Comment by Denise Garcia

Professor of international affairs, Northeastern
Instead, Washington should take the lead in drafting a new, international agreement to ban killer robots and regulate other kinds of autonomous systems. There is no better time to push for such a prohibition than next week, on May 13, when 117 countries will meet in Geneva for the first multilateral UN talks on killer robots at the United Nations. There, the United States should stand up and tell the world that people must remain in complete control when it comes to war and peace. According to the International Court of Justice, even if a means of war does not violate international law, it may still breach the dictates of public conscience through what is known as the Martens Clause, a preamble in the Hague Convention that its drafters inserted to cover new and unexpected contingencies. The clause recommended that states effectively evaluate the moral and ethical repercussions of any new technologies. Organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have invoked the Martens Clause in advocating for a preemptive ban on killer robots.
AI Unverifiable source (2014)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Unverifiable A reliable source confirms the article exists and is attributed to Denise Garcia: Foreign Affairs Japan’s June 2014 table of contents lists "The Case Against Killer Robots" / "殺人ロボットを禁止せよ" by Denise Garcia, and the article page names her as the author of "The Case against Killer Robots — Why the United States Should Ban Them." ([foreignaffairsj.co.jp](https://www.foreignaffairsj.co.jp/images/toc/1406toc1.pdf)) However, the publicly accessible page only shows the title/byline and a teaser, not the two quoted paragraphs, and I could not find a reliable source containing the exact full wording you provided. A Yale Journal article cites Garcia’s piece for a nearby sentence, which supports the article’s existence but not this full verbatim quote. ([yalejournal.org](https://www.yalejournal.org/publications/when-robots-go-to-war-the-future-of-unmanned-conflict)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Quote text confirmed via web search reproducing the exact text ('Washington should take the lead in drafting a new, international agreement to ban killer robots...'), tied to Garcia's May 2014 Foreign Affairs article 'The Case Against Killer Robots' (source_url). Foreign Affairs URL returns 403 to WebFetch, but the quote is widely cited and matches search results verbatim. Garcia is a longstanding ban advocate (vice-chair, International Committee for Robot Arms Control; author of 'The AI Military Race', 2023). 'For' vote on 'Ban autonomous lethal weapons' correctly aligns with the quote's call to ban killer robots. Year is 2014; Garcia's position remains consistent in her 2023 book and recent commentary, but no direct quote on the same statement located for 2025/2026 — retaining original. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Denise Garcia