We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Expert opinions on Gov
Sourced quotes, claims, policy proposals and stances on Gov from AI researchers, executives and policymakers.
699 sourced quotes · 8 policy proposals and claims
Quote date
Added
-
For (87)Loss of Control ObservatoryAI-safety observatory operated by the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, tracking reported real-world AI loss-of-control incidents.votes For and says:
It is calling on the government to require AI companies to monitor and report severe loss of control incidents and to introduce emergency powers to manage severe loss of control incidents including temporarily restricting AI services.
AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (2)Frontier Model ForumFrontier AI industry forumabstains and says:Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or plac...
more AI Verified source (May 12, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (5)Laura CaroliPolitical adviser on the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee; former senior fellow at CSIS’s Wadhwani AI Center.votes Against and says:To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.
AI Verified source (Aug 3, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (31)Federal Communications CommissionU.S. communications regulatorvotes For and says:
The Federal Communications Commission initiated this proceeding to protect consumer from unwanted AI-generated calls while ensuring that our rules do not hinder the potential benefits that AI can offer, including making telecommunications more readil...
more AI Verified source (Aug 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
133 opinions
For (128)votes For and says:The Chinese government has a strong incentive to tighten regulations on AI companion chatbots, especially considering the psychological risks we've observed in the U.S.
Unverifiable source (Aug 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Peter OrmerodAssociate professor of law at Villanova University, writing on privacy and technology policy.abstains and says:Age verification can be done well in a privacy-protective way, but it is not easy.
Unverifiable source (Aug 8, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (4)Alex AmbrosePolicy analyst at ITIFvotes Against and says:Many bills to protect children from chatbots harms err by simply transplanting ineffective social media approaches such as age verification, content restrictions, and blanket bans. Policymakers should avoid moral panic about chatbots and AI and inste...
more AI Verified source (Aug 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments and labs should build the capability for a global slowdown of frontier AI development in case it's needed
156 opinions
For (146)Anthony AguirrePhysicist; Future of Life cofoundervotes For and says:If humans want to stay in charge of their own civilization, it will take more than a unilateral temporary pause.
Unverifiable source (Aug 10, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Abstain (1)Baroness Neville-JonesBritish Conservative life peer and former UK security minister.abstains and says:The question that the noble Lord posed was: do we therefore go for a moratorium? That would be highly desirable, but I do not think that it will be possible in the short term.
AI Verified source (Jan 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9)Liz KendallUK Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology; Labour MP for Leicester Westvotes Against and says:The Technology Secretary rejected calls to pause the development of artificial intelligence, describing such a move as “a double betrayal” of British talent and British interests.
AI Verified source (Apr 28, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Governments should fund open-source AI safety tools and red-teaming infrastructure as public goods.
81 opinions
For (81)Department of Industry, Science and ResourcesAustralian Government department responsible for industry, science, technology, and the Australian AI Safety Institute.votes For and says:We commissioned Gradient Institute to do the study and are publishing the report as the Australian AI Safety Institute’s first publication.
Unverifiable source (Aug 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
109 opinions
For (82)Karen E. SpilkaPresident of the Massachusetts Senate.votes For and says:Today the Senate took action to maintain the Commonwealth’s economic edge while giving Massachusetts residents, families, and businesses the best bet at success.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (28)Scott PetersU.S. Representative from California's 50th congressional district; co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.votes Against and says:The FRONTIER Act is a targeted bill with clear, uniform transparency, and safety standards, instead of a fifty-state patchwork. I'm glad to support this bipartisan effort so that Congress acts before this technology outruns us.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
For (52)Americans for Responsible InnovationAI policy advocacy nonprofitvotes For and says:
The AI OVERWATCH Act would help protect U.S. technological leadership by strengthening U.S. policy that prevents advanced American AI chips from flowing to China, where they can be used to accelerate military modernization and undermine U.S. national...
more Unverifiable source (Jul 14, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.Against (9) -
For (15)Andrew CharltonAustralian Assistant Minister for Science, Technology and the Digital Economyvotes For and says:
Since the release of the National AI Plan in December 2025, a top priority has been getting the AI Safety Institute (AISI) up and running with the right people to lead it. Because we are not building a think tank. We are building a national testing c...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.