Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance

ai-regulation data-privacy digital-democracy law policy privacy regulations surveillance ai-governance

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Key insights

Many quotes treat facial recognition, remote biometrics, predictive policing, and social scoring as the clearest examples of AI mass surveillance (13804, 6884, 15563, 18444).
Several quotes draw a boundary around mass domestic surveillance while still allowing some lawful foreign-intelligence, counterintelligence, or explicitly authorized uses, making scope a key fault line in the debate (14351, 13804, 14572, 17225).
Calls for a ban come from a wide mix of actors in the provided bios, including human-rights groups, lawmakers, attorneys general, unions, AI researchers, AI companies, and employee groups (14985, 18088, 18624, 16809, 16357, 15095).
Even many pro-ban quotes also call for companion safeguards such as warrants, loophole closure, and other guardrails, suggesting that prohibition and governance are often presented together rather than as opposites (13487, 13488, 14820, 18088).
The limited opposition in the quotes mostly argues for public-safety, deterrence, or accountability benefits, or for regulation instead of a blanket ban, rather than denying any need for legal constraints (9738, 8356, 18364).

Arguments for

Rights and democratic harms

Supporters argue that AI-driven mass surveillance is incompatible with democratic values and human rights, especially when it is arbitrary, indiscriminate, or shielded by broad exemptions. They say it threatens fundamental liberties, privacy, and democratic institutions themselves.

Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties.

Dario Amodei · Feb 26, 2026 · full quote
Strictly prohibit arbitrary, indiscriminate and mass surveillance used for law enforcement purposes, including biometric and AI applications, such as facial recognition technology, AI systems that create or expand facial recognition databases through the untargeted scraping of fa…

Gina Romero · Apr 21, 2026 · full quote
We will champion the report and call for governments and other stakeholders to implement its recommendations, including the need to strictly prohibit the use and transfer of surveillance technologies that fail to comply with international human rights law, as well as to ban the u…

ARTICLE 19 · Jun 15, 2026 · full quote
Failing to enact a total ban on public biometric surveillance creates broad national security exemptions that jeopardize fundamental rights.

Matt Mahmoudi · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
The growth in surveillance technology and the use of artificial intelligence to augment that physical force pose a direct threat to our remaining democratic institutions and freedoms and require immediate action by Congress before the forces of repression have grown too strong to…

Bruce Nestor · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote

AI supercharges warrantless tracking

Proponents say AI lets agencies and contractors combine purchased or incidentally collected personal data with powerful analysis, expanding surveillance at scale and sometimes exponentially. They argue this can evade warrants and oversight, while secrecy about AI errors leaves the public and lawmakers unable to assess abuses.

The government wants to use AI to analyze Americans’ information obtained without a warrant through purchases from data brokers and “incidental” collection from foreign intelligence surveillance. Congress must act now and demand closures to these loopholes that undermine our Cons…

Jeramie D. Scott · Apr 14, 2026 · full quote
Federal agencies are sidestepping longstanding legal protections by buying vast amounts of personal data and using artificial intelligence to analyze it—without a warrant, without oversight, and without accountability. That is not how our system is supposed to work.

Raúl Torrez · Mar 24, 2026 · full quote
Big Tech has built a massive surveillance economy to track, package and sell deeply detailed information about our movements, purchases, preferences, and relationships. Now, out of control federal agencies are buying this data to evade constitutional protections and track and sur…

William Tong · Mar 26, 2026 · full quote
EFF opposes the use of generative AI for the purposes of mass government surveillance because that use supercharges unconstitutional violations of civil liberties and because government secrecy prevents the public and lawmakers from knowing when generative AI models make mistakes…

Matthew Guariglia · Jun 4, 2026 · full quote
The idea of surveillance that overreaches legal mandates has been an ongoing concern, but with AI, it gets supercharged. It happens at scale, and I think updated rules are needed.

Steve Feldstein · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote
Combining that data with the power of AI would expand the Pentagon’s surveillance powers exponentially, and companies like Anthropic are well within their rights to push back on that outcome.

Samir Jain · Mar 16, 2026 · full quote

Biometric systems target communities

Many supporters focus on facial recognition, remote biometric identification, predictive policing, and social scoring as core forms of AI mass surveillance. They argue these systems target marginalized communities, perpetuate bias, criminalize people who are not suspected of wrongdoing, and normalize constant monitoring in public life.

To respect privacy and human dignity, MEPs ask for a permanent ban on the automated recognition of individuals in public spaces, noting that citizens should only be monitored when suspected of a crime. Parliament calls for the use of private facial recognition databases (like the…

European Parliament · 2021 · full quote
Many AI systems have been proven to magnify discrimination and inequality. In particular, so-called ‘predictive policing’ and biometric surveillance systems are disproportionately used to target marginalised groups including racialised, working class and migrant communities. Thes…

Open Rights Group · Jul 26, 2024 · full quote
It’s past time for the federal government to end its use of this abusive surveillance technology. A great place to start is its use for immigration enforcement, given ICE and CBP’s utter disdain for the law. Face surveillance in the hands of the government is a fundamentally harm…

India McKinney · Feb 5, 2026 · full quote
Facial recognition should never be part of New Yorkers’ lives, least of all when they’re buying groceries or unlocking their front door. We’ve seen over and over how facial recognition perpetuates discrimination and systemic bias, and we’re proud to continue fighting for legislat…

Corinne Worthington · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote
Biometric surveillance poses an urgent threat to our fundamental rights. Facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies have been used by authoritarian regimes around the world to target journalists, protestors, and marginalized communities; they are increasingl…

Jenna Ruddock · Feb 5, 2026 · full quote

Bright-line prohibitions

Another pro-ban case is that some AI surveillance uses pose unacceptable risks or cannot comply with human rights standards, so governments should adopt clear prohibitions or moratoria. On this view, distinctions such as real-time versus later review do not meaningfully reduce the threat, and the law has not kept pace with rapidly advancing capabilities.

In human rights terms, there is no salient difference between real-time and post-remote biometric identification. Threats posed to rights and freedoms are not reduced just because authorities or companies have extra time to review footage.

Chloé Berthélémy · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
Governments should adopt clear prohibitions or moratoria on AI systems and uses that pose unacceptable risks to human rights.

Zach Lampell · Jul 2026 · full quote
The reason we chose fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance as the areas where we simply can't say yes is because the technology is so new that we do not believe the laws may be perfectly designed to account for how the technology could work.

Daniela Amodei · Jul 2, 2026 · full quote
Governments should enact binding, enforceable and human rights-based regulation to govern AI systems, including a ban on the development and deployment of AI systems that are incompatible with international human rights law.

Amnesty International · Apr 2026 · full quote
AI systems that cannot meet human rights standards or that pose an unacceptable risk to human rights must be prohibited from use, transfer, or export.

Ben Saul · Jul 8, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Policing and crime control

Opponents argue that AI and related technologies can give the state continuous visibility in the justice system and policing, helping authorities get ahead of criminals. In this view, expansive surveillance capacity can be a legitimate law-enforcement tool.

When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times. Similarly, in the world of pol…

Shabana Mahmood · 2026 · full quote

Deterrence and oversight

Another opposing argument is that pervasive AI monitoring can supervise police officers at all times, automatically report problems, and encourage citizens to stay on their best behavior. Supporters of this view present constant observation as a source of deterrence and accountability.

Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times [...] AI will report that problem [...] Citizens will be on their best behavior

Larry Ellison · 2024 · full quote

Regulate, don't prohibit

A more qualified opposing view holds that the answer is not a blanket ban but a meaningful regulatory regime grounded in necessity, responsibility, proportionality, transparency, accountability, and lawfulness. Its aim is to constrain law-enforcement powers while still enabling authorities to protect the public and safeguard fundamental rights.

The new legal framework must include a meaningful regulatory regime which operationalises principles such as necessity, responsibility, proportionality, transparency, accountability and lawfulness. These principles should then structure and constrain law enforcement powers, enabl…

William Webster · Feb 24, 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Bans with narrow exceptions

Some quotes support bans on specific forms of AI mass surveillance while still allowing limited exceptions, explicit legal authorization, or lawful foreign-intelligence and counterintelligence uses. This approach draws firm boundaries around mass domestic or public-space surveillance without rejecting every security-related use.

AI systems that pose a threat to people’s safety, rights or livelihoods are banned from use in the EU. The use of real-time remote biometric identification systems such as facial recognition by law enforcement authorities in public spaces is also prohibited, with some limited exc…

Council of the European Union · Jun 29, 2026 · full quote
AI may not be used to: • Conduct mass surveillance, facial recognition, or social scoring unless explicitly authorized by law and governing body.

Transportation Authority of Marin · Mar 9, 2026 · full quote
American AI technologies shall neither be developed nor used by the national security enterprise to censor free speech, embed ideological bias, or conduct unauthorized or unlawful surveillance activities.

Donald Trump · Jun 5, 2026 · full quote
Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values.

Anthropic · Feb 26, 2026 · full quote

Warrants and loophole closure

Another nuanced position focuses on requiring warrants, closing data-broker and incidental-collection loopholes, and halting agencies' use of commercially purchased data and AI tools without oversight. These quotes emphasize stopping AI from turning data obtained without a warrant or public safeguards into mass surveillance.

Whether through the GSRA or another vehicle, Congress must work together to pair a reauthorization of the surveillance authority with warrant requirements.

Allie Maloney · Jun 24, 2026 · full quote
The government wants to use AI to analyze Americans’ information obtained without a warrant through purchases from data brokers and “incidental” collection from foreign intelligence surveillance. Congress must act now and demand closures to these loopholes that undermine our Cons…

Jeramie D. Scott · Apr 14, 2026 · full quote
Congress can start by passing the bipartisan Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, a commonsense reform bill that bans the government from buying data that it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain. Congress must also impose basic guardrails on the government’s use of novel AI …

Ashley Gorski · Mar 9, 2026 · full quote
Attorney General William Tong joined a coalition of seventeen state attorneys general urging Congress to take immediate action to halt federal agencies’ use of commercially purchased data and artificial intelligence tools that enable mass surveillance of Americans without judicia…

William Tong · Mar 26, 2026 · full quote

Rules before rollout

Some voices emphasize that AI surveillance is reaching a tipping point and should not expand further without updated rules and clear legal frameworks. Their focus is on putting oversight in place before broader deployment.

This has effectively given police a very long leash to experiment with these technologies. And now we're in a tipping point situation where it's about to be expanded all over the country, and there's a real necessity for those legal frameworks to be in place.

Jasleen Chaggar · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
The idea of surveillance that overreaches legal mandates has been an ongoing concern, but with AI, it gets supercharged. It happens at scale, and I think updated rules are needed.

Steve Feldstein · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote
Without oversight, this technology is dangerous in the hands of any government, and the Trump Administration is abusing it to trample on privacy, freedom of speech, and civil liberties.

Edward J. Markey · Feb 5, 2026 · full quote

Across the quotes, supporters describe AI mass surveillance as a uniquely scalable threat to rights, democracy, and accountability, especially when tied to biometrics, predictive systems, and purchased personal data (16809, 13488, 6884). The main disagreement is whether these uses require categorical bans, bans with narrow exceptions, or a regulatory framework that preserves some policing and security applications (17385, 13804, 18364, 9738).

Cast your vote:

Results (113 votes):

Total (113 votes)

For 108 (96%) Abstain 2 (2%) Against 3 (3%)

For (107)

Stacy Garrity
Pennsylvania Treasurer and Republican candidate for governor of Pennsylvania.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Flock cameras are an intrusive invasion of privacy and they should be banned.
AI Verified source (Sep 4, 2026)

added 2d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Josh Shapiro
Governor of Pennsylvania

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This is not something in the public interest. I think law enforcement needs to have tools to keep communities safe. Flock cameras are not a tool that I support.
AI Verified source (Sep 2, 2026)

added 4d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bernie Sanders
U.S. Senator from Vermont

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We must come together to stop Flock and AI mass surveillance. That is why I will soon be introducing legislation to do just that.
AI Verified source (Aug 28, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Ron DeSantis
Governor of Florida

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Go after criminals — great, let’s all do that. But surveilling just regular Floridians’ movements, and how that data’s used, that’s a bird of a different feather.
AI Verified source (Aug 26, 2026)

added 5d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chloé Berthélémy
Senior Policy Advisor at European Digital Rights (EDRi), focusing on digital rights and biometric surveillance.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In human rights terms, there is no salient difference between real-time and post-remote biometric identification. Threats posed to rights and freedoms are not reduced just because authorities or companies have extra time to review footage.
AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 29d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Matt Mahmoudi
Amnesty AI and human rights researcher

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Failing to enact a total ban on public biometric surveillance creates broad national security exemptions that jeopardize fundamental rights.
AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 29d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Henry Dillon
Secretary of the West Virginia Freedom Caucus and a West Virginia state legislator.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Fourth Amendment was written specifically to stop the government from engaging in generalized surveillance and warrantless searches. Flock cameras don't just identify criminals — they create a database documenting where law-abiding citizens worsh...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026)

added 11d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tim Burchett
U.S. Representative for Tennessee's 2nd congressional district.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

No Federal agency may purchase, deploy, operate, access, or contract for any automated surveillance system that identifies, tracks, or records individuals.
AI Verified source (Jul 21, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Graciela Guzmán
Illinois State Senator.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress must stop that cycle: abolish DHS, end federal data purchases that sidestep constitutional protections, hold corporations accountable, and protect states defending our people.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bruce Nestor
Attorney based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The growth in surveillance technology and the use of artificial intelligence to augment that physical force pose a direct threat to our remaining democratic institutions and freedoms and require immediate action by Congress before the forces of repre...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jesse Franzblau
Associate Director of Policy at the National Immigrant Justice Center.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Lawmakers must also act at the federal level, including by cutting funds for ICE or Border Patrol, and redirecting funds away from surveillance-related contracts and towards communities.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tania Unzueta
Political Director and co-founder of Mijente.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Nearly ten years later, that same surveillance infrastructure is generating even greater profits. Palantir alone has received more than $1.8 billion in federal contracts since 2025, including a $1 billion DHS agreement that allows ICE and CBP to buy ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Paromita Shah
Executive Director of Just Futures Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

ICE and CBP are not only immigration policing agencies; they are also central pillars of the new security state with a rapidly expanding surveillance apparatus powered by AI-driven technologies, private contractors, and massive data-sharing systems.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Delia C. Ramirez
U.S. Representative for Illinois's 3rd congressional district.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As a Chicagoan, I know Black and Brown communities are no strangers to overpolicing, surveillance, and criminalization. And I have had a front row seat as the Trump administration has aggressively accelerated the use of technology and artificial inte...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Henry C. "Hank" Johnson Jr.
U.S. Representative from Georgia; member of the House Judiciary Committee.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Americans cannot afford gas, groceries, or healthcare, yet the Trump Administration and MAGA Republicans are pouring money into funding these mass surveillance tools used by ICE agents operating with impunity. It has got to stop. We must fight back.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alex Turner
AI safety researcher and former Google DeepMind research scientist.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I resigned from Google DeepMind bc it broke its founding promise by selling AI to the military without restrictions against killer robots or mass spying. For months, I worked to stop this but watched powerful ethicists and institutions choose silenc...
more Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bruce Schneier
Security technologist and author

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Now that we recognize the danger of AI-enhanced mass surveillance, we can make the policy choices not to implement it.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Franco Giandana Di Gena
Policy analyst at Access Now.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI tools are supercharging surveillance and suppression of protesters, journalists, human rights defenders, and other communities at risk. We therefore echo calls for the adoption of human rights-centered binding legal standards and global governance...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Zachary Lampell
Senior Legal Advisor and Coordinator of the Digital Rights Program at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law
International legal organization working on civil society, digital rights, and the rule of law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Daniela Amodei
President and co-founder of Anthropic.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The reason we chose fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance as the areas where we simply can't say yes is because the technology is so new that we do not believe the laws may be perfectly designed to account for how the technology cou...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sapiens First
AI policy advocacy organization promoting democracy, shared prosperity, and safety.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Ban AI-Enabled Mass Surveillance
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)

added 17d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Zach Lampell
Senior Legal Advisor and Coordinator for Digital Programs at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Governments should adopt clear prohibitions or moratoria on AI systems and uses that pose unacceptable risks to human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Council of the European Union
EU Council of governments

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI systems that pose a threat to people’s safety, rights or livelihoods are banned from use in the EU. The use of real-time remote biometric identification systems such as facial recognition by law enforcement authorities in public spaces is also pro...
more AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
David Boyer

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The one by my house, it hits me every time I go on the turnpike…Daily commuters, their whole habits are there. These are pinging tens of thousands of license plates every day here in our state. They're not just going after criminals. They're pinging ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)

added 25d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Béatrice Fresko-Rolfo
Member of Monaco’s National Council and delegate to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In the wrong hands, [AI] becomes a tool for mass surveillance, predictive policing, risk rating, social scoring, and even the censorship of political opinions. AI, however, does not confine itself to merely watching; it is therefore up to us to set l...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 29d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Allie Maloney
Policy Analyst at Americans for Responsible Innovation; former Scoville Peace Fellow at the Federation of American Scientists.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Whether through the GSRA or another vehicle, Congress must work together to pair a reauthorization of the surveillance authority with warrant requirements.
AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Patrick Casey
Irish parliamentarian; member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

If we fail to act with urgency, we risk allowing our information space to be shaped not by democratic deliberation, but by opaque algorithms, foreign interference, and unaccountable private actors. The report makes this clear: AI systems depend on ma...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
ARTICLE 19
Free expression and human rights organisation

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We will champion the report and call for governments and other stakeholders to implement its recommendations, including the need to strictly prohibit the use and transfer of surveillance technologies that fail to comply with international human right...
more AI Verified source (Jun 15, 2026) 1 of 2

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Human Rights Watch
Global human rights advocacy organization

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The risk of privacy violations is notable, as AI systems deployed in military use cases are often “dual use” and developed and deployed in non-military settings where widespread and indiscriminate data collection may constitute mass surveillance, whi...
more AI Verified source (Jun 14, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate