We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Roman V. Yampolskiy
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-policy (5)
ai-safety (4)
agi (3)
ai (3)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-risk (3)
existential-risk (3)
future (2)
ethics (1)
policy (1)
research-policy (1)
transparency (1)
Top
New
-
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes For
and says:
The condition would be not time, but capabilities. Pause until you can do X, Y, Z. And if I’m right and you cannot, it’s impossible, then it becomes a permanent ban. But if you’re right, and it’s possible, so as soon as you have those safety capabili... more AI Verified source (2024)
added 7mo ago
-
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes Against
and says:
My argument is that it's impossible to do that. You cannot indefinitely control something smarter than you. So it's not a question of more money or more time or any other resource. AI Unverifiable source (2026)
added 1mo ago
-
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes Against
and says:
We haven’t lost until we have lost. We still have a great chance to do it right and we can have a great future. We can use narrow AI tools to cure aging, an important problem and I think we are close on that front. Free labor, physical and cognitive,... more AI Unverifiable source (2024)
added 7mo ago
-
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes Against
and says:
Advanced AIs would not be able to accurately explain some of their decisions. AI Verified source (2019)
added 8mo ago
-
Roman V. Yampolskiy
abstains
and says:
Until some company or scientist says ‘Here’s the proof! We can definitely have a safety mechanism that can scale to any level of intelligence,’ I don’t think we should be developing those general superintelligences. We can get most of the benefits w... more AI Verified source (2024)
added 4mo ago