We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
policy (3)
ai-safety (2)
ethics (2)
regulations (2)
ai (1)
ai-ethics (1)
existential-risk (1)
future (1)
law (1)
public-interest-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
37 opinions
Vitalik Buterin
votes For
and says:
The hope is that humans and LLMs fail in distinct ways, and so requiring human + LLM 2-of-2 confirmation to take risky actions (and allowing human override only with much more friction and/or time delay) is much safer than fully relying only on eithe...
more AI Verified source (Apr 2, 2026) -
Vitalik Buterin
votes For
and says:
Once AI becomes powerful enough to be truly dangerous, it's maximizing the risk of an irreversible anti-human outcome that even you will deeply regret.
Unverifiable source (2026) 1 of 3 -
Vitalik Buterin
votes Against
and says:
Putting liability on users feels most incentive-compatible. While the link between how a model is developed and how it ends up being used is often unclear, the user decides exactly how the AI is used. Liability on users creates a strong pressure to d...
more AI Verified source (2025)