Biased? Add more sourced quotes.
We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
Cast your vote:
For (20)
-
Gavin NewsomGovernor of Californiavotes For and says:California leads in AI, and we're going to use every tool we have to ensure companies protect people's rights, not exploit them or put them in harm's way. [...] While others in Washington are designing policy and creating contracts in the shadow of m... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Michael KleinmanHead of U.S. Policy at the Future of Life Institute; former AI policy staff at Meta and Amnesty International USAvotes For and says:Big Tech and their allies in the administration are desperate to stop states from regulating AI, even as it ravages families, eliminates jobs, and threatens to replace humans wholesale. Any legislative framework that includes federal preemption witho... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Joseph Gordon-LevittAmerican actor and entrepreneurvotes For and says:The federal government hasn't done anything about this yet, but thank goodness, the states are stepping up. Utah has been a leader in the past, protecting kids against these predatory tech companies. Now I think it's time for Utah to be that leader a... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Doris MatsuiU.S. Representative for California's 7th Congressional Districtvotes For and says:Republicans keep trying to strip states of the ability to enact commonsense AI safeguards—at a time when there are no meaningful federal protections in place. President Trump's executive order is illegal coercion: it threatens states with costly laws... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Deborah RossU.S. Representative for North Carolina's 2nd congressional districtvotes For and says:The Constitution reserves a lot of power to the states in particular areas [like] public safety, which can pertain to issues that AI touches like deepfakes, election interference, and regulating how technology shows up in mental health care. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Brian SchatzU.S. Senator (D–Hawaii)votes For and says:Embracing the amazing possibilities of AI can't come at the cost of leaving Americans vulnerable to its profound risks, which is exactly what President Trump and Republicans are trying to do. Preventing states from enacting common-sense regulation th... more Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Don BeyerU.S. Representative from Virginia's 8th district; co-sponsor of the GUARDRAILS Act on AIvotes For and says:In today's lawless, Wild West artificial intelligence environment, states have been leading the charge to implement safeguards addressing serious risks ranging from algorithmic bias to data privacy and consumer protection. But the Trump White House a... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Zoe LofgrenU.S. Representative from California's 18th district; Ranking Member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committeevotes For and says:What we should not do is preempt the states from taking necessary actions to protect their citizens while here in Congress, we do nothing to pass legislation ourselves. Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Josh GottheimerU.S. Representative from New Jerseyvotes For and says:Today, the White House released its AI framework which broadly blocks state AI laws and lacks key consumer protections around AI models and agent safety. [...] Preemption only makes sense if federal law effectively replaces what states have built wit... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Samir JainVice President of Policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT)votes For and says:The White House's high-level AI framework contains some sound statements of principles, but its usefulness to lawmakers is limited by its internal contradictions and failure to grapple with key tensions between various approaches to important topics ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Brad CarsonAmericans for Responsible Innovation presidentvotes For and says:After witnessing the harmful impact of the tech industry's move-fast-break-things mantra during the rise of social media platforms, the public wants safeguards now. What's most disturbing is that the framework recommends both banning state laws on AI... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Spencer CoxGovernor of Utah; chair of the National Governors Association (2024–2025)votes For and says:Let's use this technology to benefit humankind, and let's regulate it to make sure they don't destroy humankind. I don't think that's a contradiction. I think that's common sense, and I think that's where most Americans are. [...] It's one thing if w... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Alondra NelsonHarold F. Linder Professor at the Institute for Advanced Study; former Acting Director of the White House OSTPvotes For and says:This is not deregulation. It is hyper-regulation by other means. [...] When consequential decisions are made through executive discretion rather than deliberative process, they escape ordinary channels of accountability. [...] Democratic accountabili... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Robert WeissmanPresident, Public Citizenvotes For and says:Preemption would effectively mean no U.S. regulation of AI at all, with the narrow exception of rules to deal with nonconsensual intimate deepfakes, because there are no national rules in place. [...] To be clear, states aren't keeping up with the ri... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Cody VenzkeSenior Policy Counsel, ACLU (Surveillance, Privacy, and Technology)votes For and says:The tug of war between states and the federal government will continue. While states made significant strides in 2025 to address AI, federal policymakers were instead focused on preempting those efforts. Despite failing to do so twice, proponents of ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Scott WienerCalifornia state senatorvotes For and says:The idea that the federal government would say or the Congress would say, 'We're not going to do anything about it, but you're not allowed to do anything about it either,' that is absurd, and it's actually outrageous. It shows that this administratio... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Ron DeSantisGovernor of Floridavotes For and says:Stripping states of jurisdiction to regulate AI is a subsidy to Big Tech and will prevent states from protecting against online censorship of political speech, predatory applications that target children, violations of intellectual property rights an... more Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Matt LaneSenior Policy Counsel, Fight for Futurevotes For and says:Preemption undoes all that work. [...] We remain against preemption in KOSA and COPPA 2.0, just like we are against preemption of state AI regulations. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Neil RichardsLaw professor, tech and privacyvotes For and says:Congress is allowed to operate in ways to set a general national standard but still allows States to experiment with stronger standards Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Rob BontaCalifornia attorney generalvotes For and says:Any federal AI law should serve as a floor, not a ceiling, preserving flexibility for states to go further where necessary to protect their residents. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (5)
-
Daniel CastroDirector, Center for Data Innovationvotes Against and says:The United States cannot remain competitive if developers, businesses, and users face fifty different legal regimes governing a general-purpose technology. [...] Congress should take this recommendation seriously and establish a light-touch national ... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:This was in response to a growing patchwork of 50 different state regulatory regimes that threaten to stifle innovation and jeopardize America's lead in the AI race. [...] In December, President Trump signed an Executive Order tasking us with the dev... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Marsha BlackburnU.S. Senator from Tennesseevotes Against and says:Instead of pushing AI amnesty, President Trump rightfully called on Congress to pass federal standards and protections to solve the patchwork of state laws that has hindered AI innovation. Now, Congress must answer his call to establish one federal r... more Unverified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Adam ThiererR Street Institute senior fellowvotes Against and says:Congress could [...] formally preempt specific State and local regulatory enactments that impose an undue burden on interstate algorithmic commerce. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
-
Donald J. TrumpU.S. President (2025–present)votes Against and says:establishing a uniform Federal policy framework for AI that preempts State AI laws that conflict with the policy set forth in this order. Unverified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-safety
votes