We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-policy (5)
×
agi (4)
ai-safety (4)
ai-ethics (3)
ai-governance (3)
existential-risk (3)
policy (3)
research-policy (3)
ai (2)
ai-regulation (2)
ai-risk (2)
regulations (2)
cern-for-ai (1)
ethics (1)
future (1)
Top
New
-
Yann LeCun votes For and says:
I don't like the phrase AGI. I prefer human-level intelligence because human intelligence is not general. Internally, we call this AMI-advanced machine intelligence. We have a pretty good plan on how to get there. First, we are building systems that... more Unverified source (2024) -
Yann LeCun votes Against and says:
There is no such thing as an intelligence explosion. There is no reason AI should become in control just because it is more capable. Unverified source (2025) -
Yann LeCun votes Against and says:
AI could theoretically replace humans, but it is unlikely due to societal resistance. Humans would remain in control, effectively becoming the 'boss' of superintelligent AI systems. [...] He downplayed fears of a doomsday scenario caused by AI, label... more Unverified source (2025) -
Yann LeCun votes Against and says:
The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does. Unverified source (2023) -
Yann LeCun votes Against and says:
My first reaction to [the Pause Giant AI Experiments letter] is that calling for a delay in research and development smacks me of a new wave of obscurantism. Unverified source (2023)