Comment by Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (France)

At first, lethal autonomous weapons systems that cannot guarantee use in conformity with international humanitarian law — that is, systems that are intrinsically indiscriminate; systems whose effects cannot be limited, anticipated and controlled; systems of a nature to cause superfluous injury or unnecessary suffering; and systems operating outside any human control and a responsible chain of command (fully autonomous lethal weapon systems) — should be prohibited. In a second phase, lethal weapons systems integrating autonomy, to which military command may entrust the execution of tasks related to critical functions (identification, selection and engagement of targets) within a specific framework of action (so‑called “partially” autonomous lethal weapons), should be regulated by implementing appropriate national measures throughout the system’s life cycle to ensure, in particular, that their development and use will be in accordance with international humanitarian law, while preserving human control as well as human responsibility and accountability.
AI Verified source (2025)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote makes a clear nuanced position: it says fully autonomous lethal weapon systems should be prohibited, but partially autonomous lethal weapons should be regulated, not banned. That implies opposition to a blanket ban on all autonomous lethal weapons in the complete statement. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history AI Unverifiable Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Unverifiable The quote supports prohibiting only "fully autonomous lethal weapon systems" that "should be prohibited," while saying "partially" autonomous lethal weapons "should be regulated," not clearly endorsing a blanket ban on all autonomous lethal weapons. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the French original appears in the official Assemblée nationale written-answer materials for Question n°8402, where the responding ministry is listed as "Europe et affaires étrangères" and the response was published on 2 September 2025. The quoted English is a faithful translation of the official French text: "Dans un premier temps... devraient être prohibés" and "Dans un second temps... devraient être réglementés..." in the answer text. The user-supplied URL is a generic index page, not the specific record, but the official Q&A page/PDF contains the passage. ([questions.assemblee-nationale.fr](https://questions.assemblee-nationale.fr/q17/17-8402QE.htm)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Quote content matches France's well-documented two-tier position on LAWS: phase 1 — prohibit fully autonomous lethal weapons that can't comply with IHL; phase 2 — regulate partially autonomous lethal weapon systems (PALWS) while preserving human control. This matches France's UN working papers, CD Geneva position, and the French Defense Ethics Committee's opinion on autonomy in weapon systems. assemblee-nationale.fr URL returns 403 to WebFetch but France's position is corroborated by docs-library.unoda.org/France 78/241 submission, Automated Decision Research's France country page, Lieber Institute, and HRW. Vote was originally 'against' on 'Ban autonomous lethal weapons' — changed to 'abstain' because France supports banning fully autonomous LAWS but opposes a blanket ban that would also catch partially autonomous systems; this nuanced position is more accurately abstain than against. Year 2025. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs (France)