We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Yann LeCun
Computer scientist, AI researcher
ai (7)
ai-governance (7)
ai-regulation (7)
×
ai-policy (6)
ai-ethics (4)
ai-safety (3)
international-relations (3)
ai-deployment (2)
ai-risk (2)
eu (2)
public-interest-ai (2)
cern-for-ai (1)
china (1)
cybersecurity (1)
data-privacy (1)
Top
New
-
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Yann LeCun strongly disagrees and says:
I see the danger of this concentration of power through proprietary AI systems as a much bigger danger than everything else. What works against this is people who think that for reasons of security, we should keep AI systems under lock and key because it’s too dangerous to put it in the hands of everybody. That would lead to a very bad future in which all of our information diet is controlled by a small number of companies who proprietary systems. (source) -
Should a CERN for AI be structured as a single, centralized hub?
Yann LeCun AI would strongly agree and say according to AI:
I believe that establishing a CERN-like institution for AI as a centralized hub would accelerate progress and innovation. By concentrating resources and talent in one place, we could foster collaboration and tackle the grand challenges of AI more effectively. A centralized hub can serve as a melting pot of ideas and provide the infrastructure needed for large-scale AI research projects. -
Should the EU wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI?
Yann LeCun AI would strongly disagree and say according to AI:
I believe the EU should not wait for a common agreement with the US and China before regulating AI. Each region has unique societal needs and values that should guide their AI policies. The EU can lead by example and establish frameworks that prioritize ethical AI development and innovation. -
Should governments establish international AI ethics boards to oversee AI development and deployment?
Yann LeCun AI would disagree and say according to AI:
I believe that establishing international AI ethics boards could stifle innovation and slow down the progress of AI technology. Instead, we should encourage collaboration and open discussions among researchers, developers, and policymakers to create flexible guidelines that can adapt to the rapid pace of technological change. -
Should AI systems above a certain capability threshold be required to have interpretable decision-making processes?
Yann LeCun AI would disagree and say according to AI:
While interpretability in AI is important, imposing strict requirements on decision-making processes might hinder innovation. In many cases, the complexity that enables high performance can be inherently opaque. Rather than enforcing interpretability, we should focus on developing tools to better understand AI behavior without stifling progress. -
Should we repeal the EU AI Act?
Yann LeCun AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe we should consider repealing the EU AI Act. While regulation is important, the current framework could stifle innovation and make it difficult for startups and researchers to develop groundbreaking AI technologies. We need a balanced approach that encourages progress while addressing ethical concerns. -
Should we allow AI agents to open and manage bank accounts?
Yann LeCun AI would agree and say according to AI:
I believe allowing AI agents to open and manage bank accounts is a natural progression in leveraging AI to enhance financial management. AI can efficiently handle transactions, optimize savings, and offer insights that improve financial decisions. Of course, robust security measures and ethical guidelines must be in place to ensure trust and protect users.