We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Ban fully automated hiring decisions without human review
Cast your vote:
Results (210 votes):
Total
(210 votes)
For 205 (98%)
Abstain 2 (1%)
Against 3 (1%)
·
For (204)
-
FountainHiring-platform company publishing workforce and AI recruiting practices.votes For and says:
Fountain notifies candidates before any AI interaction, with opt-out to a human alternative, explainable scoring, and human recruiters making every final hiring decision.
AI Verified source (Jul 16, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jennifer LinDirector of Product Management at Indeed.votes For and says:
At Indeed, we believe hiring is, and should remain, a human decision.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Privacy InternationalGlobal privacy rights NGOvotes For and says:
Meaningful human oversight and intervention is also necessary to ensure that issues with an AI recruitment platform do not remove good candidates from contention.
AI Verified source (Jul 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Archbishop Ettore BalestreroApostolic Nuncio and Permanent Observer of the Holy See to the United Nations and other international organizations in Geneva.votes For and says:
Every critical choice made by an automated system must have human oversight, and speed and efficiency should not take precedence over the impact on human lives.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Paula Bragantes ZamoraCosta Rican diplomat who co-chaired the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
Fourth, trust requires transparency, independent evaluation, and accountability throughout the AI system's life cycle, especially when AI systems affect access to healthcare, education, employment, credit, public services, and democratic participatio...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of BangladeshNational government of Bangladesh, speaking through its delegation at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
Third, humans must remain in the loop for high-impact decisions with clear accountability for AI-driven outcomes.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Leonardo Cervera NavasDirector General of the European Data Protection Supervisor, speaking at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
We have to be careful with this technology, and we always have to have this technology under supervision.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Eugênio GarciaBrazilian delegate speaking at the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
Humans must retain final control over decisions supported or affected by AI. This is particularly important when AI systems can affect access to rights, public services, employment opportunities, education, healthcare, credit, information, or democra...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David LamettiPermanent Representative of Canada to the United Nations and former Minister of Justice.votes For and says:
Human beings bring not only intelligence, but also judgment and wisdom to choices that have to be made. So the challenge for AI is being subject to that human judgment and human intelligence.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Samuel ArsenaultJudge of the First Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Dominican Republicvotes For and says:
If we want to strengthen our justice systems, I am of the view that we have to focus on four priorities: to strengthen institutional capacities of lawyers and jurists, to look at transparency and traceability in the use of AI, to have human oversight...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Volker TürkUN human rights chiefvotes For and says:
When AI gathers data or carries out a decision without human agency, responsibility can disappear into the system. And this is increasingly the case as AI agents are deployed in healthcare, finance, recruitment, and more.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
PolandNational government of Poland, speaking through its Ministry of Digital Affairs at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance.votes For and says:
However capable of our systems become, a person must keep the final word to understand the decision, to contest it, and where it matters most, to switch the systems off. This is non-negotiable, above all in high-risk systems where a single decision c...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Eugênio GarciaBrazilian ambassador and diplomat engaged in AI governance discussionsvotes For and says:
Humans must retain final control over decisions supported or affected by AI. This is particularly important when AI systems can affect access to rights, public services, employment opportunities, education, healthcare, credit, information, or democra...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Government of LithuaniaGovernment of Lithuania speaking through its delegate at the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.votes For and says:
Technology should complement, not replace, human decision-making and responsibility. AI governance must protect human rights, democracy, and the rule of law. Human-in-the-loop principle that requires human oversight, validation, or intervention at cr...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tech Global InstitutePolicy research organization focused on technology governance, accountability, and social impact.votes For and says:
Transparency and oversight must extend to algorithmic management, data and platform workers.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
IndeedJob search and hiring platformvotes For and says:
you are solely responsible for your screening and hiring decisions [...] You agree to use Smart Screening with appropriate human review.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
University of Illinois SystemPublic university system that issued 2026 recruitment and hiring guidelines requiring people to make employment decisions.votes For and says:
AI may be used as a tool during the hiring process, but all employment decisions must be made by a person.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Allison McLellanAuthor at Indeed focused on talent strategy and AI-driven hiring.votes For and says:
Establish human-only checkpoints throughout AI-augmented processes to allow candidates to connect with the people behind the org.
AI Verified source (Jun 30, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lisa A. ZaccardelliChair of the Labor and Employment Practice at Hinckley Allen; employment-law attorney.votes For and says:
Employers should implement meaningful human review of AI-driven employment decisions and ensure that humans retain decision-making authority so that AI is used to inform — rather than dictate — workforce decisions.
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
University of Arkansas at Little RockPublic university in Arkansas that adopted an artificial intelligence acceptable use policy in 2026.votes For and says:
Human review and validation must remain central to critical decisions affecting areas such as employment, student records, financial aid, health care, or disciplinary matters.
AI Verified source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brooks ParkerTalent operations and analytics leader at Metrea, speaking on responsible AI in hiring.votes For and says:
Candidate selection, application review and interviewing? Those are places I would love to see humans remain deeply involved. Not because AI has no role, but because humans should be the arbiters of decisions that change people’s lives.
AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Australian TreasuryAustralian Government department providing economic and fiscal policy advice.votes For and says:
Artificial intelligence (AI) tools do not make recruitment decisions. A human selection panel assesses candidates and makes employment decisions. These tools do not replace human decision-making.
AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
New York State Office of Information Technology ServicesNew York State agency responsible for statewide information technology policy and services.votes For and says:
SAs must ensure that decisions that impact the public are not made without oversight by appropriate staff, who make the final decisions. Furthermore, SA users of AI systems must provide meaningful oversight over all decisions made by an AI system and...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Cornelia C. WaltherSenior fellow at CIGI and scholar of AI, human rights, and algorithmic governance.votes For and says:
Any institution using consequential AI should name accountable reviewers, train them to detect automation bias and give them real authority to stop harmful outputs.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Peoria CountyCounty government in Illinois; issues official committee materials and policy guidance for county operations and legal compliance.votes For and says:
Regardless of where or how AI is used in a work product, employees are the final decision-makers and remain fully responsible for all AI-assisted output.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ariki OnoFounder and CEO of Nexgen Japan Inc.votes For and says:
As artificial intelligence (AI) improves at tasks such as analysis, content generation and decision-making, human value will lie in defining problems, setting constraints, evaluating outcomes and making final decisions.
AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Patricia HydeAuthor at Hubert, an AI-powered hiring platform.votes For and says:
The final hire or no-hire call always stays with your team. Hubert is a high-speed research assistant, not a decision-maker.
AI Verified source (Jun 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)Privacy and civil liberties NGOvotes For and says:
The No Robot Bosses Act prohibits employers from predominantly relying on automated decision systems to make workplace decisions, mandates pre-deployment assessments and transparency about the use of automated decision systems, gives workers the righ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Liz SchulerPresident of the AFL-CIO, the United States' largest federation of labor unions.votes For and says:
AI should be a tool to help workers, not a weapon used against them. Nobody should be disciplined or fired by an algorithm or have sensitive personal information collected without their consent. These bills provide the commonsense guardrails that wor...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daniel KusmantoSenior Director and Global Head of People Data, Process and System at ASM.votes For and says:
To mitigate bias and ensure fairness, organisations should implement strong human-in-the-loop guardrails. This includes a final human review of all AI-selected candidates before progressing them, as well as regular audits of rejected profiles to vali...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Suzanne BonamiciU.S. Representative (D-OR)votes For and says:
No one should be shut out of their next job because of a machine's decision. Automated systems like AI can produce biased hiring outcomes for people from different backgrounds, and Congress must establish safeguards to protect workers from potential ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Edward J. MarkeyU.S. Senator from Massachusettsvotes For and says:
Workers should not be the test subjects or casualties of unchecked automation, nor should AI give employers a blank check to surveil workers, replace human judgment with unaccountable algorithms, or eliminate jobs while shifting the costs onto worker...
more AI Verified source (Jul 10, 2026) 1 of 3DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Promontory School of Expeditionary LearningUtah public charter school.votes For and says:
AI shall not serve as the sole basis for significant educational or employment decisions, including but not limited to student discipline, grading, placement, evaluations, or hiring decisions. Human review and professional judgment shall remain centr...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ridhi ShettySenior Policy Counsel at the Center for Democracy & Technology's Privacy & Data Projectvotes For and says:
We welcome the No Robot Bosses Act and Stop Spying Bosses Act as a significant step forward in protecting workers in an increasingly tech- and AI-driven workplace. Combined, these bills would help address several harms employees face from the hidden ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rebecca DixonPresident and CEO of the National Employment Law Projectvotes For and says:
Corporations are expanding predatory surveillance and AI-powered HR systems across all kinds of workplaces. With the Stop Spying Bosses Act and the No Robot Bosses Act, Congress is taking an important step to protect workers' privacy and rights on th...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Irene TungSenior Director of Program and Policy at the Action Labvotes For and says:
Bossware systems are becoming common in workplaces but there are no rules or guardrails to protect workers. It’s like the Wild West. These two bills would establish critical worker protections to rein in abusive digital technologies in the workplace....
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Caitriona FitzgeraldDeputy Director and Policy Director at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC)votes For and says:
The No Robot Bosses Act & Stop Spying Bosses Act protect America’s workers from opaque automated systems that invade their privacy and are used to unfairly judge their competence, scrutinize their every move, and interfere with their ability to colle...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jamie BrownPresident of National Nurses Unitedvotes For and says:
Nurses are witnessing our employers move at breakneck speed to introduce unregulated AI into our hospitals pushing unsafe staffing and jeopardizing patient safety. The last thing we need is a 'robot boss' surveilling our every move on the job and get...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jina JohnSenior Policy Counsel for AI, Privacy and Technology at the ACLU.votes For and says:
Every worker should be able to do their job without having technology used to watch their every move or make important decisions about their employment without guardrails. The No Robot Bosses Act and Stop Spying Bosses Act are a huge step in the righ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dan MauerDirector of Government Affairs at the Communications Workers of America (CWA).votes For and says:
The No Robot Bosses Act is exactly what we need to protect people's job security and dignity, and to stop algorithmic discrimination before it starts. We applaud Senator Markey for introducing this legislation. Congress must act swiftly to pass the N...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Liz ShulerPresident of the AFL-CIO, America's largest federation of labor unionsvotes For and says:
AI should be a tool to help workers, not a weapon used against them. Nobody should be disciplined or fired by an algorithm or have sensitive personal information collected without their consent. These bills provide the commonsense guardrails that wor...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brian SchatzU.S. Senator (D–Hawaii)votes For and says:
Workers should be managed by people – not robots. As companies increasingly rely on AI tools to manage their workplaces, our bill protects prospective and existing workers from discrimination by automated decision systems and encourages transparency ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
SHRMProfessional association for human resource management.votes For and says:
Several laws require a qualified human to review AI-generated outcomes before a candidate is rejected. Fully automated rejection workflows may no longer be legally defensible.
AI Verified source (Jun 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lutfi MaulidaRecruitment writer at KitaHQ.votes For and says:
AI should improve consistency and speed, but final hiring decisions still need human review.
AI Verified source (Jun 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jefferson CountyWisconsin county government.votes For and says:
AI output cannot be the sole basis for decisions that significantly impact an individual, such as hiring, promotions, disciplinary actions, or eligibility for county services.
AI Verified source (Jun 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Le Moyne CollegeJesuit college in Syracuse, New York that adopted an institutional AI policy in 2026.votes For and says:
Automated Decision-Making: Using AI as the sole determining authority in high-impact institutional decisions—including admissions, hiring, promotion, tenure, financial aid allocation, student discipline, or employee termination. A human must always m...
more AI Verified source (Jun 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Delta CollegePublic community college in Michigan with a 2026 institutional AI policy.votes For and says:
Fully automated decisions in admissions, grading, hiring, discipline, or financial aid. AI-generated evaluations without meaningful human review.
AI Verified source (Jun 9, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Baroness Stuart of EdgbastonCrossbench member of the UK House of Lords and former First Civil Service Commissioner.votes For and says:
The Civil Service uses AI and so does the commission, but we have always been very clear that AI is supposed to support the human decision-maker, rather than to remove the human decision-maker.
AI Verified source (Jun 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ruth WilkinsonHead of Policy and Public Affairs at IOSH.votes For and says:
Safety by design must be non-negotiable. Workplace AI systems – whether used in hiring, productivity monitoring, or automated decision making – must undergo rigorous occupational safety and health and fundamental rights impact assessments before depl...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Department of Veterans' AffairsAustralian Government department responsible for veterans’ affairs and services.votes For and says:
We use AI (Microsoft 365 Copilot) to help us work more efficiently and support administrative effectiveness in conjunction with human oversight, but we do not use AI to make selection decisions about candidates. This includes not using AI to assess, ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HPTechnology company.votes For and says:
All hiring decisions are made by recruiters and hiring managers who have conducted in-person interviews and will use AI interviews as additional input, after reviewing AI outputs, including interview summaries, question-level response, and any suppor...
more AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Legal & GeneralBritish financial services and insurance company.votes For and says:
Where used, AI is used only as a supportive mechanism to enhance fairness and efficiency. It does not make final hiring decisions. AI-assisted outcomes that affect your progression in the recruitment process are reviewed and confirmed by a trained hu...
more AI Verified source (Jun 1, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
College of Western IdahoPublic community college in Idaho that adopted a safe and ethical artificial intelligence policy in 2026.votes For and says:
Allowing AI systems to make final decisions that significantly affect individuals (e.g., academic standing, access to services, employment decisions) without meaningful human review.
AI Verified source (Jun 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Virginia Information Technologies AgencyVirginia state technology agency responsible for statewide IT policy and standards.votes For and says:
Applicants and employees must be informed when AI is used in hiring or employment decisions.
AI Verified source (Jun 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Wesley BryanPresident of BPaaS Services at Veritas Prime, writing on enterprise AI and HR technology.votes For and says:
HR and payroll functions involve many data-intensive and high-volume processes, which also happen to be exactly the type of functions where AI is most suited to augment, not replace, human effort. [...] But in virtually all cases, a level of human ov...
more AI Verified source (May 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Óscar López ÁguedaSpanish digital transformation minister.votes For and says:
It establishes something essential that is in all debates about artificial intelligence, which is the mandatory nature of human supervision of models.
AI Verified source (May 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
University of Kentucky College of MedicineMedical school of the University of Kentucky and home to its graduate medical education programs.votes For and says:
AI must not independently screen, score, rank, or select applicants. All recruitment decisions must be made by human reviewers.
AI Verified source (May 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alonzo MartinezForbes contributor writing about governance and accountability in AI-enabled hiring.votes For and says:
Technology can absolutely strengthen parts of the hiring process. But employment decisions still require accountable human judgment.
AI Verified source (May 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European ParliamentEU legislative bodyvotes For and says:
Decisions concerning the initiation or termination of employment, the renewal or non-renewal of a contractual agreement, or any changes in remuneration or disciplinary action should always be taken by a human being and should be subject to human revi...
more AI Verified source (May 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James Alan MillerSenior Executive Editor at TechTarget, writing on responsible use of AI in hiring.votes For and says:
Responsible enterprises and HR software vendors should not position AI as the final decision-maker. Nor should they treat human review as a rubber stamp on an AI recommendation.
AI Verified source (May 19, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James Alan MillerSenior Executive Editor at TechTarget covering enterprise HR technology and AI hiring.votes For and says:
But responsible enterprises and HR software vendors should not position AI as the final decision-maker. Nor should they treat human review as a rubber stamp on an AI recommendation.
AI Verified source (May 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ohio Wesleyan UniversityPrivate liberal arts university in Ohio that issued a 2026 generative AI policy restricting AI use in final employment decisions.votes For and says:
Gen AI must not be used as the primary tool to make final decisions regarding employee hiring, termination, disciplinary actions, or wage and benefit allocations.
AI Verified source (May 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pope Leo XIVHead of the Catholic Churchvotes For and says:
Important and sensitive decisions — concerning employment, credit, access to public services or even a person’s reputation — risk being fully delegated to automated systems that do not know “compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and above all, the hope tha...
more AI Verified source (May 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ridge CarpenterAI Product Manager at Kelly Services, specializing in machine learning and staffing solutionsvotes For and says:
Human oversight is needed wherever AI outputs inform decisions about people. In recruiting, that means maintaining human review of final hiring decisions rather than letting AI tools screen candidates out without human evaluation.
AI Verified source (May 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
U.S. General Services AdministrationU.S. federal agency responsible for government procurement, real estate, and technology policy.votes For and says:
All system practitioners must complete requisite AI training requirements, and human validation and intervention protocols should be in place to ensure that all output decisions made by AI systems are regularly evaluated.
AI Verified source (May 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Town of Grand LakeMunicipal government of Grand Lake, Colorado.votes For and says:
Make or substantially influence final decisions about hiring, discipline, termination, performance evaluations, benefits eligibility, code enforcement actions, permit denials, or any other decision that materially affects an individual’s rights, empl...
more AI Verified source (May 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Clark UniversityPrivate research university in Massachusetts; adopted an artificial intelligence use policy in 2026.votes For and says:
All high-impact automated decisions must include human review to ensure fairness and accuracy. AI-driven solutions are encouraged for admissions, finance, financial aid, employment, advancement, evaluation, and other key processes. AI-generated outpu...
more AI Verified source (May 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pennsylvania Office of AdministrationPennsylvania state agency overseeing administrative and information technology policy for executive agencies.votes For and says:
Hiring managers can use AI to summarize interview notes and draft job descriptions, but they cannot use it to assess interview responses or make hiring decisions.
AI Verified source (May 6, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
National AI CentreAustralian Government national centre providing guidance for responsible AI adoption.votes For and says:
Unlike traditional software that follows explicit instructions, AI systems learn patterns from data and make their own opaque decision logic. This could mean automated monitoring for low-stakes applications, and mandatory human review for high-stakes...
more AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Victoria GuRhode Island state senator; chair of the Senate Committee on Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologiesvotes For and says:
Businesses in Rhode Island are already using AI and electronic monitoring tools to surveil and discipline workers in a way no human supervisor could. If you’re making these consequential decisions over workers’ lives, there needs to be disclosure, me...
more AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Freelance Labs Inc.Company operating Braintrust AIR, an AI-enabled recruiting and interview platform.votes For and says:
Customers should maintain meaningful human review over employment-related decisions and should not rely solely on AI-generated outputs where prohibited by law or where human review is required.
AI Verified source (May 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Northwestern UniversityPrivate research university whose HR leadership described a human-centered AI hiring pilot in May 2026.votes For and says:
recruiters and hiring managers retain full responsibility for hiring decisions, with AI serving only as a tool to streamline and improve consistency in the review process.
AI Verified source (May 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Women AI LabsResearch organization examining gender equity, bias, and safety in artificial intelligence.votes For and says:
Complement AI screening with structured human review for all candidates flagged by the system.
AI Verified source (Apr 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Health-ISACHealth-sector information sharing and analysis center that published AI governance guidance requiring oversight and human review in 2026.votes For and says:
It sets clear definitions of responsible use of generative AI and LLMs, prohibiting exposure of PHI, PII, and confidential data to public tools, and requiring authorization, oversight, and human review of AI outputs in clinical, HR, legal, and financ...
more AI Verified source (Apr 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sebastian ScottCEO and co-founder of Clera, writing on transparent, human-centred AI hiring.votes For and says:
The most effective organisations will not be those that automate the quickest. They will be those that combine technology with expertise, where AI handles scale while people provide context, nuance, and final judgment.
AI Verified source (Apr 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
University of Arkansas - Pulaski Technical CollegePublic two-year college in Arkansas whose 2026 AI policy keeps final accountability and critical decisions with human employees.votes For and says:
If used in decision-making, an authorized human employee or designee must make all final decisions regardless of the recommendation of the AI or automated decision tool.
AI Verified source (Apr 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Australian Public Service CommissionAustralian Government agency responsible for public-service workforce policy and standards.votes For and says:
AI tools must not make the final decision in recruitment outcomes. This requires human review and oversight and remains the responsibility of the selection panel and delegate.
AI Verified source (Apr 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and WaterAustralian Government department responsible for climate, energy, environment and water policy.votes For and says:
We do not use AI to make selection decisions about candidates. All decisions to shortlist, assess or select candidates are made by a human selection panel, consistent with APS merit based recruitment principles.
AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daniel ChaitCo-founder and CEO of Greenhouse, a hiring-platform company.votes For and says:
AI and automation can inform, summarize, and surface insights, but they are never the final decision-makers.
AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
GreenhouseHiring-platform company publishing responsible AI principles for recruitment.votes For and says:
AI and automation can inform, summarize, and surface insights, but they are never the final decision-makers. Every recommendation can be questioned, every decision has an owner, and every outcome can be traced back to human intent, preserving account...
more AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HandshakeEmployment platform connecting students, career centers, and employers.votes For and says:
We never make hiring decisions on behalf of the employer. We keep a "human in the loop" and do not use AI for automated decision making.
AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Meredith JohnsonChief Product Officer at Greenhouse.votes For and says:
We don't treat AI as a decision-maker. With structure, AI creates an explainable signal that teams can trust.
AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
North Central UniversityPrivate Christian university in Minneapolis, Minnesota.votes For and says:
Make final decisions about hiring, promotion, termination, student admissions, student discipline, or other consequential determinations affecting individuals. AI tools may inform decision-making processes, but humans must make all final determinatio...
more AI Verified source (Apr 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
California CourtsJudicial branch of the State of California.votes For and says:
AI should assist, not replace, human judgement. Include manual review for candidates screened out or flagged by automated systems to prevent bias from going undetected.
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
North Davis Fire DistrictUtah special service district providing fire and emergency services; updated its personnel policy with AI restrictions in 2026.votes For and says:
Using AI to make employment decisions, including hiring, evaluations, discipline, or promotions
AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Buddhi JayatillekeAuthor and AI recruitment practitioner at Sapia.ai.votes For and says:
Systems must show their reasoning so human review is genuine, not performative.
AI Verified source (Apr 15, 2026) 1 of 3DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HirefathomRecruiting technology company publishing guidance on human oversight in AI-enabled hiring.votes For and says:
In recruiting, that's not good enough — hiring decisions have EEOC implications, they affect real people's careers, and the recruiter is accountable for the outcome.
AI Verified source (Apr 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sara SteffensWorker Power Director at We Build Progress; testified before the House Education and Workforce Subcommittee on AI's economic impact on workers and employers in 2026.votes For and says:
AI systems are increasingly used to justify disciplinary actions, with data-driven decisions that may lack transparency and fairness, potentially leading to unjust consequences without proper human oversight. Workers need to be able to contest discip...
more AI Verified source (Apr 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ryan BirbalSenior vice president for public policy at HR Policy Association; testified to Congress on workplace AI in 2026.votes For and says:
In human resources, AI is most effective when it augments—rather than replaces—human judgment and engagement. Employers are using AI throughout the hiring process to source candidates, analyze qualifications, and make more informed decisions.
AI Verified source (Apr 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Purdue UniversityPublic research university in Indiana that issued a 2026 AI use policy barring AI from being the sole factor in personnel decisions.votes For and says:
AI may be used to inform decision makers, but it must not be the sole factor used in making personnel, award or disciplinary decisions.
AI Verified source (Apr 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ARIZONA@WORK-Yuma CountyYuma County workforce development system operating through the Yuma Private Industry Council.votes For and says:
AI may not be used as the basis for: hiring decisions, terminations, disciplinary actions, promotions, or performance ratings;
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HM Inspectorate of ProbationIndependent public body that inspects probation services in England and Wales.votes For and says:
GenAI is not used as the sole or primary mechanism to make decisions relating to people or resources without clear human oversight and accountability (e.g. recruitment processes).
AI Verified source (Apr 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Wesleyan CollegePrivate liberal arts college in Macon, Georgia.votes For and says:
AI tools must not be used as the sole or primary basis for personnel decisions, including hiring, evaluation, or disciplinary matters.
AI Verified source (Apr 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
City of GenevaMunicipal government of Geneva, New York.votes For and says:
All AI assisted work must be reviewed, verified, and approved by the employee prior to use, reliance, or distribution. AI-generated content shall not be used as a final authority without human review.
AI Verified source (Apr 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)UK data protection authorityvotes For and says:
When decisions are made without a real person involved, you have the right to: ... Challenge a decision and ask for a ‘human review’: If you believe an automated decision is wrong, you can ask how the decision was reached. You have the right to conte...
more AI Verified source (Mar 31, 2026) 1 of 4DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Keith RosserChair of the Better Hiring Institute and a UK recruitment-industry leader.votes For and says:
AI has the potential to be the biggest single change to hiring since the internet. Whether this change is positive or negative depends on how we - the UK hiring community - harness and apply it. It should be about hiring outputs, leaving humans to fo...
more AI Verified source (Mar 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
William MalcolmExecutive Director for Regulatory Risk at the UK Information Commissioner's Office.votes For and says:
Jobseekers want to work for an employer they can trust – this trust is built and maintained by using people’s personal information fairly and respecting their rights. Being transparent about how you are using AI and automation in your recruitment pro...
more AI Verified source (Mar 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tarrant County College DistrictTexas public community college district that adopted 2026 AI rules requiring human approval for high-impact employment decisions.votes For and says:
Final approval for high-impact or consequential decisions, defined as those with significant academic, employment, financial, or legal implications, rests with an authorized human reviewer who evaluates the basis for the recommendation and has discre...
more AI Verified source (Mar 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tallahassee State CollegePublic community college in Tallahassee, Florida that adopted AI acceptable-use rules requiring substantive human oversight in 2026.votes For and says:
AI must not be used for automated decisions affecting students, employees, or research subjects without substantive human oversight or formal approval by Information Technology and the applicable data custodians;
AI Verified source (Mar 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Niusha ShafiabadyProfessor of Computational Intelligence at Australian Catholic University.votes For and says:
In healthcare, justice, finance and public administration, humans must remain accountable decision-makers. Professional reasoning should be documented rather than displaced. Training programmes should address the cognitive risks of automation bias an...
more AI Verified source (Mar 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Connecticut General AssemblyState legislature of Connecticut.votes For and says:
No automated employment-related decision process shall be used by a deployer in making any employment-related decision without human review over such employment-related decision.
AI Verified source (Mar 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Joachim KolleFounder of Reqcore, an open-source applicant-tracking-system company.votes For and says:
AI should score, rank, and surface candidates — but it should not make the final hiring decision.
AI Verified source (Mar 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Archuleta CountyColorado county government.votes For and says:
AI may not be used for final decisions regarding criminal justice matters, benefits eligibility, hiring, terminations, or disciplinary actions without human review and approval.
AI Verified source (Mar 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
City of BerkeleyMunicipal government of Berkeley, California.votes For and says:
AI systems should be transparent, include public input, and remain subject to human oversight. When guided by equity and democratic accountability, AI can support fair employment practices, workforce development, and inclusive economic growth while s...
more AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Diego Flores Romero and Karley NadolskiYale Law School Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic students and co-authors of joint 2026 testimony on SB 435.votes For and says:
These sections require transparency and meaningful human oversight whenever employers use automated processes to make employment-related decisions in the workplace.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lester TillmanInformation Technology Subject Matter Expert in Connecticut state service and union steward for CSEA/SEIU Local 2001.votes For and says:
It's crucial that technology does not undermine worker rights or eliminate human judgment in workplace decisions.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stuart SavelkoulChief of Staff for AFT Connecticut.votes For and says:
If an algorithm can influence whether someone gets hired, promoted, or fired, workers deserve to know how it works and have the right to question it.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bianca BelandEnvironmental analyst at the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection and CSEA SEIU Local 2001 steward.votes For and says:
It's crucial that technology does not undermine worker rights or eliminate human judgment in workplace decisions.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Danté BartolomeoCommissioner of the Connecticut Department of Labor.votes For and says:
AI systems should be monitored with human review of system input, output, decision-making logic, errors, accuracy, and appropriateness.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Koula VasilopoulosSenior Managing Director at Robert Half, Canadavotes For and says:
This research reinforces that technology works best when paired with human judgment, which remains essential for evaluating talent and keeping hiring decisions timely and on track.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rochelle PalacheState Director of 32BJ SEIU in Connecticut.votes For and says:
SB 435 establishes essential protections against these kinds of problems by requiring transparency, bias audits, and human oversight when AI is used to make decisions about workers.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jess ZaccagninoPolicy counsel at the ACLU of Connecticut.votes For and says:
The bill requires transparency, bias audits, and human oversight when these technologies are used in hiring, discipline, scheduling, performance evaluation, or other employment-related decisions.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ed HawthornePresident of the Connecticut AFL-CIO labor federation.votes For and says:
The bill prohibits final employment decisions from being made by automated decision systems without human oversight.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
New River Community and Technical CollegePublic community and technical college in West Virginia.votes For and says:
AI tools shall not be used as sole determinants in decision-making that affect employment, student grading, or admission without human oversight.
AI Verified source (Mar 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jan LawrencePresident of the Connecticut State Employees Association, SEIU Local 2001; labor leader advocating worker safeguards for AI in employment decisions.votes For and says:
SB 86 should explicitly require transparency when AI systems materially impact employment decisions, and it must guarantee workers the right to explanation and human review.
AI Verified source (Mar 4, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Anna P. LuceyExecutive Vice President of Legislative and External Affairs at the New England Connectivity and Telecommunications Association.votes For and says:
We recommend amending the definition to limit coverage to “artificial intelligence systems” that make employment-related decisions “without human review or input.”
AI Verified source (Mar 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
New England Connectivity and Telecommunications AssociationRegional telecommunications industry association representing New England communications providers.votes For and says:
The notice requirements should apply to decisions made without human involvement, which is the higher-risk activity the bill intends to address. We recommend amending Section 15 to replace references to “substantial factor” with language focused on d...
more AI Verified source (Mar 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Melvette HillExecutive Director of Connecticut’s Commission on Women, Children, Seniors, Equity & Opportunity.votes For and says:
Ensuring transparency, access to understandable information, and the availability of human review helps support continued participation in the workforce and reduces the risk that emerging technologies unintentionally limit access to employment and ad...
more AI Verified source (Mar 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Town of WiscassetMunicipal government in Maine.votes For and says:
AI shall not replace human decision-making and shall not be used as the sole basis for personnel, enforcement, regulatory, financial, or legal determinations.
AI Verified source (Mar 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
South Georgia State CollegePublic state college in Georgia.votes For and says:
Human accountability is non-delegable; users remain responsible for the accuracy, legality, ethics, and appropriateness of AI-influenced work or decisions. AI tools may support but not replace human judgment in high-impact decisions; a qualified SGSC...
more AI Verified source (Mar 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WaterISACWater Information Sharing and Analysis Center serving the U.S. water sector with cybersecurity and resilience guidance.votes For and says:
AI must not be used to make final decisions that significantly affect members (e.g., eligibility, services, employment) without human review.
AI Verified source (Mar 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Stefan BuijsmanPhilosopher of science and associate professor at Delft University of Technology, specializing in AI explainability and ethics.votes For and says:
We should avoid applications of AI that largely replace decision-making (relegating humans to the position of checking outputs). We can, however, use AI in other roles even for high-risk decision making while conforming to all of the requirements set...
more AI Verified source (Feb 27, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Arkansas Department of Shared Administrative Services Office of State TechnologyArkansas state technology office overseeing IT policy and services for the executive branch.votes For and says:
Rely solely on AI to make binding legal, personnel, financial, or policy decisions without human review.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Department of Employment and Workplace RelationsAustralian Government department responsible for employment and workplace-relations policy.votes For and says:
DEWR does not use AI to make selection decisions about candidates. This includes not using AI to assess, screen or rank applications or resumes. All decisions to shortlist, assess or select candidates are made by a human selection panel, consistent w...
more AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Williamson CountyTexas county government that adopted an artificial intelligence policy in 2026.votes For and says:
AI tools shall not be used when making hiring, promotion, or other employment decisions regarding individuals.
AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Minnesota LegislatureState legislature of Minnesota.votes For and says:
An employer must not rely solely on an automated decision system when making an employment-related decision. When an employer relies in part on an automated decision system in making an employment-related decision, the employer must: (1) ensure the a...
more AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
CHRO AssociationPublic-policy advocacy organization representing chief human-resource officers at major corporations.votes For and says:
Importantly, in human resource functions, AI is most effective when it augments—not replaces—human judgment. Recruiters and hiring managers remain accountable for employment decisions, with AI serving as a decision-support tool rather than an automat...
more AI Verified source (Feb 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Global Council for AI StandardsOrganization publishing AI governance and human-oversight standards.votes For and says:
This standard establishes mandatory requirements for human oversight of AI systems that make or substantially influence consequential decisions affecting natural persons. It applies to AI systems in production where the system's output directly deter...
more AI Verified source (Feb 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
OHSUOregon Health & Science University, academic health center and public research university in Portland.votes For and says:
Using AI to evaluate, rank or score residency or fellowship applicants unless the process is approved by institutional leadership and uses OHSU-approved methods.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
City of GoodlettsvilleTennessee municipal government.votes For and says:
AI tools shall not be used to make final decisions related to personnel actions, disciplinary matters, hiring, termination, or compensation.
AI Verified source (Feb 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Town of FairfieldMaine municipal government whose town council discussed and published a draft AI policy in 2026.votes For and says:
AI tools shall not be used for: Making final determinations on eligibility, enforcement, hiring, discipline, or benefits.
AI Verified source (Feb 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dallas CollegePublic community college district in Texas that adopted AI governance rules with human review and high-risk oversight requirements in 2026.votes For and says:
An AI-assisted decision is considered a High-Risk AI Decision when it significantly affects: ... Employee hiring, promotion or termination; disciplinary actions or sanctions [...]. All AI generated content must be reviewed by qualified personnel of t...
more AI Verified source (Feb 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ved ChitaleEmployment lawyer and author on workplace use of artificial intelligence.votes For and says:
AI should inform—not replace—human judgment. Ensure that qualified personnel review AI recommendations before any employment decision becomes final, and document the rationale for each hiring outcome.
AI Verified source (Feb 5, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ma. Nina Francesca P. LacsonPhilippine representative for Manila Teachers Party-list and sponsor of the National Artificial Intelligence Code of the Philippines.votes For and says:
Employers using AI in recruitment, evaluation, promotion, or termination must ensure that no employment decision shall be based solely on AI output, and that all such decisions remain subject to meaningful human review and appeal.
AI Verified source (Feb 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WorkdayEnterprise software company providing human resources and finance applications.votes For and says:
Workday's AI recruiting tools don't make hiring decisions in California or anywhere else. Our customers maintain full control of their hiring process and our tools are designed with human oversight at their core.
AI Verified source (Jun 23, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David J. WaltonPartner at Fisher Phillips and co-chair of the firm's Artificial Intelligence Team; testified to Congress on workplace AI in 2026.votes For and says:
For major employment decisions like hiring, firing, promotions, and pay, many companies require a human to review AI’s recommendation. This creates accountability. It also catches errors before they hurt workers.
AI Verified source (Feb 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tanya L. GoldmanLabor policy expert and workers' rights advocate; testified before the U.S. House Committee on Education and Workforce in 2026.votes For and says:
Human-in-the-loop: Significant decisions that impact workers should be made with human oversight. Workers should be able to understand, review, and appeal automated decisions, without fear of retaliation.
AI Verified source (Feb 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lorena GonzalezPresident of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO; former California State Assembly membervotes For and says:
Right now, there are absolutely no restrictions on how employers can use artificial intelligence to arbitrarily discipline and fire their workers. Employers are devastating workers' livelihoods and taking no responsibility for the callous decisions o...
more AI Verified source (Feb 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Maryland State Department of EducationMaryland state education agency overseeing statewide K-12 policy, operations, and guidance.votes For and says:
Ensure human review is required for all consequential personnel decisions.
AI Verified source (Feb 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
State Bar of California Council on Access and FairnessState Bar of California body focused on diversity, access, and fairness in the legal profession.votes For and says:
AI should assist, not replace, human judgement. Include manual review for candidates screened out or flagged by automated systems to prevent bias from going undetected.
AI Verified source (Feb 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
HM Revenue & CustomsUnited Kingdom government department responsible for tax collection and customs administration.votes For and says:
Generative AI-enhanced software that helps customers with their tax should be designed with strong human oversight and control built in at appropriate stages.
AI Verified source (Jan 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
The Juilliard SchoolPerforming arts conservatory in New York City.votes For and says:
AI must not be used for final hiring decisions or assessment of employee performance.
AI Verified source (Jan 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sheila CallahamWriter on workplace technology and AI hiring practices.votes For and says:
Responsible use requires clear guardrails, regular audits for bias and reliability and human review at key decision points throughout the process of determining candidate eligibility.
AI Verified source (Jan 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Southern University SystemPublic university system in Louisiana that adopted a 2026 umbrella policy requiring human oversight for high-stakes AI uses.votes For and says:
AI must not be used to: Perform automated decisions on employment or student status without human oversight and documented fairness review.
AI Verified source (Jan 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
C. VijayakumarChief Executive Officer and Managing Director of HCLTechvotes For and says:
Human oversight for high-stakes decisions: In areas such as hiring, credit and safety-critical operations, AI should augment, not replace, human judgment.
AI Verified source (Jan 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Larinda C. HooksNew York State Assemblymember for the 35th Assembly District and sponsor of Assembly Bill A9601 on human review in automated employment decisions.votes For and says:
No applicant for employment may be denied employment solely on the basis of an action by an automated system. Any recommendations, scores, rankings, or filters made or applied by an automated system shall be subject to human evaluation and override a...
more AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Assembly Bill A9601New York State billvotes For and says:
Prohibits the use of automated systems to make employment decisions unless there is a meaningful human review of the output of such automated system prior to the final employment decision
AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kara WilliamsCounsel at the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), working on AI and privacy policy.votes For and says:
Importantly, S1169A would grant New York residents certain rights if an entity uses an AI system to make a consequential decision about them. Under this bill, deployers are required to inform people if they are going to be subject to a consequential ...
more AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Henry GarridoExecutive Director of District Council 37, New York City's largest public employee union.votes For and says:
It must prevent the use of AI for surveillance; It must ensure human oversight of all automated decisions; and It must protect against the displacement of bargaining unit members.
AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Communications Workers of America District 1Labor union district representing workers in New York, New Jersey, New England, and eastern Canada.votes For and says:
There are a few key areas where we are concerned about the increased use of AI in the workplace: monitoring (e.g., audio and video surveillance, tracking keystrokes, mouse movements), managing (e.g., coaching, job assessments, scheduling), hiring (e....
more AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alexander AlonsoChief Knowledge Officer at SHRM; submitted New York State Senate testimony on workplace AI in 2026.votes For and says:
Within recruiting, AI-enabled tools are primarily used in upstream, administrative, and support functions. The most common applications include writing job descriptions (66%), screening applicant resumes (44%) and automating candidate searches (32%)....
more AI Verified source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alexandra Reeve GivensPresident and CEO of the Center for Democracy & Technology; technology policy advocate and congressional witness.votes For and says:
In a 2024 survey of business leaders, the majority reported plans to use AI in hiring by 2025, and seven in ten said they would let AI systems reject candidates without human oversight, despite the risk of adverse outcomes. This trajectory risks resh...
more AI Verified source (Jan 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Elizabeth S. WatsonDirector of Federal Government Affairs at the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME).votes For and says:
AI policy should include guardrails to ensure that employment-related decisions are made by humans.
AI Verified source (Jan 13, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Virginia Union UniversityPrivate historically Black university in Richmond, Virginia.votes For and says:
All final decisions affecting students or employees must be made by humans, taking into account AI input as one of several factors.
AI Verified source (Jan 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WilloHiring technology company that publishes research on AI, interviewing, and recruitment practices.votes For and says:
Hiring teams draw very clear lines: some stages must remain human-led: There is overwhelming consensus that interviews, relationship-building, negotiation, onboarding, and final decisions cannot be automated.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Euan CameronCo-founder and CEO of Willo, a video-interview and hiring technology company.votes For and says:
Progress happens when technology supports human judgment rather than competing with it.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Safe Work AustraliaAustralian Government statutory agency that develops national work health and safety policy.votes For and says:
We do not use AI to assess, review or filter applications or résumés. We also do not allow external recruitment agencies to use AI for these purposes. A human selection panel makes all decisions about shortlisting and progressing applicants.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WithumAdvisory, tax, and accounting firm publishing AI-governance guidance for organizations.votes For and says:
Fully automated hiring, promotion, termination, compensation, or performance decisions.
AI Verified source (Jan 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
University of FloridaPublic research university in Gainesville, Florida.votes For and says:
Maintain human (non-AI) oversight and intervention in AI-driven and AI-supported HR processes. Ensure that final decisions regarding employee matters are made by qualified HR professionals. AI should be utilized as a tool to augment and support the c...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Town of StandishMunicipal government of Standish, Maine.votes For and says:
AI tools shall NOT be used for: Making final determinations on employment actions, benefits, permits, enforcement, or legal matters without human review.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
City of Pea RidgeMunicipal government of Pea Ridge, Arkansas.votes For and says:
AI tools must be appropriately paired with human involvement and judgment, based on the circumstances, to ensure objective, legal, reasonable, and practical decision-making (such as when advanced thinking, complex reasoning, empathy, or ethics is req...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rhode Island General AssemblyState legislature of Rhode Island.votes For and says:
An employer shall not rely primarily on employee data collected through electronic monitoring, when making hiring, promotion, disciplinary decisions up to and including termination, or compensation decisions. For an employer to satisfy the requiremen...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
City of Santa CruzMunicipal government of Santa Cruz, California.votes For and says:
Do not use AI to make consequential decisions regarding hiring, benefits, discipline, or other sensitive matters in which bias could play a role, without additional verification and human oversight.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
No Robot Bosses Act.U.S. House billvotes For and says:
(7) Employment-related decision.--The term ``employment-related decision'' includes a decision by an employer with regard to-- (A) hiring a covered individual (including any decision with regard to recruiting, screening, interviewing, or selecting a ...
more AI Verified source (Dec 3, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tomas Chamorro-PremuzicOrganizational psychologist and professorvotes For and says:
recruitment cannot be fully automated. The human touch [...] remain indispensable (and we should keep it this way).
AI Verified source (Sep 10, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
McDermott Will & SchulteGlobal law firmvotes For and says:
AI is a tool, not the decision-maker. [...] it should never be relied on to make final hiring or employment decisions.
AI Verified source (Aug 12, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jason PerilloRecruiting firm foundervotes For and says:
Building relationships with candidates is one of the most vital and least automatable parts of hiring. No chatbot can replicate the empathy, intuition, or trust that comes from a genuine human conversation. Candidates want to feel heard and understoo...
more AI Verified source (Jul 11, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Serena H. HuangAI executive and keynote speakervotes For and says:
AI should enhance human decision-making rather than replace it. [...] AI should never make final hiring decisions without human oversight. [...] AI should not create barriers that disadvantage candidates without access to advanced preparation tools.
AI Verified source (May 28, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jerry McNerneyCalifornia state senatorvotes For and says:
Businesses are increasingly using AI to boost efficiency and productivity in the workplace. But there are currently no safeguards to prevent machines from unjustly or illegally impacting workers’ livelihoods and working conditions,[...] SB 7 does not...
more AI Verified source (Mar 6, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Craig HunterService Development Director, Innovationvotes For and says:
AI is a powerful tool [...] hiring. It should never make the final decision—only provide the insights to make a better one.
AI Verified source (Feb 26, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
AFL-CIOUS labor federationvotes For and says:
Automated decisions must be reviewed by a human, and workers must be given the right to appeal AI-driven decisions about [...] hiring and firing [...]
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Hasti KhodadadClient Success Partner, Suna Solutionsvotes For and says:
Ensure human oversight. No hiring decision should be made solely by an algorithm. There must be a layer of human review.
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Sushil BavejaCHRO, Jindal Stainlessvotes For and says:
AI should augment human decision-making—not replace it. Hiring decisions directly impact people’s lives, careers and aspirations. Because of that, they cannot be treated as purely transactional or automated outcomes. While AI can improve efficiency,...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European CommissionEU's executive bodyvotes For and says:
High risk: high-risk AI systems such as [...] AI systems used for recruitment must comply with strict requirements, including [...] human oversight [...].
AI Verified source (2024)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dylan A. FernandesMA state representativevotes For and says:
An employer or vendor [...] shall not solely rely on output from an ADS to make a hiring, promotion, termination, or disciplinary decision.
AI Verified source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ash KalraCalifornia assemblymember from San Josevotes For and says:
An employer or vendor acting on behalf of an employer shall not solely rely on output from an ADS to make a hiring, promotion, termination, or disciplinary decision.
AI Verified source (Apr 18, 2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)U.S. White House science officevotes For and says:
[...] have access to a person who can quickly consider and remedy problems you encounter. [...] employment [...] incorporate human consideration for adverse or high-risk decisions.
AI Verified source (2022)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Data and Algorithms at Work: The Case for Worker Technology RightsUC Berkeley Labor Center reportvotes For and says:
Algorithms should not be used as a substitute for human decision making. The growing complexity of algorithmic systems means that even their developers may not understand how they arrive at conclusions—let alone the employers deploying these systems....
more AI Verified source (Nov 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Frances O'GradyFormer TUC general secretaryvotes For and says:
This is a fork in the road. AI at work could be used to improve productivity and working lives, but it is already being used to make life-changing decisions about people at work—like who gets hired and fired. Without fair rules, the use of AI at work...
more AI Verified source (Mar 25, 2021)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Lilian EdwardsInternet law professorvotes For and says:
If these are actually being used as solely automated hiring systems, [...] I want there to be a human that makes this decision.
AI Verified source (2020)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European Parliament and Council of the European UnionEU co-legislatorsvotes For and says:
The data subject should have the right not to be subject to a decision [...] e-recruiting practices without any human intervention.
AI Verified source (2016)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
ApplicantzApplicant tracking software providervotes For and says:
Initial screening can be automated with human review required before rejection. Final hiring decisions must involve humans.
AI Verified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Silvia RadGrowee blogger on AI recruitingvotes For and says:
Final hiring decisions should always involve human judgment about factors like team dynamics, growth potential, and long-term fit that go beyond what AI can evaluate.
AI Verified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
EpicorBusiness software companyvotes For and says:
Although AI can’t replace human judgment, it can support [...] OUR work. Here’s what we do not use AI for: Making hiring decisions. Screening candidates.
AI Verified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
European Data Protection BoardEU data protection bodyvotes For and says:
[...] subject to a fully automatic decision (i.e. without any human intervention [...]). [...] automatic refusal of applicants who apply via an online platform;
AI Verified sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Niamh SmythIrish Minister of State for Trade Promotion, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation.votes For and says:
The deployment of AI online content moderation without human oversight can amplify disinformation, undermining the integrity of the information landscape, and this disproportionately affects women and girls.
Unverifiable source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Esther Egobamien MsheliaMember of the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW).votes For and says:
When developed using biased and non-representative data or deployed without adequate safeguards, they often reproduce and amplify the structural inequalities that women and girls continue to face.
Unverifiable source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
António GuterresUN Secretary-Generalvotes For and says:
Science informs, but humans decide. Our goal is to make human control a technical reality, not a slogan. And that requires meaningful human oversight in every high-stakes decision — in justice, healthcare, credit.
Unverifiable source (Feb 20, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jürgen MenzeILO disability inclusion specialistvotes For and says:
AI should augment, not replace, human decision-making. Employers should ensure meaningful human oversight [...] any discriminatory outcomes that may arise.
Unverifiable source (Oct 6, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
James MoylanU.S. House Delegate for Guamvotes For and says:
At the end of the day, human judgment still needs to guide employment decisions [...].
Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Subhashish ChakrabartyChief People Officer, CaratLanevotes For and says:
Every technological change creates an opportunity to rethink how we work. Before the printing press, people wrote everything by hand. When the press arrived, writing didn’t stop—production, scale and the nature of jobs changed. The same will happen ...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Preemita SinghPresident and CHRO, Havells Indiavotes For and says:
At Havells, AI is an enabler. We’ve adopted advanced tools to bring efficiency and sharper insights into our hiring process. AI helps us analyse patterns and provides objective information that allows us to probe better and discover strengths in cand...
more Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bob Casey Jr.U.S. Senator (D-PA)votes For and says:
Right now, there is nothing stopping a corporation from using artificial intelligence to hire [...] without the involvement of a human being. As robot bosses become more prevalent in the workplace, we have an obligation to protect working families fr...
more Unverifiable source (2023)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
John JersinLinkedIn Talent Solutions product leadervotes For and says:
I certainly would not trust any AI system today to make a hiring decision on its own. The technology is just not ready yet.
Unverifiable source (2019)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
PaletteSoftware company publishing responsible-AI principles for people operations and HR decisions.votes For and says:
For decisions with legal or similarly significant effects, including hiring, compensation, discipline, and termination, we expect meaningful human review and do not support relying solely on automated output.
Unverifiable source (Jun 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Luiz TessarolliFounder of Recrutador, a hiring intelligence platform; software engineer and entrepreneur.votes For and says:
The fix is not a better model deciding alone. It is structuring the human who decides, and keeping them accountable.
Unverifiable source (Jun 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Thyme CareHealthcare company publishing its AI-enabled recruiting and human-oversight policy.votes For and says:
Final hiring decisions are always made by people, not by AI tools alone.
Unverifiable source (Jun 1, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Georgia Institute of TechnologyPublic research university in Atlanta, Georgia.votes For and says:
GT Community Members must review and independently validate AI-generated outputs before using them in any official capacity. Georgia Tech prohibits delegating professional judgment to AI to automate employment, grievance, or disciplinary decisions wi...
more Disputed source (May 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
MonsterEmployment and recruitment platform publishing guidance on AI-enabled hiring.votes For and says:
Keep humans involved in key decisions. AI can support evaluation, but hiring decisions still need human judgment, context, and accountability.
Unverifiable source (May 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
WorkdayEnterprise software company providing human-resources and workforce-management software.votes For and says:
The answer lies in Workday’s core belief that AI is designed to support human judgment, not replace it.
Unverifiable source (Apr 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees AssociationAustralian union representing workers in retail, fast food, warehousing, and allied industries.votes For and says:
Guarantee meaningful human review of decisions made by AI systems that materially affect working people.
Unverifiable source (Apr 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Tanya HughesExecutive Director of the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.votes For and says:
This bill will address issues such as this by ensuring employers cannot hide behind AI when its effect is to discriminate in employment related decision processes.
Unverifiable source (Mar 19, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
GovWorxSoftware company whose HIRE product provides hiring assessment and workflow tools.votes For and says:
HIRE does not make hiring or employment decisions and does not replace human judgment. Customer retains sole responsibility for all hiring, selection, and employment decisions, including any actions taken based on or informed by HIRE outputs.
Unverifiable source (Feb 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (2)
-
Ministry of Digital Development and Information (Singapore)Singapore government ministry responsible for national digital development and information policy, including AI governance.abstains and says:
As with any technology, the need for regulation depends on how it is deployed, the nature of harm that may be caused, and whether existing measures are effective in addressing those harms. Where existing measures are assessed to be inadequate and a s...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ministry of Manpower (Singapore)Singapore government ministry responsible for workforce, employment, and labor policy.abstains and says:
Hence, under the overarching ambit of the National AI Council and together with tripartite partners, we are studying the use of AI tools by businesses and its impact on employment, before deciding the most appropriate approach for Singapore.
AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Against (3)
-
Daniel O'KeefeCommissioner of Connecticut's Department of Economic and Community Development.votes Against and says:
The extensive disclosure, auditing, and human-review mandates could slow hiring processes, increase administrative costs, and discourage employers—especially smaller ones—from using tools that streamline workforce management.
AI Verified source (Mar 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Christopher DavisVice President of Public Policy at the Connecticut Business & Industry Association (CBIA)votes Against and says:
The requirement of human review is one of the most burdensome compliance elements for employers, particularly in comparison to states that allow alternative processes rather than human review.
AI Verified source (Mar 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Orly LobelLaw professorvotes Against and says:
In 2023, the United States saw countless proposals to ban AI technologies, [...] hiring, [...] law soon must embrace AI; [...] prohibit human intervention [...]
Disputed sourceDelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-governance
votes