We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by David J. Chalmers
Philosopher of mind, consciousness and AI
If there is AI, then there will be AI+ [...] Soon after we have produced a human-level AI, we will produce an even more intelligent AI.AI Verified source (2010)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote directly links human-level AI (AGI) to the rapid emergence of a more intelligent AI: 'Soon after we have produced a human-level AI, we will produce an even more intelligent AI.' That clearly addresses AGI quickly leading to superintelligence.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Verified
The quote says that 'soon after' producing a 'human-level AI,' 'we will produce an even more intelligent AI,' which clearly supports AGI quickly leading to a more intelligent-than-human system.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the source URL’s transcript of David J. Chalmers’s 2010 paper, The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis, contains the exact wording of both quoted fragments in the same section, and the official PDF on Chalmers’s site matches it; the ANU repository also lists the work as Chalmers, 2010. The ellipsis is faithful, though the source’s second sentence continues with ': an AI+'. ([studyres.com](https://studyres.com/doc/5937178/the-singularity--a-philosophical-analysis))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified via web search. David Chalmers's "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis" (Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2010) contains the "Extension premise": "If there is AI, then there will be AI+ (soon after; absent defeaters)." Chalmers's framework defines AI as human-level and AI+ as greater than human level, with the singularity argument that soon after human-level AI we get more intelligent AI. The full quote with [...] elision correctly summarizes this central premise of his paper. Chalmers is correctly identified. Vote "for" aligns perfectly with the statement "AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence" — this is the core argument of Chalmers's paper. Year 2010 matches.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to David J. Chalmers