understanding (for the most part) about what it is possible for AI develo... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Rebecca Bauer-KahanCalifornia State Assembly membervotes For and says:That is fundamentally the basis of this bill, is that they will be defining their own safety protocols. They will be making those public, and then they will have to follow them. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Office of Governor Kathy HochulNew York Governor's press officevotes For and says:Governor Kathy Hochul today signed legislation to require AI frameworks for AI frontier models, setting a nation-leading standard for AI transparency and safety. The agreed-upon chapter amendments to the RAISE Act (S6953B/A6453B) requires large AI de... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Office of Governor Gavin NewsomCalifornia Governor's Officevotes For and says:SB 53 establishes new requirements for frontier AI developers creating stronger: ✅ Transparency: Requires large frontier developers to publicly publish a framework on its website describing how the company has incorporated national standards, intern... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
New York State SenateState legislative chamber, New Yorkvotes For and says:The RAISE Act requires [...] frontier AI developers to write, implement, publish, and comply with plans [...] including how they assess the safety risks of their models. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew GounardesNew York State Senatorvotes For and says:It requires companies [...] to create and share [...] protocols before they deploy these models publicly. And then it requires [...] to complete an annual assessment [...]. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Encode AIAI policy advocacy nonprofitvotes For and says:They will require these companies to publish important information regarding their safety protocols and risk evaluations, and report major safety incidents to the Attorney General. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
AnthropicAI safety research companyvotes For and says:Release public transparency reports summarizing their catastrophic risk assessments and the steps taken to fulfill their respective frameworks before deploying powerful new models. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andreas StuhlmüllerCEO of Elicitvotes For and says:SB53's requirements for safety protocols and transparency reports are exactly what we need as AI becomes more powerful and widespread. AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Office of Senator Scott WienerOfficial office of CA State Senatorvotes For and says:help California develop workable guardrails for deploying GenAI [...] Companies will be required to publish their safety and security protocols and risk evaluations AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
California State LegislatureState legislative bodyvotes For and says:Before, or concurrently with, deploying a new frontier model [...] publish on its internet website a transparency report [...] summaries of [...] assessments of catastrophic risks. AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Peter KyleUK shadow technology secretary, Labourvotes For and says:[Companies] have to release all of the test data and tell us what they are testing for, so we can see exactly what is happening and where this technology is taking us. Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jack TitusAI policy writer at FASvotes For and says:For models with risk above the lowest level, both pre- and post-mitigation evaluation results and methods should be public, including any performed mitigations. AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Richard BlumenthalU.S. Senator from Connecticutvotes For and says:AI companies ought to be required to test their systems, disclose known risks, and allow independent researcher access. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:First, it is vital that AI companies–especially those working on the most powerful models–adhere to [...] testing prior to release and publication of evaluation results. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Partnership on AIAI governance nonprofit, multi-stakeholdervotes For and says:Disclose details such as testing methodologies, evaluation criteria, results, limitations, and gaps for any internal and external evaluations conducted prior to release. Unverified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ben BrooksHead of public policy, Stability AIvotes For and says:If necessary, we could require frontiers developers to obtain third-party evaluations prior to release, share their findings [...]. Unverified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Department for Science, Innovation and TechnologyUK government science departmentvotes For and says:Some of this information can be made available to the public by publishing a transparency report (such as a model card) and providing general overviews of model purpose and risk assessment evaluation results. Unverified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (8)
-
Jason OxmanPresident and CEO of the Information Technology Industry Council (ITI), a global tech industry trade associationvotes Against and says:The U.S. leads when it promotes innovation and security through voluntary frameworks rather than regulation. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:[The executive order] expressly forbids the creation of a new licensing, preclearance, or permitting regime. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Eric SchmidtFormer Google CEO; tech investorvotes Against and says:A [central] problem with regulating frontier AI models is that a new feature emerges in these systems that is not tested, testable. [...] As long as you have this new emergent power, you have deep reasoning, deep capabilities, and they will make mist... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Neil ChilsonAI policy head, Abundance Institutevotes Against and says:Those compliance costs are merely the beginning. The bill, if passed, would feed California regulators truckloads of company information that they will use to design a compliance industrial complex. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Chamber of ProgressTech industry policy associationvotes Against and says:we still have lingering concerns about how the bill [...] fails to protect trade secrets necessary to maintain competitiveness. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Paul LekasSIIA public policy executivevotes Against and says:These will require companies to publish detailed information and reports that could expose trade secrets and other sensitive information. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Frontier Model ForumFrontier AI industry forumvotes Against and says:[I]f the evaluation results indicate that a particular model has an exploitable vulnerability that may lead to a significant increase in biorisks, this information should not be published. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Aden HizkiasPolicy Manager, Chamber of Progressvotes Against and says:Chamber of Progress [...] opposes SB 53 [...] Developers must formally publish detailed security protocols and transparency reports at or before the time of deployment. AI Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-safety
votes