We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Maciej Zając
Philosopher and technology ethicist
I argue that enacting a global ban would be both unnecessary and insufficient for avoiding or meaningfully limiting AWS proliferation to actors willing to use them as weapons of subjugation and terror. It would be unnecessary because banning high-end AWS designed for counter-platform use in civilian-sparse environments would do nothing to stop proliferation of primitive killer robots best suited for mass casualty attacks against civilians.
It would also be entirely insufficient – getting states generally willing to abide by the international law to support the ban would do little to stop tyrants and terrorists from acquiring simple killer robots. The latter would have to be prevented or limited by a number of vigorously pursued policies aimed specifically at malevolent actors.
AI Verified
source
(2025)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified: This is from Maciej Zając's 2025 article "Stopping Killer Robot Proliferation to Tyrants and Terrorists: Why A Global Ban Is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient" in Philosophy & Technology (doi 10.1007/s13347-025-00910-8). The Springer URL returned 403 to WebFetch, but PhilArchive and other sources corroborate the title, author, year, and the specific argument quoted - a global ban being "unnecessary and insufficient" to prevent proliferation to tyrants/terrorists. Year 2025 is correct. The vote "against" on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" aligns with Zając's explicit thesis.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 7d ago
replying to Maciej Zając