We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority
Cast your vote:
For (23)
-
Caroline JeanmaireInterim Director of U.S. AI Governance at The Future Society; AI governance and AI safety policy expertvotes For and says:Rather than pushing incidents under the carpet, this incentivizes sharing and coordination between companies and the federal government. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Josh HawleyU.S. Senator for Missourivotes For and says:I think we ought to enact my legislation that I have with Senator [Richard] Blumenthal that would make that sort of reporting and monitoring mandatory. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Helen TonerInterim Executive Director at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET); former OpenAI board membervotes For and says:AI systems are being developed entirely within private industry, with little visibility available to Congress or the executive branch. [...] Congress should set transparency requirements for developers of high-stakes AI systems, including requirement... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sean McGregorExecutive Director of the AI Incident Database; Fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center; General Chair of IAAI 2026votes For and says:The volume that we're dealing with is one where eventually we do need to switch from this kind of voluntary reporting, to more mandatory form of reporting. [...] The insight you can derive from mandatory reporting is greater than that of this volunta... more AI Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Rumman ChowdhuryAI ethicist and Humane Intelligence CEOvotes For and says:Robust regulation of high-risk AI does not stifle innovation; it enables it. In safety engineering there is a saying: brakes help you drive faster. The existence of reliable brakes does not slow cars down—brakes create the conditions under which driv... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Rishi BommasaniSociety Lead at Stanford's Center for Research on Foundation Models; lead author of the Foundation Model Transparency Index and the California Report on Frontier AI Policyvotes For and says:The law will bring much-needed disclosure to the AI industry. [...] You can write whatever law in theory, but the practical impact of it is heavily shaped by how you implement it, how you enforce it, and how the company is engaged with it. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Marietje SchaakeStanford Cyber Policy Center; former MEP; UN AI Advisory Body member; author of The Tech Coupvotes For and says:[It is] concerning that models with far-reaching impact are controlled by a private company. [...] Now would be a good time to agree on disclosure rules and oversight mechanisms. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
David EbyPremier of British Columbia, Canadavotes For and says:The federal government needs a reporting threshold for all artificial intelligence companies that deliver services in Canada, where they must report to law enforcement, so there's no judgment calls in a back room that Canadians don't have a line of s... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Sam AltmanCEO at OpenAIvotes For and says:In the blueprint, we talk, for instance, about incident reporting that's modeled a little bit after how the aviation industry does things whenever there's kind of a near miss or any incidents, however minor, that kind of gets reported to a database s... more AI Unverifiable source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Elham TabassiDirector of the AI and Emerging Technology Initiative at the Brookings Institution; former Chief AI Advisor at NIST and CTO of the U.S. AI Safety Institutevotes For and says:Most risk management or governance looks at pre-deployment. But the majority of incidents we have to worry about cannot be reliably predicted before deployment. [...] We need standardised definitions of incidents and accidents. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nick MoësExecutive Director of The Future Society; expert at OECD AI Policy Observatory Working Groups on AI Incidents, Risk & Accountability, and Agentic AIvotes For and says:This may be one of the last years in which we can still prevent an AI disaster as defined by the OECD. The scale and growth of incidents we are witnessing is already concerning. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Dario AmodeiCEO at Anthropicvotes For and says:The right place to start is with transparency legislation, which essentially tries to require that every frontier AI company engage in [safety and transparency] practices. California's SB 53 and New York's RAISE Act are examples of this kind of legis... more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Yoshua BengioAI Pioneer, Turing Award winnervotes For and says:Unfortunately, the pace of advances is still much greater than the pace of [progress in] how we can manage those risks and mitigate them. And, that, I think, puts the ball in the hands of the policymakers. AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Alex BoresNew York State Assemblymembervotes For and says:We need to take heed when the leaders in this field say that there need to be safety precautions taken with this rapidly developing technology. The RAISE Act will ensure there are protocols in place in the event of a major security risk and help New ... more AI Verified source (2025) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Chris LehaneOpenAI chief global affairs officervotes For and says:While we continue to believe a single national safety standard for frontier AI models established by federal legislation remains the best way to protect people and support innovation, the combination of the Empire State with the Golden State is a big... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Jack ClarkAnthropic cofounder and policy researchervotes For and says:Governor Newsom's signature on SB 53 establishes meaningful transparency requirements for frontier AI companies without imposing prescriptive technical mandates. While federal standards remain essential to avoid a patchwork of state regulations, Cali... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Thomas WoodsideSecure AI Project co-foundervotes For and says:The California Report on Frontier AI Policy acknowledged that 'if those whose analysis points to the most extreme risks are right… then the stakes and costs for inaction on frontier AI at this current moment are extremely high.' Thanks to Senator Wie... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Teri OlleDirector, Economic Security California Actionvotes For and says:By signing SB 53 into law, Governor Newsom recognizes that the tremendous innovative power of AI should benefit all of us, not just a handful of tech corporations and their investors. In addition to establishing common-sense transparency and safety s... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Nathan CalvinEncode AI general counselvotes For and says:As AI systems become more powerful and consequential, SB 53's requirements — greater transparency in safety practices and strong protections for AI whistleblowers — are critical to ensuring that safety is built into innovation from the very beginning... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Gavin NewsomGovernor of Californiavotes For and says:AI is the new frontier in innovation, and California is not only here for it — but stands strong as a national leader by enacting the first-in-the-nation frontier AI safety legislation that builds public trust as this emerging technology rapidly evol... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Scott WienerCalifornia state senatorvotes For and says:With a technology as transformative as AI, we have a responsibility to support that innovation while putting in place commonsense guardrails to understand and reduce risk. With this law, California is stepping up, once again, as a global leader on bo... more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Andrew GounardesNew York State Senatorvotes For and says:This is an enormous win for the safety of our communities, the growth of our economy and the future of our society. The RAISE Act lays the groundwork for a world where AI innovation makes life better instead of putting it at risk. Big tech oligarchs ... more Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Kathy HochulGovernor of New Yorkvotes For and says:By enacting the RAISE Act, New York is once again leading the nation in setting a strong and sensible standard for frontier AI safety, holding the biggest developers accountable for their safety and transparency protocols. AI Unverifiable source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (1)
-
David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:If you have to report to 50 different state regulators at 50 different times with 50 different definitions, it's extremely onerous. And it's going to slow down innovation, and it's going to hinder our progress in the AI race. AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-safety
votes