We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
AGI could make governments subordinate to the companies that develop it
Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends
Cast your vote:
Results (32 votes):
Total
(32 votes)
For 32 (100%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 0 (0%)
·
For (31)
-
Lord Clement-JonesTim Clement-Jones, Baron Clement-Jones CBE; Liberal Democrat peer; UK House of Lords AI policy expertvotes For and says:
This episode—and, potentially, the recent OpenAI episode mentioned by some of the noble Baronesses—shows that what we have built in this country is not technological independence but, in the AI Minister’s own phrase, a search for strategic leverage. ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Joanna ShieldsDirector of the Responsible AI Future Foundation and former UK minister for internet safety and security.votes For and says:
Frontier AI capability sits overwhelmingly in the hands of a few companies headquartered mainly in the United States and China. Every other nation participates by permission, not by right. That permission can be withdrawn arbitrarily in an instant.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tsiporah FriedVisiting senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, writing on technology, sovereignty, and international security.votes For and says:
Allowing a private company to reserve the right to suspend services based on its own reading of contractual language would hand corporate executives a degree of operational authority traditionally reserved for elected civilian leaders and military co...
more AI Verified source (Jul 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
We have allowed a handful of multinational corporates, which have displayed a carelessness to the effects of what they do, to wield immense power—more power than national Governments. It is increasingly difficult for Governments to pull levers that a...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Katy KnightPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Siegel Family Endowment.votes For and says:
Today, a small number of frontier technology companies control technical talent, computing resources, evaluation capabilities and the narratives around AI development. Governments and philanthropic funders make large-dollar bets based on information ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mikheil KavelashviliPresident of Georgiavotes For and says:
Artificial intelligence is, by its very nature, a centralized technology. The creation of advanced models requires the mobilization of colossal financial resources, computational capacities, and large-scale data. This unprecedented concentration of p...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tom WheelerVisiting Fellow at Brookings Institution; former Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 2013-2017; author and tech policy expertvotes For and says:
A handful of companies and their leaders now control the cognitive capabilities upon which governments, businesses, and citizens depend.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bernie SandersU.S. Senator from Vermontvotes For and says:
As a society, we can no longer sit back and allow a handful of Big Tech oligarchs to determine the future of this revolutionary technology with no democratic input.
AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
The first, frontier-provider sovereignty, assigns privileged authority to the provider of the most capable models and is reflected in contemporary arguments for frontier-model testing, release gating, transparency duties, and compute-related controls...
more AI Verified source (Jun 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of CanadaFederal government of Canadavotes For and says:
Currently, AI is a game of scale that is dominated by hegemons and hyperscalers. This poses a significant security and economic challenge as countries around the globe risk becoming subordinate or reliant on them.
AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
OpenAIAI research organizationvotes For and says:
Transformative technologies can concentrate power, or they can broaden it. They can make life easier for a few, or they can expand opportunity for many. Our approach is rooted in the belief that AI should work for people: helping them pursue their ow...
more AI Verified source (Jun 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mark CarneyPrime Minister of Canada; former Governor of the Bank of England and Bank of Canadavotes For and says:
That creates real risks that foreign entities could access Canadian data, deploy AI products that shape Canadian lives without reflecting our values, and tilt the playing field against Canadian firms — while Canada lacks the leverage to push back or ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:
At various times in history (such as the Gilded Age in the United States or the East India Company in the UK), companies have become powerful enough that they capture the state or adopt quasi-state characteristics. AI will soon become so capable that...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
S. Yash KalashSenior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation; expert in strategy, public policy, digital technology and financial services.votes For and says:
If firms own the AGI systems that automate most economic activity, they may provide stipends, dividends or services to users, effectively becoming private welfare institutions. Economic efficiency may improve, but democratic accountability would weak...
more AI Verified source (May 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Because their products are indispensable, their de facto policies become real constraints on governmental action.
AI Verified source (Apr 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Artur IshkhanyanResearcher at the National Academy of Sciences of Armenia studying artificial intelligence governance, corporate power, and state sovereignty.votes For and says:
Corporate-led AI governance often surpasses state oversight, resulting in accountability deficits and regulatory fragmentation.
AI Verified source (Apr 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Priyanshu JainResearcher on artificial intelligence, geopolitics, and economic concentration.votes For and says:
AI infrastructure owners command more wealth and capability than most governments.
AI Verified source (Apr 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tristan HarrisCenter for Humane Technology cofoundervotes For and says:
Do you have to listen to the people's political power if you don't get your tax revenue from the people anymore, you get it from AI companies? And if companies - you can't use your bargaining power. You can't, like, withdraw your labor like a labor u...
more AI Verified source (Mar 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Holly ElmoreFounder and Executive Director of PauseAI US; evolutionary biologist and AI moratorium advocatevotes For and says:
The governance of superintelligence has to represent the stakeholders of Earth— all people. AI companies cannot grade their own homework. They cannot be allowed to hold so much power that they eclipse democracy.
AI Verified source (Mar 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
votes For and says:
Corporate power extends beyond lobbying, manifesting as infrastructural and platform power as governments and societies become increasingly dependent on these critical functions.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Adam SegalIra A. Lipman chair in emerging technologies and national security and director of the Digital and Cyberspace Policy program at the Council on Foreign Relationsvotes For and says:
If the frontier labs do achieve superintelligence, their capabilities will become extraordinary. They could launch cyberattacks, wield political influence, or fashion new and exotic weapons to seize power. U.S. policymakers need to ensure that there ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Hélène LandemoreYale political science professorvotes For and says:
Currently I just see elected legislatures quite captured by the tech industry and incapable or unwilling to regulate.
Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Joseph StiglitzNobel laureate economist based at Columbia Universityvotes For and says:
It is an oligarchy with better technology. [...] If the tech oligarchs continue in their mindset overall of downscaling government, that will impair the ability of government to facilitate the AI transition.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David LieDirector of the Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society at the University of Toronto; Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering; Canada Research Chair in Secure and Reliable Systemsvotes For and says:
That is not a choice a for-profit corporation should be allowed to make in a democratic society. Nor should such a company be able to restrict the ability of society to make choices about its own security.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Karen HaoTechnology journalist and authorvotes For and says:
[These companies are] consolidating a historic amount of economic and political power, terraforming our earth, reshaping our geopolitics.
Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Will MacAskillPhilosopher; effective altruism cofounder; researcher at Forethought Centre for AI Strategyvotes For and says:
Another possibility, if there's a large enough intelligence explosion, is that the first project to build AGI organically becomes a de facto world government. This possibility is worth taking pretty seriously, given the stakes and the fact that an in...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bruce SchneierSecurity technologist and authorvotes For and says:
A democracy that defers its knowledge to private algorithms is one that risks becoming a spectator to its own governance. [...] If public knowledge is absorbed into proprietary systems that the public cannot inspect, audit or meaningfully challenge, ...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daron AcemogluNobel laureate economist; MIT Institute Professor; author of Power and Progressvotes For and says:
As AI reorders economies and concentrates power in fewer and fewer hands, the question is no longer whether democracy needs saving, but whether we can save it in time.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
António GuterresUN Secretary-Generalvotes For and says:
We are witnessing perhaps the greatest transfer of power of our times — not from Governments to people, but from Governments to private technology companies. [...] When technologies that shape behaviour, elections, markets, and even conflicts operate...
more Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Simon ChestermanVice provost at the National University of Singapore, professor of Law and authorvotes For and says:
Sovereignty — understood as the authority to set rules, allocate resources, and shape collective futures — is migrating from public institutions to private actors. These 'silicon sovereigns' set rules, adjudicate disputes, police speech, shape labor ...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (0)
Loading more opinions...
More
h/ai-safety
votes