We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached
For (24)
-
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:Frontier AI systems could surpass most individuals across most cognitive tasks within just a few years. These advances could unlock solutions to major global challenges, but they also carry significant risks. To safely advance toward superintelligenc... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nick BostromPhilosopher; 'Superintelligence' author; FHI foundervotes For and says:Superintelligence could become extremely powerful and be able to shape the future according to its preferences. If humanity had been sane and had our act together globally, the sensible course of action would be to postpone development of superintel... more Unverified source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Anthony AguirrePhysicist; Future of Life cofoundervotes For and says:Time is running out. The only thing likely to stop AI companies barreling toward superintelligence is for there to be widespread realization among society at all its levels that this is not actually what we want. That means building public will and s... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Geoffrey HintonGodfather of Deep Learningvotes For and says:I don’t think they should scale this up more until they have understood whether they can control it. We’ve entered completely unknown territory. We’re capable of building machines that are stronger than ourselves, but what if we develop machines that... more Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elon MuskFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalvotes For and says:If I could put a pause on AI or really advanced AI, superintelligence, I would. It doesn’t seem that is realistic. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bill JoySun Microsystems cofounder; computer scientistvotes For and says:We are being propelled into this new century with no plan, no control, no brakes. Have we already gone too far down the path to alter course? I don’t believe so, but we aren’t trying yet, and the last chance to assert control—the fail-safe point—is r... more Unverified source (2000)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Toby OrdOxford philosopher; The Precipice authorvotes For and says:When it comes to scientific moratoriums, we’ve got some examples, such as the moratorium on human cloning and the moratorium on human germline genetic engineering — that’s genetic engineering that’s inherited down to the children, that could lead to ... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
PauseAIGlobal campaign to pause frontier AIvotes For and says:We’re calling for a ban on more powerful general AI systems, until we know how to build provably safe AI, and [...] under democratic control. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
ControlAICampaign to prohibit superintelligence developmentvotes For and says:prevent the development of artificial superintelligence and keep humanity in control. [...] inform every relevant person in the democratic process. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Max TegmarkPhysicist, AI Researchervotes For and says:I really empathize for them, frankly, because they’re so stuck in this race to the bottom that they just feel an irresistible pressure to keep going and not get overtaken by the other guy. I think that’s why it’s so important to stigmatize the race t... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Joseph Gordon-LevittAmerican actor and entrepreneurvotes For and says:Yeah, we want specific AI tools that can help cure diseases, strengthen national security, etc. But does AI also need to imitate humans, groom our kids, turn us all into slop junkies and make zillions of dollars serving ads? Most people don’t want th... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Johnnie MooreAmerican evangelical leader and businessman, founder of The Kairos Company and chairman of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundationvotes For and says:We should rapidly develop powerful AI tools that help cure diseases and solve practical problems, but not autonomous smarter-than-human machines that nobody knows how to control. Creating superintelligent machines is not only unacceptably dangerous a... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Prince Harry, Duke of SussexMember of the British royal familyvotes For and says:The future of AI should serve humanity, not replace it. The true test of progress will be not how fast we move, but how wisely we steer. Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Eliezer YudkowskyAI researcher and writervotes For and says:The moratorium on new large training runs needs to be indefinite and worldwide. There can be no exceptions, including for governments or militaries. If the policy starts with the U.S., then China needs to see that the U.S. is not seeking an advantage... more Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mary RobinsonFormer Irish president; Elders chairvotes For and says:AI offers extraordinary promise to advance human rights, tackle inequality, and protect our planet, but the pursuit of superintelligence threatens to undermine the very foundations of our common humanity. We must act with both ambition and responsibi... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Roman V. YampolskiyAI safety researcher, Louisville professorvotes For and says:The condition would be not time, but capabilities. Pause until you can do X, Y, Z. And if I’m right and you cannot, it’s impossible, then it becomes a permanent ban. But if you’re right, and it’s possible, so as soon as you have those safety capabili... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stephen FryBritish writer, comedian and actorvotes For and says:To get the most from what AI has to offer mankind, there is simply no need to reach for the unknowable and highly risky goal of superintelligence, which is by far a frontier too far. By definition this would result in a power that we could neither un... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
John WolfsthalAmerican nuclear security expert and former special assistant to the U.S. President for National Security Affairs.votes For and says:The discussion over AGI should not be cast as a struggle between so called doomers and optimists. AGI presents a common challenge for all of humanity. We must ensure we control technology and it does not control us. Until and unless developers and th... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Samuel ButeauAI researcher and PhD candidate at Mila (Quebec AI Institute).votes For and says:Barring an international agreement, humanity will quite likely not have the ability to build safe superintelligence by the time the first superintelligence is built. Therefore, pursuing superintelligence at this stage is quite likely to cause the per... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Mark BeallPresident of Government Affairs at the AI Policy Network.votes For and says:When AI researchers warn of extinction and tech leaders build doomsday bunkers, prudence demands we listen. Superintelligence without proper safeguards could be the ultimate expression of human hubris—power without moral restraint. Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yuval Noah HarariIsraeli historian and professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalemvotes For and says:Superintelligence would likely break the very operating system of human civilization - and is completely unnecessary. If we instead focus on building controllable AI tools to help real people today, we can far more reliably and safely realize AI’s in... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Walter KimKorean American evangelical pastor and president of the National Association of Evangelicals.votes For and says:If we race to build superintelligence without clear and morally informed parameters, we risk undermining the incredible potential AI has to alleviate suffering and enable flourishing. We should intentionally harness this amazing technology to help pe... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Stuart J. RussellAI Expert and Professorvotes For and says:This is not a ban or even a moratorium in the usual sense. It’s simply a proposal to require adequate safety measures for a technology that, according to its developers, has a significant chance to cause human extinction. Is that too much to ask? Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (14)
-
Marc AndreessenGeneral Partner at a16z (VC), co-founder of Netscapevotes Against and says:Our enemy is the Precautionary Principle, which would have prevented virtually all progress since man first harnessed fire. The Precautionary Principle was invented to prevent the large‑scale deployment of civilian nuclear power, perhaps the most cat... more Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Eric HorvitzMicrosoft Chief Scientistvotes Against and says:Guidance, regulation, reliability, and controls are part of advancing the field—done properly, they can even speed it up. But a blanket prohibition on development until some vague threshold of public buy‑in and universal scientific consensus is reach... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Emily M. BenderLinguist; AI criticvotes Against and says:Treating speculative “superintelligence” as the policy target and proposing to freeze development until there’s public buy‑in and scientific consensus distracts from the actual, present‑day harms of AI systems. These systems are already amplifying di... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jensen HuangNvidia cofounder and CEOvotes Against and says:AI is a foundational technology that every country, every industry, and every person will ultimately rely on. You can’t slam on the brakes and wait for some abstract consensus before building the future. We should not be putting up stop signs to prog... more Unverified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ben GoertzelSingularityNET founder; AGI researchervotes Against and says:I don’t think Nick Bostrom or anyone else is going to stop the human race from developing advanced AI because it’s a source of tremendous intellectual curiosity but also of tremendous economic advantage. So if let’s say President Trump decided to ban... more Unverified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Eric SchmidtFormer Google CEO; tech investorvotes Against and says:I’m not in favor of a six-month pause because it will simply benefit China. What I am in favor of is getting everybody together to discuss what are the appropriate guardrails. So, I’m in favor of letting the industry try to get its act together. This... more Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew NgBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainvotes Against and says:The call for a 6 month moratorium on making AI progress beyond GPT-4 is a terrible idea. I’m seeing many new applications in education, healthcare, food, … that’ll help many people. Improving GPT-4 will help. Lets balance the huge value AI is creatin... more Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bloomberg Opinion EditorsEditorial board of Bloomberg Opinionvotes Against and says:This is a formula for outright stagnation. [...] regulators should let entrepreneurship flourish while efforts to monitor and improve AI safety proceed in parallel. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Tyler CowenProfessor of Economics, George Mason University & author of Average is Overvotes Against and says:I disagree. A slowdown would politicize AI development... and could induce a talent drain. [...] The risk is that the delay could be extended indefinitely. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Bill GatesPhilanthropist. Founder and former CEO of Microsoft.votes Against and says:I don’t really understand who they’re saying could stop, and would every country in the world agree to stop, and why to stop. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes Against and says:But the governance of the most powerful systems, as well as decisions regarding their deployment, must have strong public oversight. We believe people around the world should democratically decide on the bounds and defaults for AI systems. Second, w... more Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes Against and says:My first reaction to [the Pause Giant AI Experiments letter] is that calling for a delay in research and development smacks me of a new wave of obscurantism. Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gary MarcusProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencevotes Against and says:My opinion is that the moratorium that we should focus on is actually deployment until we have good safety cases. I don't know that we need to pause that particular project, but I do think its emphasis on focusing more on AI safety, on trustworthy, r... more Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
OpenAIAI research organizationvotes Against and says:We are likely to eventually need something like an IAEA for superintelligence efforts; any effort above a certain capability (or resources like compute) threshold will need to be subject to an international authority that can inspect systems, require... more Unverified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
ai-governance
votes
More
ai-regulation
votes