We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
I am this person!
Location: United States
policy (10)
ai-regulation (8)
ai-governance (7)
ai-safety (7)
regulations (6)
ai-ethics (4)
research-policy (4)
ai (3)
ai-policy (3)
transparency (3)
ai-risk (2)
economics (2)
ethics (2)
future-of-work (2)
impact-on-labor (2)
Top
New
-
Andrew Ng
votes For
and says:
There will be no AI jobpocalypse. [...] While there are examples of AI taking away jobs, the trends strongly suggest the net job creation is vastly greater than the job destruction — just like earlier waves of technology. [...] There will be an AI jo...
more AI Verified source (2026) -
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
29 opinions
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
I'm disappointed [the Big Beautiful Bill] didn't include a proposed moratorium on U.S. state-level AI regulation. While there is a role for AI regulation, it is when the technology is new and poorly understood that lobbyists are most likely to succee...
more AI Verified source (2026) -
Andrew Ng
votes For
and says:
I hope that we will reach AGI and ASI superintelligence someday, maybe within our lifetimes, maybe within the next few decades or hundreds of years, we’ll see how long it takes. Even AI has to obey the laws of physics, so I think physics will place l...
more Unverifiable source (2025) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
SB 1047 will stifle open source AI and hinder AI innovation [...] and therefore will make AI less safe.
Unverifiable source (2024) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023) -
Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority
12 opinions
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
However, it is important to differentiate regulating applications (which we need) vs. regulating the technology (which is ill-advised).
AI Verified source (Dec 11, 2023) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
I have to admit, I don’t get it, [...] I’m struggling to see how AI could pose any meaningful risk for our extinction.
AI Verified source (2023) 1 of 2 -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says: