We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
[🇺🇸 Congress, Jan 2026] Giving Congress power to block AI chip exports to adversaries
ai-governance
ai-policy
defense
international-relations
us
regulations
us-congress
ai-regulation
law
trade
policy
gov
Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends
Cast your vote:
Results (61 votes):
Total
(61 votes)
For 52 (85%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 9 (15%)
·
For (51)
-
Josh GottheimerU.S. Representative from New Jerseyvotes For and says:
We can’t let our adversaries — especially China — dodge our export controls by simply renting what they can’t buy.
AI Verified source (Jun 26, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kevin CramerU.S. Senator from North Dakota and member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.votes For and says:
Safeguarding American security and competitiveness starts here at home. The Bureau of Industry and Security is charged with the significant behind-the-scenes task of evaluating risks associated with foreign ownership of our most sensitive exports. Re...
more AI Verified source (Jun 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Alexandria Paolozzi MooreSenior Director of Government Relations at FDD Action.votes For and says:
Congress should move quickly to include them in this year’s NDAA.
AI Verified source (Jun 17, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David FeithSenior Fellow at Hudson Institute; former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State and National Security Council officialvotes For and says:
The central task for Congress, I would submit, is to help turn America’s compute advantage into durable strategic leverage. AI Overwatch Act: This would codify limits on exporting the most capable AI chips.
AI Verified source (Jun 11, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jack BurnhamSenior research analyst in the China Program at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.votes For and says:
Congress should launch an investigation into the scale of the breach, which is likely significant, and institute stronger export controls to prevent China from accessing American hardware.
AI Verified source (Jun 2, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mark WarnerU.S. Senator from Virginia; former Governor of Virginia; Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committeevotes For and says:
As China continues working to acquire advanced American AI technology through illicit networks, we need stronger tools to detect and prevent these violations. This bipartisan legislation empowers whistleblowers to help expose illegal export schemes a...
more AI Verified source (May 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Mike RoundsU.S. Senator from South Dakota.votes For and says:
The United States has taken extensive measures to prevent American-made semiconductors from falling into the wrong hands, particularly China; however, China continues to smuggle these chips into their country. As the use of artificial intelligence co...
more AI Verified source (May 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Senate Foreign Relations DemocratsDemocratic members of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee issuing official committee statements.votes For and says:
We reiterate bipartisan calls for strict enforcement of export controls and the closure of loopholes that allow AI chips and manufacturing equipment to reach Beijing.
AI Verified source (May 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Chris CoonsU.S. Senator from Delawarevotes For and says:
These chips are among the most powerful processors on the market today and are typically used to develop highly capable artificial intelligence systems. In light of the control that the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army exert o...
more AI Verified source (May 5, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban AffairsU.S. Senate committee with jurisdiction over banking, housing, urban affairs, and relevant economic and trade policy.votes For and says:
This bill ensures that the chips powering the next generation of AI fuel American innovation and American national security, not the military and surveillance apparatus of the Chinese Communist Party.
AI Verified source (May 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Catherine Cortez MastoU.S. Senator from Nevada.votes For and says:
In the wrong hands, AI tools and advanced microchips have the capacity to cause as much damage as conventional weapons. The United States’ microchip technology is well ahead of any of its competitors and allowing countries like Communist China to imp...
more AI Verified source (May 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeanne ShaheenU.S. Senator from New Hampshirevotes For and says:
American technological leadership is vital to our economic and national security. Shipping advanced chips to our primary competitor is a sure way to lose that lead. The American people want AI innovation that creates good jobs at home, not that advan...
more AI Verified source (May 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jim BanksU.S. Senator from Indiana (Republican); lead sponsor of the Senate AI OVERWATCH Actvotes For and says:
We are in an AI arms race with the Chinese Communist Party that’s powered by advanced chips and the winner will determine the future of global military superiority. I’m leading the AI OVERWATCH Act to bolster President Trump’s national security strat...
more AI Verified source (May 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Greg StantonU.S. Representative for Arizona's 4th congressional district.votes For and says:
As the United States weighs significant changes to our trade policies for the semiconductor industry, the legislation would ensure Congress conducts a thorough review of existing policies and identifies changes needed to bolster enforcement and close...
more AI Verified source (Apr 22, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dmitri AlperovitchCo-founder and chairman of Silverado Policy Accelerator; co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike; cybersecurity and national security policy expert.votes For and says:
There should be no licenses granted for advanced AI chips to China, period. To that end, the AI Overwatch Act offers a sound framework: mandatory congressional notification before any such export is approved, verifiable safeguards preventing military...
more AI Verified source (Apr 16, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Samuel HammondDirector of AI Policy and Chief Economist at the Foundation for American Innovationvotes For and says:
Either our allies match our controls on the most important tools and components for advanced semiconductors, or the United States closes the loopholes itself.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Michael BaumgartnerU.S. Representative from Washington's 5th congressional district; sponsor of the MATCH Actvotes For and says:
I introduced the MATCH Act to ensure that America and our allies move in lockstep to close these gaps, defend our technological edge, and safeguard the supply chains that power everything from our weapons systems to our critical infrastructure.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Chuck SchumerU.S. Senate Majority Leadervotes For and says:
The United States should not be handing the Chinese Communist Party any access to technologies that fuel their military ambitions and jeopardize U.S. national security.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Pete RickettsU.S. Senator from Nebraskavotes For and says:
The MATCH Act strengthens our controls and creates a level playing field for U.S. companies.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jim RischU.S. Senator from Idaho and Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.votes For and says:
The MATCH Act will prevent adversaries from undermining the U.S. semiconductor industry and threatening our national security.
AI Verified source (Apr 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Roman RozhavskyAssistant Director of the FBI Counterintelligence and Espionage Division.votes For and says:
Zheng, Kelly, and English allegedly conspired to sell millions of dollars’ worth of American-made AI computer chips to buyers in China, in clear violation of U.S. export controls.
AI Verified source (Mar 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
John A. EisenbergU.S. Assistant Attorney General for National Security.votes For and says:
The cutting-edge AI chips the defendants allegedly schemed to export to China represent the best of American ingenuity and years of strategic investment in maintaining our technological leadership.
AI Verified source (Mar 25, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign RelationsCommittee of the U.S. Senate responsible for foreign policy, international relations, and related oversight.votes For and says:
Congress should enact legislation that bans the sale of cutting-edge AI chips to foreign adversaries and imposes stringent restrictions on less advanced yet still powerful semiconductors.
AI Verified source (Mar 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bill HuizengaU.S. Representative from Michiganvotes For and says:
I introduced the Chip Security Act to help meet this challenge. The Chip Security Act ensures that AI chips are not smuggled to China by scaling up best security practices, encouraging innovative technologies, and directly supporting the Trump admini...
more AI Verified source (Feb 24, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:
First, we should absolutely not be selling chips, chip-making tools, or datacenters to the CCP.
AI Verified source (Jan 31, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Connor PfeifferFDD Action government relations directorvotes For and says:
America’s cutting-edge chips and advanced technology must never be used to power the AI systems that support China’s military and intelligence apparatuses, especially at the expense of American innovators. FDD Action endorses the AI OVERWATCH Act, be...
more AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brian MastU.S. Representative (R-FL)votes For and says:
Companies like Nvidia are requesting to sell millions of advanced AI chips, which are the cutting edge of warfare, to Chinese military companies like Alibaba and Tencent. These are the same companies that work to spy against the United States of Amer...
more AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Michael McCaulU.S. Representative, House Foreign Affairs chairvotes For and says:
There are special interest groups out there right now with millions of dollars funded by the very people who will profit off the sale of these chips and others that ... are waging a social media campaign war...against this bill. Shame on them.
AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Gregory W. MeeksU.S. Representative (D-NY)votes For and says:
While I wish the bill before us today directly prohibited the sale of H200s, it nevertheless puts in place robust guardrails that would delay those sales and allow for congressional review and oversight going forward.
AI Verified source (Jan 21, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (9)
Loading more opinions...