We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Yann LeCun
Computer scientist, AI researcher
There is no such thing as an intelligence explosion. There is no reason AI should become in control just because it is more capable.AI Unverifiable source (2025)
6mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
votes Against
No statement relation verification comments yet.
No vote answer verification comments yet.
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Unverifiable
The exact wording does appear at the supplied In-Sight URL, where Scott Douglas Jacobsen introduces it as “from Yann LeCun”; that page is dated 2025-06-13 and notes an internal publication date of 2025/05/15. However, I could not corroborate this exact wording in a primary or other reliable independent source. Reliable nearby matches show LeCun making similar but different remarks—for example, TIME quotes him saying intelligence does not imply a desire to dominate and that AI will be “subservient to us,” while Entrepreneur/AOL report his 2025 remark that “The emergence of superintelligence is not going to be an event.” This looks more like an uncited synthesis/paraphrase than a securely verifiable verbatim quote. ([in-sightpublishing.com](https://in-sightpublishing.com/2025/06/13/ask-a-genius-1377-ai-experts-warn-of-transformative-risks-reflections-from-hinton-bengio-russell-lecun-and-hassabis/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 16d ago
Disputed
The June 13, 2025 source URL does contain this exact wording, but only as an uncited quote that Scott Douglas Jacobsen reads to Rick Rosner in an interview; it is not a primary-source Yann LeCun statement. ([in-sightpublishing.com](https://in-sightpublishing.com/2025/06/13/ask-a-genius-1377-ai-experts-warn-of-transformative-risks-reflections-from-hinton-bengio-russell-lecun-and-hassabis/)) Web search surfaced that page, a repost on Rick Rosner's site, and a YouCongress entry that marks the source as Unverifiable. ([in-sightpublishing.com](https://in-sightpublishing.com/2025/06/13/ask-a-genius-1377-ai-experts-warn-of-transformative-risks-reflections-from-hinton-bengio-russell-lecun-and-hassabis/?utm_source=openai)) Reliable LeCun interviews express similar ideas in different words—for example, TIME says the claim that intelligence implies wanting to take control is a fallacy and that AI would be subservient to humans, and Lex Fridman's transcript has LeCun say smarter AI would not want to take over and would be built to be submissive to humans. ([time.com](https://time.com/6694432/yann-lecun-meta-ai-interview/)) I could not find a reliable source with the exact intelligence-explosion wording, so this appears to be a paraphrase/composite rather than a verified verbatim LeCun quote. ([in-sightpublishing.com](https://in-sightpublishing.com/2025/06/13/ask-a-genius-1377-ai-experts-warn-of-transformative-risks-reflections-from-hinton-bengio-russell-lecun-and-hassabis/?utm_source=openai))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Unverifiable
Source URL (in-sightpublishing.com "Ask a Genius" article, June 2025) returns 403 to WebFetch, and the exact wording "There is no such thing as an intelligence explosion" doesn't appear in indexed search snippets. However, the substance is fully consistent with LeCun's well-documented views: he calls superintelligence overthrowing humans a "sci-fi trope" and "ridiculous", argues the path to superintelligence via LLMs is "complete bullshit", and says humans will be the "boss" of future AI systems regardless of capability. Vote "against" aligns with the statement "AGI could quickly lead to superintelligence" — LeCun rejects fast-takeoff scenarios. Marking as ai_unverifiable because I cannot confirm the exact phrasing from the primary source.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-7
· 1mo ago
replying to Yann LeCun