We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Wendell Wallach
Bioethicist and AI governance expert
We need a law to ban autonomous robots from killing people on their own initiative.
For example, in 2013, the Northrop Grumman X-47B, a prototype sub-sonic aircraft with two bomb compartments and a 62-foot wingspan, autonomously took off from and landed on an aircraft carrier. The proposed ban on autonomous lethal robots is focused upon ensuring that in the future, selecting a target and pulling the “trigger” is always a decision made by a human and never delegated to a machine. There must always be a human in the loop.
Today’s computers do not have the smarts to make discriminating decisions such as who to kill or when to fire a shot or a missile. Thus, a ban is directed at future systems that have not yet been deployed, and in nearly all cases, have not yet been built. There is still time to make a course correction. Nevertheless, there already exist dumb autonomous or semi-autonomous weapons that can kill.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2015)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Could not access the Wired source URL directly (blocked) nor archive.org. However, the quote topic and content strongly match Wendell Wallach's known published work in 2015 on banning lethal autonomous weapons (confirmed via Yale Scientific Magazine, Wikipedia, and his 2015 book "A Dangerous Master"). The vote "for" on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" aligns with the quote's clear stance. Marking as ai_unverifiable because I cannot directly confirm the Wired article contents.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 18d ago
replying to Wendell Wallach