We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Saket Srivastava
Chief Information Officer at Asana
By 2026, boards will ask the same questions about agents that they ask about people: who is allowed to do what, with which data and under whose supervision.AI Verified source (2025)
3mo ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
I found the quoted sentence verbatim as the first sentence of a longer quotation in TechInformed’s December 23, 2025 article, where it is explicitly attributed to Saket Srivastava, Chief Information Officer at Asana. I could not find Saket Srivastava or the quote on the provided StarCIO page, so the quote appears authentic but the supplied source URL does not appear to be the containing source. ([techinformed.com](https://techinformed.com/agentic-ai-predictions-nine-trends-to-look-out-for/))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Quote attributed to Saket Srivastava (CIO at Asana), year 2025, "for" statement #418 ("Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains"). Checks: (1) Year 2025 — recent, OK. (2) Quote accuracy/attribution: web search confirms the exact verbatim wording ("By 2026, boards will ask the same questions about agents that they ask about people: who is allowed to do what, with which data and under whose supervision") attributed to Saket Srivastava, CIO at Asana, in a December 2025 agentic-AI predictions roundup (TechInformed), parallel to the recorded starcio.com prediction roundup. (3) Vote alignment: the quote frames AI agents as needing the same accountability/supervision as people ("under whose supervision"), supporting human oversight/governance of agentic AI, so a "for" vote is correct. (4) Author bio (CIO at Asana) is correct. (5) The recorded source URL (drive.starcio.com) returns HTTP 403 to WebFetch, but the verbatim quote and attribution are independently confirmed via web search, so this is positively verified rather than ai_unverifiable. Verified.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 28d ago
replying to Saket Srivastava