We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ban autonomous lethal weapons
For (30)
-
Mirjana Spoljaric EggerPresident of the International Committee of the Red Crossvotes For and says:Life-and-death decisions must never be delegated to sensors and algorithms. Human control over the use of force is critical to preserving accountability in warfare. Machines with the power to take lives without human involvement should be banned unde... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Pope FrancisLeader of the Catholic Churchvotes For and says:in light of the tragedy that is armed conflict, it is urgent to reconsider the development and use of devices like the so-called ‘lethal autonomous weapons’ and ultimately ban their use. This starts from an effective and concrete commitment to introd... more Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:It opens up entirely new possibilities for things that you can do—where you can go into battle or do a terrorist attack with zero risk to yourself, and you can also do it anonymously, because if some drones show up and start killing people somewhere ... more Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
António GuterresUN Secretary-Generalvotes For and says:I send greetings to everyone attending these important consultations on a defining issue of our time — the threat posed by lethal autonomous weapons systems. Machines that have the power and discretion to take human lives without human control are p... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gen. Paul J. SelvaFormer Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefsvotes For and says:I don't think it's reasonable for us to put robots in charge of whether or not we take a human life. [...] I was "an advocate for keeping that restriction." Humans needed to remain in the decision making process "because we take our values to war." Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Christof HeynsSouth African human rights law scholarvotes For and says:It is obviously gratifying to see one’s research having an impact. At the same time, it should be recognised that we have a long way to go before there will be a complete ban, as I and many others have called for. This is an immensely complicated iss... more Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Alan F. T. WinfieldProfessor of Robot Ethics, UWE Bristolvotes For and says:The second reason I think it’s a bad idea is if the robot-with-a-gun is not remotely controlled by a human but ‘autonomous’. Of course there are serious ethical and legal problems with this, like who is responsible if the robot makes a mistake and sh... more Unverified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mark CoeckelberghPhilosopher, AI ethics scholarvotes For and says:There are more problems with fully autonomous weapons, but the conclusion is clear to me: while they have some advantages, their use is ethically highly problematic in many ways. Therefore, we should not use them and perhaps ban them. Based on the mo... more Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:This risk should further motivate us to redesign the global political system in a way that would completely eradicate wars and thus obviate the need for military organizations and military weapons. [...] It goes without saying that lethal autonomous... more Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Izumi NakamitsuUN disarmament chiefvotes For and says:The Secretary-General has always said that using machines with fully delegated power, making a decision to take human life is just simply morally repugnant. It should not be allowed. It should be, in fact, banned by international law. That's the Unit... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Alyn SmithScottish MP; foreign affairs leadvotes For and says:The developments in Artificial Intelligence and facial recognition technologies, as well as other related technologies, could remove that human element from the control of these weapons altogether. They should be banned. They should be banned pre-emp... more Unverified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Holy SeeThe Vatican’s sovereign entityvotes For and says:Autonomous Weapon Systems, which are capable of identifying and attacking targets without direct human intervention, are a “cause for grave ethical concern” because they lack the “unique human capacity for moral judgment and ethical decision-making.”... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Alexander SchallenbergAustria’s foreign minister and diplomatvotes For and says:Rapid technological advances raise fundamental legal, moral and security questions. No more so than lethal autonomous weapons systems. This is not science fiction. It is fast becoming a reality – a reality that the Secretary-General of the UN has rig... more Unverified source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs (Austria)Austria’s foreign ministry (press office)votes For and says:What greater attack on human rights and human dignity could there be than allowing an algorithm to make life‑or‑death decisions? Human rights and humanitarian international law are our compass; they must continue to focus on people, not on machines. ... more Unverified source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ian R. KerrCanada Research Chair in Tech Ethicsvotes For and says:Although engaged citizens sign petitions everyday, it is not often that captains of industry, scientists and technologists call for prohibitions on innovation of any sort — let alone an outright ban. The ban is an important signifier. Even if it is s... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Frank SauerSenior research fellow, Bundeswehr Universityvotes For and says:The point of a preemptive treaty is to prevent future harm and with all the dangers and concerns associated with fully autonomous weapons, it would be irresponsible to take a “wait and see” approach and only try to deal with the issue after the harm ... more Unverified source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Denise GarciaProfessor of international affairs, Northeasternvotes For and says:Instead, Washington should take the lead in drafting a new, international agreement to ban killer robots and regulate other kinds of autonomous systems. There is no better time to push for such a prohibition than next week, on May 13, when 117 countr... more Unverified source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Amnesty InternationalHuman rights NGOvotes For and says:Ban the development, transfer, deployment and use of fully autonomous weapons systems. Verified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
International Committee for Robot Arms ControlNGO on autonomous weapons policyvotes For and says:to prohibit the development, testing, production and use of autonomous weapon systems in all circumstances. Unverified source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Human Rights WatchGlobal human rights advocacy organizationvotes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jody WilliamsNobel Peace laureate; landmine-ban advocatevotes For and says:Killer robots loom over our future if we do not take action to ban them now, Unverified source (2013)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stuart J. RussellAI Expert and Professorvotes For and says:A treaty banning autonomous weapons would prevent large-scale manufacturing of the technology. Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Peter AsaroNew School professor; ICRAC co-foundervotes For and says:We have been working for the past seven years now trying to get an international treaty to prohibit fully autonomous weapons systems of this nature. Unverified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Campaign to Stop Killer RobotsCoalition to ban killer robotsvotes For and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
European ParliamentEU legislative bodyvotes For and says:Weapons without meaningful human control over selecting and attacking targets should be banned before it is too late, stressed MEPs on Wednesday. Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mark GubrudPhysicist, UNC adjunct, arms-control advocatevotes For and says:That is why I believe we need to ban them as fast and as hard as we possibly can. Unverified source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Toby WalshScientia Professor of Artificial Intelligencevotes For and says:We must add autonomous weapons to the list of weapons that are morally unacceptable to use. Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Noel SharkeyEmeritus AI and robotics professorvotes For and says:It is clear that the rational approach to the inhumanity of automating death by machine is to prohibit it. Unverified source (2012)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Wendell WallachBioethicist and AI governance expertvotes For and says:We need a law to ban autonomous robots from killing people on their own initiative. For example, in 2013, the Northrop Grumman X-47B, a prototype sub-sonic aircraft with two bomb compartments and a 62-foot wingspan, autonomously took off from and la... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bonnie DochertyHuman rights lawyer and scholarvotes For and says:The next revolution in warfare threatens to undermine fundamental principles of morality and law. Fully autonomous weapons, already under development in a number of countries, would have the power to select targets and fire on them without meaningful... more Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (24)
-
Mary L. CummingsRobotics and AI policy scholarvotes Against and says:There has been increasing debate over the use of autonomous weapons in the military, whether they should be banned for offensive uses, and even whether such technologies threaten human existence. As a former fighter pilot for the U.S. Navy, but also ... more Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Evan AckermanIEEE Spectrum robotics senior editorvotes Against and says:We’re not going to be able to prevent autonomous armed robots from existing. The real question that we should be asking is this: Could autonomous armed robots perform better than armed humans in combat, resulting in fewer casualties on both sides? T... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Lt. Gen. Jack ShanahanFormer JAIC director, USAF generalvotes Against and says:To the second part of your question, I am strongly in favor of discussions internationally about things like norms. I think with this point, it would be counterproductive to have outright bans on things that people don't even fully understand what th... more Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Christopher JenksSMU law professor, LOAC expertvotes Against and says:Unrealistic, belated and short-sighted, and ignores mankind's frailties. I am not advocating their use, but I object to an outright ban. […] At a minimum, it's at least possible that at some point in the not-too-distant future LARs may be able to bet... more Unverified source (2013)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
United States Department of StateU.S. foreign affairs departmentvotes Against and says:The United States has opposed calls to develop a ban and does not support opening negotiations, whether on a legally binding instrument or a political declaration, at this time. We must not be anti-technology and must be cautious not to make hasty ju... more Unverified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gill PrattRoboticist; Toyota Research Institute CEOvotes Against and says:I believe that now is the wrong time to be making decisions like this. Having the discussion is fine. But saying, “No, we’re not going to work on this” is wrong. First, we need to understand what’s possible. We can make a choice not to use what we de... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Joshua DorosinU.S. State Dept. deputy legal adviservotes Against and says:We believe it is premature to enter into negotiations on a legally binding instrument, a political declaration, a code of conduct, or other similar instrument, and we cannot support a mandate to enter into such negotiations. Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Robert O. WorkFormer U.S. Deputy Defense Secretaryvotes Against and says:“Here is one of the problems with the Campaign To Stop Killer Robots,” said former deputy defense secretary Robert Work. “They refer to ‘lethal autonomous weapons systems.’ […] They’re defining a weapon that is unsupervised or independent from human ... more Unverified source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jai GalliottRobotics researcher and philosophervotes Against and says:The open letter signed by more than 12,000 prominent people calling for a ban on artificially intelligent killer robots, connected to arguments for a UN ban on the same, is misguided and perhaps even reckless. Wait, misguided? Reckless? Let me offer... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Kelsey D. AthertonDefense technology journalistvotes Against and says:Those headlines were misleading. The letter doesn’t explicitly call for a ban, although one of the organizers has suggested it does. Rather, it offers technical advice to a UN committee on autonomous weapons formed in December. The group’s warning t... more Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Maciej ZającPhilosopher and technology ethicistvotes Against and says:I argue that enacting a global ban would be both unnecessary and insufficient for avoiding or meaningfully limiting AWS proliferation to actors willing to use them as weapons of subjugation and terror. It would be unnecessary because banning high-end... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jean-Baptiste Jeangène VilmerFrench security policy scholarvotes Against and says:Those who reply that to delegate firing at targets to a machine is on principle unacceptable are begging the question. They do not define the “human dignity” they invoke, nor do they explain how exactly it is violated. Regarding the Martens Clause, i... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (France)France’s foreign ministryvotes Against and says:At first, lethal autonomous weapons systems that cannot guarantee use in conformity with international humanitarian law — that is, systems that are intrinsically indiscriminate; systems whose effects cannot be limited, anticipated and controlled; sys... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Roger CabinessPentagon public affairs spokespersonvotes Against and says:The U.S. Department of Defense has a policy to keep a “human in the loop” when deploying lethal force. […] “For example, commanders can use precision‑guided weapon systems with homing functions to reduce the risk of civilian casualties,” said Cabines... more Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michael C. HorowitzPolitical scientist; former DoD officialvotes Against and says:Advocates of a ban on autonomous weapons often claim that the technology today isn’t good enough to discriminate reliably between civilian and military targets, and therefore can’t comply with the laws of war. In some situations, that’s true. For oth... more Unverified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Kathleen McKendrickBritish Army officer; Chatham House fellowvotes Against and says:Thus, a prohibition on the development and use of lethal autonomous weapons systems is not the simple solution it appears to be. Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Greg AllenAI and defense policy analystvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Paul ScharreCNAS executive and weapons expertvotes Against and says:Even worse, the proposed solution—a legally binding treaty banning autonomous weapons—won't solve the real problems humanity faces as autonomy advances in weapons. Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Kenneth AndersonAmerican University law professor, juristvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ronald C. ArkinRobotics professor, Georgia Techvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Steven GrovesHeritage Foundation fellowvotes Against and says:DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Subbarao KambhampatiASU computer science professor; ex-AAAI presidentvotes Against and says:But a ban is not the solution – neither is inflaming the public with dystopian visions of the future. Unverified source (2017)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Government of the United KingdomUnited Kingdom central governmentvotes Against and says:The UK remains fully committed to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Under the UK’s chairmanship in 2017, High Contracting Parties agreed essential financial reforms. But the Convention will only become financially stable if all High Con... more Unverified source (2018)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
National Security Commission on Artificial IntelligenceU.S. federal advisory commissionvotes Against and says:World military powers both large and small are pursuing artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled and autonomous weapon systems. Such systems have the potential to help commanders make faster, better, and more relevant decisions. They will enable weapon s... more Unverified source (2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
international-relations
votes
| Establish a UN-led body to oversee compute-intensive AI |
| The CERN for AI should have a central hub in one location |
| Normalize US relations with Cuba |