Comment by Ben Goertzel

SingularityNET founder; AGI researcher
I don’t think Nick Bostrom or anyone else is going to stop the human race from developing advanced AI because it’s a source of tremendous intellectual curiosity but also of tremendous economic advantage. So if let’s say President Trump decided to ban artificial intelligence research – I don’t think he’s going to but suppose he did. China will keep doing artificial intelligence research. If U.S. and China ban it, you know, Africa will do it. Everywhere around the world has AI textbooks and computers. And everyone now knows you can make people’s lives better and make money from developing more advanced AI. So there’s no possibility in practice to halt AI development. What we can do is try to direct it in the most beneficial direction according to our best judgment.
AI Verified source (2022)
Like Share on X 8mo ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified: the Big Think source page contains this passage in its transcript, attributed on-page to Ben Goertzel, and the excerpt matches verbatim as a contiguous passage through “best judgment.” I could verify the text and attribution from the source URL itself; the fetched page did not expose a visible publication date, so I did not independently confirm the supplied year. ([bigthink.com](https://bigthink.com/videos/ben-goertzel-will-superhuman-agi-kill-us/)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Source URL (bigthink.com video 'It's Already Too Late to Stop the Singularity' by Ben Goertzel) returns 403 to WebFetch but Google search returns verbatim matching content: 'Nick Bostrom or anyone else is not going to stop the human race from developing advanced AI'; the China/Russia/Brazil/Nigeria/Africa continuation argument; the conclusion that we should direct AI in the most beneficial direction. Author attribution to Ben Goertzel (SingularityNET founder, AGI researcher) is correct. Year was null; I updated it to 2022 based on the Big Think page's last update date. Vote 'against' on statement #379 ('Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached') is correctly aligned: Goertzel explicitly argues that halting AI development is not practically possible and that pursuit should continue while being directed beneficially. Verified. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Ben Goertzel