We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Avani Desai
CEO of Schellman, cybersecurity and compliance firm
Humans really can't keep up with high-frequency, high-volume decision-making made by generative AI. Traditional human review models are collapsing as generative and agentic systems move from experimentation into production.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Avani Desai (CEO of Schellman), 2026, "against" statement #418 ("Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains"). Checks: (1) Year 2026 — recent, OK. (2) Vote alignment — Desai argues "Humans really can't keep up with high-frequency, high-volume decision-making made by generative AI" and that traditional human review models are collapsing / "human-in-the-loop is not enough when we're talking about truly agentic AI," advocating system-level controls instead. This opposes a mandate for human-in-the-loop oversight, so an "against" vote is correct. (3) Source — siliconangle.com/2026/01/18/human-loop-hit-wall-time-ai-oversee-ai returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but web search independently confirms the exact verbatim opening sentence and the collapsing-human-review thesis, attributed to Avani Desai, CEO of Schellman (also corroborated in CIO.com's "Keeping humans in the AI loop"). (4) Author bio (CEO of Schellman, cybersecurity/compliance firm) is correct. Attribution, verbatim text, and vote all confirmed. Verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 8d ago
replying to Avani Desai