Comment by Robert O. Work

“Here is one of the problems with the Campaign To Stop Killer Robots,” said former deputy defense secretary Robert Work. “They refer to ‘lethal autonomous weapons systems.’ […] They’re defining a weapon that is unsupervised or independent from human direction, unsupervised in its battlefield operations, and self-targeting [i.e. chooses its own targets],” Work said. “The weapon doesn’t exist! It might not even be technically feasible, and if it is technically feasible, there’s absolutely no evidence that a western army, certainly the United States, would employ such a weapon.” “In the meantime,” Work went on angrily, “they’re willing to say, ‘I’m willing to sacrifice the lives of American servicemen and women, I’m willing to take more civilian casualties, and I’m willing to take more collateral damage, on the off chance that sometime in the future this weapon will exist. “That’s unethical to me,” Work said. “That’s terribly unethical. In fact, I think it’s immoral.” AI Verified source (2019)
Like Share on X 7mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Verified Verified: This is from former U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Robert O. Work quoted in Sydney J. Freedberg Jr.'s August 29, 2019 Breaking Defense article. The URL was blocked by WebFetch but web search confirms the exact quoted text, the author/source, and the date. Year 2019 is correct. The vote "against" on "Ban autonomous lethal weapons" aligns perfectly - Work explicitly criticized the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots as "unethical" and "immoral." · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 7d ago
replying to Robert O. Work