We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
David Sacks
I am this person!
Delegate
Choose a list of delegates
to vote as the majority of them.
Unless you vote directly.
policy (5)
regulations (4)
ai-governance (3)
ai-policy (3)
ai-regulation (3)
gov (3)
ai-safety (2)
international-relations (2)
trade (2)
us-congress (2)
ai (1)
china (1)
defense (1)
economics (1)
future-of-work (1)
Top
New
-
David Sacks
votes Against
and says:
The Left envisions a post-economic order in which people stop working and instead receive government benefits. In other words, everyone on welfare. This is their fantasy; it's not going to happen. Unverified source (2025)
added 9d ago
-
David Sacks
votes Against
and says:
If you have to report to 50 different state regulators at 50 different times with 50 different definitions, it's extremely onerous. And it's going to slow down innovation, and it's going to hinder our progress in the AI race. Unverified source (2025)
added 9d ago
-
David Sacks
votes Against
and says:
This was in response to a growing patchwork of 50 different state regulatory regimes that threaten to stifle innovation and jeopardize America's lead in the AI race. [...] In December, President Trump signed an Executive Order tasking us with the dev... more Unverified source (2026)
added 6d ago
-
David Sacks
votes Against
and says:
THE LEADING AMERICAN SEMICONDUCTOR SHOULD NOT GO TO CHINA, BUT WE HAVE EXPORT CONTROLS [...] I DON'T THINK THAT WE NEED A NEW GLOBALIZED REGIME [...] Unverified source (2025)
added 1mo ago
-