Yann LeCun

There is nothing qualitatively different between the previous technological revolutions and this one. It's just another set of tools that makes us more efficient. [...] Don't listen to CEOs [...] They have a vested interest in propping up the power o...

Whether AI's benefits are widely shared is a political question, has nothing to do with technology.

Current LLMs are intrinsically unsafe, but with world models, guardrail objectives can be implemented — so by construction, they will not knowingly produce actions that will produce dangerous results.

There is no such thing as an intelligence explosion. There is no reason AI should become in control just because it is more capable.

AI could theoretically replace humans, but it is unlikely due to societal resistance. Humans would remain in control, effectively becoming the 'boss' of superintelligent AI systems. [...] He downplayed fears of a doomsday scenario caused by AI, label...

I don't like the phrase AGI. I prefer human-level intelligence because human intelligence is not general. Internally, we call this AMI-advanced machine intelligence. We have a pretty good plan on how to get there. First, we are building systems that...

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.

The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.