Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

ai-safety policy regulations gov ai-governance ai-policy public-interest-ai

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Key insights

Many supportive quotes pair incident reporting with other safeguards such as independent testing, audits, post-deployment monitoring, security standards, and whistleblower protections.
Several quotes argue that reporting should flow to a centralized or national mechanism because the current landscape is described as voluntary, scattered, or vulnerable to fragmented mandates.
The biggest design disagreement is often about timing and trigger rather than the basic importance of serious incidents: quotes mention 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours, as well as 7-day and 15-day alternatives, with clocks starting at discovery, determination, or reasonable detection.
Both supportive and nuanced quotes emphasize speed, but they differ on what the first report should contain, with some wanting immediate visibility for action and others warning against deadlines that assume completed root-cause analysis.
Support comes from elected officials, government agencies, companies, researchers, nonprofits, and international bodies, showing that the issue is being framed across policy, industry, and security settings.

Arguments for

Rapid government response

Proponents say that when high-capability AI systems malfunction, expose vulnerabilities, or show dangerous behavior, authorities need timely notice so they can assess threats, coordinate action, warn others, and respond before incidents grow worse. A centralized reporting mechanism is presented as giving government the visibility needed to monitor ongoing and emerging public-safety risks.

AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and I want to see it flourish, but not without accountability and not without human oversight. The rule of law should apply to this new frontier. This legislation ensures that when something goes wrong with a high-capability AI system, the U…

Nathaniel Moran · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote
As AI technologies continue to advance at an unprecedented pace, AI systems face growing threats that can expose sensitive data, create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and beyond. Congress cannot afford to fall behind in addressing these emerging risks and ensuring appropriate…

Don Beyer · Jun 23, 2026 · full quote
Timely reporting of critical safety incidents to the government is essential to ensure that public authorities are promptly informed of ongoing and emerging risks to public safety. This reporting enables the government to monitor effectively in the event that advanced capabilitie…

New York State Assembly · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
Timely incident reporting is critical to protecting Canada's digital ecosystem. Organizations – especially those in government and critical infrastructure – should report suspected cyber incidents as soon as possible. Early reporting helps us assess threats more quickly and provi…

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · Jun 24, 2026 · full quote
The new reporting regime is a practical improvement as well—a 24-hour initial notification and a fuller report within 72 hours will help regulators and the National Cyber Security Centre to spot patterns, warn others and act on the lessons that are learned from incidents.

Luke Myer · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote

Transparency and accountability

Supporters argue that serious incidents involving powerful AI systems should not stay behind closed doors at private companies. Mandatory reporting is framed as a transparency and accountability measure that gives public authorities, Congress, or the public a line of sight into high-stakes systems and the risks they create.

America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching systems it was never supposed to to…

Erin Houchin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
AI systems are being developed entirely within private industry, with little visibility available to Congress or the executive branch. [...] Congress should set transparency requirements for developers of high-stakes AI systems, including requirements regarding training data, cap…

Helen Toner · 2026 · full quote
The federal government needs a reporting threshold for all artificial intelligence companies that deliver services in Canada, where they must report to law enforcement, so there's no judgment calls in a back room that Canadians don't have a line of sight to that put our kids and …

David Eby · 2026 · full quote
The unglamorous agenda—mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming—doesn’t require anyone to believe the models are about to go rogue.

Kate Klonick · Jul 29, 2026 · full quote
AI Incident Reporting: Ensure transparency and accountability for AI failures.

Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) · Jul 30, 2026 · full quote

Shared learning infrastructure

Several quotes argue that disclosure is necessary to learn the right lessons from failures and to build a formal pathway for reporting instead of relying on scattered voluntary channels. In this view, structured incident reporting is a core governance function because it lets responders collect, route, and act on information about serious failures and near-misses.

These recent events are also providing an opportunity to policymakers and researchers to respond, but we will need disclosure of the incident details in order to learn the appropriate lessons.

Sean Fillingham · Jul 29, 2026 · full quote
Until now, the AI community has lacked a formal pathway to report flaws to organizations equipped to coordinate a response, leaving AI systems vulnerable to failure or exploitation.

Lauren McIlvenny · Jul 1, 2026 · full quote
FLARE-AI is the culmination of that effort: a one-stop shop that redirects your reports to the voluntary recipient orgs working with us, rather than scattering accountability across social media, journalism, bug bounties, and feedback forms. Read the Hugging Face blog post, WIRED…

Avijit Ghosh · Jul 1, 2026 · full quote
One of the main contributions that we would like to make to this discussion is the urgent need for structured AI incidents reporting as a core pillar of global AI governance.

Center for Responsible AI · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
There's no shared incident reporting infrastructure. So you'll have different incident monitors tracking failures independently and voluntarily, but there's no legal duty to report.

Nof Alhamli · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote

Targeted national framework

Many supporters say reporting duties should sit inside a single national framework focused on the largest or most capable developers, rather than a one-size-fits-all regime for smaller innovators. They present uniform transparency, independent assessment, and centralized rules as a way to protect the public without undermining innovation or creating a patchwork of mandates.

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators driving America's AI ecosystem. By …

Scott Franklin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Thanks to input from researchers, …

Scott Peters · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring transparency, independent evaluatio…

Jay Obernolte · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while giving them a single, clear nat…

Lori Trahan · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
To protect American innovation and ensure global AI leadership while providing for a safe and secure digital future, leading labs need a unified framework for frontier AI safety, security, incident reporting, and transparency.

Google · Jun 2026 · full quote

Workable 72-hour baseline

Supporters of the specific timing argue that a roughly 72-hour deadline is a practical baseline: it aligns with protocols used in other sectors, gives organizations time to assess the facts, and still provides prompt visibility to authorities. Some proposals further tie the clock to discovery or reasonable detection, so the obligation starts when an incident is actually recognized.

Adopting a reporting window of about 72 hours would align with protocols already used in industries such as aviation, nuclear power, and public health emergencies.

Geneva Centre for Security Policy · Jul 3, 2026 · full quote
We propose a minimum of 72 hours for the preliminary report for high-risk systems, which would allow sufficient time to assess the facts and determine whether the event meets the definition of a “serious incident.”

Business Software Alliance · Feb 12, 2026 · full quote
Constructive engagement should focus on three concrete needs: a clarification that AI-specific attack vectors including data poisoning, model manipulation, adversarial ML inputs, and supply chain compromise of model artifacts constitute qualifying cyber incidents when they result…

Cloud Security Alliance AI Safety Initiative · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
Mandates that frontier AI contractors report security incidents (theft of model weights) to the DoD within 72 hours of discovery and/or report material vulnerabilities in the model or concerning behavior within 7 days of discovering the issue is material.

Kirsten Gillibrand · Jun 2, 2026 · full quote
It recommends common safety standards, testing of frontier AI before deployment, incident reporting within 72 hours, and global coordination to prevent catastrophic cyber, biological and autonomous AI threats.

Strategic Foresight Group · Jul 14, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Too slow for active harm

One objection is that some incidents move faster than a 72-hour deadline. In that view, when harm such as data theft happens very quickly, a 72-hour report can function only as a post-mortem rather than an effective defense mechanism.

When data theft occurs inside 60 minutes, a 72-hour reporting window ceases to function as an effective defense mechanism. Instead, it becomes a post-mortem.

Nicole Quinn · Jun 9, 2026 · full quote

Longer deadline preferred

Another line of opposition does not reject reporting itself but rejects the 72-hour deadline, favoring a longer period after discovery or after facts support a reasonable conclusion that an incident occurred. One opponent also said they understood the intent of faster-reporting amendments but still did not support them.

Require Covered Developers to report Critical Safety Incidents to the designated Agency within 15 days of the Covered Developer discovering the Critical Safety Incident or facts that would lead the Covered Developer to reasonably conclude that the Critical Safety Incident has occ…

Anthropic · Jun 2026 · full quote
I appreciate the intent behind the amendments and the shadow Minister’s position of understanding but not supporting them, which I share.

Kanishka Narayan · Feb 5, 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Preliminary then fuller reports

Some nuanced voices support prompt reporting but say the first submission should be preliminary, followed by fuller or amended reports as facts, impact, and root causes become clearer. They warn that if deadlines implicitly require a complete analysis, they may produce premature or unreliable reports or impose unrealistic burdens.

Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or place unrealistic burdens on repor…

Frontier Model Forum · May 12, 2026 · full quote
Publish and adhere to an incident-reporting time window for public disclosures. The developer may make a preliminary disclosure within the window and follow up with additional information thereafter, provided the initial disclosure indicates when follow-up will occur.

Guidelight AI Standards · May 19, 2026 · full quote
We propose a minimum of 72 hours for the preliminary report for high-risk systems, which would allow sufficient time to assess the facts and determine whether the event meets the definition of a “serious incident.”

Business Software Alliance · Feb 12, 2026 · full quote
Proposed law requires a frontier developer to report any critical safety incident involving its frontier models to the department within 15 days of discovery. Further requires reporting within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death, serious injury, or an active …

Louisiana State Legislature · 2026 · full quote
The new reporting regime is a practical improvement as well—a 24-hour initial notification and a fuller report within 72 hours will help regulators and the National Cyber Security Centre to spot patterns, warn others and act on the lessons that are learned from incidents.

Luke Myer · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote

Risk-based timing triggers

Several quotes treat 72 hours as a baseline rather than a universal rule, pairing it with faster deadlines for imminent threats or especially severe harms. They also start the clock at discovery, reasonable belief, or reasonable detection, instead of the moment the underlying compromise began.

Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical harm.

JB Pritzker · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
Frontier developers are required to report such incidents to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security within 72 hours of discovery, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury.

Illinois General Assembly · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
A frontier developer shall report any critical safety incident pertaining to one or more of its frontier models to the office within seventy-two hours from a determination that a critical safety incident has occurred or within seventy-two hours of the frontier developer learning …

New York State Legislature · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
Constructive engagement should focus on three concrete needs: a clarification that AI-specific attack vectors including data poisoning, model manipulation, adversarial ML inputs, and supply chain compromise of model artifacts constitute qualifying cyber incidents when they result…

Cloud Security Alliance AI Safety Initiative · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
The following AI incidents shall be subject to mandatory reporting to the NAIRP within the timelines specified: deaths or serious physical harm attributable to an AI system (within six hours); significant violations of individuals' fundamental rights caused by AI decisions (withi…

Atlas AI Institute · Jun 2026 · full quote

Confidential learning-focused system

Some supporters want a reporting regime designed for learning and prevention rather than punishment, with confidential channels, scoped public disclosures, whistleblower protections, and protection for sensitive commercial or national-security information. This approach aims to make organizations more willing to report candidly while still giving authorities enough visibility to act.

Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures that ensure transparency and dem…

OpenAI · Apr 2026 · full quote
Government needs trusted mechanisms for model access, evaluation partnerships, and incident reporting that protect sensitive commercial and national-security information while giving agencies enough visibility to act.

Federation of American Scientists · May 2026 · full quote
A series of measures could significantly improve the current system: (i) clarification of the reporting duties, including the development of a common taxonomy of risk or harm, alongside the expansion of the persons and entities under duty; (ii) disconnection of incident reporting…

Michael Chatzipanagiotis · Feb 27, 2026 · full quote
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act establishes a framework requiring developers of the largest advanced AI systems to publicly disclose safety practices, report significant safety incidents, and maintain robust compliance processes. The law also creates confidential …

State of Illinois · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.

Chris Lehane · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote

Across the quotes, incident reporting is usually discussed as one part of a broader AI safety framework that also includes testing, audits, monitoring, security standards, and whistleblower protections. The sharpest disagreement is over design: whether 72 hours is the right baseline, whether some cases require faster or slower timelines, and how to make reporting centralized, confidential, and useful for action rather than mere compliance. The debate therefore centers as much on implementation details as on the principle of mandatory disclosure itself.

Cast your vote:

Results (94 votes):

Total (94 votes)

For 87 (93%) Abstain 2 (2%) Against 5 (5%)

For (86)

Loss of Control Observatory
AI-safety observatory operated by the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, tracking reported real-world AI loss-of-control incidents.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

It is calling on the government to require AI companies to monitor and report severe loss of control incidents and to introduce emergency powers to manage severe loss of control incidents including temporarily restricting AI services.
AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)

added 1d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tommy Shaffer-Shane
Senior AI Policy Manager at the Centre for Long-Term Resilience and project lead of its Loss of Control Observatory.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)

added 2d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
QDR Labs
Malaysian technology organization submitting technical recommendations on AI incident reporting to the National AI Office.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

R1. Define a minimum reconstructable PROPERTY SET for any reportable incident — eight properties: (a) actor, (b) authority, (c) action, (d) policy, (e) decision basis, (f) resource touch, (g) lifecycle context, (h) verification strength.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chris Parker
Professor at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, researching information technology and stakeholder impacts.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Effective systems therefore need incentives for firms to disclose and correct problems, along with credible consequences when they fail to act.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 8d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Patrick Higgins
Managing Director of the LaCross Institute for Ethical AI in Business at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

You cannot treat AI governance as a static set of rules. Organizations need ways to identify unexpected behavior, collaborate across functions and adjust their safeguards as the landscape evolves.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Timothy Laseter
Professor of Practice at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, specializing in operations strategy and innovation.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The overriding policy objective should be to maximize rapid disclosure, information sharing and collaborative remediation. Regulations that unintentionally discourage voluntary reporting could leave both government and industry less informed about em...
more AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
IFRAME NETWORK SDN. BHD.
Malaysian technology company submitting public input on AI governance and incident reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We also support the proposed AI Risk Framework, AI Incident Reporting Mechanism and AI Sandbox as important components of a modern AI governance ecosystem.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP)
Digital rights NGO

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI Incident Reporting: Ensure transparency and accountability for AI failures.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sean Fillingham
Independent technical AI-governance researcher and research manager at ERA.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

These recent events are also providing an opportunity to policymakers and researchers to respond, but we will need disclosure of the incident details in order to learn the appropriate lessons.
AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 16d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Kate Klonick

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The unglamorous agenda—mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming—doesn’t require anyone to believe the models are a...
more AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 21d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alliance for a Better Future
US nonprofit organization advocating public-interest policy responses to emerging technologies.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The latest version of the bipartisan Obernolte–Trahan framework, FRONTIER Act, is a serious step forward. It's one of the strongest efforts yet to establish a federal AI framework that protects Americans while preserving America's leadership in AI. T...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026)

added 1d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
J.B. Branch
AI Governance and Technology Policy Counsel at Public Citizen.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress must establish a comprehensive federal AI safety framework with mandatory safety testing, independent audits, incident reporting requirements, and regulators empowered to remove AI systems when they pose risks.
AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Greg Casar
U.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need regular mandatory independent safety testing and oversight, mandatory disclosure of security incidents, and international cooperation to keep people safe from absolute disaster.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Suhas Subramanyam
U.S. Representative from Virginia and co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This is a four-alarm fire. We need to take action now. These frontier models could have the power to create serious chaos and harm without adequate regulations. This bill, while not perfect, is an important, bipartisan step in the right direction. We...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Franklin
U.S. Representative from Florida; member of the House Appropriations Committee

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators drivi...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Peters
U.S. Representative from California's 50th congressional district; co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Than...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jay Obernolte
U.S. Representative from California

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring trans...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Lori Trahan
U.S. representative from Massachusetts

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while g...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Erin Houchin
U.S. Representative for Indiana's 9th congressional district (Republican); cosponsor of the Great American AI Act

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching syste...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chris Lehane
OpenAI chief global affairs officer

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Iqbal Mohamed
UK Member of Parliament for Dewsbury and Batley; former pharmaceutical regulatory professional.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Secondly, the Government must mandate independent statutory testing for AI before its release, and a yellow card scheme that would be a national register where safety incidents, near misses and harms caused by AI were reported, tracked and acted on e...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Center for Responsible AI
Research center at IIT Madras focused on responsible AI governance, accountability, and incident reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

One of the main contributions that we would like to make to this discussion is the urgent need for structured AI incidents reporting as a core pillar of global AI governance.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Rachel Ventura
Illinois State Senator representing the 43rd District; co-sponsor of the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

With the rise of Artificial Intelligence in all aspects of our lives, coupled with the lack of oversight, we face a looming crisis. This legislation sets a strong precedent to ensure AI developers abide by important safety standards and transparency ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Nof Alhamli
Science and Technology Advisor at the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

There's no shared incident reporting infrastructure. So you'll have different incident monitors tracking failures independently and voluntarily, but there's no legal duty to report or to recognize—or any recognition between them.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026) 1 of 2

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Paula Bragantes Zamora
Costa Rican diplomat who co-chaired the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Before 2027 dialogue, we should advance shared terminology, comparable risk classifications, consistent documentation, interoperable incident reporting, and multilingual evaluation methods.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
State of Illinois
U.S. state government; publisher of official announcements on Illinois artificial intelligence law and policy.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act establishes a framework requiring developers of the largest advanced AI systems to publicly disclose safety practices, report significant safety incidents, and maintain robust compliance processes. The ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Maria Collett
Pennsylvania state senator representing the 12th District.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In addition, significant AI safety incidents must be reported to state officials within 72 hours of discovery, and whistleblower protections must be honored for employees who raise legitimate safety concerns.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
JB Pritzker
Governor of Illinois; signed the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act in 2026.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical harm.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Illinois General Assembly
State legislature of Illinois, United States.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Frontier developers are required to report such incidents to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security within 72 hours of discovery, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Abstain (2)

Against (5)

Laura Caroli
Political adviser on the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee; former senior fellow at CSIS’s Wadhwani AI Center.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.
AI Verified source (Aug 3, 2026)

added 22h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

More h/ai-safety votes

Mandate big AI companies spend 30% of compute on AI safety

[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors

If leading AI labs adopted a windfall clause (pre-committing to broadly share profits above a high threshold), it would meaningfully reduce competitive pressure to cut safety corners

Require AI labs to publish safety evaluations before deploying frontier models

Require open source AI models to include safety benchmarks in release notes

Back