We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Marc Andreessen
General Partner at a16z (VC), co-founder of Netscape
ai (4)
ai-governance (3)
ai-safety (3)
ai-ethics (2)
ai-regulation (2)
economics (2)
existential-risk (2)
ai-deployment (1)
ai-policy (1)
ai-risk (1)
democracy (1)
future (1)
inequality (1)
law (1)
public-interest-ai (1)
Top
New
-
Should humanity ban the development of superintelligence until there is a strong public buy-in and broad scientific consensus that it will be done safely and controllably?
Marc Andreessen strongly disagrees and says:
Our enemy is the Precautionary Principle, which would have prevented virtually all progress since man first harnessed fire. The Precautionary Principle was invented to prevent the large‑scale deployment of civilian nuclear power, perhaps the most catastrophic mistake in Western society in my lifetime. The Precautionary Principle continues to inflict enormous unnecessary suffering on our world today. It is deeply immoral, and we must jettison it with extreme prejudice. We believe in accelerationism – the conscious and deliberate propulsion of technological development – to ensure the fulfillment of the Law of Accelerating Returns. To ensure the techno‑capital upward spiral continues forever. (2023) source Verified -
Should we ban future open-source AI models that can be used to create weapons of mass destruction?
Marc Andreessen strongly disagrees and says:
there has to be full open source here. [...] if you're worried about AI-generated pathogens, [...] Let's do a Manhattan Project for biological defense. (2023) source Unverified -
Will AGI create abundance?
Marc Andreessen strongly agrees and says:
It would mean a takeoff rate of economic productivity growth that would be absolutely stratospheric, far beyond any historical precedent. Prices of existing goods and services would drop across the board to virtually zero. Consumer welfare would skyrocket. Consumer spending power would skyrocket. New demand in the economy would explode. Entrepreneurs would create dizzying arrays of new industries, products, and services, and employ as many people and AI as they could as fast as possible to meet all the new demand. Suppose AI once again replaces that labor? The cycle would repeat, driving consumer welfare, economic growth, and job and wage growth even higher. It would be a straight spiral up to a material utopia that neither Adam Smith or Karl Marx ever dared dream of. (2023) source Unverified -
Should we tax unrealized gains?
Marc Andreessen strongly disagrees and says:
If you’re a venture firm, you’re getting strips of your portfolio pulled away from you every year. You’re out of business. [...] This makes startups completely implausible. source Unverified -
Should humanity build artificial general intelligence?
Marc Andreessen strongly agrees and says:
The development and proliferation of AI – far from a risk that we should fear – is a moral obligation that we have to ourselves, to our children, and to our future. We should be living in a much better world with AI, and now we can. Rather than allowing ungrounded panics around killer AI, “harmful” AI, job-destroying AI, and inequality-generating AI to put us on our back feet, we in the United States and the West should lean into AI as hard as we possibly can. We should seek to win the race to global AI technological superiority and ensure that China does not. In the process, we should drive AI into our economy and society as fast and hard as we possibly can, in order to maximize its gains for economic productivity and human potential. (2023) source Unverified