We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ban the use of AI for mass surveillance
ai-regulation
data-privacy
digital-democracy
law
policy
privacy
regulations
surveillance
ai-governance
Cast your vote:
Results (85 votes):
Total
(85 votes)
For 83 (98%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 2 (2%)
·
For (82)
-
Graciela GuzmánIllinois State Senator.votes For and says:
Congress must stop that cycle: abolish DHS, end federal data purchases that sidestep constitutional protections, hold corporations accountable, and protect states defending our people.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bruce NestorAttorney based in Minneapolis, Minnesota.votes For and says:
The growth in surveillance technology and the use of artificial intelligence to augment that physical force pose a direct threat to our remaining democratic institutions and freedoms and require immediate action by Congress before the forces of repre...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jesse FranzblauAssociate Director of Policy at the National Immigrant Justice Center.votes For and says:
Lawmakers must also act at the federal level, including by cutting funds for ICE or Border Patrol, and redirecting funds away from surveillance-related contracts and towards communities.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tania UnzuetaPolitical Director and co-founder of Mijente.votes For and says:
Nearly ten years later, that same surveillance infrastructure is generating even greater profits. Palantir alone has received more than $1.8 billion in federal contracts since 2025, including a $1 billion DHS agreement that allows ICE and CBP to buy ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paromita ShahExecutive Director of Just Futures Law.votes For and says:
ICE and CBP are not only immigration policing agencies; they are also central pillars of the new security state with a rapidly expanding surveillance apparatus powered by AI-driven technologies, private contractors, and massive data-sharing systems.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Delia C. RamirezU.S. Representative for Illinois's 3rd congressional district.votes For and says:
As a Chicagoan, I know Black and Brown communities are no strangers to overpolicing, surveillance, and criminalization. And I have had a front row seat as the Trump administration has aggressively accelerated the use of technology and artificial inte...
more AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Henry C. "Hank" Johnson Jr.U.S. Representative from Georgia; member of the House Judiciary Committee.votes For and says:
Americans cannot afford gas, groceries, or healthcare, yet the Trump Administration and MAGA Republicans are pouring money into funding these mass surveillance tools used by ICE agents operating with impunity. It has got to stop. We must fight back.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alex TurnerAI safety researcher and former Google DeepMind research scientist.votes For and says:
I resigned from Google DeepMind bc it broke its founding promise by selling AI to the military without restrictions against killer robots or mass spying. For months, I worked to stop this but watched powerful ethicists and institutions choose silenc...
more Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bruce SchneierSecurity technologist and authorvotes For and says:
Now that we recognize the danger of AI-enhanced mass surveillance, we can make the policy choices not to implement it.
AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Franco Giandana Di GenaPolicy analyst at Access Now.votes For and says:
AI tools are supercharging surveillance and suppression of protesters, journalists, human rights defenders, and other communities at risk. We therefore echo calls for the adoption of human rights-centered binding legal standards and global governance...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Zachary LampellSenior Legal Advisor and Coordinator of the Digital Rights Program at the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law.votes For and says:
We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
International Center for Not-for-Profit LawInternational legal organization working on civil society, digital rights, and the rule of law.votes For and says:
We can and should implement red lines where AI cannot comply with human rights.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daniela AmodeiPresident and co-founder of Anthropic.votes For and says:
The reason we chose fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance as the areas where we simply can't say yes is because the technology is so new that we do not believe the laws may be perfectly designed to account for how the technology cou...
more AI Verified source (Jul 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Council of the European UnionEU Council of governmentsvotes For and says:
AI systems that pose a threat to people’s safety, rights or livelihoods are banned from use in the EU. The use of real-time remote biometric identification systems such as facial recognition by law enforcement authorities in public spaces is also pro...
more AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Allie MaloneyPolicy Analyst at Americans for Responsible Innovation; former Scoville Peace Fellow at the Federation of American Scientists.votes For and says:
Whether through the GSRA or another vehicle, Congress must work together to pair a reauthorization of the surveillance authority with warrant requirements.
AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Patrick CaseyIrish parliamentarian; member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.votes For and says:
If we fail to act with urgency, we risk allowing our information space to be shaped not by democratic deliberation, but by opaque algorithms, foreign interference, and unaccountable private actors. The report makes this clear: AI systems depend on ma...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ARTICLE 19Free expression and human rights organisationvotes For and says:
We will champion the report and call for governments and other stakeholders to implement its recommendations, including the need to strictly prohibit the use and transfer of surveillance technologies that fail to comply with international human right...
more AI Verified source (Jun 15, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Human Rights WatchGlobal human rights advocacy organizationvotes For and says:
The risk of privacy violations is notable, as AI systems deployed in military use cases are often “dual use” and developed and deployed in non-military settings where widespread and indiscriminate data collection may constitute mass surveillance, whi...
more AI Verified source (Jun 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of Senator Chris CoonsOfficial office of U.S. Senator Chris Coons of Delaware.votes For and says:
The Responsible Artificial Intelligence Defense Act would require AI-enabled autonomous systems to be deployed in a way that ensures human operators are able to control, monitor, detect unintended behavior, and manually disengage or deactivate any de...
more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Matthew GuarigliaEFF activism directorvotes For and says:
EFF opposes the use of generative AI for the purposes of mass government surveillance because that use supercharges unconstitutional violations of civil liberties and because government secrecy prevents the public and lawmakers from knowing when gene...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kirsten GillibrandU.S. Senator from New York; member of the Senate Armed Services and Intelligence Committeesvotes For and says:
The most critical decisions affecting our national security and the lives of our service members must always be made by human beings, not unaccountable machines. Right now, the Pentagon is moving toward deploying incredibly powerful AI technology wit...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sara B. GeroAmnesty International Netherlands contributor writing on AI-enabled repression and human rights.votes For and says:
Some forms of AI surveillance must be banned altogether, including highly invasive spyware.
AI Verified source (May 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeramie D. ScottDirector of the Electronic Privacy Information Center's Surveillance Oversight Program.votes For and says:
The government wants to use AI to analyze Americans’ information obtained without a warrant through purchases from data brokers and “incidental” collection from foreign intelligence surveillance. Congress must act now and demand closures to these loo...
more AI Verified source (Apr 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Amnesty InternationalHuman rights NGOvotes For and says:
Governments should enact binding, enforceable and human rights-based regulation to govern AI systems, including a ban on the development and deployment of AI systems that are incompatible with international human rights law.
AI Verified source (Apr 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Amazon Employees for Climate JusticeEmployee-led advocacy organization addressing Amazon's climate, labor, and technology policies.votes For and says:
We are calling on our leaders and fellow workers in the tech industry to urge Congress to enact privacy protections, specifically closing the data broker loophole that allows the government to buy mass surveillance from data brokers, and ban AI use f...
more AI Verified source (Mar 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
William TongAttorney General of Connecticut.votes For and says:
Big Tech has built a massive surveillance economy to track, package and sell deeply detailed information about our movements, purchases, preferences, and relationships. Now, out of control federal agencies are buying this data to evade constitutional...
more AI Verified source (Mar 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Anthony G. BrownAttorney General of Maryland.votes For and says:
Attorney General Anthony G. Brown joined a coalition of 17 attorneys general urging Congress to take immediate action to halt federal agencies’ use of commercially purchased data and artificial intelligence (AI) tools that enable mass surveillance of...
more AI Verified source (Mar 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rob BontaCalifornia attorney generalvotes For and says:
I urge Congress to take action now and limit the ability of the federal government to deploy mass surveillance on Americans.
AI Verified source (Mar 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Raúl TorrezAttorney General of New Mexico.votes For and says:
Federal agencies are sidestepping longstanding legal protections by buying vast amounts of personal data and using artificial intelligence to analyze it—without a warrant, without oversight, and without accountability. That is not how our system is s...
more AI Verified source (Mar 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elizabeth WarrenU.S. Senator (D-MA)votes For and says:
I am concerned that the terms of this agreement may permit the Trump Administration to use OpenAI’s technology to conduct mass surveillance of Americans and build lethal autonomous weapons that could harm civilians with little to no human oversight.
AI Verified source (Mar 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elissa SlotkinU.S. Senator from Michigan; former CIA analyst and Pentagon official; member of the Senate Armed Services Committeevotes For and says:
My bill ensures a human is involved when deadly autonomous weapons are fired, AI cannot be used to spy on the American people, and that a human is on the switch to launch nuclear weapons.
AI Verified source (Mar 17, 2026) 1 of 3DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Samir JainVice President of Policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT)votes For and says:
Combining that data with the power of AI would expand the Pentagon’s surveillance powers exponentially, and companies like Anthropic are well within their rights to push back on that outcome.
AI Verified source (Mar 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Patrick ToomeyDeputy director of the ACLU National Security Project.votes For and says:
AI-powered surveillance poses immense dangers to our democracy. Anthropic’s public advocacy for AI guardrails is laudable and protected by the First Amendment — not something the Pentagon should be punishing.
AI Verified source (Mar 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
MicrosoftTechnology companyvotes For and says:
Microsoft also believes that American AI should not be used to conduct domestic mass surveillance or start a war without human control.
AI Verified source (Mar 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ashley GorskiSenior staff attorney with the ACLU National Security Project.votes For and says:
Congress can start by passing the bipartisan Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act, a commonsense reform bill that bans the government from buying data that it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain. Congress must also impose basic guardrails on the...
more AI Verified source (Mar 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Transportation Authority of MarinCalifornia transportation agency serving Marin County.votes For and says:
AI may not be used to: • Conduct mass surveillance, facial recognition, or social scoring unless explicitly authorized by law and governing body.
AI Verified source (Mar 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lord StrasburgerLiberal Democrat life peervotes For and says:
Live facial recognition is not just another camera on a street corner; it is a mass surveillance tool that can scan every face in a crowd, compare people in real time against a watch-list and permanently change what it feels like to stand in the publ...
more AI Verified source (Mar 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Baroness DooceyLiberal Democrat life peer in the UK House of Lords and advocate for civil liberties and privacy safeguards.votes For and says:
We must ensure that Parliament, not oblique algorithms, decides the limit of state power.
AI Verified source (Mar 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Privacy InternationalUK privacy and digital rights NGO.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Steve FeldsteinSenior Fellow in the Democracy, Conflict, and Governance Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.votes For and says:
The idea of surveillance that overreaches legal mandates has been an ongoing concern, but with AI, it gets supercharged. It happens at scale, and I think updated rules are needed.
AI Verified source (Mar 2, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Corinne WorthingtonAdvocacy and Community Engagement Manager at the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (STOP); New York privacy and surveillance policy advocate.votes For and says:
Facial recognition should never be part of New Yorkers’ lives, least of all when they’re buying groceries or unlocking their front door. We’ve seen over and over how facial recognition perpetuates discrimination and systemic bias, and we’re proud to ...
more AI Verified source (Mar 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alejandra Montoya-BoyerCivil-rights and technology policy leadervotes For and says:
As civil rights advocates, we have and will always stand against mass domestic surveillance and technology weaponized against our communities, especially those historically overpoliced and wrongfully targeted by the government.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Greg CasarU.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucusvotes For and says:
This is a flashing red siren for anyone who cares about keeping America safe and free. The Trump administration wants to use A.I. to spy on Americans without a warrant and to give A.I. power to make life and death decisions without humans involved. T...
more AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:
Our safety and basic rights must not be at the mercy of a company's internal policy; lawmakers must work to codify these overwhelmingly popular red lines into law.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Zoe LofgrenU.S. Representative from California's 18th district; Ranking Member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committeevotes For and says:
Any freedom loving American can appreciate Anthropic's attempts to prevent the DOD from using its AI model for mass surveillance of Americans.
AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Hakeem JeffriesU.S. Representative from New York and House Democratic Leader.votes For and says:
Donald Trump and the Department of Defense want to use powerful artificial intelligence technology to spy on American citizens through mass surveillance. Anthropic, a leading American company, has courageously pushed back against this shocking invasi...
more AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sean ParnellPentagon chief spokesperson in 2026.votes For and says:
The military has no interest in using AI to conduct mass surveillance of Americans (which is illegal) nor do we want to use AI to develop autonomous weapons that operate without human involvement.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AnthropicAI safety research companyvotes For and says:
Mass domestic surveillance. We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Valerie FousheeU.S. Representative for North Carolina's 4th congressional district; sponsor of the Protecting Consumers from Deceptive AI Actvotes For and says:
I firmly object to any effort by the Administration to strong-arm AI companies into enabling mass surveillance or developing weapons that operate without meaningful human control. These uses threaten civil liberties and human rights at home and aroun...
more AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:
But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values. AI-driven mass surveillance presents serious, novel risks to our fundamental liberties. To the extent that such surveillance is currently legal, this is on...
more AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Erika Guevara RosasSenior Director of Research, Advocacy Policy and Campaigns at Amnesty Internationalvotes For and says:
Amnesty International’s own research has shown that the deployment of harmful technologies such as facial recognition and automation in the public sector have threatened the right to privacy and social protection in India and have led to discriminati...
more AI Verified source (Feb 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jenna RuddockAdvocacy Director at Free Press Action, focused on civil liberties and surveillance technology.votes For and says:
Biometric surveillance poses an urgent threat to our fundamental rights. Facial recognition and other biometric surveillance technologies have been used by authoritarian regimes around the world to target journalists, protestors, and marginalized com...
more AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
India McKinneyEFF Director of Federal Affairsvotes For and says:
It’s past time for the federal government to end its use of this abusive surveillance technology. A great place to start is its use for immigration enforcement, given ICE and CBP’s utter disdain for the law. Face surveillance in the hands of the gove...
more AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lia HollandFight for the Future campaigns directorvotes For and says:
Facial recognition creates a broad, warrantless hoard of surveillance data that can instantly be weaponized for intimidation and oppression. It has no place in a free society and we will continue to fight to see it banned in every arena.
AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Edward J. MarkeyU.S. Senator from Massachusettsvotes For and says:
Without oversight, this technology is dangerous in the hands of any government, and the Trump Administration is abusing it to trample on privacy, freedom of speech, and civil liberties.
AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeff MerkleyU.S. Senator from Oregonvotes For and says:
For years, I’ve been ringing the alarm bells about the dangers of a national surveillance state built on facial recognition technology. Now, we’re seeing Trump’s lawless federal agents deploy this technology on our streets across the nation as he tri...
more AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pramila JayapalU.S. Representative (D-WA)votes For and says:
We are at an incredibly dangerous moment in this country, where overzealous and overly violent ICE and Border Patrol agents are increasing their use of biometric identification systems. This has become a surveillance state with militarized federal tr...
more AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ron WydenU.S. Senator from Oregon, Ranking Member of the Senate Finance Committee; longtime advocate for healthcare and technology policyvotes For and says:
ICE and CBP have trampled on our Constitution when they build databases of regular people concerned about ICE committing violence in their communities or scan the faces of people on the street to run through their surveillance systems. I'm glad to wo...
more AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of BangladeshNational government of Bangladesh, speaking through its delegation at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
The government shall also prohibit AI companies from deploying AI-enabled social scoring and indiscriminate biometric mass surveillance in public spaces.
AI Verified source (Feb 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Henry GarridoExecutive Director of District Council 37, New York City's largest public employee union.votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Fight for the FutureDigital-rights advocacy organization campaigning against surveillance technologies and for online civil liberties.votes For and says:
Our demand of lawmakers at the city, state, and federal levels is to address CBP’s and others’ illegal access to this surveillance network and to ban AI surveillance tech.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Adam SchiffU.S. Senator from California; former House Intelligence Committee chairvotes For and says:
There are good reasons to use AI technology to advance our national security, however — just as with any tool, we cannot depend on technology alone to guide us, particularly when the risks of harm can be fatal. My legislation would [...] ensure that ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:
We have long believed that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Open Rights GroupDigital rights advocacy groupvotes For and says:
Many AI systems have been proven to magnify discrimination and inequality. In particular, so-called ‘predictive policing’ and biometric surveillance systems are disproportionately used to target marginalised groups including racialised, working class...
more AI Verified source (Jul 26, 2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mher HakobyanAmnesty AI regulation advocacy advisor.votes For and says:
There is a risk the European Parliament may upend considerable human rights protections reached during the committee vote on May 11, opening the door for the use of technologies which are in direct conflict with international human rights law. [...] ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 13, 2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Marcel KolajaCzech digital rights activist; former MEPvotes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Daniel TherrienPrivacy Commissioner of Canada (2014–2022)votes For and says:
Clearview sells a facial recognition tool that allows law enforcement and commercial organizations to match photographs of unknown people against a massive databank of 3 billion images, scraped from the Internet. The vast majority of these people hav...
more AI Verified source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European ParliamentEU legislative bodyvotes For and says:
To respect privacy and human dignity, MEPs ask for a permanent ban on the automated recognition of individuals in public spaces, noting that citizens should only be monitored when suspected of a crime. Parliament calls for the use of private facial r...
more AI Verified source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Access Nowdefends and extends digital rightsvotes For and says:
Perhaps the greatest threat posed by technologies that fall under the umbrella of artificial intelligence comes from their ability to facilitate the mass surveillance of populations. Advances in machine learning in particular have significantly reduc...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Matt CagleACLU tech and civil liberties attorneyvotes For and says:
As Santa Cruz rightly recognized, predictive policing and facial recognition are dangerous, racially biased technologies that should never be used by our government. [...] Lawmakers across the country have a responsibility to step up and dismantle s...
more AI Verified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)US civil liberties advocacy organizationvotes For and says:
The ACLU is calling on U.S. policymakers to contend with the technology’s enormous power, prohibit its use for mass surveillance [...].
Unverifiable source (2019) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ben SaulUnited Nations Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism.votes For and says:
AI systems that cannot meet human rights standards or that pose an unacceptable risk to human rights must be prohibited from use, transfer, or export.
Unverifiable source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering TerrorismUN expert on counter-terrorism, human rightsvotes For and says:
Indiscriminate AI-powered mass surveillance of the population must be prohibited.
Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dragoș TudoracheMEP; EU AI Act co-rapporteurvotes For and says:
We don't want mass surveillance, we don't want social scoring, we don't want predictive policing in the European Union, full stop.
Unverifiable source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
UNESCOUN agency for education, science, culturevotes For and says:
It bans as invasive the use of AI systems for social scoring and mass surveillance.
Unverifiable source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ylva JohanssonEU Commissioner for Home Affairsvotes For and says:
there is no room for mass surveillance in our society. Our proposal bans mass social scoring [...]
Unverifiable source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Surveillance Technology Oversight Project (S.T.O.P.)New York-based privacy and civil-rights organization advocating limits on surveillance technology.votes For and says:
The civil rights group renewed its call on the City Council and the New York State Legislature to ban facial recognition and other invasive, biased forms of biometric surveillance.
Unverifiable source (May 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
We Will Not Be DividedNamed 2026 open letter by Google and OpenAI employees opposing domestic AI mass surveillance and autonomous killing without human oversight.votes For and says:
We hope our leaders will put aside their differences and stand together to continue to refuse the Department of War's current demands for permission to use our models for domestic mass surveillance and autonomously killing people without human oversi...
more Unverifiable source (Feb 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Meredith WhittakerSignal President; AI policy advocatevotes For and says:
The deeper integration of AI agents into devices is pretty perilous for encrypted services because they require access to huge amounts of data stored in various apps. [...] It threatens to break the blood-brain barrier between the application layer a...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)UN human rights officevotes For and says:
The use of emotion recognition technologies, such as polygraphs, to try to infer how a person feels, what they think, or the veracity of what they are saying, is not only technologically flawed but also highly likely to result in discriminatory, bias...
more Disputed source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Wojciech Rafał WiewiórowskiEuropean Data Protection Supervisorvotes For and says:
The EDPS also welcomes the inclusion in the convention, among the definitions to be provided, of the notion of “AI subject” and, in connection with this definition, he inclusion of procedural safeguards and rights for “AI subjects” (namely, persons a...
more Disputed source (2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (2)
-
Shabana MahmoodUK Home Secretary; Labour MP for Birmingham Ladywood; former Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretaryvotes Against and says:
When I was in justice, my ultimate vision for that part of the criminal justice system was to achieve, by means of AI and technology, what Jeremy Bentham tried to do with his Panopticon. That is that the eyes of the state can be on you at all times. ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Larry EllisonOracle co-founder and chairmanvotes Against and says:
Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times [...] AI will report that problem [...] Citizens will be on their best behavior
Unverifiable source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-governance
votes