We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence
Cast your vote:
Results (38 votes):
Total
(38 votes)
For 31 (82%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 7 (18%)
For (24)
-
Spencer Greenberg 🔍A mathematician/entrepreneur in social science. Here, my aim is to help you gain insights about psychology, critical thinking, philosophy, tech, and society.votes For and says:
Example 1: self-play. AI is not just human level at chess, it far exceeds human level because of self-play. Example 2: aggregation of peak performance. No human can get all math Olympiad problems right; but an A.I. can be trained on the correct an...
more Unverifiable sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Scott AlexanderAuthor and psychiatristvotes For and says:
AI has gone from "dumber than a child" to "expert level" in a few years in many domains. The gap between "expert level" and "above top geniuses" is smaller, so we expect it to take less time. This has been a pattern in fields like chess and Go, where...
more AI Verified source (2026-06-11) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jack ClarkAnthropic co-founder and Head of Public Benefitvotes For and says:
What I'm looking at is a technological trend where, if anything, the speed will accelerate further. [...] My prediction is by the end of 2028, it's more likely than not that we have an AI system where you would be able to say to it: 'Make a better ve...
more Unverifiable source (2026-05-07)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Demis HassabisNobel laureate, AI Researcher and CEO of DeepMindvotes For and says:
We are standing in the foothills of the singularity. [...] I think what we're seeing is soft self-improvement, in the sense of these coding agents are making engineers much more productive.
Disputed source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Will MacAskillPhilosopher; effective altruism cofounder; researcher at Forethought Centre for AI Strategyvotes For and says:
Another possibility, if there's a large enough intelligence explosion, is that the first project to build AGI organically becomes a de facto world government. This possibility is worth taking pretty seriously, given the stakes and the fact that an in...
more Disputed source (2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ajeya CotraAI safety researcher; senior research analyst at Open Philanthropyvotes For and says:
AI R&D is fully automated in the middle of a year and this kicks off a rapid intelligence explosion that leads to very broadly superhuman AI.
Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elon MuskFounder of SpaceX, cofounder of Tesla, SolarCity & PayPalvotes For and says:
We might have AI that is smarter than any human by end of this year, and no later than next year. And probably 2030 or 2031 -- 5 years from now -- AI will be smarter than all of humanity collectively. [...] I said years ago that humans are just the '...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tristan HarrisCenter for Humane Technology cofoundervotes For and says:
We are extremely close to recursive self-improvement right now. The companies, I think, are planning to do this in the next 12 months. The asteroid is coming for Earth.
Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tim RocktäschelAI researchervotes For and says:
Once AI reaches human-level capabilities, we will be able to use it to improve itself in a self-referential way. I personally believe that if we can reach AGI, we will reach ASI shortly, maybe a few years after that.
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Anthony AguirrePhysicist; Future of Life cofoundervotes For and says:
The development of full artificial general intelligence – what we will call here AI that is "outside the Gates" – would be a fundamental shift in the nature of the world: by its very nature it means adding a new species of intelligence to Earth with ...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Eric SchmidtFormer Google CEO; tech investorvotes For and says:
So what happens when this thing starts to scale? Well, a lot. One way to say this is that within three to five years we'll have what is called general intelligence AGI, which can be defined as a system that is as smart as the smartest mathematician, ...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jared KaplanAnthropic chief scientistvotes For and says:
If you imagine you create this process where you have an AI that is smarter than you, or about as smart as you, it’s [then] making an AI that’s much smarter. It’s going to enlist that AI help to make an AI smarter than that. It sounds like a kind of ...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tom DavidsonAI governance researchervotes For and says:
So the the prototypical situation I'm imagining here is you know there's a kind of one ai project, which is you know somewhat ahead of the others, and maybe it it goes through intelligence explosion, whereas which by which I mean kind of AI can autom...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:
I don’t know exactly when it’ll come, I don’t know if it’ll be 2027. I think it’s plausible it could be longer than that. I don’t think it will be a whole bunch longer than that when AI systems are better than humans at almost everything. Better than...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Nick BostromPhilosopher; 'Superintelligence' author; FHI foundervotes For and says:
once we have full AGI, super intelligence might be quite close on the heels of that.
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Leopold AschenbrennerAI investor; former OpenAI researchervotes For and says:
As the race to AGI intensifies, the national security state will get involved. The USG will wake from its slumber, and by 27/28 we’ll get some form of government AGI project. No startup can handle superintelligence. Somewhere in a SCIF, the endgame w...
more AI Verified source (2024-06) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:
Moreover, frontier AI companies are seeking to develop AI with a specific skill that could very well unlock all others and turbocharge advances: AIs with the ability to advance research in AI. An AI system that would be as capable at AI research as t...
more AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ben GoertzelSingularityNET founder; AGI researchervotes For and says:
My own view is once you get to human-level AGI, within a few years you could get a radically superhuman AGI — unless the AGI threatens to throttle its own development out of its own conservatism. I think once an AGI can introspect its own mind, then ...
more AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ben SouthwoodAI economist and commentatorvotes For and says:
Because post-superintelligence abundance will be so great, agreements to share power and benefits should strongly be in the leader’s national self-interest: as we noted in the section on abundance, having only 80% of a very large pie is much more des...
more Disputed source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Leopold AschenbrennerAI investor and policy analystvotes For and says:
On the current course, the leading Chinese AGI labs won’t be in Beijing or Shanghai—they’ll be in San Francisco and London. In a few years, it will be clear that the AGI secrets are the United States’ most important national defense secrets—deserving...
more Disputed source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stephen HawkingTheoretical physicist, cosmologist, and authorvotes For and says:
Once humans develop artificial intelligence it would take off on its own,[...] Humans [...] couldn't compete and would be superseded.
Unverifiable source (2014)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David J. ChalmersPhilosopher of mind, consciousness and AIvotes For and says:
If there is AI, then there will be AI+ [...] Soon after we have produced a human-level AI, we will produce an even more intelligent AI.
AI Verified source (2010)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Eliezer YudkowskyAI researcher and writervotes For and says:
From our perspective, an AI will either be so slow as to be bottlenecked, or so fast as to be FOOM. [...] 'AI go FOOM'.
Unverifiable source (2008)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
I. J. GoodBritish statistician; Turing collaboratorvotes For and says:
The survival of man depends on the early construction of an ultra-intelligent machine. In order to design an ultraintelligent machine we need to understand more about the human brain or human thought or both. In the following pages an attempt is made...
more Disputed source (1965)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (6)
-
Gary MarcusProfessor of Psychology and Neural Sciencevotes Against and says:
Plot the same improvements on a linear y-axis and you get steady incremental gains, impressive but not the hockey stick that triggered the panic. [...] We don't have evidence that Mythos is actually an important step towards broad superintelligence.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tim DettmersMachine learning researchervotes Against and says:
The concept of superintelligence is built on a flawed premise. The idea is that once you have an intelligence that is as good or better than humans — in other words, AGI — then that intelligence can improve itself, leading to a runaway effect. This i...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Yann LeCunComputer scientist, AI researchervotes Against and says:
There is no such thing as an intelligence explosion. There is no reason AI should become in control just because it is more capable.
Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mustafa SuleymanMicrosoft AI CEO; authorvotes Against and says:
It depends on your definition of AGI, right? AGI isn’t the singularity. The singularity is an exponentially recursive self-improving system that very rapidly accelerates far beyond anything that might look like human intelligence. To me, AGI is a ge...
more Unverifiable source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes Against and says:
But then there is a long continuation from what we call AGI to what we call Superintelligence.
AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ramez NaamScience author and futuristvotes Against and says:
We can see this more directly. There are already entities with vastly greater than human intelligence working on the problem of augmenting their own intelligence. A great many, in fact. We call them corporations. And while we may have a variety of th...
more AI Verified source (2015)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.