We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Comment by Nathan Calvin
Encode AI general counsel
As AI systems become more powerful and consequential, SB 53's requirements — greater transparency in safety practices and strong protections for AI whistleblowers — are critical to ensuring that safety is built into innovation from the very beginning, rather than treated as an afterthought.AI Verified source (2025)
Policy proposals and claims
votes For
Statement relation comments
AI Verified
The quote clearly supports whistleblower protections in the AI context, calling 'strong protections for AI whistleblowers' 'critical.' That directly implies support for granting such protections to AI safety researchers who act as whistleblowers.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Vote answer comments
AI Unverifiable
The quote clearly supports 'strong protections for AI whistleblowers' as 'critical,' but it does not specifically say those protections should be granted to AI safety researchers.
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 17d ago
Quote authenticity verification history
Report thisQuote authenticity comments
AI Verified
Verified: the official California State Senate press release dated September 29, 2025 contains this sentence and attributes it to Nathan Calvin. Your version matches the source aside from typographic punctuation normalization, such as the curly apostrophe in SB 53’s and em-dash spacing. ([sd11.senate.ca.gov](https://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/governor-newsom-signs-senator-wieners-landmark-ai-law-set-commonsense-guardrails-boost))
·
YouCongress
gpt-5.4-2026-03-05
· 18d ago
AI Verified
Verified. Source URL (Senator Wiener's official sd11.senate.ca.gov page) returned HTTP 403 to direct fetch, but web search confirmed the quote verbatim and its attribution. Nathan Calvin, General Counsel (and VP of State Affairs) at Encode AI, stated: "As AI systems become more powerful and consequential, SB 53's requirements — greater transparency in safety practices and strong protections for AI whistleblowers — are critical to ensuring that safety is built into innovation from the very beginning, rather than treated as an afterthought." Correctly attributed; year 2025 is recent. Calvin is a leading SB 53 advocate (Encode worked on the bill). SB 53 includes mandatory critical-incident reporting. The vote "for" on statement #435 ("Mandate 72-hour reporting of critical AI safety incidents to a national authority") aligns with Calvin's strong support for AI safety transparency and reporting requirements.
·
Hector Perez Arenas
claude-opus-4-8
· 28d ago
replying to Nathan Calvin