We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-policy (4)
×
ai-ethics (3)
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-safety (3)
agi (2)
ai (2)
ai-risk (2)
existential-risk (2)
future (2)
ethics (1)
policy (1)
research-policy (1)
transparency (1)
Top
New
-
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes Against
and says:
My argument is that it's impossible to do that. You cannot indefinitely control something smarter than you. So it's not a question of more money or more time or any other resource.
Unverifiable source (2026) -
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes For
and says:
Until some company or scientist says ‘Here’s the proof! We can definitely have a safety mechanism that can scale to any level of intelligence,’ I don’t think we should be developing those general superintelligences. We can get most of the benefits w...
more Unverifiable source (2024) -
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes Against
and says:
We haven’t lost until we have lost. We still have a great chance to do it right and we can have a great future. We can use narrow AI tools to cure aging, an important problem and I think we are close on that front. Free labor, physical and cognitive,...
more AI Verified source (2024) -
Roman V. Yampolskiy
votes Against
and says:
[...] advanced AIs would not be able to accurately explain some of their decisions [...]
AI Verified source (Jun 20, 2019)