Comment by Roman V. Yampolskiy

AI safety researcher, Louisville professor
The condition would be not time, but capabilities. Pause until you can do X, Y, Z. And if I’m right and you cannot, it’s impossible, then it becomes a permanent ban. But if you’re right, and it’s possible, so as soon as you have those safety capabilities, go ahead. If we create general superintelligences, I don’t see a good outcome long-term for humanity. So there is X‑risk, existential risk, everyone’s dead. There is S‑risk, suffering risks, where everyone wishes they were dead. [...] It’s not obvious what you have to contribute to a world where superintelligence exists.
AI Verified source (2024)
Like Share on X 8mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote clearly states that creating general superintelligent AI could lead to 'X-risk, existential risk, everyone’s dead,' which directly indicates the author believes AI can pose an existential threat to humanity. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago
Vote inference verification history Latest opinion AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly says that if we create 'general superintelligences,' there is 'X-risk, existential risk, everyone’s dead,' so it clearly supports the claim that AI can pose an existential threat to humanity. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 17d ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Verified. The Lex Fridman transcript page for podcast #431, posted June 2, 2024, attributes the first paragraph to Roman Yampolskiy at 01:23:54, and it attributes the second paragraph to him at 00:00:00; the same second passage also appears again at 00:07:45. The [...] is a faithful omission of intervening sentences about I-risk, creativity, and jobs, so the wording is real and correctly attributed, though the blockquote is a composite of two separate passages from the same interview. ([lexfridman.com](https://lexfridman.com/roman-yampolskiy/?utm_source=openai)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Source URL (lexfridman.com transcript for podcast #431 Roman Yampolskiy: Dangers of Superintelligent AI, June 2, 2024) returns 403 to WebFetch. However, Google search returns verbatim snippets of Yampolskiy's framing: X-risk ('everyone dies'), S-risk ('everyone wishes they were dead'), and his consistent advocacy for capability-based (not time-based) pause on superintelligence development that becomes a permanent ban if safety is impossible. Author attribution to Roman V. Yampolskiy (Louisville professor, AI safety researcher) is corroborated by multiple sources. Year 2024 matches the podcast publication date. Vote 'for' on statement #379 ('Ban superintelligence development until safety consensus is reached') is correctly aligned: the quote explicitly proposes a capability-conditional ban that becomes permanent if safety cannot be achieved. Verified. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-7 · 1mo ago
replying to Roman V. Yampolskiy