Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains

ai-safety ai-governance policy ethics ai-regulation regulations

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Key insights

Many quotes define high-stakes use by effects on life and safety, rights, employment, healthcare, education, public services, critical infrastructure, or material financial loss.
Supporters and skeptics alike focus on governance architecture such as identity, permissions, audit trails, monitoring, overrides, shutdowns, and escalation, rather than arguing that AI should simply be abandoned.
A recurring distinction is between routine execution that can be delegated and consequential actions that should remain subject to human review, final authority, or the power to stop a system.
Public-sector, legal, and rights-focused voices often stress contestability, accountability, and redress, while enterprise and security voices often emphasize operational controls and intervention points.
The disagreement is less about whether humans remain responsible than about which oversight mode can stay meaningful under increasing speed, scale, and autonomy.

Arguments for

Human judgment for high stakes

Proponents say that when agentic systems can affect finances, employment, healthcare, safety, legal rights, or essential services, AI may inform the decision but should not make or execute it alone. Actions such as large payments, production changes, hiring outcomes, or lethal force are presented as cases where a person should keep the final word or explicit approval role.

As AI becomes more autonomous the real question for business leaders is where human judgment matters most. What should machines be allowed to do independently? What should trigger human intervention? And who remains accountable for the outcome? [...] At the highest level are deci…

Alan Turnley-Jones · Sep 22, 2026 · full quote
An agent that can reconcile invoices, route support tickets or prepare a management report may save time with less risk. The same agent should not be allowed to approve a large payment, change a production system, make a hiring decision or send an external commitment without huma…

Tamaghn Kasibhatta · Oct 6, 2026 · full quote
Human approval should remain mandatory for actions that could jeopardize human safety, create material financial loss, change production systems, delete or disclose sensitive data, alter security policies, create legal commitments, affect employment or significantly impact custom…

Mohan Veloo · Sep 7, 2026 · full quote
However capable of our systems become, a person must keep the final word to understand the decision, to contest it, and where it matters most, to switch the systems off. This is non-negotiable, above all in high-risk systems where a single decision can cost a life, a livelihood, …

Rafal Kownacki · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
No machine should ever be given the power to decide to kill a human being on its own.

Don Beyer · Jul 17, 2026 · full quote

Autonomy outpaces reliability

Supporters argue that current agents still make substantial errors, face ambiguity, and can behave in ways that are hard to predict or correct quickly. Because greater autonomy can amplify harm before anyone intervenes, they say monitoring and human control should expand alongside autonomy.

State-of-the-art AI agents can have error rates exceeding 25 per cent on complex tasks, a situation that is unacceptable in high-stakes decision-making. Organisations seeking accuracy and repeatability must embed domain expertise into AI-agent workflows while keeping humans at th…

Bryan Harris · Oct 2, 2026 · full quote
This is a systemic problem that we cannot leave to the good graces of private companies. When thinking about regulations, we should focus centrally on how much autonomy we give these systems. A chatbot that answers a question poses one set of risks. An agent that can browse the i…

Fareed Zakaria · Sep 18, 2026 · full quote
The complexity and unpredictability of real world scenarios mean that even the most sophisticated AI agent can encounter uncertainty, ambiguous requirements, and high-stakes decisions that are beyond its capabilities. This is where human oversight becomes essential.

Oracle · Jul 13, 2026 · full quote
Because we still understand so little about the inner workings of these systems, ensuring that these more powerful agents stay under human control, that we can correct or stop them if they start behaving badly, is an urgent and persistent problem.

International AI Safety Report · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
because AI agents can act directly upon the real world, virtually and increasingly in the physical world, their failures can potentially cause severe harm before a human can even intervene.

Concordia AI · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote

Oversight preserves accountability

Many quotes tie oversight to explainability, auditability, contestability, and redress, insisting that institutions cannot defend a consequential outcome by saying the system made them do it. On this view, meaningful oversight requires identifiable people with authority, time, and independence to review, alter, or stop outcomes.

Governments should provide clear, simple explanations for how an AI system reaches an outcome. This includes: [...] the implementation of human oversight. [...] When an AI system influences or is used as part of administrative decision making, decisions should be explainable, and…

Australian Government Department of Finance · Sep 8, 2026 · full quote
Human oversight of AI systems cannot be just a rubber stamp. It requires that an identified person be granted authority, competence, time, independence, and power to alter and even stop a system.

Volker Türk · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
The true challenge is to ensure that its use is transparent, responsible, can be audited, and completely compatible with ethical judicial priorities, human rights, and the rule of law. No public institution can justify a decision by saying that that is what the system told us to …

Samuel Arsenault · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
We need to appoint an identifiable human being in charge for all issues that are tied to rights, and there needs to be a right to redress in good time, in line with the speed of AI systems, so that humans can receive redress if necessary. Therefore, the functioning of the algorit…

Amal El Fallah Seghrouchni · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
High-impact automated decisions, such as customs targeting, identity verification, or logistics prioritization, must remain under clear human accountability and be traceable and contestable.

Universal Postal Union · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
Human oversight must be real, informed, and able to change outcomes.

UNHCR · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote

Controls should be built in

Another line of support treats human oversight as a workflow that must be engineered into systems through bounded identities, access limits, approval gates, escalation paths, audit trails, and reliable override or shutdown mechanisms. Proponents say these controls should be built from the start so humans can monitor and intervene before unsafe actions proceed.

Companies do not need to abandon AI. They need to deploy it with discipline. Every agent should have a distinct identity, clearly defined access rights, and an audit trail showing what it did. Where practical, credentials should be short-lived, and permissions should be easy to r…

Julio Rivera · Oct 1, 2026 · full quote
Implement accessible kill switches, override controls or independent shutdown mechanisms for every autonomous or safety-relevant edge AI system. These controls should not rely on the AI’s cooperation and should be tested regularly. Define where human approval is required before A…

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote
Design for human oversight from Day 1: Don't bolt on governance after deployment. Build approval workflows, block states, and audit trails directly into your architecture.

Jaleh Reeves · Jul 1, 2026 · full quote
Make the technical controls real. That means AI-ready data, clear access controls, audit trails, model and agent monitoring, defined escalation paths and the ability to intervene when something behaves outside expectations.

Joe Depa · Aug 7, 2026 · full quote
Advanced AI models should never be deployed without a reliable off switch. The AI Kill Switch Act establishes a commonsense safeguard by requiring leading AI companies to maintain the ability to shut down their models and empowering the federal government to act when a deployed s…

Brad Carson · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
An "audit trail should preserve both identities: the human who initiated or authorized the action and the agent that executed it."

Vinay Patel · Jul 29, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Blanket review does not scale

Critics argue that routing agent actions to humans may be workable in development or low-frequency settings, but becomes unrealistic in production systems making many decisions each hour. They say more sophisticated governance and accountability frameworks are needed than constant manual review.

Our frameworks were not built to contemplate autonomous agents, and relying on a human in the loop for all agent actions is unlikely to be realistic. More sophisticated governance and accountability frameworks may be needed.

Sarah Breeden · Jul 2, 2026 · full quote
The industry’s current answer is unsatisfying: Human-in-the-Loop (HITL). In development environments and low-frequency pipelines, routing uncertain decisions to a human can be defensible. In production systems operating at scale—dozens of agents, hundreds of decisions per hour—it…

Artur Huk · May 11, 2026 · full quote

Approval slows high velocity

Some opponents say human-in-the-loop should be used only where absolutely necessary because it cannot operate at high velocity. In this view, a general approval requirement would slow operations and undermine the results organizations want from autonomous systems.

We’re not huge fans of human-in-the-loop. It’s something that you should use judiciously, where you absolutely need it. But it’s not something that you can do at high velocity. You will not get the results that you want to get.

Eric Brandwine · Jun 20, 2026 · full quote

Automatic containment acts faster

Another objection is that some security controls should respond immediately when trust changes rather than waiting on a person to approve a ticket. Continuous verification and automatic restriction of access are presented as faster ways to contain risky agent behavior before it grows into a larger incident.

A lot of tools can tell you an AI agent is behaving strangely. Very few can act on that at the network layer, without waiting on a human to approve a ticket. That’s the piece we’re closing.

Garrett Gross · Aug 18, 2026 · full quote
Every identity that can connect, access data, or act must be continuously verified and governed. Portnox gives organizations the ability to immediately restrict access when trust changes, without waiting for an AI agent to create a larger security incident.

Denny LeCompte · Aug 18, 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Graduated oversight models

Several quotes support strong human responsibility but distinguish among human-in-the-loop, human-on-the-loop, and human-in-command models, suggesting direct approval is not the only valid form of oversight. They argue the suitable arrangement depends on risk, confidence, ambiguity, scale, and whether human supervisors actually have the capacity and authority to change outcomes.

Human-in-the-loop should be designed as a graduated oversight model rather than a single pattern. The right mode depends on risk, confidence, ambiguity, regulatory sensitivity, operational maturity, and the trustworthiness of the automation.

Florian Lauck-Wunderlich · Jul 24, 2026 · full quote
Conventional oversight models are increasingly insufficient. The shift is moving from “human-in-the-loop” to “human-on-the-loop”, reflecting a more supervisory rather than directly interventionist role for people.

Pieter Danhieux · Jul 13, 2026 · full quote
To protect employees and exact real productivity, businesses must build in human oversight at the right level – not at every level.

Sonali Fenner · Jul 20, 2026 · full quote
Our national AI policy ensures human in the loop where AI must support and not replace human decision-making. Human on the loop, where human oversight remains an inbuilt feature. And human in command, where ultimate legal responsibility remains that of humans.

Shahza Fatima Khawaja · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
Existing responsible AI governance frameworks mandate human oversight. Yet they share a critical assumption: that competent human overseers remain present and capable of exercising meaningful oversight and control over AI decisions. Accountability must be treated as a capacity-se…

Gabriel Sze · Apr 20, 2026 · full quote

Across sectors, most quotes treat high-stakes agentic AI as an area where human responsibility must remain visible and actionable. They emphasize final authority over consequential decisions, along with records, approvals, override powers, and redress when systems affect rights, safety, money, or critical services. The main unresolved question is whether that should be enforced mainly through direct human-in-the-loop requirements or through more scalable combinations of supervision, embedded governance, and automatic controls.

Cast your vote:

Results (550 votes):

Total (550 votes)

For 534 (97%) Abstain 1 (0%) Against 15 (3%)

For (529)

Satya Nadella
Microsoft CEO

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

That same kind of mechanistic understanding eludes us in today’s Super Intelligence systems, even as the frontier models powering these systems are now more capable than traditional software systems. We can’t attribute model behaviors and outputs to ...
more AI Verified source (Oct 12, 2026)

added 5h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bernard Montel
EMEA Field CTO at Tenable and cybersecurity strategist with over 20 years of industry experience.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The trick is moving away from constant human micromanagement and adopting risk-proportional oversight instead. Low-risk tasks like summarising internal documents can run fully automated, while medium-risk tasks like updating database records can exec...
more AI Verified source (Oct 11, 2026)

added 21h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mahmoud Ramin
Research director at Info-Tech Research Group with a PhD in Neuroscience, specializing in enterprise IT, AI, and responsible operational deployment.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As organizations unleash the power of agent autonomy, it raises the pivotal and non-negotiable requirement of enforcing governance. [...] With basic AI systems, risk is much more contained compared to that of an autonomous agent that has access to mu...
more AI Verified source (Oct 9, 2026)

added 3d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Meagen Eisenberg
Chief Marketing Officer at Samsara; enterprise technology executive with experience leading marketing at MongoDB, Navan, and Lacework.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Governance must be designed into the deployment as well. Organizations should define which actions systems may take autonomously, when human review is required and how decisions can be understood or challenged. The level of oversight should reflect t...
more AI Verified source (Oct 8, 2026)

added 1d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Dipankar Sarkar
Writer on AI data rights and data-monetization policy; author for the Human Data Rights Coalition.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

An agent is a set of actions: read a ticket, look up a customer, draft a reply, update a field, send an email, issue a refund. Each action carries different risk. The right question is: What action needs what kind of human approval? [...] Low reversi...
more AI Verified source (Oct 8, 2026)

added 4d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tan Kiat How
Singapore Senior Minister of State for Digital Development and Information.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Existing guidelines and regulations, including risk management processes and oversight, also apply to agentic AI systems. This includes the principle of maintaining human accountability, implementing sufficient controls and guardrails, as well as eff...
more AI Verified source (Oct 7, 2026)

added 5d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Ministry of Digital Development and Information (Singapore)
Singapore government ministry responsible for national digital development and information policy, including AI governance.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

For essential services and other higher-risk applications, stronger safeguards are necessary. [...] We cannot rely on simply telling AI agents what to do. We must also deliberately limit what they can access and do, conduct appropriate test suites, r...
more AI Verified source (Oct 6, 2026) 1 of 2

added 1d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tamaghn Kasibhatta
AI Product Manager at NxtGen Cloud Technologies, working on enterprise AI infrastructure and governance.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

An agent that can reconcile invoices, route support tickets or prepare a management report may save time with less risk. The same agent should not be allowed to approve a large payment, change a production system, make a hiring decision or send an ex...
more AI Verified source (Oct 6, 2026)

added 6d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Bryan Harris
Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer at SAS, leading its data, analytics, and AI research and development organization.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

State-of-the-art AI agents can have error rates exceeding 25 per cent on complex tasks, a situation that is unacceptable in high-stakes decision-making. Organisations seeking accuracy and repeatability must embed domain expertise into AI-agent workfl...
more AI Verified source (Oct 2, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Julio Rivera
Cybersecurity researcher, business and political strategist, and technology columnist; founder of ItFunk.org.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Companies do not need to abandon AI. They need to deploy it with discipline. Every agent should have a distinct identity, clearly defined access rights, and an audit trail showing what it did. Where practical, credentials should be short-lived, and p...
more AI Verified source (Oct 1, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Gleb Tsipursky
Behavioral scientist and author

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

An agent with production access, payment authority, persistent credentials, or the ability to direct other agents should face stronger evaluation, logging, approval, and incident-reporting expectations. [...] For serious incidents, a report should an...
more AI Verified source (Sep 24, 2026)

added 17d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alan Turnley-Jones
CEO of NTT Data Middle East and Africa, writing on AI governance, autonomy, and accountable deployment.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As AI becomes more autonomous the real question for business leaders is where human judgment matters most. What should machines be allowed to do independently? What should trigger human intervention? And who remains accountable for the outcome? [...]...
more AI Verified source (Sep 22, 2026)

added 19d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Fareed Zakaria
CNN host, Washington Post columnist, author, and political commentator.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This is a systemic problem that we cannot leave to the good graces of private companies. When thinking about regulations, we should focus centrally on how much autonomy we give these systems. A chatbot that answers a question poses one set of risks. ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 18, 2026)

added 23d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alastair Denniston
NHS consultant and Chair of the National Commission into the Regulation of AI in Healthcare.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

One message came through clearly: people are open to AI improving their care, but only if it is safe, overseen by humans, and if they know when it is being used. These recommendations are designed to make that trust possible, so that the UK can lead ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Steven Mills
Chief AI Ethics Officer and Managing Director & Partner at BCG

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Deeper human review is concentrated on the AI products that carry the greatest risk.
AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Menlo Security
Cybersecurity company providing browser and AI-agent security products for enterprises.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

At that point, speed matters less than judgment (aka security). A person needs to understand the context, weigh the risk, and decide whether the action should proceed. As agents take on more routine execution, human involvement shifts toward these le...
more AI Verified source (Sep 8, 2026)

added 29d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Australian Government Department of Finance

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Governments should provide clear, simple explanations for how an AI system reaches an outcome. This includes: [...] the implementation of human oversight. [...] When an AI system influences or is used as part of administrative decision making, decisi...
more AI Verified source (Sep 8, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mohan Veloo
Chief Technology Officer for Asia Pacific, China and Japan at F5, specializing in enterprise technology and security.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Human approval should remain mandatory for actions that could jeopardize human safety, create material financial loss, change production systems, delete or disclose sensitive data, alter security policies, create legal commitments, affect employment ...
more AI Verified source (Sep 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Basile Njei
Associate Professor Adjunct at Yale School of Medicine who studies AI in clinical care.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The human being is going to be the orchestrator.
AI Verified source (Sep 1, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tiffany Xingyu Wang
CEO of Songsheet; writer on AI governance, trust, and human judgment in automated decision-making.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In writing my forthcoming book, The Trust Code, I interviewed the people who run AI inside the world’s most critical systems, from energy grids and payment networks to technology giants. One pattern kept surfacing. The organizations that scale AI wit...
more AI Verified source (Sep 1, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Australia’s Data and Digital Ministers
Australian federal, state, and territory ministers responsible for data and digital policy.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Those responsible for the different phases of the AI system lifecycle should be identifiable and accountable for the outcomes of the AI systems, and human oversight of AI systems should be enabled.
AI Verified source (Aug 25, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
OpenAI
AI research organization

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Guided by our National Security Principles, we approach national security deployments with safeguards, meaningful human judgment, and appropriate oversight, especially in high-stakes settings.
AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2026) 1 of 3

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Cathal McCarthy
Chief Strategy Officer at Kore.ai, writing on AI governance and enterprise AI.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Organizations need processes to monitor, challenge and review AI systems, particularly as they become more autonomous.
AI Verified source (Aug 14, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Janet Bastiman
Chief data scientist at Napier AI, writing on responsible AI, human oversight, and workforce skills.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Ensuring meaningful human oversight of AI systems through various types of checks will ensure that the employees keep their core skills sharp for the task, but allowing the shift of work into new tasks will allow the building of new skills that were ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 12, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Henry Han
Researcher on AI governance, verifiability, and auditability in financial technology.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Financial institutions are delegating consequential decisions to agentic AI systems that decompose goals, coordinate models and tools, and act with little oversight. Yet agentic AI governance in FinTech is under-investigated.
AI Verified source (Aug 11, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Amanda Caswell
AI Editor at Tom's Guide and technology journalist.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Human-in-the-Loop gates: High-stakes actions like sending emails, modifying files, executing code, or moving money, require explicit human confirmation before the AI can proceed.
AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Ricardo Britto
Author of a 2026 arXiv paper on assurance for AI-native software development.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The AI-Native Manifesto envisions large-scale agile software development in which humans increasingly govern intent, risk, and exceptions while agents execute more of the engineering process.
AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Edmund Seto
Environmental health researcher and author of a 2026 paper on human-in-the-loop agentic AI.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We conclude that effective use of agentic AI requires both domain expertise to frame questions and evaluate outputs, and coding literacy to guide the AI's approach.
AI Verified source (Aug 7, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

Abstain (1)

Loading more opinions...

Against (15)

Garrett Gross
Field Chief Information Security Officer at Portnox, an enterprise access-control provider.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

A lot of tools can tell you an AI agent is behaving strangely. Very few can act on that at the network layer, without waiting on a human to approve a ticket. That’s the piece we’re closing.
AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Denny LeCompte
Chief Executive Officer of Portnox, a cloud-native enterprise access-control provider.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

Every identity that can connect, access data, or act must be continuously verified and governed. Portnox gives organizations the ability to immediately restrict access when trust changes, without waiting for an AI agent to create a larger security in...
more AI Verified source (Aug 18, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

More h/ai-regulation votes

AI agents should be granted legal personhood as non-human corporations

Require all advanced AI chips to be registered and traceable to their physical location

AI companies should be liable for harms caused by their deployed models

Ban AI companion chatbots for minors under 18

Ban autonomous lethal weapons

Back