Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

ai-safety policy regulations gov ai-governance ai-policy public-interest-ai

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Arguments for

Rapid risk response

Supporters say critical AI failures can quickly escalate into public-safety, cyber, or infrastructure threats, so incidents should not stay behind closed doors. A 72-hour mandate is presented as a way to give government enough notice to act quickly and reduce catastrophic risk when high-capability systems behave dangerously.

America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching systems it was never supposed to to…

Erin Houchin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring transparency, independent evaluatio…

Jay Obernolte · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and I want to see it flourish, but not without accountability and not without human oversight. The rule of law should apply to this new frontier. This legislation ensures that when something goes wrong with a high-capability AI system, the U…

Nathaniel Moran · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote
The capabilities of advanced AI models are increasing by the day, and so are the risks of AI systems gaining the ability to self-improve, evade human oversight, and enabling attacks against our nation’s infrastructure. We need mechanisms to identify these risks early so that lead…

Brendan Steinhauser · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote
Timely reporting of critical safety incidents to the government is essential to ensure that public authorities are promptly informed of ongoing and emerging risks to public safety. This reporting enables the government to monitor effectively in the event that advanced capabilitie…

New York State Assembly · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote

Government visibility

Proponents argue that powerful AI is being developed with too little public or governmental visibility. Mandatory reporting to a central public authority would give officials a reliable window into serious incidents and support coordinated oversight and incident review.

AI systems are being developed entirely within private industry, with little visibility available to Congress or the executive branch. [...] Congress should set transparency requirements for developers of high-stakes AI systems, including requirements regarding training data, cap…

Helen Toner · 2026 · full quote
As AI technologies continue to advance at an unprecedented pace, AI systems face growing threats that can expose sensitive data, create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and beyond. Congress cannot afford to fall behind in addressing these emerging risks and ensuring appropriate…

Don Beyer · Jun 23, 2026 · full quote
The federal government needs a reporting threshold for all artificial intelligence companies that deliver services in Canada, where they must report to law enforcement, so there's no judgment calls in a back room that Canadians don't have a line of sight to that put our kids and …

David Eby · 2026 · full quote
As AI systems grow more and more capable, the government needs a reliable window into powerful AI models developing dangerous capabilities, like launching a cyberattack or helping build a biological weapon. Congressman Moran is leading a new vanguard of AI policy in the Republica…

Mark Beall · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote
The Center for AI Standards and Innovation at the Department of Commerce should be codified and funded as the federal government’s central technical authority on AI systems, with an incident review function modeled on the National Transportation Safety Board.

David A. Hoffman · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote

Shared reporting infrastructure

Several quotes describe today's reporting landscape as fragmented and mostly voluntary, with no shared infrastructure or legal duty to report. They argue that a structured, interoperable system would create a formal pathway to log, track, and act on incidents rather than leaving accountability scattered.

One of the main contributions that we would like to make to this discussion is the urgent need for structured AI incidents reporting as a core pillar of global AI governance.

Center for Responsible AI · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
There's no shared incident reporting infrastructure. So you'll have different incident monitors tracking failures independently and voluntarily, but there's no legal duty to report or to recognize—or any recognition between them.

Nof Alhamli · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
Until now, the AI community has lacked a formal pathway to report flaws to organizations equipped to coordinate a response, leaving AI systems vulnerable to failure or exploitation.

Lauren McIlvenny · Jul 1, 2026 · full quote
FLARE-AI is the culmination of that effort: a one-stop shop that redirects your reports to the voluntary recipient orgs working with us, rather than scattering accountability across social media, journalism, bug bounties, and feedback forms. Read the Hugging Face blog post, WIRED…

Avijit Ghosh · Jul 1, 2026 · full quote
Before 2027 dialogue, we should advance shared terminology, comparable risk classifications, consistent documentation, interoperable incident reporting, and multilingual evaluation methods.

Paula Bragantes Zamora · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote
Secondly, the Government must mandate independent statutory testing for AI before its release, and a yellow card scheme that would be a national register where safety incidents, near misses and harms caused by AI were reported, tracked and acted on exactly as we do for adverse dr…

Iqbal Mohamed · Jul 8, 2026 · full quote

Targeted, innovation-compatible rules

Backers say reporting can be designed as a targeted requirement for the handful of largest frontier developers, rather than a blanket rule for all AI firms. In that framing, clear national standards and transparency obligations improve trust and safety without undermining smaller innovators or U.S. competitiveness.

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators driving America's AI ecosystem. By …

Scott Franklin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while giving them a single, clear nat…

Lori Trahan · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Thanks to input from researchers, …

Scott Peters · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
America should lead the world in artificial intelligence, and that leadership starts with secure and reliable systems. This bipartisan bill creates a practical framework to identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited, helping strengthen trust in AI while sup…

Jeff Hurd · Jun 23, 2026 · full quote
Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.

Chris Lehane · Jul 15, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Premature reporting risk

Opponents and cautious voices argue that a rigid 72-hour mandate may assume root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been completed. They warn this could produce premature or unreliable reports and favor a longer window from discovery or from the point when facts reasonably establish that a critical safety incident has occurred.

Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or place unrealistic burdens on repor…

Frontier Model Forum · May 12, 2026 · full quote
Require Covered Developers to report Critical Safety Incidents to the designated Agency within 15 days of the Covered Developer discovering the Critical Safety Incident or facts that would lead the Covered Developer to reasonably conclude that the Critical Safety Incident has occ…

Anthropic · Jun 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Staged and protected reporting

Some quotes support mandatory reporting but want a staged system: a preliminary report after reasonable detection, followed by fuller analysis once facts are clearer. They also emphasize that incident sharing should prioritize learning and prevention while protecting sensitive technical, commercial, and national-security information and shielding reporters.

We propose a minimum of 72 hours for the preliminary report for high-risk systems, which would allow sufficient time to assess the facts and determine whether the event meets the definition of a “serious incident.”

Business Software Alliance · Feb 12, 2026 · full quote
Constructive engagement should focus on three concrete needs: a clarification that AI-specific attack vectors including data poisoning, model manipulation, adversarial ML inputs, and supply chain compromise of model artifacts constitute qualifying cyber incidents when they result…

Cloud Security Alliance AI Safety Initiative · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures that ensure transparency and dem…

OpenAI · Apr 2026 · full quote
A series of measures could significantly improve the current system: (i) clarification of the reporting duties, including the development of a common taxonomy of risk or harm, alongside the expansion of the persons and entities under duty; (ii) disconnection of incident reporting…

Michael Chatzipanagiotis · Feb 27, 2026 · full quote

Severity-based escalation

Another nuanced approach keeps 72 hours as a general rule but accelerates notification for the most urgent cases. These quotes call for 24-hour reporting when incidents pose imminent risks such as death, serious physical harm, critical infrastructure failure, or critical security breaches, sometimes followed by a fuller report later.

Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical harm.

JB Pritzker · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
Frontier developers are required to report such incidents to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security within 72 hours of discovery, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury.

Illinois General Assembly · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
Additionally, frontier developers would be required to report critical safety incidents to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and the Office of the Attorney General within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injur…

Mary Edly-Allen · May 21, 2026 · full quote
Critical incidents (immediate reporting): serious injury, death, or potential for death; critical infrastructure failure; and critical security breach must be reported within 24 hours.

Government of Bangladesh · Jun 24, 2026 · full quote
The new reporting regime is a practical improvement as well—a 24-hour initial notification and a fuller report within 72 hours will help regulators and the National Cyber Security Centre to spot patterns, warn others and act on the lessons that are learned from incidents.

Luke Myer · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote

Insights

Many supportive quotes link incident reporting to a lack of current government visibility into privately developed frontier systems and to the need for authorities to act quickly.
Several supporters pair incident reporting with broader safeguards such as independent testing, audits, transparency requirements, and whistleblower protections rather than treating reporting as a stand-alone tool.
A recurring implementation divide is over timing and thresholds: some quotes back 72 hours, some call for 24-hour escalation for imminent harm, and some prefer a longer period such as 15 days or a preliminary report followed by fuller analysis.
Multiple supporters explicitly argue that any mandate should focus on the largest or most capable developers, not startups or the wider AI ecosystem.
The quotes discuss incident reporting across legislatures, executive agencies, industry groups, nonprofits, and international bodies, showing the issue is being framed as both a domestic oversight question and a broader governance design problem.

In the provided quotes, support is broad for the idea that critical AI incidents should not remain solely inside private organizations and that a designated authority needs timely notice, especially for frontier systems. The sharper disagreement is over implementation: whether 72 hours is the right default, when the clock should start, whether the most urgent cases need faster notice, and how to preserve report quality and confidentiality.

Cast your vote:

Results (71 votes):

Total (71 votes)

For 67 (94%) Abstain 1 (1%) Against 3 (4%)

For (66)

Kate Klonick

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The unglamorous agenda—mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming—doesn’t require anyone to believe the models are a...
more AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 19h ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
J.B. Branch
AI Governance and Technology Policy Counsel at Public Citizen.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress must establish a comprehensive federal AI safety framework with mandatory safety testing, independent audits, incident reporting requirements, and regulators empowered to remove AI systems when they pose risks.
AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2026)

added 10d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Greg Casar
U.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need regular mandatory independent safety testing and oversight, mandatory disclosure of security incidents, and international cooperation to keep people safe from absolute disaster.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Suhas Subramanyam
U.S. Representative from Virginia and co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This is a four-alarm fire. We need to take action now. These frontier models could have the power to create serious chaos and harm without adequate regulations. This bill, while not perfect, is an important, bipartisan step in the right direction. We...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Franklin
U.S. Representative from Florida; member of the House Appropriations Committee

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators drivi...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Peters
U.S. Representative from California's 50th congressional district; co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Than...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jay Obernolte
U.S. Representative from California

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring trans...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Lori Trahan
U.S. representative from Massachusetts

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while g...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Erin Houchin
U.S. Representative for Indiana's 9th congressional district (Republican); cosponsor of the Great American AI Act

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching syste...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 16d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chris Lehane
OpenAI chief global affairs officer

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Iqbal Mohamed
UK Member of Parliament for Dewsbury and Batley; former pharmaceutical regulatory professional.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Secondly, the Government must mandate independent statutory testing for AI before its release, and a yellow card scheme that would be a national register where safety incidents, near misses and harms caused by AI were reported, tracked and acted on e...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 24d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Center for Responsible AI
Research center at IIT Madras focused on responsible AI governance, accountability, and incident reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

One of the main contributions that we would like to make to this discussion is the urgent need for structured AI incidents reporting as a core pillar of global AI governance.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Rachel Ventura
Illinois State Senator representing the 43rd District; co-sponsor of the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

With the rise of Artificial Intelligence in all aspects of our lives, coupled with the lack of oversight, we face a looming crisis. This legislation sets a strong precedent to ensure AI developers abide by important safety standards and transparency ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Nof Alhamli
Science and Technology Advisor at the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

There's no shared incident reporting infrastructure. So you'll have different incident monitors tracking failures independently and voluntarily, but there's no legal duty to report or to recognize—or any recognition between them.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026) 1 of 2

added 27d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Paula Bragantes Zamora
Costa Rican diplomat who co-chaired the UN Global Dialogue on Artificial Intelligence Governance in July 2026.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Before 2027 dialogue, we should advance shared terminology, comparable risk classifications, consistent documentation, interoperable incident reporting, and multilingual evaluation methods.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 27d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Maria Collett
Pennsylvania state senator representing the 12th District.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

In addition, significant AI safety incidents must be reported to state officials within 72 hours of discovery, and whistleblower protections must be honored for employees who raise legitimate safety concerns.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 23d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
JB Pritzker
Governor of Illinois; signed the Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act in 2026.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical harm.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 23d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Illinois General Assembly
State legislature of Illinois, United States.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Frontier developers are required to report such incidents to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security within 72 hours of discovery, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical...
more AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 24d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sundeep Waslekar
Strategic Foresight Group president

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The report also recommends mandatory reporting of serious AI safety incidents within about 72 hours.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 24d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Office of the Governor of Illinois
Official press office of the Governor of Illinois.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act establishes a framework requiring developers of the largest advanced AI systems to publicly disclose safety practices, report significant safety incidents, and maintain robust compliance processes.
AI Verified source (Jul 6, 2026)

added 24d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Geneva Centre for Security Policy
International foundation and executive-education institution focused on peace, security, and international cooperation.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Adopting a reporting window of about 72 hours would align with protocols already used in industries such as aviation, nuclear power, and public health emergencies.
AI Verified source (Jul 3, 2026)

added 24d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Avijit Ghosh
AI ethics and policy researcher at Hugging Face, focused on AI evaluations, governance, and flaw disclosure.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

FLARE-AI is the culmination of that effort: a one-stop shop that redirects your reports to the voluntary recipient orgs working with us, rather than scattering accountability across social media, journalism, bug bounties, and feedback forms. Read the...
more AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jessica Ji
Senior Research Analyst at Georgetown University's Center for Security and Emerging Technology, working on AI governance and safety.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

I think it’s a really good initiative. I’m in support of anything that makes AI more transparent.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Lauren McIlvenny
Technical Director of Threat Analysis at Carnegie Mellon University's Software Engineering Institute and advisor to the FLARE-AI project.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Until now, the AI community has lacked a formal pathway to report flaws to organizations equipped to coordinate a response, leaving AI systems vulnerable to failure or exploitation.
AI Verified source (Jul 1, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mark Minevich
AI strategist, investor, and Forbes contributor writing on AI governance and global technology policy.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Adopting a reporting window of about 72 hours would align with protocols already used in industries such as aviation, nuclear power, and public health emergencies.
AI Verified source (Jun 30, 2026)

added 28d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sanchit Vir Gogia
Chief analyst at Greyhound Research, an independent technology-industry research and advisory firm.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The serious frontier developers already run the evaluations, the red-teaming and the escalation drills. What they have never faced at the federal level is a legal obligation to tell the government, on the clock, when a model behaves dangerously.
AI Verified source (Jun 26, 2026)

added 20d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Nathaniel Moran
U.S. Representative from Texas

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and I want to see it flourish, but not without accountability and not without human oversight. The rule of law should apply to this new frontier. This legislation ensures that when something goes wrong with a hi...
more AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026) 1 of 2

added 2d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mark Beall
President of Government Affairs at the AI Policy Network.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As AI systems grow more and more capable, the government needs a reliable window into powerful AI models developing dangerous capabilities, like launching a cyberattack or helping build a biological weapon. Congressman Moran is leading a new vanguard...
more AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Brendan Steinhauser
CEO of The Alliance for Secure AI; longtime Republican political strategist and former Tea Party organizer

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The capabilities of advanced AI models are increasing by the day, and so are the risks of AI systems gaining the ability to self-improve, evade human oversight, and enabling attacks against our nation’s infrastructure. We need mechanisms to identify ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 25, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security
Canadian government cybersecurity authority.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Timely incident reporting is critical to protecting Canada's digital ecosystem. Organizations – especially those in government and critical infrastructure – should report suspected cyber incidents as soon as possible. Early reporting helps us assess ...
more AI Verified source (Jun 24, 2026)

added 17d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate