We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Expert opinions on Policy
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances on Policy from AI researchers, executives and policymakers.
6362 sourced quotes · 57 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
560 opinions
For (544)Simon HuntChief Product Officer at Securonix; cybersecurity product leader with over 30 years of experience as a CTO, CPO, and GM.votes For and says:“Okay, the AI SOC operator can operate within those parameters, but if it goes beyond them, it goes back to the human.” Having a human in the loop for every decision becomes having a human in the loop for exceptional decisions. [...] “I would, howeve...
more AI Verified source (Nov 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Gabriel SzeUniversity of Portsmouth researcher writing on AI governance, accountability, and human oversight of agentic systems.abstains and says:Existing responsible AI governance frameworks mandate human oversight. Yet they share a critical assumption: that competent human overseers remain present and capable of exercising meaningful oversight and control over AI decisions. Accountability mu...
more AI Verified source (Apr 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (15)Garrett GrossField Chief Information Security Officer at Portnox, an enterprise access-control provider.votes Against and says:A lot of tools can tell you an AI agent is behaving strangely. Very few can act on that at the network layer, without waiting on a human to approve a ticket. That’s the piece we’re closing.
AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Slow down AI development
190 opinions
For (137)Mustafa SuleymanMicrosoft AI CEO; authorvotes For and says:If consciousness started to emerge in training, I would call for everyone to stop AI development until we could design out those properties.
AI Verified source (Nov 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (17)António GuterresUN Secretary-Generalabstains and says:Governments must assume their responsibilities. It is the first responsibility of any government to protect its citizens – including from the threats of artificial intelligence. National action is essential. But global coordination is also indispensa...
more AI Verified source (Sep 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (37)Arvind KrishnaIBM chairman and CEOvotes Against and says:It's actually impossible to control it unless we think the entire world is going to sing kumbaya and say let's slow down, which as you said is unlikely. So if that's the case, fine. You put slowdown here maybe. Well, okay. Does it mean Japan slows do...
more AI Verified source (Oct 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI will create more jobs than it destroys
518 opinions
For (269)Abstain (135)Sudhir ChowdharyEditor – Tech at The Financial Express and veteran technology journalist covering AI, business, and policy.abstains and says:AI is creating opportunities in model development, chip design, data infrastructure, cybersecurity, governance and enterprise implementation. The question is whether these roles will grow fast enough to offset pressure on routine work, and whether di...
more AI Verified source (Nov 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (115)Imagining the Digital Future CenterResearch centre at Elon University studying the social impact of digital technologies and artificial intelligence.votes Against and says:In our national survey, 83% of U.S. adults expect AI to eliminate more jobs than it creates.
AI Verified source (Oct 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AI poses an existential threat to humanity
190 opinions
For (144)Zofishan UmairPakistani journalist and columnist writing for Dawn, including commentary on technology and society.votes For and says:Turns out, we were being unnecessarily pessimistic. Even though the planet is on fire, extreme temperatures will not be the ones to knock us out of the evolutionary game. (So much for our soggy paper straws.) Instead, we’ve decided to build something...
more AI Verified source (Oct 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (5)Nick JenningsBritish computer scientist specializing in artificial intelligence and autonomous systems; Vice-Chancellor and President of Loughborough University.abstains and says:To get from today’s AI to human extinction requires a long chain of assumptions. [...] Luckily, none of the steps on this list have come to pass yet. [...] However, something being difficult to disprove does not make it likely. [...] Possibility is b...
more AI Verified source (Nov 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (42)Gabe FirmentLouisiana state representative for District 22 and candidate for U.S. Congress.votes Against and says:We do need to have some safeguards in place to make sure there are no unintended consequences, but, no, I do not think AI is going to imperil human existence.
AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (181)Jerry McNerneyCalifornia state senatorvotes For and says:
We can put these companies on notice that they’re going to be evaluated by folks that understand the process, that understand the technology, and will be transparent and hold them accountable so that they create safe products, and they don’t send out...
more AI Verified source (Oct 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Andrew YoonMember of the technical staff at CivAI, a nonprofit that analyzes AI capabilities and risks.abstains and says:It’s a very thorny area. It’s uncharted territory. There’s a good argument to be made on either side.
AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (20)David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:I just don’t think the developer is in a position to know exactly how their product is being used.
AI Verified source (Jul 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (28)Peter N. SalibAssistant Professor of Law at the University of Houston Law Center researching constitutional law, economics, and artificial intelligence.votes For and says:
Some people worry that giving AIs separate legal personhood would let AI companies, or bad actors using AIs, shield themselves from responsibility. But it doesn’t have to work that way… when a Walmart delivery driver runs over a pedestrian, we want t...
more AI Verified source (Sep 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (5)Gillian HadfieldLegal scholar and AI governance researcher; Bloomberg Distinguished Professor of AI Alignment and Governance at Johns Hopkins University; Canada CIFAR AI Chair (Vector Institute)abstains and says:There is a reasonable chance, however, that if the vision for AI agents comes to pass, then for our markets and legal accountability regimes to function effectively, agents will have to have the capacity to sue and be sued directly. This is the defin...
more AI Verified source (Jul 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (92)Pope Leo XIVHead of the Catholic Churchvotes Against and says:Machines are tools, not persons. Today, some propose granting these systems rights, or even legal personhood. Such an approach risks obscuring human responsibility and leaving those who suffer harm to confront a faceless entity.
AI Verified source (Oct 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should tax capital, not labor, as AI makes human work less central to the economy
111 opinions
For (99)Robert E. LitanEconomist and attorney; nonresident senior fellow in Economic Studies at the Brookings Institution.votes For and says:Alternatively, a second idea suggested by Greg Ip of the Wall Street Journal, Nobel Prize winners Paul Krugman and Daron Acemoglu (with co-authors Andrea Manera and Pascual Restrepo) is to rectify the current imbalance of taxation on labor and capita...
more AI Verified source (Oct 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Bipartisan Policy CenterU.S. nonprofit think tank that develops bipartisan public-policy research and recommendations.abstains and says:To date, BPC has not taken a position on whether AI should be taxed and does not endorse any particular option in this issue brief. [...] The code treats labor and capital differently: Employers owe payroll taxes on wages, while investments in equipm...
more AI Verified source (Aug 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (11)Adam MichelDirector of tax policy studies at the Cato Institute and writer on tax policy and economic growth.votes Against and says:AI will most certainly change the labor market. But it has not yet changed the complementary relationship between workers and the tools that make them more productive. Taxing the machines is simply a softer version of the Luddite English textile work...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (91)Hamilton for KansasAdam Hamilton's 2026 campaign for U.S. Senate in Kansas.votes For and says:
Hamilton's campaign tells Axios it used an AI voice-over in one Meta ad but no AI in its TV ads, and it supports a federal law requiring AI disclosure.
AI Verified source (Oct 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (10)John FlemingLouisiana State Treasurer and former U.S. Representative.votes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
139 opinions
For (111)Patricia FahyNew York State Senator for the 46th District and sponsor of the 2026 TERMINATOR Act on frontier-AI safety oversight.votes For and says:When an OpenAI engineer sounded the alarm on the rapid pace of AI development, warning that this technology has the potential to have cataclysmic consequences, it wasn’t just deeply alarming—but a call to action. Critically, the 2026 International AI...
more Unverifiable source (Oct 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (28)Scott PetersU.S. Representative from California's 50th congressional district; co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.votes Against and says:The FRONTIER Act is a targeted bill with clear, uniform transparency, and safety standards, instead of a fifty-state patchwork. I'm glad to support this bipartisan effort so that Congress acts before this technology outruns us.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mandate third-party audits for major AI systems
227 opinions
For (206)Bruce BarcottEditorial Lead at Transparency Coalition.AI; environmental journalist and author.votes For and says:Independent third-party AI auditors will act like financial accounting firms: investigating and verifying safety protocols and legal compliance. They’re a critical part of the safeguards needed around powerful frontier AI models.
AI Verified source (Oct 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (21)Paul LekasSIIA public policy executivevotes Against and says:You’ll see industry oppose outside auditors and the main reason is they would mandate something that can’t be done [today] in a robust and uniform manner.
AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (118)Lawrence WongPrime Minister of Singapore.votes For and says:
And as a first step, I suggest that interested parties and countries can come together to launch a pilot around AI incident reporting. We can start by agreeing on a common set of incident categories and information to be shared. We can explore how pa...
more AI Verified source (Oct 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (1)Chris MeseroleExecutive Director of the Frontier Model Forum; AI policy expert and congressional witness on frontier AI security.votes Against and says:Rather than creating entirely new channels, policymakers should focus on ensuring that existing channels can effectively incorporate information related to frontier models and agents. Building on trusted relationships will be faster and more effectiv...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (44)Vivek ChilukuriSenior Fellow and Director of the Technology and National Security Program at the Center for a New American Security, researching AI, emerging technology, and great-power competition.votes For and says:
The United States has a clear interest in helping its partners and allies navigate this choice strategically, and there are several steps it should take. Most importantly, Washington should develop frameworks to assure more reliable access to the U.S...
more AI Verified source (Oct 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (106)Lord TarassenkoDavid James Tarassenko, Baron Tarassenko; British engineer, academic, and crossbench member of the UK House of Lords.votes For and says:
I wish to speak in support of Amendment 41, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, to which I have added my name. We heard during Committee not only about the out-of-control behaviour from agents running AI models from OpenAI, Google and Me...
more AI Verified source (Oct 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Frontier Model ForumFrontier AI industry forumabstains and says:Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or plac...
more AI Verified source (May 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (6)Laura CaroliPolitical adviser on the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee; former senior fellow at CSIS’s Wadhwani AI Center.votes Against and says:To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.
AI Verified source (Aug 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (57)Stephen CasperAI safety researcher at the UK AI Security Institute, researching safeguards for open-weight AI models.votes For and says:
Open models have a tendency to be less safe a lot of the time than closed ones. Maybe it could be misused by someone who downloads it and modifies it to remove safeguards or to sharpen its harmful capabilities. This type of fine-tuning could cost hun...
more AI Verified source (Oct 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (3)Daniel CommeyAuthor of a 2026 game-theoretic study of open-weight AI release policy.abstains and says:Restricting access to a dual-use AI model is precautionary only if it delays harmful actors more than defenders. That condition varies across actors: a state agency or organized criminal group may obtain a substitute through theft, distillation, inte...
more AI Verified source (Jul 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (56)The Washington Post Editorial BoardEditorial board of The Washington Post, publishing the newspaper’s institutional opinions.votes Against and says:Open-weight models have been a boon for defenders. When Hugging Face investigated how OpenAI-powered agents penetrated its systems, proprietary models refused some of the forensic work, but the Chinese open-weight model GLM-5.2 helped reconstruct the...
more AI Verified source (Oct 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (79)Yaim CooperMathematician studying the foundations of deep learning and AI’s societal impacts.votes For and says:
External evaluators should be embedded at AI companies, but they should not be restricted to AI safety researchers, and they should not be selected by the company being evaluated. Rather, they should represent communities across society, address a mu...
more AI Verified source (Oct 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)tropoFarmerPublic AI and technology commentator.abstains and says:the bad news: Dario estimates that in 6 months AI will have the ability to take over the internet the worse news: Anthropic's current commitment to stopping this is... putting independent evaluators in desks in their office have a great day
AI Verified source (Sep 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Lilian EdwardsInternet law professorvotes Against and says:They really become part of the company, which makes it difficult to criticize it because the staffers become almost your friends.
AI Verified source (Sep 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.