YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Blaise Agüera y Arcas

Avatar
VP and Fellow at Google Research; AI researcher and author
No single concentration of intelligence, human or artificial, should regulate itself. Power must check power, and in a world of artificial agents, this means building conflict and oversight into the institutional architecture. [...] Humans remain in the loop — agent institutions are populated by both humans and AI agents in different roles and configurations.
Disputed source (2026)
Like Share on X 3mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains
votes For
Statement relation verification history Unverified Report this
No statement relation verification comments yet.
Vote inference verification history Unverified Report this
No vote answer verification comments yet.

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

Disputed PubMed identifies https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aeg1895 as the Science piece "Agentic AI and the next intelligence explosion," published 2026-03-19, with three named authors: James Evans, Benjamin Bratton, and Blaise Agüera y Arcas. ([pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41855332/)) The exact wording does appear in the official arXiv version of the same work, but the stored excerpt is not verbatim as presented because it reverses the source order: the text says "Crucially, humans remain in the loop..." before "no single concentration of intelligence...". ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20639)) Because the source is a multi-author work, this platform cannot verify it as a single-author quote by Blaise Agüera y Arcas alone. · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 16d ago
Disputed The passage does appear in the 2026 paper tied to DOI 10.1126/science.aeg1895, but your version is not verbatim: in the source, the sentence about humans remaining in the loop comes before the sentence about no single concentration of intelligence, not after an ellipsis, and the work is jointly authored by James Evans, Benjamin Bratton, and Blaise Agüera y Arcas, so attributing it to Blaise alone is inaccurate. ([arxiv.org](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.20639)) · YouCongress gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 · 18d ago
AI Verified Checked all dimensions. Year: 2026 (current; Science article "Agentic AI and the next intelligence explosion," March 2026). Author: Blaise Agüera y Arcas, VP/Fellow at Google Research — correctly attributed as a co-author (with James Evans and Benjamin Bratton). Vote alignment: statement "Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains" with a "for" vote is correct — the quote argues "no single concentration of intelligence, human or artificial, should regulate itself. Power must check power," that oversight must be built "into the institutional architecture," and explicitly that "Humans remain in the loop — agent institutions are populated by both humans and AI agents in different roles and configurations," supporting human oversight of agentic AI. Source: direct fetch of science.org and the arXiv mirror (2603.20639) both return HTTP 403 to automated requests, but an independent web search returned the verbatim passage ("no single concentration of intelligence, human or artificial, should regulate itself. Power must check power...building conflict and oversight into the institutional architecture") from this exact March 2026 Science article, confirming the source contains the quote. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 1mo ago
replying to Blaise Agüera y Arcas