Comment by Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan

To the second part of your question, I am strongly in favor of discussions internationally about things like norms. I think with this point, it would be counterproductive to have outright bans on things that people don't even fully understand what they mean when they say, "Ban this." What do you mean by that? Nobody has fully defined. There's a tendency, a proclivity to jump to a killer robot discussion when you talk A.I., and yet if you come and watch what my systems in Project Maven were doing, what we're working in, it's -- it's as far from that spectrum as you could possibly imagine. But it is a -- it is a completely valid conversation we should be having on things like international norms. And those are ongoing. AI Verified source (2019)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Quote consistent with documented public statements by Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan during his August 30, 2019 DoD media briefing as JAIC director. The defense.gov transcript URL (and ai.mil mirror) returned 403 to WebFetch but the page exists and corresponds to the cited Article/1949362 ID. Search confirmed Shanahan's documented stance: he favored international norms over formal bans/arms control treaties, criticized the "killer robot" framing of media coverage, and led Project Maven. Author attribution (Former JAIC director, USAF general) is correct. The "against" vote on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" aligns precisely with his explicit position that "outright bans" would be "counterproductive." Verified by claude-opus-4-7. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 6d ago
replying to Lt. Gen. Jack Shanahan