We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (6)
ai-regulation (6)
policy (6)
regulations (6)
×
ai-safety (4)
research-policy (3)
ai-policy (2)
ethics (2)
international-relations (2)
transparency (2)
ai-ethics (1)
law (1)
open-science (1)
open-source (1)
public-interest-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Yann LeCun
votes Against
and says:
I don’t see current AI as dangerous. The calls to slow down AI development are a form of marketing and lobbying. Anthropic is portraying AI as highly dangerous to scare governments. But LLMs aren’t at that level yet.
AI Verified source (Oct 12, 2026) -
Yann LeCun
votes Against
and says:
Making technology developers liable for bad uses of products built from their technology will simply stop technology development,
AI Verified source (2024) -
Yann LeCun
votes Against
and says:
The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.
AI Verified source (2023) 1 of 2 -
Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority
33 opinions
Yann LeCun
votes Against
and says:
The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.
AI Verified source (2023) 1 of 2 -
Yann LeCun
votes Against
and says:
The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.
AI Verified source (2023) -
Yann LeCun
votes Against
and says:
The question that people are debating is whether it makes sense to regulate research and development of AI. And I don't think it does.
AI Verified source (2023)