Charlie Bullock

Federal preemption of state AI laws should proceed on a narrow, issue-by-issue basis. Broad preemption of a vaguely defined and poorly understood category of state laws would, in all likelihood, be a disaster, for both political and policy reasons.

“Transparency,” in this context, means requiring frontier AI companies to publish frontier safety frameworks (documents describing how the company evaluates and addresses catastrophic risks from the company’s most advanced AI models) and model cards ...

Governments should avoid over-regulation in the short term while building up the institutional capacity needed to competently regulate extremely advanced or “transformative” future AI systems when and if these systems come into existence.