We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Andrew Ng
Baidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brain
Guardrails are needed. But they should be applied to AI applications, not to general-purpose AI technology. Regulating the technology itself would stifle innovation and hold back the progress that benefits everyone.
AI Unverifiable
source
(2023)
Policy proposals and claims
Verification History
AI Unverifiable
Quote attributed to Andrew Ng, year 2023, "against" statement #418 ("Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains"). Source: aifund.ai written statement before the U.S. Senate AI Insight Forum. Findings: (1) The source URL returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch, so I could not directly confirm the verbatim text on the page. Web search corroborates the quote is genuine and accurately attributed — it matches Ng's 2023 Senate AI Insight Forum written statement ("guardrails are needed. But they should be applied to AI applications, not... general-purpose AI technology"). (2) STALENESS: the quote is from 2023, older than 2025/2026; per protocol it should be replaced with a recent quote. I searched extensively for a recent (2025-2026) Ng quote specifically relevant to mandating human-in-the-loop oversight (Bain "Winning in the Agentic Era" conversation, The Batch letters, Fast Company), but all candidate sources are 403-blocked and search returned only paraphrases, so I could not establish a verifiable verbatim recent replacement. (3) RELEVANCE/VOTE concern: the 2023 quote is about regulating technology vs. applications generally and is only loosely about this statement's specific topic (human-in-the-loop oversight); notably, requiring human-in-the-loop oversight is itself an application-level guardrail that Ng tends to support, so the recorded "against" vote is questionable. Recommend a human revisit to replace with a current Ng quote and re-examine the vote direction. Marked ai_unverifiable because the source is blocked and no verifiable replacement could be obtained.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 8d ago
replying to Andrew Ng