Yann LeCun

AI is becoming essential infrastructure. No single company or country should determine who can build on it, adapt it, or benefit from it. Project Tapestry is a test of whether frontier AI can be built as open infrastructure: collaborative, capable, a...

There is nothing qualitatively different between the previous technological revolutions and this one, [...] It's just another set of tools that makes us more efficient.

There’s no such thing as AGI. There is human-level AI, but human intelligence is extremely specialised. So calling it general intelligence is complete nonsense.

Current LLMs are intrinsically unsafe, but with world models, guardrail objectives can be implemented — so by construction, they will not knowingly produce actions that will produce dangerous results.

There is no such thing as an intelligence explosion. There is no reason AI should become in control just because it is more capable.

[LLMs] don't really understand the physical world. They don't really have persistent memory. They can't really reason and they certainly can't plan.

Making technology developers liable for bad uses of products built from their technology will simply stop technology development,

I see the danger of this concentration of power through proprietary AI systems as a much bigger danger than everything else. What works against this is people who think that for reasons of security, we should keep AI systems under lock and key becaus...

Well, my first reaction to this is that calling for a delay in research and development smacks me of a new wave of obscurantism, essentially, like why slow down the progress of knowledge and science? Then there is the question of products, like, you ...

My first reaction to [the letter] is that calling for a delay in research and development smacks me of a new wave of obscurantism,

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.