We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors
Cast your vote:
Results (12 votes):
Total
(12 votes)
For 9 (75%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 3 (25%)
·
For (9)
-
The Jed FoundationYouth mental health nonprofitvotes For and says:
Do not deploy AI companions to minors. No emotionally responsive chatbot should be offered to anyone under 18. Companion AIs that impersonate people or simulate friendship, romance, or therapy are unsafe for adolescents. They delay help-seeking, unde...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Robbie TorneyAI safety director, Common Sense Mediavotes For and says:
Companies must immediately implement robust age assurance systems and limit access to AI companion features and dedicated companion products [...] for users under 18.
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Kathy HochulGovernor of New Yorkvotes For and says:
As New York's first mom governor, the well-being and safety of our children has always been one of my top priorities. [...] These AI programs are designed to keep your kids glued to the screens at all costs. Some target children in the most vulnerabl...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Josh ShapiroGovernor of Pennsylvaniavotes For and says:
Some kids are just too young to understand the difference between AI and a real person. [...] Remember, this is not a person... this is just something you download in the app store. It's not just our kids — these chatbots and the companies behind the...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jenny RadeskyAssociate Professor of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School; researcher on children's technology use and digital designvotes For and says:
My biggest concern is attachment and relationships. Kids are wired to want to attach to other humans. It's how they learn their sense of self, what a healthy relationship feels like. And the AI companions are exploiting this. [...] The concerns are n...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Erin Maye QuadeMinnesota state senator (DFL-Apple Valley); Chair, Senate Internet & Technology Committeevotes For and says:
AI companions pose an unacceptable amount of risk to teens and children. They are designed to create emotional attachment and dependency. They easily produce harmful content, encourage self-harm, disordered eating, violence, and risky behavior. This ...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ethics and Public Policy CenterPublic policy think tankvotes For and says:
AI companions are unsafe for children, and yet they are all too easy to access. Just as we have done for pornography websites, EPPC is putting forth a new model bill that would age restrict AI companions entirely out of childhood. The burden is curre...
more Disputed source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Chloe LawrencePolicy analyst at EPPCvotes For and says:
EPPC’s model defines which platforms would be covered by the bill, limiting the bill to AI companion chatbots as opposed to general purpose chatbots. Companion chatbots are defined based on their features, including: anthropomorphic features; feature...
more Disputed source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Josh HawleyU.S. Senator for Missourivotes For and says:
No AI chatbot companion should be targeted at children who are younger than 18 years of age.
Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (3)
-
Adam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:
Competition, innovation, and speech options will be limited as a result of these moves.
Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jennifer Huddleston and Juan LondoñoCato policy analystvotes Against and says:
Among the most concerning aspects of the bill [...] Different families may have different views [...] This decision appropriately belongs with parents, not policymakers.
Disputed source (Apr 29, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA)Technology trade associationvotes Against and says:
VOTE “NO” ON AB 1064 AB 1064 not only BANS access of anyone under 18 to general-purpose AI or other covered products, [...]
Disputed source (Sep 3, 2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-safety
votes