We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Virginia Dignum
Professor of Responsible Artificial Intelligence at Umeå University; AI ethics expert
The central risk is not that machines will outthink us, but that humans will abdicate responsibility. By framing AI as an autonomous decision-maker, especially in high-stakes domains, we risk normalizing the idea that accountability can be delegated to systems that cannot understand values, consequences, or justice.
AI Verified
source
(2026)
2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Verified
Year 2026 (current). Princeton University Press source returns HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the quote verbatim from "Virginia Dignum on The AI Paradox": "The central risk is not that machines will outthink us, but that humans will abdicate responsibility. By framing AI as an autonomous decision-maker, especially in high-stakes domains, we risk normalizing the idea that accountability can be delegated to systems that cannot understand values, consequences, or justice." Corroborated by the PUP Substack and her book "The AI Paradox." Attribution to Virginia Dignum (Professor of Responsible AI, Umeå University) is correct. The vote "for" on statement 418 ("Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains") aligns: she argues humans must retain responsibility rather than delegate accountability to AI in high-stakes domains.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 12d ago
replying to Virginia Dignum