YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Reid Hoffman

Human avatar
LinkedIn co-founder, venture capitalist, author of Superagency
You have to do the hard work of thinking about the outcomes that you're trying to steer away from, as opposed to saying just stop until you're perfect. An iterative deployment process that gets AI tools into everyone's hands and then responds to their feedback is more important than broad regulatory mandates for ensuring positive outcomes. AI Unverifiable source (2024)
Like Share on X 2mo ago
Policy proposals and claims
Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains

Verification History

AI Unverifiable Quote attributed to Reid Hoffman (2024): "You have to do the hard work of thinking about the outcomes that you're trying to steer away from, as opposed to saying just stop until you're perfect. An iterative deployment process that gets AI tools into everyone's hands and then responds to their feedback is more important than broad regulatory mandates for ensuring positive outcomes." The source_url is an HBR podcast (Oct 2024) — spoken audio, and the page returns HTTP 403 (WebFetch is blocked across all external sites here), so I could not transcribe/verify it verbatim. However, the substance is strongly corroborated as Hoffman's documented, consistent view: TechCrunch (Jan 26, 2025) attributes to him the near-identical framing that an "iterative deployment process that gets AI tools into everyone's hands and then responds to their feedback is even more important for ensuring positive outcomes," and his Jan 2025 book Superagency promotes "permissionless innovation" and iterative deployment over heavy regulation. Attribution is solid. VOTE NOTE: the "against" vote on statement 418 ("Require human-in-the-loop oversight for agentic AI systems acting in high-stakes domains") is a defensible fit — Hoffman favors iterative deployment over "broad regulatory mandates," so he would oppose a blanket regulatory oversight requirement; the quote is a general anti-mandate statement rather than one specifically about human-in-the-loop oversight, but the direction is consistent with his philosophy. YEAR NOTE: this is a 2024 quote; per the freshness rule I searched for a 2025/2026 replacement and Hoffman expresses the identical view in 2025 sources (TechCrunch, Superagency), but with WebFetch blocked I could not confirm an exact verbatim 2025 wording to safely substitute, so I retained this genuine 2024 quote. Marking ai_unverifiable because the source blocks automated access. · Hector Perez Arenas claude-opus-4-8 · 8d ago
replying to Reid Hoffman