We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
I am this person!
Location: United States
ai-governance (6)
×
ai-regulation (6)
ai-safety (6)
policy (5)
existential-risk (4)
ai (3)
ai-ethics (3)
future (3)
regulations (3)
ai-policy (2)
ai-risk (2)
ethics (2)
open-source (2)
agi (1)
nuclear (1)
Top
New
-
-
Andrew Ng
votes For
and says:
The lack of control of AI is one of the things that has been overhyped. [...] We can't control AI exactly. And it will sometimes be buffeted around by random factors. But with the right engineering, we can control them well enough for most applicatio... more AI Unverifiable source (2026) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
I'm struggling to see how AI could pose any meaningful risks for our extinction. [...] I don't see how it can lead to human extinction. AI Verified source (2023) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
The call for a 6 month moratorium on making AI progress beyond GPT-4 is a terrible idea. I’m seeing many new applications in education, healthcare, food, … that’ll help many people. Improving GPT-4 will help. Lets balance the huge value AI is creatin... more AI Verified source (2023) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
SB 1047 will stifle open source AI and hinder AI innovation [...] and therefore will make AI less safe. AI Verified source (2024) -
Andrew Ng
votes Against
and says:
Guardrails are needed. But they should be applied to AI applications, not to general-purpose AI technology. Regulating the technology itself would stifle innovation and hold back the progress that benefits everyone. AI Unverifiable source (2023)