Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance

ai-regulation data-privacy digital-democracy law policy privacy regulations surveillance ai-governance

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Arguments for

Rights and democracy

Proponents argue that AI-driven mass surveillance is incompatible with democratic values and international human rights law because it threatens privacy, free expression, association, and other fundamental liberties. They describe arbitrary, indiscriminate monitoring as a category of use that governments should strictly prohibit.

Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties.

Dario Amodei · Feb 26, 2026 · full quote
Strictly prohibit arbitrary, indiscriminate and mass surveillance used for law enforcement purposes, including biometric and AI applications, such as facial recognition technology, AI systems that create or expand facial recognition databases through the untargeted scraping of fa…

Gina Romero · Apr 21, 2026 · full quote
We will champion the report and call for governments and other stakeholders to implement its recommendations, including the need to strictly prohibit the use and transfer of surveillance technologies that fail to comply with international human rights law, as well as to ban the u…

ARTICLE 19 · Jun 15, 2026 · full quote
Governments should enact binding, enforceable and human rights-based regulation to govern AI systems, including a ban on the development and deployment of AI systems that are incompatible with international human rights law.

Amnesty International · Apr 2026 · full quote
Indiscriminate AI-powered mass surveillance of the population must be prohibited.

United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism · 2025 · full quote

AI amplifies surveillance

Supporters say AI does not simply continue existing surveillance practices but supercharges them by processing huge amounts of data at scale, expanding surveillance powers exponentially and creating novel risks that laws may not yet address. Because AI changes the reach and speed of surveillance, they argue that policymakers should draw hard red lines now.

Now that we recognize the danger of AI-enhanced mass surveillance, we can make the policy choices not to implement it.

Bruce Schneier · Jul 10, 2026 · full quote
The idea of surveillance that overreaches legal mandates has been an ongoing concern, but with AI, it gets supercharged. It happens at scale, and I think updated rules are needed.

Steve Feldstein · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote
Combining that data with the power of AI would expand the Pentagon’s surveillance powers exponentially, and companies like Anthropic are well within their rights to push back on that outcome.

Samir Jain · Mar 16, 2026 · full quote
The reason we chose fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance as the areas where we simply can't say yes is because the technology is so new that we do not believe the laws may be perfectly designed to account for how the technology could work.

Daniela Amodei · Jul 2, 2026 · full quote
We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.

Zachary Lampell · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote

Biometric surveillance harms

Many supporters single out facial recognition and other remote biometric identification as inherently invasive forms of mass surveillance, especially in public spaces. They argue these systems monitor everyone rather than only suspects, that harms persist whether identification is real-time or after the fact, and that even perfect accuracy would not cure the underlying problem.

In human rights terms, there is no salient difference between real-time and post-remote biometric identification. Threats posed to rights and freedoms are not reduced just because authorities or companies have extra time to review footage.

Chloé Berthélémy · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
Live facial recognition is not just another camera on a street corner; it is a mass surveillance tool that can scan every face in a crowd, compare people in real time against a watch-list and permanently change what it feels like to stand in the public square.

Lord Strasburger · Mar 9, 2026 · full quote
Live facial-recognition technology subjects everyone to constant surveillance, which goes against the democratic principle that people should not be monitored unless there is suspicion of wrongdoing.

Zoë Garbett · Feb 11, 2026 · full quote
It’s past time for the federal government to end its use of this abusive surveillance technology. A great place to start is its use for immigration enforcement, given ICE and CBP’s utter disdain for the law. Face surveillance in the hands of the government is a fundamentally harm…

India McKinney · Feb 5, 2026 · full quote
To respect privacy and human dignity, MEPs ask for a permanent ban on the automated recognition of individuals in public spaces, noting that citizens should only be monitored when suspected of a crime. Parliament calls for the use of private facial recognition databases (like the…

European Parliament · 2021 · full quote

Targets dissent and minorities

Another line of argument is that AI surveillance is used to suppress protesters, journalists, migrants, and communities already subject to overpolicing, discrimination, and criminalization. On this view, banning these tools is necessary to prevent them from reinforcing bias and expanding repressive infrastructures.

AI tools are supercharging surveillance and suppression of protesters, journalists, human rights defenders, and other communities at risk. We therefore echo calls for the adoption of human rights-centered binding legal standards and global governance mechanisms to regulate digita…

Franco Giandana Di Gena · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
As a Chicagoan, I know Black and Brown communities are no strangers to overpolicing, surveillance, and criminalization. And I have had a front row seat as the Trump administration has aggressively accelerated the use of technology and artificial intelligence in its militarized im…

Delia C. Ramirez · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote
Amnesty International’s own research has shown that the deployment of harmful technologies such as facial recognition and automation in the public sector have threatened the right to privacy and social protection in India and have led to discrimination and exclusion of marginaliz…

Erika Guevara Rosas · Feb 20, 2026 · full quote
Biometric surveillance poses an urgent threat to our fundamental rights. Facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies have been used by authoritarian regimes around the world to target journalists, protestors, and marginalized communities; they are increasingl…

Jenna Ruddock · Feb 5, 2026 · full quote
Many AI systems have been proven to magnify discrimination and inequality. In particular, so-called ‘predictive policing’ and biometric surveillance systems are disproportionately used to target marginalised groups including racialised, working class and migrant communities. Thes…

Open Rights Group · Jul 26, 2024 · full quote
As Santa Cruz rightly recognized, predictive policing and facial recognition are dangerous, racially biased technologies that should never be used by our government. [...] Lawmakers across the country have a responsibility to step up and dismantle surveillance systems that have …

Matt Cagle · 2020 · full quote

Closes warrant loopholes

Supporters also stress that agencies can buy commercial data and use AI to analyze it without warrants, oversight, or accountability, sidestepping constitutional and statutory protections. They argue that bans and related reforms are needed to close these loopholes and curb a growing surveillance apparatus backed by contractors and data-sharing systems.

The government wants to use AI to analyze Americans’ information obtained without a warrant through purchases from data brokers and “incidental” collection from foreign intelligence surveillance. Congress must act now and demand closures to these loopholes that undermine our Cons…

Jeramie D. Scott · Apr 14, 2026 · full quote
Federal agencies are sidestepping longstanding legal protections by buying vast amounts of personal data and using artificial intelligence to analyze it—without a warrant, without oversight, and without accountability. That is not how our system is supposed to work.

Raúl Torrez · Mar 24, 2026 · full quote
Big Tech has built a massive surveillance economy to track, package and sell deeply detailed information about our movements, purchases, preferences, and relationships. Now, out of control federal agencies are buying this data to evade constitutional protections and track and sur…

William Tong · Mar 26, 2026 · full quote
Congress can start by passing the bipartisan Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, a commonsense reform bill that bans the government from buying data that it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain. Congress must also impose basic guardrails on the government’s use of novel AI …

Ashley Gorski · Mar 9, 2026 · full quote
ICE and CBP are not only immigration policing agencies; they are also central pillars of the new security state with a rapidly expanding surveillance apparatus powered by AI-driven technologies, private contractors, and massive data-sharing systems.

Paromita Shah · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote
Lawmakers must also act at the federal level, including by cutting funds for ICE or Border Patrol, and redirecting funds away from surveillance-related contracts and towards communities.

Jesse Franzblau · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Omnipresent policing

Opponents present pervasive AI monitoring as a policing tool: keeping the state's eyes on people at all times, supervising officers continuously, flagging problems, and encouraging both officials and citizens to behave better because they know they are being watched. In this view, broad AI surveillance capacity can improve order, accountability, and crime prevention rather than something to ban.

When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times. Similarly, in the world of pol…

Shabana Mahmood · 2026 · full quote
Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times [...] AI will report that problem [...] Citizens will be on their best behavior

Larry Ellison · 2024 · full quote

Middle ground

Ban with narrow exceptions

Some speakers support prohibiting mass domestic or public-space surveillance while still leaving room for lawful foreign intelligence, specifically authorized uses, or limited exceptions. Their position favors strong restrictions on mass surveillance, but not necessarily an absolute ban on every possible surveillance context.

Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values.

Anthropic · Feb 26, 2026 · full quote
AI systems that pose a threat to people’s safety, rights or livelihoods are banned from use in the EU. The use of real-time remote biometric identification systems such as facial recognition by law enforcement authorities in public spaces is also prohibited, with some limited exc…

Council of the European Union · Jun 29, 2026 · full quote
American AI technologies shall neither be developed nor used by the national security enterprise to censor free speech, embed ideological bias, or conduct unauthorized or unlawful surveillance activities.

Donald Trump · Jun 5, 2026 · full quote
AI may not be used to: • Conduct mass surveillance, facial recognition, or social scoring unless explicitly authorized by law and governing body.

Transportation Authority of Marin · Mar 9, 2026 · full quote

Rules before expansion

A more procedural position stresses that police and agencies have been given too much room to experiment, so legal frameworks, warrant requirements, and guardrails should be in place before any further expansion. This approach emphasizes oversight and defined limits without always spelling out a total blanket ban across all settings.

This has effectively given police a very long leash to experiment with these technologies. And now we're in a tipping point situation where it's about to be expanded all over the country, and there's a real necessity for those legal frameworks to be in place.

Jasleen Chaggar · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
Whether through the GSRA or another vehicle, Congress must work together to pair a reauthorization of the surveillance authority with warrant requirements.

Allie Maloney · Jun 24, 2026 · full quote
Congress can start by passing the bipartisan Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, a commonsense reform bill that bans the government from buying data that it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain. Congress must also impose basic guardrails on the government’s use of novel AI …

Ashley Gorski · Mar 9, 2026 · full quote
The idea of surveillance that overreaches legal mandates has been an ongoing concern, but with AI, it gets supercharged. It happens at scale, and I think updated rules are needed.

Steve Feldstein · Mar 2, 2026 · full quote

Insights

Support for restrictions appears across civil-liberties groups, elected officials, attorneys general, AI companies, and international institutions, not just one sector.
Facial recognition and other biometric systems are the most recurring concrete examples of the AI surveillance practices supporters want banned.
Several quotes pair mass-surveillance bans with other AI red lines, especially autonomous weapons, nuclear decision-making, and social scoring.
The scope of the proposed ban varies across quotes: some call for total prohibitions without exceptions, while others focus on mass domestic surveillance, public-space uses, or unlawful surveillance.
The few opposing quotes emphasize policing benefits from constant visibility and deterrence, rather than directly disputing the privacy and human-rights concerns.

The debate centers on whether AI turns surveillance into an unacceptable threat to privacy, human rights, and democratic freedoms, especially through biometric identification and large-scale data analysis. The opposing view in the quotes presents constant AI monitoring as a practical way to supervise conduct and get ahead of crime. Some conditional positions support bans on mass domestic or public-space surveillance but still allow narrow exceptions or call first for clearer legal guardrails and warrant rules.

Cast your vote:

Results (105 votes):

Total (105 votes)

For 101 (96%) Abstain 1 (1%) Against 3 (3%)

For (100)

Chloé Berthélémy
Senior Policy Advisor at European Digital Rights (EDRi), focusing on digital rights and biometric surveillance.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In human rights terms, there is no salient difference between real-time and post-remote biometric identification. Threats posed to rights and freedoms are not reduced just because authorities or companies have extra time to review footage.
AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Matt Mahmoudi
Amnesty AI and human rights researcher

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Failing to enact a total ban on public biometric surveillance creates broad national security exemptions that jeopardize fundamental rights.
AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Graciela Guzmán
Illinois State Senator.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress must stop that cycle: abolish DHS, end federal data purchases that sidestep constitutional protections, hold corporations accountable, and protect states defending our people.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bruce Nestor
Attorney based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The growth in surveillance technology and the use of artificial intelligence to augment that physical force pose a direct threat to our remaining democratic institutions and freedoms and require immediate action by Congress before the forces of repre...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jesse Franzblau
Associate Director of Policy at the National Immigrant Justice Center.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Lawmakers must also act at the federal level, including by cutting funds for ICE or Border Patrol, and redirecting funds away from surveillance-related contracts and towards communities.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tania Unzueta
Political Director and co-founder of Mijente.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Nearly ten years later, that same surveillance infrastructure is generating even greater profits. Palantir alone has received more than $1.8 billion in federal contracts since 2025, including a $1 billion DHS agreement that allows ICE and CBP to buy ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Paromita Shah
Executive Director of Just Futures Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

ICE and CBP are not only immigration policing agencies; they are also central pillars of the new security state with a rapidly expanding surveillance apparatus powered by AI-driven technologies, private contractors, and massive data-sharing systems.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Delia C. Ramirez
U.S. Representative for Illinois's 3rd congressional district.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As a Chicagoan, I know Black and Brown communities are no strangers to overpolicing, surveillance, and criminalization. And I have had a front row seat as the Trump administration has aggressively accelerated the use of technology and artificial inte...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Henry C. "Hank" Johnson Jr.
U.S. Representative from Georgia; member of the House Judiciary Committee.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Americans cannot afford gas, groceries, or healthcare, yet the Trump Administration and MAGA Republicans are pouring money into funding these mass surveillance tools used by ICE agents operating with impunity. It has got to stop. We must fight back.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alex Turner
AI safety researcher and former Google DeepMind research scientist.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I resigned from Google DeepMind bc it broke its founding promise by selling AI to the military without restrictions against killer robots or mass spying. For months, I worked to stop this but watched powerful ethicists and institutions choose silenc...
more Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bruce Schneier
Security technologist and author

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Now that we recognize the danger of AI-enhanced mass surveillance, we can make the policy choices not to implement it.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Franco Giandana Di Gena
Policy analyst at Access Now.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI tools are supercharging surveillance and suppression of protesters, journalists, human rights defenders, and other communities at risk. We therefore echo calls for the adoption of human rights-centered binding legal standards and global governance...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Zachary Lampell
Senior Legal Advisor and Coordinator of the Digital Rights Program at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
International Center for Not-for-Profit Law
International legal organization working on civil society, digital rights, and the rule of law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Daniela Amodei
President and co-founder of Anthropic.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The reason we chose fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance as the areas where we simply can't say yes is because the technology is so new that we do not believe the laws may be perfectly designed to account for how the technology cou...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Zach Lampell
Senior Legal Advisor and Coordinator for Digital Programs at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Governments should adopt clear prohibitions or moratoria on AI systems and uses that pose unacceptable risks to human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 2026)

added 17d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Council of the European Union
EU Council of governments

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI systems that pose a threat to people’s safety, rights or livelihoods are banned from use in the EU. The use of real-time remote biometric identification systems such as facial recognition by law enforcement authorities in public spaces is also pro...
more AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
David Boyer

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The one by my house, it hits me every time I go on the turnpike…Daily commuters, their whole habits are there. These are pinging tens of thousands of license plates every day here in our state. They're not just going after criminals. They're pinging ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)

added 5d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Béatrice Fresko-Rolfo
Member of Monaco’s National Council and delegate to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In the wrong hands, [AI] becomes a tool for mass surveillance, predictive policing, risk rating, social scoring, and even the censorship of political opinions. AI, however, does not confine itself to merely watching; it is therefore up to us to set l...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Allie Maloney
Policy Analyst at Americans for Responsible Innovation; former Scoville Peace Fellow at the Federation of American Scientists.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Whether through the GSRA or another vehicle, Congress must work together to pair a reauthorization of the surveillance authority with warrant requirements.
AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Patrick Casey
Irish parliamentarian; member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

If we fail to act with urgency, we risk allowing our information space to be shaped not by democratic deliberation, but by opaque algorithms, foreign interference, and unaccountable private actors. The report makes this clear: AI systems depend on ma...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
ARTICLE 19
Free expression and human rights organisation

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We will champion the report and call for governments and other stakeholders to implement its recommendations, including the need to strictly prohibit the use and transfer of surveillance technologies that fail to comply with international human right...
more AI Verified source (Jun 15, 2026) 1 of 2

added 29d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Human Rights Watch
Global human rights advocacy organization

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The risk of privacy violations is notable, as AI systems deployed in military use cases are often “dual use” and developed and deployed in non-military settings where widespread and indiscriminate data collection may constitute mass surveillance, whi...
more AI Verified source (Jun 14, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Office of Senator Chris Coons
Official office of U.S. Senator Chris Coons of Delaware.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Responsible Artificial Intelligence Defense Act would require AI-enabled autonomous systems to be deployed in a way that ensures human operators are able to control, monitor, detect unintended behavior, and manually disengage or deactivate any de...
more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Donald Trump
President of the United States

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

American AI technologies shall neither be developed nor used by the national security enterprise to censor free speech, embed ideological bias, or conduct unauthorized or unlawful surveillance activities.
AI Verified source (Jun 5, 2026)

added 11d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Matthew Guariglia
Senior Policy Analyst at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, specializing in surveillance, privacy, and civil liberties.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

EFF opposes the use of generative AI for the purposes of mass government surveillance because that use supercharges unconstitutional violations of civil liberties and because government secrecy prevents the public and lawmakers from knowing when gene...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)

added 11d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Matthew Guariglia
EFF activism director

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

EFF opposes the use of generative AI for the purposes of mass government surveillance because that use supercharges unconstitutional violations of civil liberties and because government secrecy prevents the public and lawmakers from knowing when gene...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Kirsten Gillibrand
U.S. Senator from New York; member of the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence Committees

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The most critical decisions affecting our national security and the lives of our service members must always be made by human beings, not unaccountable machines. Right now, the Pentagon is moving toward deploying incredibly powerful AI technology wit...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America
U.S. independent labor union representing workers across multiple industries.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We therefore call for public and worker control of Artificial Intelligence technologies, and for the end of their use for mass surveillance and as weapons of war, in order to ensure that AI tools are used for the benefit of working people and not to ...
more AI Verified source (May 29, 2026)

added 3d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Óscar López Águeda
Spanish digital transformation minister.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The European AI Regulation, promoted by the Spanish presidency, established eight prohibitions related to subliminal techniques, vulnerability exploitation, biometric classification, social scoring, predictive surveillance, emotion recognition, face ...
more AI Verified source (May 26, 2026)

added 4d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate