Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority

ai-safety policy regulations gov ai-governance ai-policy public-interest-ai

Share this with your representatives, journalists and friends

Key insights

Across supportive quotes, incident reporting is rarely framed as a standalone rule; it is usually paired with testing, audits, monitoring, or whistleblower protections (16842, 15849, 15574, 9339).
A central design disagreement is not only whether to report, but when the clock starts, with discovery, determination, reasonable belief, and reasonable detection all appearing in the quotes (18966, 15002, 18412, 15035).
Several supporters argue a targeted national regime for frontier developers is preferable to fragmented state-level requirements, while one critic warns patchwork mandates can reduce what society learns (16159, 16157, 16160, 13035).
Quotes on multiple sides distinguish between initial alerts and fuller investigations: some call for rapid notification with follow-up, while others warn that early deadlines should not assume complete root-cause analysis (17270, 18781, 13822, 14868).
The scope of reportable events varies across quotes, with some limiting mandates to serious or critical incidents and others explicitly including near misses, vulnerabilities, misuse, or concerning behavior (19170, 11559, 12565, 17611).

Arguments for

Rapid government response

Supporters say mandatory reporting gives public authorities timely visibility into dangerous capabilities, ongoing failures, and vulnerabilities so they can assess threats, coordinate mitigation, and act quickly. They present this as especially important when advanced models could pose public-safety, cybersecurity, or catastrophic risks.

AI is a powerful engine of innovation, and I want to see it flourish, but not without accountability and not without human oversight. The rule of law should apply to this new frontier. This legislation ensures that when something goes wrong with a high-capability AI system, the U…

Nathaniel Moran · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote
Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring transparency, independent evaluatio…

Jay Obernolte · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
Timely reporting of critical safety incidents to the government is essential to ensure that public authorities are promptly informed of ongoing and emerging risks to public safety. This reporting enables the government to monitor effectively in the event that advanced capabilitie…

New York State Assembly · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
As AI technologies continue to advance at an unprecedented pace, AI systems face growing threats that can expose sensitive data, create new cybersecurity vulnerabilities, and beyond. Congress cannot afford to fall behind in addressing these emerging risks and ensuring appropriate…

Don Beyer · Jun 23, 2026 · full quote
Timely incident reporting is critical to protecting Canada's digital ecosystem. Organizations – especially those in government and critical infrastructure – should report suspected cyber incidents as soon as possible. Early reporting helps us assess threats more quickly and provi…

Canadian Centre for Cyber Security · Jun 24, 2026 · full quote

Transparency and accountability

Proponents argue serious AI incidents should not remain inside private companies or depend on internal judgment calls. Mandatory disclosure is described as a way to replace blind trust with verifiable accountability and give public authorities clearer line of sight into high-impact systems.

America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching systems it was never supposed to to…

Erin Houchin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
AI systems are being developed entirely within private industry, with little visibility available to Congress or the executive branch. [...] Congress should set transparency requirements for developers of high-stakes AI systems, including requirements regarding training data, cap…

Helen Toner · 2026 · full quote
The federal government needs a reporting threshold for all artificial intelligence companies that deliver services in Canada, where they must report to law enforcement, so there's no judgment calls in a back room that Canadians don't have a line of sight to that put our kids and …

David Eby · 2026 · full quote
AI Incident Reporting: Ensure transparency and accountability for AI failures.

Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP) · Jul 30, 2026 · full quote
“For too long, the public has had to simply trust that the most powerful AI developers are testing their systems responsibly. SB 315 replaces blind trust with verifiable disclosure,” said Steve Wimmer, Senior Technical and Policy Advisor for the Transparency Coalition. “Asking th…

Steve Wimmer · Jul 7, 2026 · full quote

Learning through monitoring

Many supporters frame incident reporting as part of a broader safety system that includes post-deployment monitoring, near-miss reporting, structured documentation, and cross-functional remediation. In this view, disclosure helps organizations and regulators learn from failures in the wild and improve safeguards over time.

They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are happening, particularly on int…

Tommy Shaffer-Shane · Aug 29, 2026 · full quote
Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures that ensure transparency and dem…

OpenAI · Apr 2026 · full quote
Pre-release testing and pre-deployment testing are important, but that type of evidence needs to continue via continual monitoring of the systems post-deployment, incident reporting, and observing behaviour in the wild rather than just in the laboratory.

Elham Tabassi · May 25, 2026 · full quote
The overriding policy objective should be to maximize rapid disclosure, information sharing and collaborative remediation. Regulations that unintentionally discourage voluntary reporting could leave both government and industry less informed about emerging failure modes.

Timothy Laseter · Jul 30, 2026 · full quote
A series of measures could significantly improve the current system: (i) clarification of the reporting duties, including the development of a common taxonomy of risk or harm, alongside the expansion of the persons and entities under duty; (ii) disconnection of incident reporting…

Michael Chatzipanagiotis · Feb 27, 2026 · full quote

Workable 72-hour benchmark

Backers say about 72 hours balances urgency with the need to confirm basic facts, and some compare it to reporting practices in other high-stakes sectors. Several quotes also pair that window with faster notice for imminent threats and later supplemental reporting as more information becomes available.

Adopting a reporting window of about 72 hours would align with protocols already used in industries such as aviation, nuclear power, and public health emergencies.

Geneva Centre for Security Policy · Jul 3, 2026 · full quote
Developers must report critical safety incidents within 72 hours, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical harm.

JB Pritzker · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
Frontier developers are required to report such incidents to the Illinois Emergency Management Agency and Office of Homeland Security within 72 hours of discovery, or within 24 hours if the incident poses an imminent risk of death or serious physical injury.

Illinois General Assembly · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote
We propose a minimum of 72 hours for the preliminary report for high-risk systems, which would allow sufficient time to assess the facts and determine whether the event meets the definition of a “serious incident.”

Business Software Alliance · Feb 12, 2026 · full quote
Publish and adhere to an incident-reporting time window for public disclosures. The developer may make a preliminary disclosure within the window and follow up with additional information thereafter, provided the initial disclosure indicates when follow-up will occur.

Guidelight AI Standards · May 19, 2026 · full quote

Targeted national standard

Some supporters argue the obligation should apply mainly to the largest or frontier developers under a single national framework. They say that approach avoids a patchwork of rules, limits burdens on smaller innovators, and protects innovation while still imposing transparency on the most capable systems.

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators driving America's AI ecosystem. By …

Scott Franklin · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Thanks to input from researchers, …

Scott Peters · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while giving them a single, clear nat…

Lori Trahan · Jul 23, 2026 · full quote
To protect American innovation and ensure global AI leadership while providing for a safe and secure digital future, leading labs need a unified framework for frontier AI safety, security, incident reporting, and transparency.

Google · Jun 2026 · full quote
As AI systems grow more and more capable, the government needs a reliable window into powerful AI models developing dangerous capabilities, like launching a cyberattack or helping build a biological weapon. Congressman Moran is leading a new vanguard of AI policy in the Republica…

Mark Beall · Jun 25, 2026 · full quote

Arguments against

Need faster acute alerts

One objection is that a 72-hour deadline can be too slow for fast-moving security incidents. On this view, when damage can occur within minutes, a 72-hour report arrives after the critical defensive window has passed.

When data theft occurs inside 60 minutes, a 72-hour reporting window ceases to function as an effective defense mechanism. Instead, it becomes a post-mortem.

Nicole Quinn · Jun 9, 2026 · full quote

Avoid flat 72-hour rules

Other critics argue policymakers should not impose a single fixed deadline for all incidents. They call for time frames calibrated to the gravity of harm or a longer window to determine whether an event is material, warning that otherwise reports may be premature, unreliable, or unduly burdensome.

To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.

Laura Caroli · Aug 3, 2026 · full quote
Require Covered Developers to report Critical Safety Incidents to the designated Agency within 15 days of the Covered Developer discovering the Critical Safety Incident or facts that would lead the Covered Developer to reasonably conclude that the Critical Safety Incident has occ…

Anthropic · Jun 2026 · full quote
Timelines for incident reports are often set with well-intentioned urgency, but if they implicitly assume that root-cause analysis or full impact assessment has already been conducted, they will either produce premature and unreliable reports or place unrealistic burdens on repor…

Frontier Model Forum · May 12, 2026 · full quote

Middle ground

Staged reporting design

Several quotes suggest an initial notice can be required quickly, followed by fuller reporting after more facts are established. They also stress that trigger rules should be clear, such as starting the clock at discovery or reasonable detection rather than at the underlying compromise.

The new reporting regime is a practical improvement as well—a 24-hour initial notification and a fuller report within 72 hours will help regulators and the National Cyber Security Centre to spot patterns, warn others and act on the lessons that are learned from incidents.

Luke Myer · Jun 16, 2026 · full quote
Constructive engagement should focus on three concrete needs: a clarification that AI-specific attack vectors including data poisoning, model manipulation, adversarial ML inputs, and supply chain compromise of model artifacts constitute qualifying cyber incidents when they result…

Cloud Security Alliance AI Safety Initiative · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote
Publish and adhere to an incident-reporting time window for public disclosures. The developer may make a preliminary disclosure within the window and follow up with additional information thereafter, provided the initial disclosure indicates when follow-up will occur.

Guidelight AI Standards · May 19, 2026 · full quote
We propose a minimum of 72 hours for the preliminary report for high-risk systems, which would allow sufficient time to assess the facts and determine whether the event meets the definition of a “serious incident.”

Business Software Alliance · Feb 12, 2026 · full quote
A frontier developer shall report any critical safety incident pertaining to one or more of its frontier models to the office within seventy-two hours from a determination that a critical safety incident has occurred or within seventy-two hours of the frontier developer learning …

New York State Legislature · Mar 27, 2026 · full quote

Learning over punishment

Some supporters emphasize that reporting systems should be designed to encourage disclosure and prevention, not just penalties. They call for confidentiality, protection for sensitive information and reporters, and separation from liability where possible so agencies gain visibility without shutting down useful signal-sharing.

Establish a mechanism for companies to share information about incidents, misuse, and near-misses with a designated public authority. The system should emphasize learning and prevention over punishment, with appropriately scoped public disclosures that ensure transparency and dem…

OpenAI · Apr 2026 · full quote
A series of measures could significantly improve the current system: (i) clarification of the reporting duties, including the development of a common taxonomy of risk or harm, alongside the expansion of the persons and entities under duty; (ii) disconnection of incident reporting…

Michael Chatzipanagiotis · Feb 27, 2026 · full quote
Government needs trusted mechanisms for model access, evaluation partnerships, and incident reporting that protect sensitive commercial and national-security information while giving agencies enough visibility to act.

Federation of American Scientists · May 2026 · full quote
The overriding policy objective should be to maximize rapid disclosure, information sharing and collaborative remediation. Regulations that unintentionally discourage voluntary reporting could leave both government and industry less informed about emerging failure modes.

Timothy Laseter · Jul 30, 2026 · full quote
The Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act establishes a framework requiring developers of the largest advanced AI systems to publicly disclose safety practices, report significant safety incidents, and maintain robust compliance processes. The law also creates confidential …

State of Illinois · Jul 6, 2026 · full quote

Voluntary first approach

An explicitly undecided view proposes starting with a voluntary incident signal-sharing arrangement among providers, safety institutes, and monitoring bodies while policymakers study mandatory reporting as a longer-run option. The argument is not against obligations in principle, but treats them as a next step rather than the immediate starting point.

For policymakers: Convene frontier model providers, AI Safety Institutes, and independent monitoring bodies to scope a voluntary AI incident signal-sharing arrangement, drawing on the financial services fraud signal consortia as a precedent. In parallel, examine the case for mand…

Sarah Bollinger · May 11, 2026 · full quote

The debate centers on design as much as on principle. Supporters present incident reporting as a core transparency and safety tool, especially for the most capable developers and within a broader monitoring regime. Critics and more cautious voices focus on calibration: whether 72 hours is too slow for acute threats, too rigid for varied harms, or too short for a reliable initial assessment.

Cast your vote:

Results (102 votes):

Total (102 votes)

For 94 (92%) Abstain 2 (2%) Against 6 (6%)

For (93)

Justin Slaughter
Vice President of Regulatory Affairs at Paradigm; formerly served as a senior adviser at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and as chief policy adviser at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need requirements on labs disclosing agent swarm exploits/events within 48 hours of lab staff gaining knowledge of them and we need them today.
AI Verified source (Sep 4, 2026)

added 15d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Loss of Control Observatory
AI-safety observatory operated by the Centre for Long-Term Resilience, tracking reported real-world AI loss-of-control incidents.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

It is calling on the government to require AI companies to monitor and report severe loss of control incidents and to introduce emergency powers to manage severe loss of control incidents including temporarily restricting AI services.
AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)

added 21d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Tommy Shaffer-Shane
Senior AI Policy Manager at the Centre for Long-Term Resilience and project lead of its Loss of Control Observatory.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

They need to be reporting what they’re finding out, even if it’s a near miss or it’s a lower severity incident. These recent incidents have also exposed that the companies themselves are not necessarily monitoring where these types of behaviours are ...
more AI Verified source (Aug 29, 2026)

added 22d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Aalok Mehta

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Rather than focusing only on incidents that meet high bars for physical or economic damage, the U.S. government should ensure that key agencies such as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Commerce Department’s Center for AI Standards an...
more AI Verified source (Aug 24, 2026)

added 17d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
QDR Labs
Malaysian technology organization submitting technical recommendations on AI incident reporting to the National AI Office.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

R1. Define a minimum reconstructable PROPERTY SET for any reportable incident — eight properties: (a) actor, (b) authority, (c) action, (d) policy, (e) decision basis, (f) resource touch, (g) lifecycle context, (h) verification strength.
AI Verified source (Jul 31, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chris Parker
Professor at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, researching information technology and stakeholder impacts.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Effective systems therefore need incentives for firms to disclose and correct problems, along with credible consequences when they fail to act.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 28d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Patrick Higgins
Managing Director of the LaCross Institute for Ethical AI in Business at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

You cannot treat AI governance as a static set of rules. Organizations need ways to identify unexpected behavior, collaborate across functions and adjust their safeguards as the landscape evolves.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Timothy Laseter
Professor of Practice at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business, specializing in operations strategy and innovation.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The overriding policy objective should be to maximize rapid disclosure, information sharing and collaborative remediation. Regulations that unintentionally discourage voluntary reporting could leave both government and industry less informed about em...
more AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
IFRAME NETWORK SDN. BHD.
Malaysian technology company submitting public input on AI governance and incident reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We also support the proposed AI Risk Framework, AI Incident Reporting Mechanism and AI Sandbox as important components of a modern AI governance ecosystem.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP)
Digital rights NGO

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

AI Incident Reporting: Ensure transparency and accountability for AI failures.
AI Verified source (Jul 30, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Sean Fillingham
Independent technical AI-governance researcher and research manager at ERA.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

These recent events are also providing an opportunity to policymakers and researchers to respond, but we will need disclosure of the incident details in order to learn the appropriate lessons.
AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Kate Klonick

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The unglamorous agenda—mandatory incident reporting, independent auditing of containment and testing practices, liability rules for harms to third parties, security standards for internal red-teaming—doesn’t require anyone to believe the models are a...
more AI Verified source (Jul 29, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Alliance for a Better Future
US nonprofit organization advocating public-interest policy responses to emerging technologies.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The latest version of the bipartisan Obernolte–Trahan framework, FRONTIER Act, is a serious step forward. It's one of the strongest efforts yet to establish a federal AI framework that protects Americans while preserving America's leadership in AI. T...
more AI Verified source (Jul 28, 2026)

added 21d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
J.B. Branch
AI Governance and Technology Policy Counsel at Public Citizen.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Congress must establish a comprehensive federal AI safety framework with mandatory safety testing, independent audits, incident reporting requirements, and regulators empowered to remove AI systems when they pose risks.
AI Verified source (Jul 27, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Greg Casar
U.S. Representative from Texas; Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

We need regular mandatory independent safety testing and oversight, mandatory disclosure of security incidents, and international cooperation to keep people safe from absolute disaster.
AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Suhas Subramanyam
U.S. Representative from Virginia and co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

This is a four-alarm fire. We need to take action now. These frontier models could have the power to create serious chaos and harm without adequate regulations. This bill, while not perfect, is an important, bipartisan step in the right direction. We...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Franklin
U.S. Representative from Florida; member of the House Appropriations Committee

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The FRONTIER Act recognizes that not every AI developer should be regulated the same way. It takes a targeted approach by focusing only on the handful of companies developing the most powerful frontier AI models, not the startups and innovators drivi...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Scott Peters
U.S. Representative from California's 50th congressional district; co-sponsor of the FRONTIER Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

The window to get AI policy right is closing, and Congress can't afford to miss it. I supported Representatives Trahan and Obernolte's initial draft so we could develop a better bill that reflects how this technology works and where it's headed. Than...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Jay Obernolte
U.S. Representative from California

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Artificial intelligence is advancing rapidly, and Congress must ensure our regulatory framework keeps pace without undermining American innovation. The FRONTIER Act focuses oversight on the largest developers and most advanced models, requiring trans...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Lori Trahan
U.S. representative from Massachusetts

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

As AI systems grow more capable, Americans deserve confidence that the most powerful models are being developed responsibly. The bipartisan FRONTIER Act delivers commonsense transparency and independent oversight for the largest AI developers while g...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Erin Houchin
U.S. Representative for Indiana's 9th congressional district (Republican); cosponsor of the Great American AI Act

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

America must lead the world in artificial intelligence, and we can do that while being clear-eyed about the risks. Just this week, one of the most advanced AI systems in the country broke out of its own developer's testing environment, reaching syste...
more AI Verified source (Jul 23, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Chris Lehane
OpenAI chief global affairs officer

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Second, companies developing the most capable systems should meet clear requirements, including independent audits, incident reporting, strong security standards, and whistleblower protections.
AI Verified source (Jul 15, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Illinois Senate Republican Caucus
Republican caucus of the Illinois State Senate.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Developers must also report critical safety incidents to IEMA-OHS and the Attorney General within 72 hours.
AI Verified source (Jul 14, 2026)

added 9d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Iqbal Mohamed
UK Member of Parliament for Dewsbury and Batley; former pharmaceutical regulatory professional.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

Secondly, the Government must mandate independent statutory testing for AI before its release, and a yellow card scheme that would be a national register where safety incidents, near misses and harms caused by AI were reported, tracked and acted on e...
more AI Verified source (Jul 8, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Steve Wimmer
Senior Technical and Policy Advisor at Transparency Coalition; advocates accountable AI governance and state leadership.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

“For too long, the public has had to simply trust that the most powerful AI developers are testing their systems responsibly. SB 315 replaces blind trust with verifiable disclosure,” said Steve Wimmer, Senior Technical and Policy Advisor for the Tran...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 16d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Center for Responsible AI
Research center at IIT Madras focused on responsible AI governance, accountability, and incident reporting.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

One of the main contributions that we would like to make to this discussion is the urgent need for structured AI incidents reporting as a core pillar of global AI governance.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 1mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Rachel Ventura
Illinois State Senator representing the 43rd District; co-sponsor of the Illinois Artificial Intelligence Safety Measures Act.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

With the rise of Artificial Intelligence in all aspects of our lives, coupled with the lack of oversight, we face a looming crisis. This legislation sets a strong precedent to ensure AI developers abide by important safety standards and transparency ...
more AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026)

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Nof Alhamli
Science and Technology Advisor at the United Arab Emirates Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes For and says:

There's no shared incident reporting infrastructure. So you'll have different incident monitors tracking failures independently and voluntarily, but there's no legal duty to report or to recognize—or any recognition between them.
AI Verified source (Jul 7, 2026) 1 of 2

added 2mo ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

Abstain (2)

Loading more opinions...

Against (6)

Laura Caroli
Political adviser on the European Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee; former senior fellow at CSIS’s Wadhwani AI Center.

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

To maximize the effectiveness of such provisions, policymakers should define a sensible range of time frames to report incidents, possibly with a graduated approach according to the gravity of the harm.
AI Verified source (Aug 3, 2026)

added 21d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate
Mark Warner
U.S. Senator from Virginia; former Governor of Virginia; Vice Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee

I am this person! Add a sourced quote Report comment

votes Against and says:

My Secure AI Development Act would establish mandatory, secure testing for our most advanced AI networks and models; improve the way the government and industry actually work together because neither team, public or private, can do this alone; streng...
more AI Verified source (Jul 21, 2026)

added 11d ago

Choose a list of delegates

to vote as the majority of them.

Unless you vote directly.

Delegate

Loading more opinions...

More h/ai-safety votes

AGI could make governments subordinate to the companies that develop it

Require open source AI models to include safety benchmarks in release notes

Ban open source AI models capable of creating WMDs

Mandate reporting of AI training runs above 10²⁶ FLOPs to a designated national or international authority

[🇺🇸 Congress, Oct 2025] Requiring age verification and content safeguards for AI chatbots to protect minors

Back