ai-safety policy regulations gov ai-governance ai-policy public-interest-ai

Share this with friends, journalists and politicians

Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

Key insights

Across many quotes, incident reporting is usually presented alongside safety testing, independent evaluation or audits, post-deployment monitoring, and whistleblower protections rather than as a standalone measure.
Much of the disagreement concerns design rather than whether authorities should ever be informed: commenters differ over mandatory versus voluntary systems, fixed versus graduated timelines, and what starts the reporting clock.
Several supporters explicitly limit the duty to the largest or frontier developers, arguing that narrower scope can create a uniform standard without burdening smaller innovators.
Many supportive quotes want reporting systems to serve both immediate response and long-term learning, including from near misses, recurring flaws, and emerging capabilities.
Quotes from governments, companies, researchers, and NGOs repeatedly call for centralized infrastructure, common terminology, and secure handling of sensitive information to make reports usable.

Arguments for

Rapid official response

Proponents say a 72-hour mandate gives government prompt visibility into ongoing and emerging risks from high-capability systems, so authorities can assess threats, coordinate action, and warn others before incidents grow worse. They argue serious failures should not remain behind closed doors.

Timely reporting of critical safety incidents to the government is essential to ensure that public authorities are promptly informed of ongoing and emerging risks to public safety. This reporting enables the government to monitor effectively in the event that advanced capabilitie…

New York State Assembly · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and I want to see it flourish, but not without accountability and not without human oversight. The rule of law should apply to this new frontier. This legislation ensures that when something goes wrong with a high-capability AI system, the U…

Nathaniel Moran · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote
Timely incident reporting is critical to protecting Canada's digital ecosystem. Organizations – especially those in government and critical infrastructure – should report suspected cyber incidents as soon as possible. Early reporting helps us assess threats more quickly and provi…

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · Jun 24, 2026 · full quote
As AI technologies continue to advance at an unprecedented pace, AI systems face growing threats that can expose sensitive data, create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and beyond. Congress cannot afford to fall behind in addressing these emerging risks and ensuring appropriate…

Don Beyer · Jun 23, 2026 · full quote
America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching systems it was never supposed to to…

Erin Houchin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
The new reporting regime is a practical improvement as well—a 24-hour initial notification and a fuller report within 72 hours will help regulators and the National Cyber Security Centre to spot patterns, warn others and act on the lessons that are learned from incidents.

Luke Myer · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote

Shared learning infrastructure

Supporters describe mandatory reporting as part of a secure, centralized pathway for collecting incident details, near misses, and recurring flaws. In their view, systematic monitoring and disclosure let researchers, agencies, and developers learn lessons across systems instead of leaving failures scattered across private channels.

Create a secure reporting process and a national AI incident database to track AI safety and security incidents, recurring flaws, and near misses so researchers, government agencies, and developers can learn from failures across different systems. The database would be establishe…

Andy Kim · Sep 24, 2026 · full quote
They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are happening, particularly on int…

Tommy Shaffer-Shane · Aug 29, 2026 · full quote
These recent events are also providing an opportunity to policymakers and researchers to respond, but we will need disclosure of the incident details in order to learn the appropriate lessons.

Sean Fillingham · Jul 29, 2026 · full quote
Until now, the AI community has lacked a formal pathway to report flaws to organizations equipped to coordinate a response, leaving AI systems vulnerable to failure or exploitation.

Lauren McIlvenny · Jul 1, 2026 · full quote
There's no shared incident reporting infrastructure. So you'll have different incident monitors tracking failures independently and voluntarily, but there's no legal duty to report.

Nof Alhamli · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
One of the main contributions that we would like to make to this discussion is the urgent need for structured AI incidents reporting as a core pillar of global AI governance.

Center for Responsible AI · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote

Targeted national standard

Many backers say the rule should focus on the largest frontier developers rather than all AI firms. They present a single national framework as a way to avoid fragmented mandates, give clear rules of the road, and protect innovation while still imposing transparency on the most powerful systems.

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators driving America's AI ecosystem. By …

Scott Franklin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Thanks to input from researchers, …

Scott Peters · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring transparency, independent evaluatio…

Jay Obernolte · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while giving them a single, clear nat…

Lori Trahan · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
To protect American innovation and ensure global AI leadership while providing for a safe and secure digital future, leading labs need a unified framework for frontier AI safety, security, incident reporting, and transparency.

Google · Jun 2026 · full quote

Baseline accountability

Another case for the mandate is that high-stakes AI should not depend on public trust alone. Proponents call incident reporting a basic legal obligation and a verifiable form of transparency and accountability, similar to what is expected in other high-impact sectors.

“For too long, the public has had to simply trust that the most powerful AI developers are testing their systems responsibly. SB 315 replaces blind trust with verifiable disclosure,” said Steve Wimmer, Senior Technical and Policy Advisor for the Transparency Coalition. “Asking th…

Steve Wimmer · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
That is why post-deployment monitoring, logging, independent auditing and incident reporting should be legal obligations.

Cornelia C. Walther · Jun 23, 2026 · full quote
AI Incident Reporting: Ensure transparency and accountability for AI failures.

Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) · Jul 30, 2026 · full quote
AI systems are being developed entirely within private industry, with little visibility available to Congress or the executive branch. [...] Congress should set transparency requirements for developers of high-stakes AI systems, including requirements regarding training data, cap…

Helen Toner · 2026 · full quote
Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.

Chris Lehane · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote
The unglamorous agenda—mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming—doesn’t require anyone to believe the models are about to go rogue.

Kate Klonick · Jul 29, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Voluntary reporting preference

Some opponents favor stronger information sharing and testing without making incident reporting mandatory. They point to a voluntary safety reporting system, modeled on aviation, as a way for government and industry to collaborate.

My Secure AI Development Act would establish mandatory, secure testing for our most advanced AI networks and models; improve the way the government and industry actually work together because neither team, public or private, can do this alone; strengthen information sharing betwe…

Mark Warner · Jul 21, 2026 · full quote

One deadline misfits

Other critics argue that a single 72-hour deadline is too rigid. In their view, reporting windows should vary with the gravity and type of harm, because some events require faster notice while others need more time to establish whether a serious incident actually occurred.

To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.

Laura Caroli · Aug 3, 2026 · full quote
When data theft occurs inside 60 minutes, a 72-hour reporting window ceases to function as an effective defense mechanism. Instead, it becomes a post-mortem.

Nicole Quinn · Jun 9, 2026 · full quote
Require Covered Developers to report Critical Safety Incidents to the designated Agency within 15 days of the Covered Developer discovering the Critical Safety Incident or facts that would lead the Covered Developer to reasonably conclude that the Critical Safety Incident has occ…

Anthropic · Jun 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Learning over punishment

Several supporters pair mandatory reporting with strong safeguards around confidentiality, safe harbor, and reporter protection. They say the system should emphasize learning and prevention, give agencies enough visibility to act, and avoid unnecessarily exposing sensitive commercial, security, or national-security information.

Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures that ensure transparency and dem…

OpenAI · Apr 2026 · full quote
Government needs trusted mechanisms for model access, evaluation partnerships, and incident reporting that protect sensitive commercial and national-security information while giving agencies enough visibility to act.

Federation of American Scientists · May 2026 · full quote
A series of measures could significantly improve the current system: (i) clarification of the reporting duties, including the development of a common taxonomy of risk or harm, alongside the expansion of the persons and entities under duty; (ii) disconnection of incident reporting…

Michael Chatzipanagiotis · Feb 27, 2026 · full quote
We propose that Congress do for artificial intelligence what it did for securities markets in 1934: create an expert, bipartisan, independent commission, the Artificial Intelligence Oversight Commission (AIOC), created through the American Artificial Intelligence Leadership and A…

Align AI Foundation and The GIE Foundation · Jul 2026 · full quote
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act establishes a framework requiring developers of the largest advanced AI systems to publicly disclose safety practices, report significant safety incidents, and maintain robust compliance processes. The law also creates confidential …

State of Illinois · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote

Initial notice, fuller follow-up

A common design approach is to separate an initial notification from a fuller report, rather than expect complete root-cause analysis within 72 hours. These quotes favor starting the clock at discovery or reasonable belief, allowing amended reports as facts develop, and using shorter deadlines for imminent physical danger.

Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or place unrealistic burdens on repor…

Frontier Model Forum · May 12, 2026 · full quote
Publish and adhere to an incident-reporting time window for public disclosures. The developer may make a preliminary disclosure within the window and follow up with additional information thereafter, provided the initial disclosure indicates when follow-up will occur.

Guidelight AI Standards · May 19, 2026 · full quote
Constructive engagement should focus on three concrete needs: a clarification that AI-specific attack vectors including data poisoning, model manipulation, adversarial ML inputs, and supply chain compromise of model artifacts constitute qualifying cyber incidents when they result…

Cloud Security Alliance AI Safety Initiative · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
We propose a minimum of 72 hours for the preliminary report for high-risk systems, which would allow sufficient time to assess the facts and determine whether the event meets the definition of a “serious incident.”

Business Software Alliance · Feb 12, 2026 · full quote
Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical harm.

JB Pritzker · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
The new reporting regime is a practical improvement as well—a 24-hour initial notification and a fuller report within 72 hours will help regulators and the National Cyber Security Centre to spot patterns, warn others and act on the lessons that are learned from incidents.

Luke Myer · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote

Beyond critical incidents

Some participants support incident reporting but want the system to capture more than only the highest-threshold critical events. They call for reporting near misses, lower-severity incidents, and other notable developments that could materially change official understanding of capabilities, threats, or safety risks.

They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are happening, particularly on int…

Tommy Shaffer-Shane · Aug 29, 2026 · full quote
Rather than focusing only on incidents that meet high bars for physical or economic damage, the U.S. government should ensure that key agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Commerce Department’s Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI) proactive…

Aalok Mehta · Aug 24, 2026 · full quote
Thus, deployers should be required to report major AI failures or even near-misses to a central database.

Nanda Min Htin · Feb 9, 2026 · full quote
Track, document and report relevant information about serious incidents and possible corrective measures to relevant regulators and/or the public in a reasonable timeframe. Reporting near-misses and corrective measures is good practice.

National AI Centre · May 5, 2026 · full quote
Create a secure reporting process and a national AI incident database to track AI safety and security incidents, recurring flaws, and near misses so researchers, government agencies, and developers can learn from failures across different systems. The database would be establishe…

Andy Kim · Sep 24, 2026 · full quote

The discussion shows broad interest in getting serious AI incidents to public authorities quickly, especially for advanced systems, and many proposals already build around a 72-hour benchmark. The main unresolved questions are whether reporting should be mandatory or voluntary, whether one deadline can fit very different incidents, and how to structure the system so reports are timely, informative, and secure.

Cast Your Vote:

Results (115 votes):

Total (115 votes)

For 107 (93%) Abstain 2 (2%) Against 6 (5%)

New Top

For (106)

Lord Tarassenko
David James Tarassenko, Baron Tarassenko; British engineer, academic, and crossbench member of the UK House of Lords.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I wish to speak in support of Amendment 41, in the name of the noble Baroness, Lady Harding, to which I have added my name. We heard during Committee not only about the out-of-control behaviour from agents running AI models from OpenAI, Google and Me...
more AI Verified source (Oct 26, 2026)

added 2d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Baroness Berger
Labour member of the UK House of Lords; former Member of Parliament.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This amendment addresses that gap. It would require an initial notification within 24 hours, a fuller account within 72 hours and a final report within 14 days, and ensure that the affected organisation, its regulator, the relevant cyber security inc...
more AI Verified source (Oct 26, 2026)

added 2d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Frontier Artificial Intelligence Safety, Transparency and Accountability Act (PA HB 2829)
Pennsylvania frontier-AI safety bill introduced October 5, 2026, proposing incident-reporting, transparency, audit, and risk-management duties for frontier-model developers.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

A frontier developer shall report, using the mechanism established under subsection (a), any critical safety incident pertaining to one or more of its frontier models to the agency and the Attorney General within 72 hours of the frontier developer le...
more AI Verified source (Oct 5, 2026)

added 17d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Baroness Harding of Winscombe
Conservative life peer and business executive in the UK House of Lords

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Where a frontier AI model has gained, or been used to gain, unauthorised access to, or has interfered with, or been used to interfere with, a relevant network and information system, the frontier AI developer must give the regulated person and the re...
more AI Verified source (Oct 2026)

added 7d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jim Banks
U.S. Senator from Indiana (Republican); lead sponsor of the Senate AI OVERWATCH Act

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The regulations issued pursuant to paragraph (1) shall require that not later than 72 hours after becoming aware of any information, incident, or development that presents an acute national security risk to the United States, the covered artificial i...
more AI Verified source (Sep 29, 2026)

added 18d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Office of U.S. Senator Brian Schatz
Official U.S. Senate office of Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), publishing the senator's legislative positions and press releases.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Create a secure reporting process and a national AI incident database to track AI safety and security incidents, recurring flaws, and near misses so researchers, government agencies, and developers can learn from failures across different systems. Th...
more AI Verified source (Sep 24, 2026)

added 28d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Andy Kim
U.S. Senator (D-NJ)

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Create a secure reporting process and a national AI incident database to track AI safety and security incidents, recurring flaws, and near misses so researchers, government agencies, and developers can learn from failures across different systems. Th...
more AI Verified source (Sep 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Benjamin Guggenheim
Washington-based AI policy journalist and author of the Washington Post Intelligence AI & Tech Brief.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Frontier Act from Reps. Jay Obernolte (R-California) and Lori Trahan (D-Massachusetts) would require a frontier developer to report a critical safety incident to the government within 72 hours of learning about it. This incident would be reported...
more AI Verified source (Sep 4, 2026)

added 26d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Justin Slaughter
Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Paradigm; formerly served as a senior adviser at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and as chief policy adviser at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need requirements on labs disclosing agent swarm exploits/events within 48 hours of lab staff gaining knowledge of them and we need them today.
AI Verified source (Sep 4, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Loss of Control Observatory
AI-safety observatory operated by the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, tracking reported real-world AI loss-of-control incidents.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

It is calling on the government to require AI companies to monitor and report severe loss of control incidents and to introduce emergency powers to manage severe loss of control incidents including temporarily restricting AI services.
AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tommy Shaffer-Shane
Senior AI Policy Manager at the Centre for Long-Term Resilience and project lead of its Loss of Control Observatory.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Aalok Mehta

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Rather than focusing only on incidents that meet high bars for physical or economic damage, the U.S. government should ensure that key agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Commerce Department’s Center for AI Standards an...
more AI Verified source (Aug 24, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
QDR Labs
Malaysian technology organization submitting technical recommendations on AI incident reporting to the National AI Office.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

R1. Define a minimum reconstructable PROPERTY SET for any reportable incident — eight properties: (a) actor, (b) authority, (c) action, (d) policy, (e) decision basis, (f) resource touch, (g) lifecycle context, (h) verification strength.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chris Parker
Professor at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, researching information technology and stakeholder impacts.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Effective systems therefore need incentives for firms to disclose and correct problems, along with credible consequences when they fail to act.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Patrick Higgins
Managing Director of the LaCross Institute for Ethical AI in Business at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

You cannot treat AI governance as a static set of rules. Organizations need ways to identify unexpected behavior, collaborate across functions and adjust their safeguards as the landscape evolves.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Timothy Laseter
Professor of Practice at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, specializing in operations strategy and innovation.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The overriding policy objective should be to maximize rapid disclosure, information sharing and collaborative remediation. Regulations that unintentionally discourage voluntary reporting could leave both government and industry less informed about em...
more AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
IFRAME NETWORK SDN. BHD.
Malaysian technology company submitting public input on AI governance and incident reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We also support the proposed AI Risk Framework, AI Incident Reporting Mechanism and AI Sandbox as important components of a modern AI governance ecosystem.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP)
Digital rights NGO

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI Incident Reporting: Ensure transparency and accountability for AI failures.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sean Fillingham
Independent technical AI-governance researcher and research manager at ERA.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

These recent events are also providing an opportunity to policymakers and researchers to respond, but we will need disclosure of the incident details in order to learn the appropriate lessons.
AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Kate Klonick

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The unglamorous agenda—mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming—doesn’t require anyone to believe the models are a...
more AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alliance for a Better Future
US nonprofit organization advocating public-interest policy responses to emerging technologies.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The latest version of the bipartisan Obernolte–Trahan framework, FRONTIER Act, is a serious step forward. It's one of the strongest efforts yet to establish a federal AI framework that protects Americans while preserving America's leadership in AI. T...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
J.B. Branch
AI Governance and Technology Policy Counsel at Public Citizen.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress must establish a comprehensive federal AI safety framework with mandatory safety testing, independent audits, incident reporting requirements, and regulators empowered to remove AI systems when they pose risks.
AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
FRONTIER Act (H.R. 9925)
Named U.S. federal legislative proposal introduced in 2026 establishing oversight, evaluation, and reporting requirements for frontier AI.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment ... the Under Secretary shall establish a mechanism for a frontier developer ... to ... submit to the Under Secretary a report on a critical safety incident ... Not later than 72 hours after a front...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Greg Casar
U.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need regular mandatory independent safety testing and oversight, mandatory disclosure of security incidents, and international cooperation to keep people safe from absolute disaster.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Suhas Subramanyam
U.S. Representative from Virginia and co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This is a four-alarm fire. We need to take action now. These frontier models could have the power to create serious chaos and harm without adequate regulations. This bill, while not perfect, is an important, bipartisan step in the right direction. We...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Franklin
U.S. Representative from Florida; member of the House Appropriations Committee

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators drivi...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Peters
U.S. Representative from California's 50th congressional district; co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Than...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jay Obernolte
U.S. Representative from California

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring trans...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Lori Trahan
U.S. representative from Massachusetts

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while g...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 3mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

Abstain (2)

Loading more opinions...

Against (6)

Laura Caroli
Political adviser on the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee; former senior fellow at CSIS’s Wadhwani AI Center.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.
AI Verified source (Aug 3, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

More h/ai-safety votes

AI poses an existential threat to humanity

Democracies should share frontier AI models with allies

Grant whistleblower protections to AI safety researchers

Require AI systems above a capability threshold to be interpretable

The U.S. and China should establish Mutually Assured Compute Destruction

Back