We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
ethics
policy
ai
regulations
international-relations
public-interest-ai
defense
ai-governance
ai-policy
ai-regulation
Cast your vote:
Results (70 votes):
Total
(70 votes)
For 45 (64%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 25 (36%)
·
For (41)
-
Jason CrowU.S. representative from Coloradovotes For and says:
I'm somebody that believes that there always must be a human involved in the kill chain, and that we should not be making decisions to take lives based on an AI algorithm. We need to be able to make those decisions as humans, and those are discussion...
more AI Verified source (Jun 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pope Leo XIVHead of the Catholic Churchvotes For and says:
It is not permissible to entrust lethal or otherwise irreversible decisions to artificial systems. No algorithm can make war morally acceptable.
AI Verified source (May 15, 2026) 1 of 7DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elizabeth MinorHead of Policy at Stop Killer Robots; autonomous weapons and disarmament expertvotes For and says:
The use of unregulated military AI in Gaza and Ukraine clearly shows the dangers of these weapons and tools — and states’ lack of movement toward legal red lines is gravely insufficient. Our political leaders must create laws to protect civilians fro...
more AI Verified source (Feb 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:
Fully autonomous weapons systems and Orwellian AI-enabled domestic mass surveillance are affronts to our dignity and liberty. [...] Domestic mass surveillance of US citizens is a red line that should never be crossed. [...] Our safety and basic right...
more AI Verified source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
António GuterresUN Secretary-Generalvotes For and says:
I send greetings to everyone attending these important consultations on a defining issue of our time — the threat posed by lethal autonomous weapons systems. Machines that have the power and discretion to take human lives without human control are p...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mirjana Spoljaric EggerPresident of the International Committee of the Red Crossvotes For and says:
Life-and-death decisions must never be delegated to sensors and algorithms. Human control over the use of force is critical to preserving accountability in warfare. Machines with the power to take lives without human involvement should be banned unde...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Izumi NakamitsuUN disarmament chiefvotes For and says:
The Secretary-General has always said that using machines with fully delegated power, making a decision to take human life is just simply morally repugnant. It should not be allowed. It should be, in fact, banned by international law. That's the Unit...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Holy SeeThe Vatican’s sovereign entityvotes For and says:
Autonomous Weapon Systems, which are capable of identifying and attacking targets without direct human intervention, are a “cause for grave ethical concern” because they lack the “unique human capacity for moral judgment and ethical decision-making.”...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pope FrancisHead of the Catholic Church (2013–2025)votes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Noel SharkeyEmeritus AI and robotics professorvotes For and says:
We will not be developing autonomous weapons. Therefore, we don’t need to have a prohibition [...] I would call that extremely blinkered.
AI Verified source (2023) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:
This risk should further motivate us to redesign the global political system in a way that would completely eradicate wars and thus obviate the need for military organizations and military weapons. [...] It goes without saying that lethal autonomous...
more AI Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alexander SchallenbergAustria’s foreign minister and diplomatvotes For and says:
Rapid technological advances raise fundamental legal, moral and security questions. No more so than lethal autonomous weapons systems. This is not science fiction. It is fast becoming a reality – a reality that the Secretary-General of the UN has rig...
more AI Verified source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alyn SmithScottish MP; foreign affairs leadvotes For and says:
The development of artificial intelligence and facial recognition technology, as well as other related technologies, could remove that human element from control of these weapons altogether. They should be banned pre-emptively. I am not the first per...
more AI Verified source (Dec 16, 2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Peter AsaroNew School professor; ICRAC co-foundervotes For and says:
We have been working for the past seven years now trying to get an international treaty to prohibit fully autonomous weapons systems of this nature.
AI Verified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Amnesty InternationalHuman rights NGOvotes For and says:
Ban the development, transfer, deployment and use of fully autonomous weapons systems.
AI Verified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mary WarehamStop Killer Robots coordinatorvotes For and says:
Inanimate machines cannot understand or respect the value of life, yet they would have the power to determine when to take it away. Our campaign believes that machines should never be permitted to take human life on the battlefield or in policing, bo...
more AI Verified source (Apr 9, 2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stuart J. RussellAI Expert and Professorvotes For and says:
Allowing machines to choose to kill humans would be devastating to our security and freedom. [...] the window to act is closing fast.
AI Verified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Christof HeynsSouth African human rights law scholarvotes For and says:
It is obviously gratifying to see one’s research having an impact. At the same time, it should be recognised that we have a long way to go before there will be a complete ban, as I and many others have called for. This is an immensely complicated iss...
more AI Verified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mark CoeckelberghPhilosopher, AI ethics scholarvotes For and says:
There are more problems with fully autonomous weapons, but the conclusion is clear to me: while they have some advantages, their use is ethically highly problematic in many ways. Therefore, we should not use them and perhaps ban them. Based on the mo...
more AI Verified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European ParliamentEU legislative bodyvotes For and says:
Weapons without meaningful human control over selecting and attacking targets should be banned before it is too late, stressed MEPs on Wednesday.
AI Verified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gen. Paul J. SelvaFormer Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefsvotes For and says:
I will tell you in this forum that I am an advocate for keeping that restriction. Because we take our values to war and because many of the things that we must do in war are governed by the laws of war, which say we must take proportional and discrim...
more AI Verified source (Jul 18, 2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Toby WalshScientia Professor of Artificial Intelligencevotes For and says:
We must add autonomous weapons to the list of weapons that are morally unacceptable to use.
AI Verified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ian R. KerrCanada Research Chair in Tech Ethicsvotes For and says:
Although engaged citizens sign petitions everyday, it is not often that captains of industry, scientists and technologists call for prohibitions on innovation of any sort — let alone an outright ban. The ban is an important signifier. Even if it is s...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
International Committee for Robot Arms ControlNGO on autonomous weapons policyvotes For and says:
to prohibit the development, testing, production and use of autonomous weapon systems in all circumstances.
AI Verified source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jody WilliamsNobel Peace laureate; landmine-ban advocatevotes For and says:
Killer robots loom over our future if we do not take action to ban them now,
AI Verified source (2013)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:
We have long believed that AI should not be used for mass surveillance or autonomous lethal weapons, and that humans should remain in the loop for high-stakes automated decisions.
Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Greg CasarU.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucusvotes For and says:
The Trump administration wants to use A.I. to spy on Americans without a warrant and to give A.I. power to make life and death decisions without humans involved. That would put our Constitutional rights and our lives in the hands of unaccountable AI ...
more Unverifiable source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Marc RotenbergFounder and Executive Director, Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP); former president of EPICvotes For and says:
The key risk is not only "runaway" AI, but the quiet normalization of systems that undermine human dignity, due process, and equal protection because no one is clearly accountable when things go wrong. [...] The central question will be whether gover...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Campaign to Stop Killer RobotsCoalition to ban killer robotsvotes For and says:
to demand meaningful human control, which ensures responsibility and accountability, in any use of force; [...] It is a world that rejects the automation of killing and instead, promotes the principle of human control over emerging technologies that ...
more Unverifiable source (Dec 1, 2021) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs (Austria)Austria’s foreign ministry (press office)votes For and says:
What greater attack on human rights and human dignity could there be than allowing an algorithm to make life‑or‑death decisions? Human rights and humanitarian international law are our compass; they must continue to focus on people, not on machines. ...
more Unverifiable source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bonnie DochertyHuman rights lawyer and scholarvotes For and says:
The next revolution in warfare threatens to undermine fundamental principles of morality and law. Fully autonomous weapons, already under development in a number of countries, would have the power to select targets and fire on them without meaningful...
more Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mark GubrudPhysicist, UNC adjunct, arms-control advocatevotes For and says:
That is why I believe we need to ban them as fast and as hard as we possibly can.
Unverifiable source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Human Rights WatchGlobal human rights advocacy organizationvotes For and says:
Governments should pre-emptively ban fully autonomous weapons because of the danger they pose to civilians in armed conflict [...].
Unverified source (Nov 19, 2012)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gary MarcusProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencevotes For and says:
The White House and people at the top of the Pentagon seem to treat it as magic, whereas those who are actually building it realize that it hallucinates, it makes mistakes, stupid errors of reasoning. And if you put that into production, into practic...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nicole van RooijenExecutive Director of Stop Killer Robots, a global coalition campaigning against autonomous weaponsvotes For and says:
It is evident that the world must act urgently to alter the self-destructive path we are on. An escalating arms race in disruptive technologies like unregulated AI, autonomous weapons, nuclear arms and other dangerous weapons is driving this path. No...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Adam SchiffU.S. Senator from California; former House Intelligence Committee chairvotes For and says:
Over the past few weeks, it has become even more clear that there is an urgent need for guardrails on how AI is used by the Defense Department. [...] Whenever a technology has the capability of taking a human life, there needs to be a human operator ...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Malcolm DavisSenior analyst, Australian Strategic Policy Institutevotes For and says:
Our authoritarian adversaries, like Russia and China, and rogue states like North Korea are not going to sign up to this ban, he said. [Automated weapons] will completely change the speed and efficiency with which armies can kill the other side, he ...
more Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Frank SauerSenior research fellow, Bundeswehr Universityvotes For and says:
The point of a preemptive treaty is to prevent future harm and with all the dangers and concerns associated with fully autonomous weapons, it would be irresponsible to take a “wait and see” approach and only try to deal with the issue after the harm ...
more Disputed source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Wendell WallachBioethicist and AI governance expertvotes For and says:
We need a law to ban autonomous robots from killing people on their own initiative. [...] For example, in 2013, the Northrop Grumman X-47B, a prototype sub-sonic aircraft with two bomb compartments and a 62-foot wingspan, autonomously took off from...
more Disputed source (Jun 29, 2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Denise GarciaProfessor of international affairs, Northeasternvotes For and says:
Instead, Washington should take the lead in drafting a new, international agreement to ban killer robots and regulate other kinds of autonomous systems. There is no better time to push for such a prohibition than next week, on May 13, when 117 countr...
more Unverifiable source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alan F. T. WinfieldProfessor of Robot Ethics, UWE Bristolvotes For and says:
The second reason I think it’s a bad idea is if the robot-with-a-gun is not remotely controlled by a human but ‘autonomous’. In other words the robot decides, on its own, where to aim its gun and when to fire. Of course there are serious ethical and ...
more Disputed source (Mar 31, 2011)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (24)
-
Vinod KhoslaVenture capitalist; Khosla Ventures foundervotes Against and says:
Personal view: I admire @AnthropicAI sticking by their principles but disagree with the principle itself. Putin won't fight fair so we should have autonomous AI weapons for sure.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Maciej ZającPhilosopher and technology ethicistvotes Against and says:
I argue that enacting a global ban would be both unnecessary and insufficient for avoiding or meaningfully limiting AWS proliferation to actors willing to use them as weapons of subjugation and terror. It would be unnecessary because banning high-end...
more AI Verified source (Jun 16, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Frank Kendall IIIFormer U.S. Air Force Secretaryvotes Against and says:
I care a lot about civil society and the rule of law, including laws of armed conflict. Our policies are written around compliance with those laws. You don't enforce laws against machines; you enforce them against people. And I think our challenge is...
more AI Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
United States Department of StateU.S. foreign affairs departmentvotes Against and says:
The United States has opposed calls to develop a ban and does not support opening negotiations, whether on a legally binding instrument or a political declaration, at this time. We must not be anti-technology and must be cautious not to make hasty ju...
more AI Verified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lt. Gen. Jack ShanahanFormer JAIC director, USAF generalvotes Against and says:
To the second part of your question, I am strongly in favor of discussions internationally about things like norms. I think with this point, it would be counterproductive to have outright bans on things that people don't even fully understand what th...
more AI Verified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Robert O. WorkFormer U.S. Deputy Defense Secretaryvotes Against and says:
“Here is one of the problems with the Campaign To Stop Killer Robots,” said former deputy defense secretary Robert Work. “They refer to ‘lethal autonomous weapons systems.’ […] They’re defining a weapon that is unsupervised or independent from human ...
more AI Verified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of the United KingdomUnited Kingdom central governmentvotes Against and says:
The UK remains fully committed to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Under the UK’s chairmanship in 2017, High Contracting Parties agreed essential financial reforms. But the Convention will only become financially stable if all High Con...
more AI Verified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tom SimoniteFormer WIRED senior editorvotes Against and says:
Those headlines were misleading. The letter doesn’t explicitly call for a ban, although one of the organizers has suggested it does. Rather, it offers technical advice to a UN committee on autonomous weapons formed in December. The group’s warning th...
more AI Verified source (Aug 22, 2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kenneth AndersonAmerican University law professor, juristvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
John LewisLegal scholar, Yale Law Journalvotes Against and says:
I argue that regulation, rather than an outright ban, would likely be more effective in ensuring that FAWs comply with international law. This argument begins from the premise that the best approach to FAWs is the one most likely to reduce human suff...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Evan AckermanIEEE Spectrum robotics senior editorvotes Against and says:
The problem with this argument is that no letter, UN declaration, or even a formal ban ratified by multiple nations is going to prevent people from being able to build autonomous, weaponized robots. The barriers keeping people from developing this ki...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2015) 1 of 5DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jai GalliottRobotics researcher and philosophervotes Against and says:
The open letter signed by more than 12,000 prominent people calling for a ban on artificially intelligent killer robots, connected to arguments for a UN ban on the same, is misguided and perhaps even reckless. Wait, misguided? Reckless? Let me offer...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gill PrattRoboticist; Toyota Research Institute CEOvotes Against and says:
I believe that now is the wrong time to be making decisions like this. Having the discussion is fine. But saying, “No, we’re not going to work on this” is wrong. First, we need to understand what’s possible. We can make a choice not to use what we de...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jean-Baptiste Jeangène VilmerFrench security policy scholarvotes Against and says:
Those who reply that to delegate firing at targets to a machine is on principle unacceptable are begging the question. They do not define the “human dignity” they invoke, nor do they explain how exactly it is violated. Regarding the Martens Clause, i...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Michael C. HorowitzPolitical scientist; former DoD officialvotes Against and says:
Advocates of a ban on autonomous weapons often claim that the technology today isn’t good enough to discriminate reliably between civilian and military targets, and therefore can’t comply with the laws of war. In some situations, that’s true. For oth...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Steven GrovesHeritage Foundation fellowvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (France)France’s foreign ministryvotes Against and says:
At first, lethal autonomous weapons systems that cannot guarantee use in conformity with international humanitarian law — that is, systems that are intrinsically indiscriminate; systems whose effects cannot be limited, anticipated and controlled; sys...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kathleen McKendrickBritish Army officer; Chatham House fellowvotes Against and says:
Thus, a prohibition on the development and use of lethal autonomous weapons systems is not the simple solution it appears to be.
Unverifiable source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Roger M. Cabiness IIPentagon spokesperson and Army officervotes Against and says:
For example, commanders can use precision-guided weapon systems with homing functions to reduce the risk of civilian casualties,
Unverified source (Aug 22, 2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paul ScharreCNAS executive and weapons expertvotes Against and says:
Even worse, the proposed solution—a legally binding treaty banning autonomous weapons—won't solve the real problems humanity faces as autonomy advances in weapons.
Unverifiable source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Subbarao KambhampatiASU computer science professor; ex-AAAI presidentvotes Against and says:
But a ban is not the solution – neither is inflaming the public with dystopian visions of the future.
Unverifiable source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ronald C. ArkinRobotics professor, Georgia Techvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Christopher JenksSMU law professor, LOAC expertvotes Against and says:
unrealistic, belated and short-sighted, and ignores mankind's frailties. I am not advocating their use, but I object to an outright ban. [...] At a minimum, it's at least possible that at some point in the not-too-distant future LARs may be able to b...
more Unverified source (Jul 2, 2013)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
National Security Commission on Artificial IntelligenceU.S. federal advisory commissionvotes Against and says:
World military powers both large and small are pursuing artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled and autonomous weapon systems. Such systems have the potential to help commanders make faster, better, and more relevant decisions. They will enable weapon s...
more Disputed source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-regulation
votes