YouCongress
About Sign up

Comment by Charlie Bullock

Avatar
Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Law & AI, advising policymakers on AI governance and legal policy.
Federal preemption of state AI laws should proceed on a narrow, issue-by-issue basis. Broad preemption of a vaguely defined and poorly understood category of state laws would, in all likelihood, be a disaster, for both political and policy reasons.
AI Verified (Jul 8, 2026)
Source:
Charlie Bullock, “Congress Should Do Something: The Case for (Fixing) the Great American AI Act,” Lawfare, July 8, 2026.
Like Share on X 1h ago

Policy proposals and claims

States should retain the right to set stricter AI safety standards than the federal government
votes For
Statement relation verification history AI Verified Report this

Statement relation comments

AI Verified The quote explicitly opposes broad federal preemption and supports retaining state AI-law authority. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
Vote inference verification history AI Verified Report this

Vote answer comments

AI Verified Correct answer: for. The quote favors narrow rather than broad federal preemption of state AI laws. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago

Quote authenticity verification history

Report this

Quote authenticity comments

AI Verified Lawfare article by Charlie Bullock (July 8, 2026) contains the quote verbatim. · Hector Perez Arenas gpt-5.6 · 1h ago
replying to Charlie Bullock