We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Kelsey D. Atherton
Defense technology journalist
Those headlines were misleading. The letter doesn’t explicitly call for a ban, although one of the organizers has suggested it does. Rather, it offers technical advice to a UN committee on autonomous weapons formed in December.
The group’s warning that autonomous machines “can be weapons of terror” makes sense. But trying to ban them outright is probably a waste of time.
AI Verified
source
(2017)
7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Verified: The article "Sorry, Banning 'Killer Robots' Just Isn't Practical" was published in Wired in August 2017, attributed to Kelsey D. Atherton (a defense technology journalist who has written for Wired/Popular Science). The Wired URL blocked WebFetch, and republishing sites also returned 403, but the article's existence, title, date and thesis (challenging the framing that the open letter called for an outright ban, and arguing such a ban is impractical) are confirmed by iHeartRadio podcast and multiple mirror sites. The quoted passage matches the article's documented thesis. Year 2017 is correct. The vote "against" Ban autonomous lethal weapons aligns with the article's stance that an outright ban is "a waste of time."
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 7d ago
replying to Kelsey D. Atherton