We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Bonnie Docherty
Human rights lawyer and scholar
The next revolution in warfare threatens to undermine fundamental principles of morality and law. Fully autonomous weapons, already under development in a number of countries, would have the power to select targets and fire on them without meaningful human control. In so doing, they would violate basic humanity and the public conscience.
A new report from Human Rights Watch and Harvard Law School’s International Human Rights Clinic, of which I was the lead author, shows why fully autonomous weapons would fail both prongs of the test laid out in the Martens Clause. We conclude that the only adequate solution for dealing with these potential weapons is a preemptive ban on their development, production, and use.
More than 70 countries will convene at the United Nations in Geneva from August 27 to 31 to discuss what they refer to as lethal autonomous weapons systems. They will meet under the auspices of the Convention on Conventional Weapons, a major disarmament treaty. To avert a crisis of morality and a legal vacuum, countries should agree to start negotiating a treaty prohibiting these weapons in 2019.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2018)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Could not directly fetch HRW URL (403 blocked) nor recent 2025/2026 sources. However, search results strongly confirm the quote content matches Bonnie Docherty's 2018 HRW/Harvard report on Martens Clause and preemptive ban on killer robots. The UN Geneva August 27-31, 2018 dates and "70+ countries" detail match confirmed reporting. Vote "for" on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" aligns. Although year 2018 is older than 2025, I was unable to fetch newer Docherty quotes (all blocked 403). Marking ai_unverifiable.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 18d ago
replying to Bonnie Docherty