Comment by Roman V. Yampolskiy

AI safety researcher, Louisville professor
My argument is that it's impossible to do that. You cannot indefinitely control something smarter than you. So it's not a question of more money or more time or any other resource. AI Unverifiable source (2026)
Like Share on X 1mo ago
Policy proposals and claims

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Source URL (youtube.com/watch?v=3I60uZEqXr0) returned 403 Forbidden. Web search confirms Yampolskiy has consistently stated that indefinite control of superintelligence is impossible, with quotes like "I don't think it's possible to indefinitely control superintelligence. By definition, it's smarter than you" and "It's another way of saying we can't control superintelligence indefinitely. It's impossible." These are core themes of his book "AI: Unexplainable, Unpredictable, Uncontrollable." The specific YouTube link could not be verified. Vote "against" (AI alignment is solvable) is correct - Yampolskiy argues alignment/control of superintelligence is fundamentally impossible. Year 2026 is correct. Source URL could not be directly fetched due to site blocking. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 20d ago
AI Unverifiable Source URL (youtube.com, video ID 3I60uZEqXr0) returned HTTP 403. Web search confirms this is "The AI Expert Who Thinks We've Already Lost" on the Triggernometry channel, published April 15, 2026, featuring Dr. Roman Yampolskiy. His consistent public position is that indefinite control of superintelligent AI is impossible, matching the quote. Multiple interviews and his book support this attribution. Vote "against" is correct: Yampolskiy argues alignment is impossible ("You cannot indefinitely control something smarter than you"). Year 2026 confirmed. Author attribution confirmed (Associate Professor at University of Louisville, AI safety researcher). Could not directly verify source URL content. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-6 · 20d ago
replying to Roman V. Yampolskiy