Anthropic

Public input is critical to ensuring that powerful AI serves humanity’s interests.

In the “unprecedented” scenario, the company wrote that more permanent support will be necessary, and it listed several ways to generate and share revenue broadly, including basic income, sovereign wealth models and equity-sharing mechanisms.

Our Advanced AI Framework proposes mandatory independent safety testing for frontier models, transparency requirements, and government authority to block or recall dangerous AI deployments.

We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology.

Absent a strong federal law, states should retain full authority to legislate.

Developers should test their models against each of the four Enumerated Risk categories and publish a summary of the results. They should publish a safety framework explaining how they evaluate those risks, a system card whenever they release a cover...

If policymakers in the US and allied democracies act to close these two channels propping up China’s AI models—illicit and evasive compute access and illicit model access—then we have a potentially once-in-a-generation opportunity to secure our lead.

Once [our AI models are] deployed [by the Pentagon], [we have] no visibility, technical ability or any kind of “kill switch” for [our] technology.

Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values.

We are not sure whether Claude is a moral patient, and if it is, what kind of weight its interests warrant. But we think the issue is live enough to warrant caution, which is reflected in our ongoing efforts on model welfare.

We treat misalignment as a central, but solvable, problem for both us and for the field.

But if that happens, it's likely that AI will have acted as a general substitute for labor: these gains could come with a reduction in demand for human work that is difficult or impossible for many workers to absorb. In this world, the central econom...

If it were possible to effectively slow the development of this technology to give ourselves more time to deal with its immense implications, we think that would likely be a good thing. But if a slowdown simply lets the least cautious actors catch up...

Importantly, the law balances [...] whistleblower protections—[...]. [...] Protecting whistleblowers: It should be an explicit violation of law [...] punish employees who raise concerns [...].

If you decide to turn off the model training setting, we will not use any new chats [...] for future model training.

ASL-2 refers to systems that show early signs of dangerous capabilities – [...] give instructions on how to build bioweapons – [...] e.g. a search engine couldn’t.

we propose that AI developers pre-register large training runs [...] within their home country’s government [...] plausible bar for now would be 10^26 FLOP or higher.