We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models
ai-risk
transparency
ai-safety
ai-regulation
regulations
research-policy
policy
ai-governance
ai-ethics
Cast your vote:
Results (137 votes):
Total
(137 votes)
For 127 (93%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 10 (7%)
·
For (124)
-
Owen LarterSenior Director of Frontier AI Policy and Global Affairs at Google DeepMind.votes For and says:
Frontier AI labs are in agreement on the need for rigorous testing before model releases.
AI Verified source (Jul 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Helen KingVice President of Responsibility at Google DeepMind.votes For and says:
If... we were to find that we were reaching a critical capability level and we didn't have the appropriate mitigations, then we would not be launching.
AI Verified source (Jul 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Chris LehaneOpenAI chief global affairs officervotes For and says:
A documented safety framework with risk assessments for frontier models and public disclosure of those assessments and their results.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew BaileyGovernor of the Bank of England.votes For and says:
We need much stronger co-ordination of testing of frontier models before they go into wide circulation. This needs to be co-ordinated internationally because no country can seal itself off from the cross-border nature of systems that are prevalent to...
more AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Demis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindvotes For and says:
Once the assessment protocol is shown to be effective and robust, formalisation could quickly follow, meaning that Frontier Models would be required to pass it to be deployed in the US market.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
MetaSocial media and AI companyvotes For and says:
We conducted extensive safety evaluations before deployment, following the Advanced AI Scaling Framework, which defines evaluations, threat models, and deployment thresholds for our most advanced models.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Charlie BullockSenior Research Fellow at the Institute for Law & AI, advising policymakers on AI governance and legal policy.votes For and says:
“Transparency,” in this context, means requiring frontier AI companies to publish frontier safety frameworks (documents describing how the company evaluates and addresses catastrophic risks from the company’s most advanced AI models) and model cards ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Anneliese DoddsUK Labour Member of Parliament for Oxford East; former Chair of the Labour Party.votes For and says:
New York, California, Illinois and the EU have moved towards approaches requiring mandatory assessment of frontier models, and we should too.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sam GregoryExecutive Director, WITNESSvotes For and says:
Both must rest on independent third-party oversight, trust verified by third parties, not asserted by the developers who profit from them.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Cooley LLPInternational law firm publishing analysis of AI regulation and technology policy.votes For and says:
Large frontier developers must also disclose summaries of catastrophic risk assessments, assessment results, involvement of third-party evaluators and other measures taken to comply with their Frontier AI Framework.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Carsten WildbergerGerman Federal Minister for Digital Transformation and Government Modernization.votes For and says:
Germany will also establish a national AI safety and security institute anchored in cutting-edge research and plugged into European and international networks. Its job is to evaluate advanced AI systems and advise government in international collabor...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Xinchen Hua LuUN AI panel member and researcher at CSIRO Australia.votes For and says:
The AI system should be evaluated through the system lifecycle, including during the training stage or after the training, before deployment or post-deployment through the monitoring stage.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sima BahousExecutive Director of UN Women.votes For and says:
So just as we would never release food or medicine or aircraft or vehicle or electrical products for use without rigorous oversight, AI should not be deployed without mandatory safeguards to ensure it is safe, accountable, and does not cause harm for...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Zachary LampellSenior Legal Advisor and Coordinator of the Digital Rights Program at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.votes For and says:
Multilateral and multi-stakeholder bodies create a certification system based on embedded safety constraints at the design stage. National procurement laws and regulations then are linked to that certification process, which ensures basic standards o...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sasha LuccioniCo-founder and Chief Scientific Officer of the Sustainable AI Group; AI researcher.votes For and says:
I think that it's really important to keep imposing safeguards and standards as well. We should be having standards for safety, sustainability at each part of this machine, no matter how many there are and no matter how easy it is to say, well, the a...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Shumaila Hussaini ShahaniPolicy and advocacy lead at Tech Global Institute.votes For and says:
We call for publicly financed, regionally hosted capacity to evaluate AI systems before they are deployed, and open benchmarks built with and for under-resourced languages, so oversight is not outsourced to the same few actors it is meant to oversee.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Volker TürkUN human rights chiefvotes For and says:
Human rights due diligence and impact assessments of AI systems are essential.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Wonjin ParkVice President of KT, speaking on AI risk assessment and deployment safeguards.votes For and says:
We evaluate our AI models and agents based on that, and we run an executive deployment safety board before release AI product. We publish the result in a technical report.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew CharltonAustralian Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economyvotes For and says:
Every one of those failures was caught not by luck, but by people whose job is to probe these systems, document what they find, and publish it.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of AustraliaGovernment of Australia speaking through its delegate at the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
Responsible AI is not a one-off task, but a continuous process of governance, monitoring, adaptation, and improvement as technologies evolve and risks emerge.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of JapanGovernment of Japan speaking through its delegate at the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
For example, the reporting framework promotes transparency and accountability in how private companies develop generative AI.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Amandeep Singh GillUN Under-Secretary-General and head of the Office for Digital and Emerging Technologiesvotes For and says:
Effective governance will need to be more adaptive and anticipatory, with mechanisms such as living risk taxonomies, controlled testing environments, and staged deployment to identify risks.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rebecca FinlayCEO of Partnership on AI.votes For and says:
Strengthen disclosure from private companies who are developing and deploying AI globally. Build a coherent international assurance ecosystem.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (France)France’s foreign ministryvotes For and says:
We must also collectively tackle the issue of independent evaluation of AI models before their rollout.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Juliana StrattonLieutenant Governor of Illinois; advocates responsible AI safeguards and public accountability.votes For and says:
Illinois is showing that innovation and accountability can go hand in hand by setting clear expectations that help protect our communities while supporting the responsible development and use of AI.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
JB PritzkerGovernor of Illinois; signed the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act in 2026.votes For and says:
As AI systems become more powerful and the federal government is unwilling to step in, states have a responsibility to protect our people from the dangers of AI while still harnessing the unique potential of the technology.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
António GuterresUN Secretary-Generalvotes For and says:
We need common baselines for frontier systems, common methods to evaluate and verify risks, and common resolve that systems with global reach must meet standards worthy of global trust.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kwame RaoulAttorney General of Illinois; supports state AI guardrails and transparency in the absence of federal oversight.votes For and says:
Frontier model AI systems have the potential to be used for many good things. However, due to their massive computing power, they also could cause catastrophic events, such as cyberattacks or the system evading control by developers or users. In the ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sunny GandhiEncode AI political affairs VPvotes For and says:
SB 315 is the strongest AI safety law in the country. It builds on the frameworks California and New York have already passed and goes one step further by requiring independent audits, so the public doesn’t have to take AI companies at their word. Il...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nick BecksteadCEO of the Secure AI Project; advocate for AI safety policy and evaluation standards.votes For and says:
Governor Pritzker and the Illinois legislature are courageously supporting stronger safeguards to oversee powerful AI. Illinois is the first state to mandate independent third-party evaluations of AI safety practices, making its AI law the strongest ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Steve WimmerSenior Technical and Policy Advisor at Transparency Coalition; advocates accountable AI governance and state leadership.votes For and says:
SB 315 passed with overwhelming bi-partisan support because lawmakers recognize the same basic truth: the public demands safety and transparency from the AI companies shaping their future. Illinois has created a new template for responsible AI govern...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alex MeinkeAI safety researcher at Apollo Research, focused on evaluations and alignment of frontier AI systems.votes For and says:
Training-run assessments conducted by a 3rd party should become a standard part of frontier AI safety.
AI Verified source (Jul 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
EU AI Code of Practice on General-Purpose AIEuropean Union code of practice for providers of general-purpose AI models, including its Safety and Security chapter adopted in 2026.votes For and says:
Signatories will conduct at least state-of-the-art model evaluations in the modalities relevant to the systemic risk to assess the model’s capabilities, propensities, affordances, and/or effects.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA)European Union agency dedicated to achieving a high common level of cybersecurity across Europe.votes For and says:
At the European level, the existing legal frameworks, including NIS2, CRA and the EU AI Act should be leveraged, to ensure that systemic risks stemming from the most advanced AI models are assessed and mitigated. To this end, it may be useful to esta...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ted BuddU.S. Senator from North Carolina; Chair of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Science, Manufacturing, and Competitiveness.votes For and says:
Leveraging the strength of both America’s public and private sector capacity to evaluate, monitor, and understand frontier AI development will only become more critical as industries in every sector of our economy continue to embrace AI technology.
AI Verified source (Jun 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
xAIArtificial intelligence company developing the Grok family of frontier AI models.votes For and says:
We publish model cards, safety evaluations, and our Frontier AI Framework to keep the community informed.
AI Verified source (Jun 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Valerie FousheeU.S. Representative for North Carolina's 4th congressional district; sponsor of the Protecting Consumers from Deceptive AI Actvotes For and says:
I’m also proud to have advanced measures that will improve federal capacity to test and evaluate frontier AI systems and measure the real energy and water impacts of data centers on our communities.
AI Verified source (Jun 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lori TrahanU.S. representative from Massachusettsvotes For and says:
There's much more to do, including giving CAISI the authority to create the standards we need to know whether a frontier model is safe before it ships, not after something goes wrong.
AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Cloud Security AllianceNonprofit organization focused on cloud computing and AI security best practices.votes For and says:
Conduct independent audit and assurance assessments according to relevant standards at least annually.
AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Narendra ModiPrime Minister of Indiavotes For and says:
We should promote safe-by-design AI systems. We should develop common standards, testing frameworks and regulatory sandboxes for AI deployment, so that innovation and governance progress together.
AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Erie MeyerSenior Fellow at Columbia Law School's Center for Law and the Economy and former Chief Technologist at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.votes For and says:
I have spent the past year working with technical colleagues to document what it would take for an AI company to meaningfully reduce the risk and harms of these systems. It turns out, none of them are particularly high tech. The classic, time-tested ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Justine GluckPolicy Analyst for AI Policy and Legislation at the Future of Privacy Forum.votes For and says:
Before, or concurrently with, deploying a new frontier model or a model with a substantial modification, frontier developers would need to publish a transparency report covering information such as release date, supported languages, output modalities...
more AI Verified source (Jun 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Taha IqbalIndependent AI safety researcher based in Lahore, Pakistan.votes For and says:
The AI equivalent requires: mandatory pre-deployment capability evaluations conducted by bodies with institutional independence from developers; standardized evaluation protocols that are public and contestable; and mandatory disclosure of evaluation...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Delia RamirezU.S. Representative from Illinois and Ranking Member of the House Homeland Security Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection Subcommittee.votes For and says:
Make companies prove their systems are safe before release — at every step, the burden of proof should be on the companies, not the consumer or the public.
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lord Watson of InvergowrieLabour member of the UK House of Lords; calls for binding regulation on powerful AI model developers.votes For and says:
In the 2024 King’s Speech, the Government committed to placing binding regulations on the developers of the most powerful AI models. Almost two years later, we still await legislation to fulfil this commitment. [...] recent models, such as Claude Myt...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Baroness Alexander of ClevedenLabour member of the UK House of Lords; argues for point-of-development AI regulation and pre-deployment testing.votes For and says:
Will they consider regulation at the point of development and not simply at the point of use? Will they mandate pre-deployment testing of high-risk AI, as the US has now done? Do they accept the case for an AI regulatory oversight body?
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:
Frontier AI models, like airplanes, should be required to go through technical testing and auditing, and their release should be blocked or reversed as a threat to public safety if they do not meet high standards of safety.
AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AmazonTechnology and cloud-computing company developing frontier AI models.votes For and says:
Amazon will publish, in connection with the launch of a frontier AI model launch (in model documentation, such as model service cards), information about the frontier model evaluation for safety and security.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AnthropicAI safety research companyvotes For and says:
Developers should test their models against each of the four Enumerated Risk categories and publish a summary of the results. They should publish a safety framework explaining how they evaluate those risks, a system card whenever they release a cover...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
OpenAIAI research organizationvotes For and says:
Policymakers should require the most capable frontier models to undergo a CAISI evaluation before public release. These evaluations should assess frontier capabilities, the effectiveness of associated safeguards and mitigations, and the resulting ris...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sam LiccardoU.S. Representative from California's 16th congressional district.votes For and says:
Several colleagues have proposed good first steps, such as enacting federal equivalents to requirements approved in California for frontier model developers to publish safety protocols, independent evaluations and testing results.
AI Verified source (May 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Illinois General AssemblyState legislature of Illinois, United States.votes For and says:
Requires large frontier developers to create, implement, publish, and annually update a frontier AI framework addressing catastrophic-risk assessment, mitigations, governance, cybersecurity, third-party evaluations, and internal-use risks.
AI Verified source (May 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Colin AhernChief Cyber Officer for the State of New York; congressional witness on frontier AI cybersecurity and safety.votes For and says:
The Federal Government should establish a regulatory framework for frontier AI development that prevents the proliferation and misuse of cyber-offensive capabilities which threaten homeland security. The framework should be harmonized with the operat...
more AI Verified source (May 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Cyber Security Agency of SingaporeSingapore government agency responsible for cybersecurity.votes For and says:
AI safety testing — automating the safety testing of AI software like chatbots to ensure they meet the government’s requirements prior to deployment.
AI Verified source (May 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Apollo ResearchAI safety research organizationvotes For and says:
Black-box evaluations have historically proven valuable to provide a precursory assessment of the safety and security of frontier AI models ahead of model deployment.
AI Verified source (May 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
METRNonprofit research organization that evaluates advanced AI systems and develops methods for assessing AI safety.votes For and says:
Recommendation: The system provider granted any necessary rights to disclose results to the evaluation’s intended audiences upfront.
AI Verified source (May 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Humans FirstAdvocacy organization organizing a named coalition on AI policy and human interests.votes For and says:
For this reason, we support proposed policies that require mandatory testing, evaluation, vetting, and government approval of potentially dangerous frontier AI systems before they are deployed.
AI Verified source (May 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Americans for Responsible InnovationAI policy advocacy nonprofitvotes For and says:
ARI’s proposal centers on structured safety evaluations that would serve as a gating mechanism for federal procurement. An AI lab building frontier models would need to demonstrate that its systems have been vetted for misuse potential before qualify...
more AI Verified source (May 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Common Sense MediaKids media and tech nonprofitvotes For and says:
The Institute will establish safety standards, build open-source evaluations that AI developers can run against their models, independently test AI products, and publish the results to provide transparency and accountability.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James P. SteyerFounder and CEO of Common Sense Mediavotes For and says:
We urgently need policies and institutions that will demand transparency, allow for independent safety evaluations, and enforce accountability.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI)US AI standards institutevotes For and says:
Through these expanded industry collaborations, CAISI will conduct pre-deployment evaluations and targeted research to better assess frontier AI capabilities and advance the state of AI security.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Natasha CramptonMicrosoft Chief Responsible AI Officer.votes For and says:
While Microsoft regularly undertakes many types of AI testing on its own, testing for national security and large-scale public safety risks necessarily must be a collaborative endeavor with governments.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Vivek MurthyFormer U.S. Surgeon General (19th and 21st); physician and public health advocatevotes For and says:
We are at great risk of making the same mistakes with AI that we made with social media: subjecting children to new technologies without adequate safety guardrails and thereby causing harm to countless lives. For all its potential uses, AI—and AI cha...
more AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
National AI CentreAustralian Government national centre providing guidance for responsible AI adoption.votes For and says:
Conduct safety evaluations that scale with model capabilities (GPAI DEV), for example: assessment for cyber-offensive capabilities and vulnerabilities; testing for potential chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear information risks; evaluation...
more AI Verified source (May 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
MicrosoftTechnology companyvotes For and says:
Technical safety benchmarks remain important, but they are insufficient without rigorous, real-world testing.
AI Verified source (May 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
U.S. General Services AdministrationU.S. federal agency responsible for government procurement, real estate, and technology policy.votes For and says:
To strengthen enterprise capacity, GSA requires all high-impact use cases to submit AI Impact Statements, independent evaluation plans, and real-world test results prior to deployment.
AI Verified source (May 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ryan GreenblattChief Scientist at Redwood Research; AI safety researcher; lead author of "Alignment faking in large language models"votes For and says:
AI companies should get third-party security experts to assess (and possibly also red-team/pen-test) their security against key threat models and then publish the high-level findings of this assessment.
AI Verified source (Apr 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Google DeepMindAI research company.votes For and says:
To address risks posed by CCLs, we conduct safety case reviews prior to external launches when relevant CCLs are reached.
AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Furong HuangAssociate professor of computer science at the University of Maryland and AI safety researcher.votes For and says:
Understanding what models are inclined to do—not just what they can do—is essential for responsible deployment.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Future of Life InstituteNonprofit on existential risksvotes For and says:
Broaden dangerous-capability evaluations and link thresholds to binding mitigations. Evaluations have gaping holes (no AI R&D data), and no procedure connects threshold breaches to deployment decisions, making thresholds effectively non-binding.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
New York State LegislatureBicameral state legislature that enacted New York’s Responsible AI Safety and Education (RAISE) Act.votes For and says:
BEFORE, OR CONCURRENTLY WITH, DEPLOYING A NEW FRONTIER MODEL OR A SUBSTANTIALLY MODIFIED VERSION OF AN EXISTING FRONTIER MODEL, A LARGE FRONTIER DEVELOPER SHALL INCLUDE IN THE TRANSPARENCY REPORT [...] SUMMARIES OF [...] ASSESSMENTS OF CATASTROPHIC R...
more AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
New York State AssemblyState legislative chambervotes For and says:
AI framework that establishes safety protocols and discloses potential catastrophic risks.
AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jacob PrattAI assurance and policy researcher at Partnership on AI.votes For and says:
External assurance is perhaps most critical for frontier AI models. The irreversible, high-stakes nature of frontier model risks, such as chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear (CBRN) risks, demands pre-deployment evaluations conducted by tru...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Don BeyerU.S. Representative from Virginia's 8th district; co-sponsor of the GUARDRAILS Act on AIvotes For and says:
Artificial intelligence foundation models commonly described as a ‘black box’ do not inherently give consumers the tools to understand why a model gives a particular response. Giving users more information about the model—how it was built and what ba...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sara JacobsU.S. Representative from California's 51st congressional districtvotes For and says:
Trust will decide the global AI race – separating the countries and developers that earn it from those that don’t. That’s why I’m proud to co-lead the AI Foundation Model Transparency Act, which will help build trust in AI by requiring clear, upfront...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mike LawlerU.S. Representative from New Yorkvotes For and says:
This is about accountability and getting ahead of a rapidly evolving technology before it outpaces common-sense guardrails. As the general public interacts with AI every day, whether they realize it or not, Americans deserve to know how these systems...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
America First Policy InstituteU.S. public-policy think tank.votes For and says:
Congress should pass legislation requiring frontier AI developers to publish sources of evaluation methods and results.
AI Verified source (Mar 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Leon StauferUniversity of Cambridge researcher and lead author of the AI Agent Index update on AI-agent safety transparency.votes For and says:
Developers publish broad, top-level safety and ethics frameworks that sound reassuring, but are publishing limited empirical evidence needed to actually understand the risks.
AI Verified source (Feb 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Leon StauferAI safety researcher at the University of Cambridge and lead author of the AI Agent Index update.votes For and says:
The latest AI Agent Index reveals the widening gap between the pace of deployment and the pace of safety evaluation. Most developers share little information about safety, evaluations, and societal impacts.
AI Verified source (Feb 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationaleFrench government secretariat for national defence and security, including national AI safety and evaluation policy.votes For and says:
Evaluations should be transparent and, in principle, repeatable. Evaluators should communicate their methods, choices, and justifications in evaluation reporting. This should allow others to replicate the reported results and analysis.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
International Network for Advanced AI Measurement, Evaluation and ScienceInternational network of AI safety and security institutes advancing measurement, evaluation, and science for advanced AI.votes For and says:
Evaluations should be reported separately: Evaluators should describe each evaluation separately in a report, including detailing what each evaluation is and what capability elicitation was undertaken. This aids transparency and clarity when communic...
more AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Baroness BergerLabour member of the UK House of Lords; former Member of Parliament.votes For and says:
Like those technologies, AI should have independent pre- and post-deployment testing.
AI Verified source (Feb 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lord Clement-JonesTim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expertvotes For and says:
Its proposals include banning deliberate superintelligence development, prohibiting dangerous capabilities, requiring safety demonstrations before deployment, and establishing licensing for advanced AI.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lionel TarassenkoOxford engineer and Crossbench life peervotes For and says:
General AGI carries real risks. But what we need now is for the Government to initiate a consultation process for the regulation of general AGI, which is likely to be attained by the next generation of frontier models. Safety testing of models by the...
more AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Etienne BrissonCanadian artificial intelligence researcher and witness to the House of Commons ethics committee.votes For and says:
We now know the effects and could take the model off the market. We don't know how it will be used by humans or what the long-term effects will be. We're still seeing it on social media. I think studies have to be done before the technology is launch...
more AI Verified source (Jan 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of the New York State Attorney GeneralOfficial office of the New York State Attorney General, which submitted January 2026 testimony on AI policy and enforcement.votes For and says:
Equally concerning are reports that new LLM models are being sped to market without basic safety testing, or with the results of that testing ignored.
AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Miles BrundageAI policy researcher; founder of AVERI (AI Verification Initiative); former OpenAI Head of Policy Researchvotes For and says:
There’s no one forcing them to work with third-party experts to make sure that things are safe and secure.
AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Baroness Foster of AghadrumseeNon-affiliated life peer and former First Minister of Northern Irelandvotes For and says:
AI is an incredible development for many reasons—R&D, innovation, economic growth, productivity, faster health diagnoses and many other areas. However, this must be balanced with a regulatory environment which allows and encourages all those positive...
more AI Verified source (Jan 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lord ColgrainConservative hereditary peer in the UK House of Lordsvotes For and says:
The last Conservative Government were committed to ensuring that the UK becomes an AI superpower with thorough safety rules. As Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak hosted the AI Safety Summit, which saw the signing of the Bletchley declaration, bringing acad...
more AI Verified source (Jan 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European CommissionEU's executive bodyvotes For and says:
The General-Purpose AI Code of Practice’s Safety and Security Chapter require providers to conduct model evaluations also through adequately qualified independent external evaluators. These reports will then support AI Office’s regulatory activities ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Federation of American ScientistsUS science policy nonprofitvotes For and says:
Mandate or formalize AI model evaluation and disclosure for cyber risks. Establish requirements for structured, pre-deployment evaluations of frontier AI models focused on cyber-relevant risks, including misuse potential, autonomy, reliability over t...
more AI Verified source (Jan 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Utah LegislatureState legislature of Utah.votes For and says:
A large frontier developer shall conspicuously publish on the large frontier developer's website summaries of the following before deploying a new frontier model or a frontier model that was substantially modified by the large frontier developer: (a)...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of Governor Kathy HochulNew York Governor's press officevotes For and says:
Governor Kathy Hochul today signed legislation to require AI frameworks for AI frontier models, setting a nation-leading standard for AI transparency and safety. The agreed-upon chapter amendments to the RAISE Act (S6953B/A6453B) requires large AI de...
more AI Verified source (Dec 19, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dean W. BallAuthor of Hyperdimensionalvotes For and says:
There is much to recommend these laws over the Nevada and Illinois bills I discussed above. Unlike those laws, SB 53 and RAISE are technically sophisticated, reflecting a clear understanding (for the most part) about what it is possible for AI develo...
more AI Verified source (Aug 21, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rebecca Bauer-KahanCalifornia State Assembly membervotes For and says:
That is fundamentally the basis of this bill, is that they will be defining their own safety protocols. They will be making those public, and then they will have to follow them.
AI Verified source (Jul 16, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew GounardesNew York state senatorvotes For and says:
It requires companies [...] to create and share [...] protocols before they deploy these models publicly. [...] And then it requires [...] to complete an annual assessment [...].
AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Miles KodamaAI policy researchervotes For and says:
Today, frontier AI developers have no legal obligation to disclose anything about their safety and security protocols to government, let alone to the public. When a company releases a new AI system more powerful than any system before, it is entirely...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Steven AdlerAI safety researcher; Lawfare writervotes For and says:
Before a new model's release, Al companies commonly (though not always) run safety tests - and release the results in a "System Card." The idea is to see if the model has any extreme abilities (like strong cyberhacking), and then to take an appropri...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jack TitusAI policy writer at FASvotes For and says:
For models with risk above the lowest level, most evaluation results and methods should be public, including any performed mitigations.
AI Verified source (Mar 5, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Partnership on AIAI governance nonprofit, multi-stakeholdervotes For and says:
Disclose details such as testing methodologies, evaluation criteria, results, limitations, and gaps for any internal and external evaluations conducted prior to release.
AI Verified source (Oct 24, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of U.S. Senator Mark R. WarnerU.S. Senate press officevotes For and says:
The Secure AI Development Act would establish a mandatory secure testing environment for the nation’s most advanced AI models before deployment, modernize the federal government’s processes for identifying and disclosing AI-related cybersecurity vuln...
more Unverifiable source (Jul 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of SloveniaNational government of Slovenia, speaking through its delegation at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
The strategy clearly promotes a human-centric approach to AI grounded in human rights, democratic values, ethics, safety, transparency, and accountability. Its objective is not only to advance AI capabilities, but to ensure that AI is developed and u...
more Unverifiable source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The AI Security InstituteUK government research organisation focused on AI safety and securityvotes For and says:
Evaluations should report capability curves, especially when performance may still be rising.
Unverifiable source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mark MinevichAI strategist, investor, and Forbes contributor writing on AI governance and global technology policy.votes For and says:
What unites these efforts is less an ideology of regulation than a shared instinct that the four specific dangers should be tested for, by someone, before a model ships.
Unverifiable source (Jun 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Secretary-General's Scientific Advisory BoardIndependent expert advisory body convened by the United Nations Secretary-General to assess scientific and technological issues.votes For and says:
Requiring developers to demonstrate a model’s trustworthiness and governability in incremental stages before deployment, including internal deployment, with verifiable deception evaluations and appropriate safeguards.
Unverifiable source (Mar 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of Governor Gavin NewsomCalifornia governor's official press officevotes For and says:
SB 53 establishes new requirements for frontier AI developers creating stronger: ✅ Transparency: Requires large frontier developers to publicly publish a framework on its website describing how the company has incorporated national standards, intern...
more Unverifiable source (Sep 29, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Thomas WoodsideSecure AI Project co-foundervotes For and says:
Those updates should include the results of evaluations for models that haven’t been publicly deployed yet, since those models could also pose serious risks.
Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of Senator Scott WienerOfficial office of CA State Senatorvotes For and says:
help California develop workable guardrails for deploying GenAI [...] Companies will be required to publish their safety and security protocols and risk evaluations
Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Peter KyleUK shadow technology secretary, Labourvotes For and says:
That is why we will move from a voluntary code to a statutory code, so that those companies engaging in that kind of research and development have to release all the test data and tell us what they are testing for so we can see exactly what is happen...
more Unverifiable source (Feb 4, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Richard BlumenthalU.S. Senator from Connecticutvotes For and says:
Sensible safeguards are not in opposition to innovation. Accountability is not a burden far from it. They are the foundation of how we can move ahead while protecting public trust. They are how we can lead the world in technology and science, but als...
more Unverifiable source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:
First, it is vital that AI companies–especially those working on the most powerful models–adhere to an appropriate set of safety requirements, including internal and external testing prior to release and publication of evaluation results.
Unverifiable sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Henna VirkkunenEU Technology Commissionervotes For and says:
Under the AI Act, advanced AI models must be evaluated, and mitigation measures carefully assessed, before the models are placed on the EU market.
Unverifiable source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Cesar FernandezHead of US State and Local Government Relations at Anthropicvotes For and says:
SB 315 makes Illinois the first state to pair AI transparency requirements with independent verification, an important step toward the accountability this technology demands.
Unverifiable source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Chris FallDirector of the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) at NIST; former Energy Department official in the first Trump administrationvotes For and says:
Independent, rigorous measurement science is essential to understanding frontier AI and its national security implications.
Unverifiable source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Adam GleaveCEO and founder of FAR.AI; AI safety researcher; UC Berkeley PhD in AI alignment and reward-hackingvotes For and says:
The central obstacle to AI safety coordination is not the absence of solutions but rather the absence of a standard: without a shared, legible definition of what makes an AI system safe, companies and governments have no basis for holding each other ...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Helen TonerInterim Executive Director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET); former OpenAI board membervotes For and says:
It's truly unprecedented the mismatch between how strategically important this technology is and how little involvement government has in developing it. [...] I think it is very important that the U.S. AI sector remains ahead of the Chinese AI sector...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Marietje SchaakeStanford Cyber Policy Center; former MEP; UN AI Advisory Body member; author of The Tech Coupvotes For and says:
[It is] concerning that models with far-reaching impact are controlled by a private company. [...] Now would be a good time to agree on disclosure rules and oversight mechanisms.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:
You never have to worry that some drug company is going to release some other drug that causes massive harm before people have figured out how to make it safe, because the FDA won't allow them to release anything until it's safe enough. [...] In the ...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:
We're seeing AIs whose behavior, when they are tested, [...] is different from when they are being used. [This] significantly hampers our ability to correctly estimate risks. [...] The gap between the pace of technological advancement and our ability...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Anu BradfordColumbia Law School professor; author of The Brussels Effect and Digital Empiresvotes For and says:
I am concerned about reforms being pushed further by corporate pressures, and about less resolute enforcement at a time when the AI race is heating up and geopolitical tensions are high. That combination increases the risk of irresponsible choices th...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew GounardesNew York State Senatorvotes For and says:
The RAISE Act requires large frontier AI developers to write, implement, publish, and comply with plans that describe in detail how they handle various safety standards and best practices, including how they assess the safety risks of their models; a...
more Disputed source (Dec 19, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alex BoresNew York State Assemblymembervotes For and says:
you design your own safety protocols ahead of time [...] if your models fail your own tests, we want to know about it.
AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2025) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Economic Security Project ActionPolicy advocacy organizationvotes For and says:
Building on the report’s “trust, but verify” approach, the amended bill requires the largest AI companies to publicly disclose their safety and security protocols and report the most critical safety incidents to the California Attorney General. The r...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Encode AIAI policy advocacy nonprofitvotes For and says:
They will require these companies to publish important information regarding their safety protocols and risk evaluations, and report major safety incidents to the Attorney General.
Disputed source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (10)
-
Kent WalkerGoogle President of Global Affairsvotes Against and says:
For the most advanced frontier AI models, an independent, federally overseen, industry-backed organization could set safety standards and verify independent, voluntary audits, similar to how other critical sectors are managed.
AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)Technology trade associationvotes Against and says:
The draft implementing regulation should clearly differentiate between API access, which should be the preferred method for safety evaluations where access to documents and relevant information are deemed insufficient, and “further” means of access, ...
more AI Verified source (Apr 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Software & Information Industry AssociationTrade association representing software and digital-content companies; submitted 2026 AI policy recommendations to the U.S. House Science Committee.votes Against and says:
Mandating public disclosures could expose vulnerabilities, provide malicious actors with actionable insights, hence undermining the very safety objectives the bill seeks to achieve.
AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Chamber of Progresstech industry policy coalitionvotes Against and says:
we still have lingering concerns about how the bill [...] fails to protect trade secrets necessary to maintain competitiveness.
AI Verified source (Sep 16, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Neil ChilsonAI policy head, Abundance Institutevotes Against and says:
Those compliance costs are merely the beginning. The bill, if passed, would feed California regulators truckloads of company information that they will use to design a compliance industrial complex.
AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paul LekasSIIA public policy executivevotes Against and says:
These will require companies to publish detailed information and reports that could expose trade secrets and other sensitive information.
AI Verified source (Sep 4, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew NgBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainvotes Against and says:
However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The White HouseExecutive office of U.S. presidentvotes Against and says:
Nothing in this section shall be construed to authorize the creation of a mandatory governmental licensing, preclearance, or permitting requirement for the development, publication, release, or distribution of new AI models, including frontier models...
more Unverifiable source (Jun 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Frontier Model ForumFrontier AI industry forumvotes Against and says:
[...] if the evaluation results indicate [...] an exploitable vulnerability that may lead to a significant increase in biorisks, this information should not be published.
Unverifiable source (Mar 18, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jennifer HuddlestonSenior fellow, Cato Institutevotes Against and says:
Mandated transparency may also not actually improve consumer education around their privacy choices. First, many consumers may grow fatigued and frustrated with the constant pop ups and consents as they do with current cookie pop ups. Second, a gover...
more Disputed source (Jun 28, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-safety
votes