We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
Cast your vote:
Results (30 votes):
Total
(30 votes)
For 22 (73%)
Abstain 0 (0%)
Against 8 (27%)
·
For (22)
-
Liz ShulerPresident of the AFL-CIO, America's largest federation of labor unionsvotes For and says:
While we would applaud any serious effort to regulate potentially dangerous AI technologies, any attempt to tie the hands of states in their efforts to keep working people safe is not acceptable. We oppose preemption of state authority to regulate th...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brian SchatzU.S. Senator (D–Hawaii)votes For and says:
Embracing the amazing possibilities of AI can’t come at the cost of leaving Americans vulnerable to its profound risks, which is exactly what President Trump’s Executive Order tries to do [...] Discouraging states from enacting common-sense regulatio...
more AI Verified source (Mar 27, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Cody VenzkeSenior Policy Counsel, ACLU (Surveillance, Privacy, and Technology)votes For and says:
First, the tug of war between states and the federal government will continue. While states made significant strides in 2025 to address AI, federal policymakers were instead focused on preempting those efforts. Despite failing to do so twice, propone...
more AI Verified source (Jan 6, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Steve FetterProfessor of public policy at the University of Maryland; member of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' Science and Security Board; former White House OSTP officialvotes For and says:
As uses of AI expand and concerns grow about potential risks, Trump revoked Biden's AI safety initiative and banned states from crafting their own AI regulation, reflecting a 'damn the torpedoes' approach to AI development.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brendan SteinhauserCEO of The Alliance for Secure AI; longtime Republican political strategist and former Tea Party organizervotes For and says:
A national AI standard should protect at least as much as it preempts, and states across the country have already enacted laws that do far more for Americans on issues like child safety and consumer protections than this proposal.
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ed MarkeyU.S. senator from Massachusettsvotes For and says:
President Trump is continuing to repay Big Tech's campaign donations by proposing to block states from protecting their communities from AI-related harms. [...] [We need the States' Right to Regulate AI Act to] put power back into the hands of people...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Doris MatsuiU.S. Representative for California's 7th Congressional Districtvotes For and says:
Republicans keep trying to strip states of the ability to enact commonsense AI safeguards—at a time when there are no meaningful federal protections in place. President Trump's executive order is illegal coercion: it threatens states with costly laws...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Don BeyerU.S. Representative from Virginia's 8th district; co-sponsor of the GUARDRAILS Act on AIvotes For and says:
In today's lawless, Wild West artificial intelligence environment, states have been leading the charge to implement safeguards addressing serious risks ranging from algorithmic bias to data privacy and consumer protection. But the Trump White House a...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Zoe LofgrenU.S. Representative from California's 18th district; Ranking Member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committeevotes For and says:
What we should not do is preempt the states from taking necessary actions to protect their citizens while here in Congress, we do nothing to pass legislation ourselves.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Brad CarsonAmericans for Responsible Innovation presidentvotes For and says:
This bill takes the current floor on state AI legislation and turns it into a federal ceiling, preventing state lawmakers from addressing emerging AI harms in an era of fast-moving technology. Over the past two decades, state lawmakers have proven to...
more AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Robert WeissmanPresident, Public Citizenvotes For and says:
Preemption would effectively mean no U.S. regulation of AI at all, with the narrow exception of rules to deal with nonconsensual intimate deepfakes, because there are no national rules in place. [...] To be clear, states aren't keeping up with the ri...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Scott WienerCalifornia state senatorvotes For and says:
The idea that the federal government would say or the Congress would say, 'We're not going to do anything about it, but you're not allowed to do anything about it either,' that is absurd, and it's actually outrageous. It shows that this administratio...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Ron DeSantisGovernor of Floridavotes For and says:
Stripping states of jurisdiction to regulate AI is a subsidy to Big Tech and will prevent states from protecting against online censorship of political speech, predatory applications that target children, violations of intellectual property rights an...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Matt LaneSenior Policy Counsel, Fight for Futurevotes For and says:
Preemption undoes all that work. [...] We remain against preemption in KOSA and COPPA 2.0, just like we are against preemption of state AI regulations.
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Rob BontaCalifornia attorney generalvotes For and says:
Any federal AI law should serve as a floor, not a ceiling, preserving flexibility for states to go further where necessary to protect their residents.
AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Teri OlleDirector, Economic Security California Actionvotes For and says:
Including safety and transparency protections recommended by Gov. Newsom’s AI commission in SB 53 is an opportunity for California to be on the right side of history and advance commonsense AI regulations while our national leaders dither, In additi...
more AI Verified source (2025)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Maria CantwellU.S. Senator from Washingtonvotes For and says:
We need meaningful safeguards on AI to address the harms they cause. That is why we cannot tell states to stand down from protecting their kids, especially when we need Congress to put standards in place. [...] I think we need to be very loud and cle...
more Unverifiable source (Jan 15, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Randi WeingartenPresident of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), one of the largest U.S. labor unionsvotes For and says:
Our response to the Great American AI Act is simple: Hard no. This bill is a giveaway to the AI industry and a handful of trillion-dollar companies, at the expense of American workers. [...] the Obernolte-Trahan bill blocks responsible state laws and...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jeffrey SonnenfeldLester Crown Professor in the Practice of Management at Yale School of Management; founder and president of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute (CELI)votes For and says:
Broad state preemption, in the form of presidential executive authority and the failed congressional moratorium, trades real protection against demonstrable harms, such as deepfake-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM), AI-driven election frau...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Bruce SchneierSecurity technologist and authorvotes For and says:
In December, the Trump administration signed an executive order that neutered states' ability to regulate AI by ordering his administration to both sue and withhold funds from states that try to do so. [...] By preempting state oversight, the federal...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Deborah RossU.S. Representative for North Carolina's 2nd congressional districtvotes For and says:
The Constitution reserves a lot of power to the states in particular areas [like] public safety, which can pertain to issues that AI touches like deepfakes, election interference, and regulating how technology shows up in mental health care.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Josh GottheimerU.S. Representative from New Jerseyvotes For and says:
Today, the White House released its AI framework which broadly blocks state AI laws and lacks key consumer protections around AI models and agent safety. [...] Preemption only makes sense if federal law effectively replaces what states have built wit...
more Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
Abstain (0)
Against (7)
-
Erin HouchinU.S. Representative for Indiana's 9th congressional district (Republican); cosponsor of the Great American AI Actvotes Against and says:
America should lead the world in artificial intelligence, not regulate ourselves into falling behind China through a patchwork of fifty different state laws.
AI Verified source (Jun 4, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Marsha BlackburnU.S. Senator from Tennesseevotes Against and says:
Instead of pushing AI amnesty, President Trump rightfully called on Congress to pass federal standards and protections to solve the patchwork of state laws that has hindered AI innovation. Now, Congress must answer his call to establish one federal r...
more AI Verified source (Mar 18, 2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Michael KratsiosU.S. OSTP Directorvotes Against and says:
Creating a patchwork of AI laws where 50 different states all have different goals is ultimately going to hurt little tech and startups more than anyone else.
AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Andrew NgBaidu; Stanford CS faculty; founded Coursera and Google Brainvotes Against and says:
I'm disappointed [the Big Beautiful Bill] didn't include a proposed moratorium on U.S. state-level AI regulation. While there is a role for AI regulation, it is when the technology is new and poorly understood that lobbyists are most likely to succee...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Daniel CastroDirector, Center for Data Innovationvotes Against and says:
The United States cannot remain competitive if developers, businesses, and users face fifty different legal regimes governing a general-purpose technology. [...] Congress should take this recommendation seriously and establish a light-touch national ...
more AI Verified source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
David SacksWhite House AI and crypto czarvotes Against and says:
In December, President Trump signed an Executive Order [...] “One Rulebook.” This was in response to a growing patchwork [...] America's lead in the AI race.
AI Verified source (Mar 20, 2026) 1 of 2DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly. -
Jay ObernolteU.S. Representative from Californiavotes Against and says:
Rather than allow protections to exist in only a handful of states or force innovators to navigate dozens of different legal regimes, our framework would establish one national standard.
Disputed source (2026)DelegateChoose a list of delegatesto vote as the majority of them.Unless you vote directly.
More
h/ai-safety
votes