We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
ai-governance (3)
ai-regulation (3)
ai-safety (3)
policy (3)
ai (2)
ai-ethics (2)
ai-policy (2)
agi (1)
democracy (1)
ethics (1)
existential-risk (1)
future (1)
law (1)
regulations (1)
research-policy (1)
Top
New
-
Vitalik Buterin votes For and says:
"AI becomes the government" is dystopian: it leads to slop when AI is weak, and is doom-maximizing once AI becomes strong. But AI used well can be empowering, and push the frontier of democratic / decentralized modes of governance. Unverified source (2026) -
Vitalik Buterin votes For and says:
But a superintelligent AI, if it decides to turn against us, may well leave no survivors and end humanity for good. AI Verified source (2023) -
Vitalik Buterin votes For and says:
Humans and LLMs fail in distinct ways, and so requiring human + LLM 2-of-2 confirmation to take risky actions (and allowing human override only with much more friction and/or time delay) is much safer than fully relying only on either one. Unverified source (2026) -
Vitalik Buterin votes Against and says:
Putting liability on users feels most incentive-compatible. While the link between how a model is developed and how it ends up being used is often unclear, the user decides exactly how the AI is used. Liability on users creates a strong pressure to d... more AI Verified source (2025)